Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "DSK" wrote in message et... NOYB wrote: .... The government can borrow ad infinitum because there will always be revenue coming in. Don't you feel kinda strange, calling yourself a "conservative" and posting things like this? I'm a social conservative, and fiscal moderate. I don't mind spending money, as long as I see see the fruits of the expenditures. Money paid towards a strong military snip The strong military you're buying now will be staffed by none other than your children. No matter WHAT the cause, you won't want them there to fight it. I'd like to see our military spending increased to the point where we can create completely automated weaponry that can be controlled by "soldiers" well out of harm's way. We already have pilotless drones carrying warheads, unmanned ground vehicles, and Tomahawk missiles capable of firing from hundreds of miles away with near-pin-point accuracy. We're in the early development phase of battlefield robots that will be able to do the street-to-street fighting being done in Iraq. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...armyrobot.html Hell, we have a pilotless drone in the White House by name of Bush. Battlefield robots doing street-to-street fighting? Heheheh. Too much RoboCop in your TV diet. You won't be laughing when one shows up at your door. "Sarah Connor?" BAM! Maybe Tuuk's a Cyborg? |