| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... bb wrote: On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 15:05:38 GMT, "Jim," wrote: Chris Noon, 03.07.05, 7:57 AM ET Good grief man, old news. It's been out since before 8:00 AM. How far back to you have to dig to find damning things to say about the current state of the nation? On a positive side, no car bombs have gone off in Iraq in over 10 minutes. Purple fingers rule, doode. bb You think the BushBORGs have already written their rationalizations for the aftermath of the next big terrorist attack on the US homeland? I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike plans are certainly already written. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
NOYB wrote:
I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike plans are certainly already written. ************************ "What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the New American Century) You guys need to be careful what you wish for. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jim," wrote in message ... wrote: NOYB wrote: I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike plans are certainly already written. ************************ "What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the New American Century) You guys need to be careful what you wish for. I thought 9/11 was considered the modern Pearl Harbor? It was worse. Pearl Harbor was a legitimate military target. 9/11 was the murder of civilians. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike plans are certainly already written. ************************ "What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the New American Century) You guys need to be careful what you wish for. *You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones hoping for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all, aren't politics more important than Country for many on the left? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
JimH wrote:
*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones hoping for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all, aren't politics more important than Country for many on the left? ************** That's a very poor guess. "You guys" refers to people who endorse the principles and recommended policies of the PNAC- a positon NOYB has taken in this forum several times. We're about one terrorist attack on the US away from a lot of moderates joining the rabid right wingers in calling for an all-out, WWII, bring back the draft, drop the nukes style obliteration of the middle east. I'm convinced that radical reactionaries on the right are praying for such an event every night. The "first" modern Pearl Harbor, 9-11, didn't quite get the job done as far as the PNAC is concerned, so if one is desirable ("what this country needs") then two or more must be even better. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: *You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones hoping for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all, aren't politics more important than Country for many on the left? ************** That's a very poor guess. "You guys" refers to people who endorse the principles and recommended policies of the PNAC- a positon NOYB has taken in this forum several times. We're about one terrorist attack on the US away from a lot of moderates joining the rabid right wingers in calling for an all-out, WWII, bring back the draft, drop the nukes style obliteration of the middle east. I'm convinced that radical reactionaries on the right are praying for such an event every night. I'd like to see us do that *before* another attack on US soil...not afterwards. The "first" modern Pearl Harbor, 9-11, didn't quite get the job done as far as the PNAC is concerned, so if one is desirable ("what this country needs") then two or more must be even better. If anything, it's the left that is hoping for another attack on US soil. Then they can say "See! Bush's war on terror isn't working." |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
NOYB wrote:
If anything, it's the left that is hoping for another attack on US soil. Really? I guess it's "the left" that has reaped enormous profits, including outright theft of hundreds of millions of dollars along with fraud, price gouging, etc etc. Then they can say "See! Bush's war on terror isn't working." Let's see... were more people killed by terrorists in 2002 or 2004? Are numbers & fatalities of terrorist attacks going up or down? Fact: President Bush's "war on terror" is not working. DSK |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"JimH" wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike plans are certainly already written. ************************ "What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the New American Century) You guys need to be careful what you wish for. *You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones hoping for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all, aren't politics more important than Country for many on the left? I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys like NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage on TV from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll be able to have sex again for a week or two afterward. |
Hybrid Mode
