"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

wrote:

NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.




I cannot understand why Nobby thinks "retaliation" is adequate payback
for thousands of dead US residents.


Perhaps you don't understand exactly what I mean by "retaliation". We
know that Syria and Iran continue to *openly* support terrorist
organizations that commit international acts of terror. It wouldn't take
much effort (or cost many US lives) to launch an all-out aerial assault
on the leadership of both of those countries



We were attacked by a bunch of Non Governmental Organization Saudis, and
we retaliated by invading Afghanistan and Iraq, and killing tens of
thousands of Iraqis.


We removed the governments of two countries which provided training
and/or funding to terrorists.



Big whoop.

"Well, Mrs. Smith, we're sorry you lost your husband in the destruction
of the WTC. Don't you feel better now that we've killed 20,000 Iraqi
children?"

The point is, after we're attacked again, do you think there is any
chance Bush will step up to the plate and admit he failed us...again?


Maybe he and his supporters will try to play the "Well, we can't stop
them all" game.


And you guys play the "Well, we can't kill 'em all" game. We certainly
have a better chance of "stopping them" by "killing them" than by trying
to seal our borders to keep them from coming into this country.


"You've got to kill people, and when you've killed enough they stop
fighting." --Curtis LeMay

Curtis LeMay was a psychotic.

He was an effective psycho though...and one of the main reasons why we won
the war against the Japanese. I'm glad he was on our side.