On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:17:10 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message
...
I am surprised that someone who is a strong proponent of making handguns
illegal is now bragging about his target practice that will allow him to
kill an intruder.. It is also interesting to note, that this proponent of
gun control is not only interested in protecting himself with a gun, but
wants to be able to shot the intruder in the head. It is also interesting
to note that this same person said he would never own a handgun.



Funny how your outlook changes when someone threatens to come to your home
and cut your throat.
What would you do....run to our newsgroup badass jughead for protection?


If someone on this group threatened to come to my home and cut my throat, I'd
start telling everyone in the group that I was getting guns and firing thousands
of rounds in target practice.

*That* would be the way to stop them!

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 9 Mar 2005 08:53:28 -0800, wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:

harry is basically a bitter old man

To any and all who have read Fritz's diatribes:
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!!!!
Just watch, he'll come back with a bunch of childish name calling, etc.

Good morning, basskisser. Please tell us the purpose of your post.

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:
On 9 Mar 2005 08:53:28 -0800, wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:

harry is basically a bitter old man

To any and all who have read Fritz's diatribes:
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!!!!
Just watch, he'll come back with a bunch of childish name calling,
etc.

Good morning, basskisser. Please tell us the purpose of your post.

--
John H

Quite simple, actually. I am pointing out that Fritz's statement about
calling Harry a "bitter old man" seems to be his reflection of himself.
Look at the nature of 99.99% of his posts, and it will become quite
obvious.

"John H" wrote in message
...
On 9 Mar 2005 08:53:28 -0800, wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:

harry is basically a bitter old man

To any and all who have read Fritz's diatribes:
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!!!!
Just watch, he'll come back with a bunch of childish name calling, etc.

Good morning, basskisser. Please tell us the purpose of your post.

To retain his title of "King of the NG idiots".....




--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 9 Mar 2005 09:51:07 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 9 Mar 2005 08:53:28 -0800, wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:

harry is basically a bitter old man

To any and all who have read Fritz's diatribes:
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!!!!
Just watch, he'll come back with a bunch of childish name calling,
etc.

Good morning, basskisser. Please tell us the purpose of your post.

--
John H

Quite simple, actually. I am pointing out that Fritz's statement about
calling Harry a "bitter old man" seems to be his reflection of himself.
Look at the nature of 99.99% of his posts, and it will become quite
obvious.

So it was basically just a personal attack, yes?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On 9 Mar 2005 09:51:07 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 9 Mar 2005 08:53:28 -0800, wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:

harry is basically a bitter old man

To any and all who have read Fritz's diatribes:
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!!!!
Just watch, he'll come back with a bunch of childish name calling,
etc.

Good morning, basskisser. Please tell us the purpose of your post.

--
John H

Quite simple, actually. I am pointing out that Fritz's statement about
calling Harry a "bitter old man" seems to be his reflection of himself.
Look at the nature of 99.99% of his posts, and it will become quite
obvious.

So it was basically just a personal attack, yes?

You forgot the cardinal rule of liebrals, they are allowed to do what
they whine about others doing.

Of course playing by asslicker's logic.............he is not 'man enough'
for anything......his statements being a reflection of himself


--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

I guess Harry has decided Gun Control is not a good thing.


"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message
...
I am surprised that someone who is a strong proponent of making handguns
illegal is now bragging about his target practice that will allow him to
kill an intruder.. It is also interesting to note, that this proponent
of
gun control is not only interested in protecting himself with a gun, but
wants to be able to shot the intruder in the head. It is also
interesting
to note that this same person said he would never own a handgun.



Funny how your outlook changes when someone threatens to come to your home
and cut your throat.
What would you do....run to our newsgroup badass jughead for protection?

No all guns does not need to be handguns, but in this case, Harry stated it
was a handgun.

Harry has stated he would prefer if handguns were not allowed for any
citizen, he does think shotguns should be allowed. I think he meant to say,
no one else should have a handgun, but I want one.


wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd. wrote:
I am surprised that someone who is a strong proponent of making
handguns
illegal is now bragging about his target practice that will allow him
to
kill an intruder..

Did you ever stop to think that MAY be because all firearms aren't
HANDGUNS??

It is also interesting to note, that this proponent of
gun control is not only interested in protecting himself with a gun,
but
wants to be able to shot the intruder in the head.

Interesting? Why? "control" doesn't mean elimination.

It is also interesting
to note that this same person said he would never own a handgun.

See above....does it HAVE to be a handgun?

No, but I was pointing out how many liberals like to say enforce laws on
others that they don't want forced on themselves.


"John H" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:31:11 -0500, "Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd."
wrote:

I am surprised that someone who is a strong proponent of making handguns
illegal is now bragging about his target practice that will allow him to
kill an intruder.. It is also interesting to note, that this proponent of
gun control is not only interested in protecting himself with a gun, but
wants to be able to shot the intruder in the head. It is also interesting
to note that this same person said he would never own a handgun.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
I'm off for a few hours, DandyDon. The shooting lesson I had scheduled
for
yesterday was postponed until today. You see, I have a somewhat
over-the-edge guy from Thailand threatening a violent invasion of my
home,
and I want to be sure I am ready for him. Today's lesson: improving my
aim
so I can place all my headshots from 15' away inside the diameter of a
golf ball, instead of merely closely surrounding one.

So, Dandy, consider yourself answered...and now you can go back to
marveling at the rest of the universe, doing whatever it is you do.

Ciao!


Doctor, are you implying that you believe that stuff?


--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

I sure am glad I didn't respond to Don's message.

Why did you think it is acceptable to use Don's message as an opportunity to
heap criticism on others?


wrote in message
oups.com...

Don Dando wrote:
I have sent him several emails asking what the source of his
reporting is
but I never get any replies. I have asked if he is or has been a
journalists, but I get no replies.

Does anyone have a clue why he reports the news as though he had just
filed
his report with Associated Press?

It appears that on rare occasion he goes for a boat ride, but then he
very
quickly returns to the news reporting.

Is this the only place on the internet that he can freely "play"
journalists?

Don Dando

Welcome to rec boats.

Your post has precipitated a behavior I often refer to as "pig piling".
Party A makes a disparaging remark about Party B, (even starts a
dedicated thread for the purpose), and easily predicted Parties C, D,
E, etc jump in to
take a shot as well. Several of the worst offenders involved in this
type of behavior recently resolved to stop, and the tone of the group
improved as a result. Please reconsider any future urges to create a
thread specifically designed to heap criticism on another person. If
cutting and pasting newspaper articles is not acceptable in the NG, why
is starting a thread to trash another person a much better or
appropriate idea?