On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all, aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage on TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all,
aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage on
TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.

You are just seeing the liebral mindset spin out of control as as their
numbers dwindle even further.




John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all,
aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage on
TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.

But John....it's true. You know that. How else can one explain spastic
foreign policy decisions? Over the past couple of years, I've given you a
number of possible explanations including complete incompetence, or a sick
need for sexual excitement derived from violence. Pick one.

Doug Kanter wrote:
... How else can one explain spastic
foreign policy decisions? Over the past couple of years, I've given you a
number of possible explanations including complete incompetence, or a sick
need for sexual excitement derived from violence. Pick one.


You're pretty cynical. Remember the rule of thumb: 'Never attribute to
malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.'

Besides, you're overlooking the one thing that President Bush's policies
have been hugely successful at... generating profits for certain favored
corporations...

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
Doug Kanter wrote:
... How else can one explain spastic foreign policy decisions? Over the
past couple of years, I've given you a number of possible explanations
including complete incompetence, or a sick need for sexual excitement
derived from violence. Pick one.

You're pretty cynical. Remember the rule of thumb: 'Never attribute to
malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.'

Besides, you're overlooking the one thing that President Bush's policies
have been hugely successful at... generating profits for certain favored
corporations...

"Favored corporations"? You mean US corporations...instead of the French,
German, Russian, and Chinese corporations that were benefitting from
skirting the UN sanctions against Iraq.

Besides, you're overlooking the one thing that President Bush's policies
have been hugely successful at... generating profits for certain favored
corporations...


NOYB wrote:
"Favored corporations"? You mean US corporations...instead of the French,
German, Russian, and Chinese corporations that were benefitting from
skirting the UN sanctions against Iraq.


No, I mean corporations other than the ones that make needed body armor
for U.S. troops, for example.

DSK

On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:27:24 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all,
aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage on
TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.

But John....it's true. You know that. How else can one explain spastic
foreign policy decisions? Over the past couple of years, I've given you a
number of possible explanations including complete incompetence, or a sick
need for sexual excitement derived from violence. Pick one.


I'm posting this only to show basskisser that it is possible to ignore written
material. Also, it is possible to entertain thoughts without resorting to
personal insults.

John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:27:24 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the
New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones
hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all,
aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage
on
TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll
be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.

But John....it's true. You know that. How else can one explain spastic
foreign policy decisions? Over the past couple of years, I've given you a
number of possible explanations including complete incompetence, or a sick
need for sexual excitement derived from violence. Pick one.


I'm posting this only to show basskisser that it is possible to ignore
written
material. Also, it is possible to entertain thoughts without resorting to
personal insults.

I haven't insulted you, unless you're one of those guys who takes it
personally when someone disagrees with his choice of TV, lawnmower or car.
I'm simply pointing out that when you strip away all the valid, sane reasons
(which do not apply to our foreign policy lately), the only ones left are
the bizarre.

On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:21:55 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:27:24 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
news On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the
New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones
hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all,
aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage
on
TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll
be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.

But John....it's true. You know that. How else can one explain spastic
foreign policy decisions? Over the past couple of years, I've given you a
number of possible explanations including complete incompetence, or a sick
need for sexual excitement derived from violence. Pick one.


I'm posting this only to show basskisser that it is possible to ignore
written
material. Also, it is possible to entertain thoughts without resorting to
personal insults.

I haven't insulted you, unless you're one of those guys who takes it
personally when someone disagrees with his choice of TV, lawnmower or car.
I'm simply pointing out that when you strip away all the valid, sane reasons
(which do not apply to our foreign policy lately), the only ones left are
the bizarre.


No, no. I didn't mean to imply that you had insulted me. I was attempting to
show basskisser that it was possible to write something *other than* the
personal insult one might feel like making upon reading a disagreeable post.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:27:24 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
news On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the
New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones
hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all,
aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys
like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage
on
TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll
be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.

But John....it's true. You know that. How else can one explain spastic
foreign policy decisions? Over the past couple of years, I've given you a
number of possible explanations including complete incompetence, or a
sick
need for sexual excitement derived from violence. Pick one.


I'm posting this only to show basskisser that it is possible to ignore
written
material. Also, it is possible to entertain thoughts without resorting to
personal insults.

I haven't insulted you, unless you're one of those guys who takes it
personally when someone disagrees with his choice of TV, lawnmower or car.
I'm simply pointing out that when you strip away all the valid, sane
reasons (which do not apply to our foreign policy lately), the only ones
left are the bizarre.

What's bizarre is the inability to see the good things happening in the
Middle East right now as a result of Bush's policies. One would have to be
stupid or ignorant to not see it. Which are you? (Pick one).