On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 15:37:35 GMT, "Jim," wrote:

John H wrote:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:03:15 -0500, thunder wrote:


On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 09:05:25 -0500, John H wrote:


Also, is there something about my signature line that offends you? You
seem desirous of changing it.

Not that it's important, but if you use the standard signature delimiter
of dash dash space return, most newsreaders will cut your signature when
quoting. Other posters generally won't bother playing with it.

http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?StandardSigDelimiter




Let's see if that works. I've never seen anyone that messes with a signature,
but I guess I've not seen everyone!


"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Try again John. I still think delusions is the more appropriate term.

What is inappropriate about my signature?

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 15:37:35 GMT, "Jim," wrote:


John H wrote:

On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:03:15 -0500, thunder wrote:



On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 09:05:25 -0500, John H wrote:



Also, is there something about my signature line that offends you? You
seem desirous of changing it.

Not that it's important, but if you use the standard signature delimiter
of dash dash space return, most newsreaders will cut your signature when
quoting. Other posters generally won't bother playing with it.

http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?StandardSigDelimiter




Let's see if that works. I've never seen anyone that messes with a signature,
but I guess I've not seen everyone!


"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Try again John. I still think delusions is the more appropriate term.


What is inappropriate about my signature?

In my opinion, binary thinkers are delusional -- simple as that.

On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 19:31:27 GMT, "Jim," wrote:

John H wrote:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 15:37:35 GMT, "Jim," wrote:


John H wrote:

On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:03:15 -0500, thunder wrote:



On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 09:05:25 -0500, John H wrote:



Also, is there something about my signature line that offends you? You
seem desirous of changing it.

Not that it's important, but if you use the standard signature delimiter
of dash dash space return, most newsreaders will cut your signature when
quoting. Other posters generally won't bother playing with it.

http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?StandardSigDelimiter




Let's see if that works. I've never seen anyone that messes with a signature,
but I guess I've not seen everyone!


"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Try again John. I still think delusions is the more appropriate term.


What is inappropriate about my signature?

In my opinion, binary thinkers are delusional -- simple as that.

Then all decision makers would be delusional, using your logic.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 19:31:27 GMT, "Jim," wrote:


John H wrote:

On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 15:37:35 GMT, "Jim," wrote:



John H wrote:


On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:03:15 -0500, thunder wrote:




On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 09:05:25 -0500, John H wrote:




Also, is there something about my signature line that offends you? You
seem desirous of changing it.

Not that it's important, but if you use the standard signature delimiter
of dash dash space return, most newsreaders will cut your signature when
quoting. Other posters generally won't bother playing with it.

http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?StandardSigDelimiter




Let's see if that works. I've never seen anyone that messes with a signature,
but I guess I've not seen everyone!


"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Try again John. I still think delusions is the more appropriate term.


What is inappropriate about my signature?


In my opinion, binary thinkers are delusional -- simple as that.


Then all decision makers would be delusional, using your logic.
I would hope that a decision maker would come to his decision after
careful consideration of all the variables. I define a binary thinker
who thinks only in terms of right/wrong, black/white. I much prefer the
former.

Going with a "different" definition for binary (off or on), a binary thinker
is one who thinks only in right and "not right", or wrong and "not wrong"
which leaves open a theoretical large grey area.

Example: I think what you said is right.... or I think what you said is not
right (but not necessarily wrong), etc. Judges appear to think along these
lines.

This holds true even more for black/white: if not black, then not
necessarily white, thus grey, etc.

"Jim," wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 19:31:27 GMT, "Jim," wrote:


John H wrote:

On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 15:37:35 GMT, "Jim," wrote:



John H wrote:


On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:03:15 -0500, thunder
wrote:




On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 09:05:25 -0500, John H wrote:




Also, is there something about my signature line that offends you?
You
seem desirous of changing it.

Not that it's important, but if you use the standard signature
delimiter
of dash dash space return, most newsreaders will cut your
signature when
quoting. Other posters generally won't bother playing with it.

http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?StandardSigDelimiter




Let's see if that works. I've never seen anyone that messes with a
signature,
but I guess I've not seen everyone!


"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Try again John. I still think delusions is the more appropriate term.


What is inappropriate about my signature?


In my opinion, binary thinkers are delusional -- simple as that.


Then all decision makers would be delusional, using your logic.
I would hope that a decision maker would come to his decision after
careful consideration of all the variables. I define a binary thinker
who thinks only in terms of right/wrong, black/white. I much prefer the
former.

On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 03:18:47 GMT, "Franko" wrote:

Going with a "different" definition for binary (off or on), a binary thinker
is one who thinks only in right and "not right", or wrong and "not wrong"
which leaves open a theoretical large grey area.

Example: I think what you said is right.... or I think what you said is not
right (but not necessarily wrong), etc. Judges appear to think along these
lines.

This holds true even more for black/white: if not black, then not
necessarily white, thus grey, etc.

My sig line doesn't say that all decision makers are 'binary thinkers'. It says
that decisions are the *result* of binary thinking.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."