On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all, aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage on TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all,
aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage on
TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.

You are just seeing the liebral mindset spin out of control as as their
numbers dwindle even further.




John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

wrote:

NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.




I cannot understand why Nobby thinks "retaliation" is adequate payback
for thousands of dead US residents.


Perhaps you don't understand exactly what I mean by "retaliation". We
know that Syria and Iran continue to *openly* support terrorist
organizations that commit international acts of terror. It wouldn't take
much effort (or cost many US lives) to launch an all-out aerial assault
on the leadership of both of those countries



We were attacked by a bunch of Non Governmental Organization Saudis, and
we retaliated by invading Afghanistan and Iraq, and killing tens of
thousands of Iraqis.


We removed the governments of two countries which provided training
and/or funding to terrorists.



Big whoop.

"Well, Mrs. Smith, we're sorry you lost your husband in the destruction
of the WTC. Don't you feel better now that we've killed 20,000 Iraqi
children?"

The point is, after we're attacked again, do you think there is any
chance Bush will step up to the plate and admit he failed us...again?


Maybe he and his supporters will try to play the "Well, we can't stop
them all" game.


And you guys play the "Well, we can't kill 'em all" game. We certainly
have a better chance of "stopping them" by "killing them" than by trying
to seal our borders to keep them from coming into this country.


"You've got to kill people, and when you've killed enough they stop
fighting." --Curtis LeMay

Curtis LeMay was a psychotic.

He was an effective psycho though...and one of the main reasons why we won
the war against the Japanese. I'm glad he was on our side.

NOYB wrote:
If anything, it's the left that is hoping for another attack on US soil.

Really? I guess it's "the left" that has reaped enormous profits,
including outright theft of hundreds of millions of dollars along with
fraud, price gouging, etc etc.


Then they can say "See! Bush's war on terror isn't working."


Let's see... were more people killed by terrorists in 2002 or 2004? Are
numbers & fatalities of terrorist attacks going up or down?

Fact: President Bush's "war on terror" is not working.

DSK

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all,
aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage on
TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.

But John....it's true. You know that. How else can one explain spastic
foreign policy decisions? Over the past couple of years, I've given you a
number of possible explanations including complete incompetence, or a sick
need for sexual excitement derived from violence. Pick one.

Doug Kanter wrote:
... How else can one explain spastic
foreign policy decisions? Over the past couple of years, I've given you a
number of possible explanations including complete incompetence, or a sick
need for sexual excitement derived from violence. Pick one.


You're pretty cynical. Remember the rule of thumb: 'Never attribute to
malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.'

Besides, you're overlooking the one thing that President Bush's policies
have been hugely successful at... generating profits for certain favored
corporations...

DSK

On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:27:24 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all,
aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage on
TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.

But John....it's true. You know that. How else can one explain spastic
foreign policy decisions? Over the past couple of years, I've given you a
number of possible explanations including complete incompetence, or a sick
need for sexual excitement derived from violence. Pick one.


I'm posting this only to show basskisser that it is possible to ignore written
material. Also, it is possible to entertain thoughts without resorting to
personal insults.

John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:27:24 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the
New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones
hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all,
aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage
on
TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll
be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.

But John....it's true. You know that. How else can one explain spastic
foreign policy decisions? Over the past couple of years, I've given you a
number of possible explanations including complete incompetence, or a sick
need for sexual excitement derived from violence. Pick one.


I'm posting this only to show basskisser that it is possible to ignore
written
material. Also, it is possible to entertain thoughts without resorting to
personal insults.

I haven't insulted you, unless you're one of those guys who takes it
personally when someone disagrees with his choice of TV, lawnmower or car.
I'm simply pointing out that when you strip away all the valid, sane reasons
(which do not apply to our foreign policy lately), the only ones left are
the bizarre.

On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:21:55 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:27:24 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the
New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones
hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all,
aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage
on
TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll
be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.

But John....it's true. You know that. How else can one explain spastic
foreign policy decisions? Over the past couple of years, I've given you a
number of possible explanations including complete incompetence, or a sick
need for sexual excitement derived from violence. Pick one.


I'm posting this only to show basskisser that it is possible to ignore
written
material. Also, it is possible to entertain thoughts without resorting to
personal insults.

I haven't insulted you, unless you're one of those guys who takes it
personally when someone disagrees with his choice of TV, lawnmower or car.
I'm simply pointing out that when you strip away all the valid, sane reasons
(which do not apply to our foreign policy lately), the only ones left are
the bizarre.


No, no. I didn't mean to imply that you had insulted me. I was attempting to
show basskisser that it was possible to write something *other than* the
personal insult one might feel like making upon reading a disagreeable post.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
NOYB wrote:
If anything, it's the left that is hoping for another attack on US soil.

Really? I guess it's "the left" that has reaped enormous profits,
including outright theft of hundreds of millions of dollars along with
fraud, price gouging, etc etc.


Then they can say "See! Bush's war on terror isn't working."


Let's see... were more people killed by terrorists in 2002 or 2004? Are
numbers & fatalities of terrorist attacks going up or down?

Where?




Fact: President Bush's "war on terror" is not working.


That's an opinion again, Doug.