On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 17:39:15 -0500, DSK wrote:

Let's see... were more people killed by terrorists in 2002 or 2004? Are
numbers & fatalities of terrorist attacks going up or down?


NOYB wrote:
Where?


Does it matter, if Americans are getting killed by terrorists?


Fact: President Bush's "war on terror" is not working.



That's an opinion again, Doug.


Well, it's an opinion that is backed by numbers in the the real world. I
guess in your opinion, that Bush/Cheney's "war on terror" is a success
despite evidence to the contrary?

Do you believe that water flows up hill, too?

DSK

It ain't over!


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 17:39:15 -0500, DSK wrote:

Let's see... were more people killed by terrorists in 2002 or 2004? Are
numbers & fatalities of terrorist attacks going up or down?


NOYB wrote:
Where?


Does it matter, if Americans are getting killed by terrorists?


Fact: President Bush's "war on terror" is not working.



That's an opinion again, Doug.


Well, it's an opinion that is backed by numbers in the the real world. I
guess in your opinion, that Bush/Cheney's "war on terror" is a success
despite evidence to the contrary?

Do you believe that water flows up hill, too?

DSK


Has there ever been a war where the opposition did not wear uniforms? Has
there ever been a war where the opposition fights from Mosques? Has there
ever been a war where the opposition uses children, straps bombs to them,
and has them walk into crowded streets killing their own people? Has there
ever been a war with no casualties?

Hmmm.

JimH wrote:
Has there ever been a war where the opposition did not wear uniforms? Has
there ever been a war where the opposition fights from Mosques? Has there
ever been a war where the opposition uses children, straps bombs to them,
and has them walk into crowded streets killing their own people?

Yes.

Ignorance is not strength, Orwell notwithstanding.

... Has there
ever been a war with no casualties?


Has there ever been a war with lots and lots of casualties, for no
purpose, which could have been avoided with better planning & better
equipment, in which the side suffering all these avoidable casualties
made a credible claim to be "winning"?

DSK