BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   OT--Attention basskisser! (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/28617-ot-attention-basskisser.html)

Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd. March 2nd 05 10:53 PM

John,
Since you are making corrections to Basskisser's post, shouldn't his email
address be "


"John H" wrote in message
...
On 2 Mar 2005 12:04:43 -0800, wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...
Here's the real life example:
I paid $825k for the current home on the water.
The last house to sell just like mine sold for $1.225m.
After realty and closing costs, I'd clear about $360k

I sold my old house for $560k last year (not on the water)
The last house to sell like my old one just sold for $625k.
If I bought the new house for $625k, after closing costs, I'd be

in it
for
under $650.


So I would net a quarter of a million dollars if I sold my current

home
and
bought my old one again.


That's profit, right?


*****************

No, it's merely the reorganization of numbers on the asset side of

your
balance sheet. Even if your house was in investment, you haven't
realized a gain until you sell it. Your neighbor's sale didn't put

any
money in your pocket. You need the house to live in. The amount of
money the house is worth is meaningless, as long as you are going

to
personally consume the asset by taking it for exclusive use.

The good news is that if the average income in Nipples doubles in

the
next couple of years, (is that likely?) your $1.2mm pad will be

"worth"
$2.4mm. The bad news is that if you sell the one you've got, and

don't
elect to lower your standard of housing, you'll simply have a

higher
number attached to an asset you don't have the flexiblity to sell.

Now, it you had purchased *two* or more homes for $825k and sold

oneof
more of them for $1.225, that $400k spread would indeed be gross
profit. You'd probably walk off with about $300k net after
commissions, cap gains taxes, local conveyance taxes, etc. Selling

your
personal house, and immediately replacing it with one costing as

much
or more, does not create "profit".



Round and round we go...where it stops nobody knows.

I wonder if he agrees with asslicker that schnapps is

whiskey...........it
make as much sense.


I wonder if you'll ever answer my question to you, you low life scum
bag.


I think 'low life' should be hyphenated when used in this manner, i.e.,
"...you
low-life..." Also, I believe 'scum bag' is, in fact, one word, i.e.,
'scumbag'.

Other than that, your post was quite well written.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."




John H March 2nd 05 10:58 PM

On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:53:33 -0500, "Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd."
wrote:

John,
Since you are making corrections to Basskisser's post, shouldn't his email
address be "


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On 2 Mar 2005 12:04:43 -0800, wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...
Here's the real life example:
I paid $825k for the current home on the water.
The last house to sell just like mine sold for $1.225m.
After realty and closing costs, I'd clear about $360k

I sold my old house for $560k last year (not on the water)
The last house to sell like my old one just sold for $625k.
If I bought the new house for $625k, after closing costs, I'd be
in it
for
under $650.


So I would net a quarter of a million dollars if I sold my current
home
and
bought my old one again.


That's profit, right?


*****************

No, it's merely the reorganization of numbers on the asset side of
your
balance sheet. Even if your house was in investment, you haven't
realized a gain until you sell it. Your neighbor's sale didn't put
any
money in your pocket. You need the house to live in. The amount of
money the house is worth is meaningless, as long as you are going
to
personally consume the asset by taking it for exclusive use.

The good news is that if the average income in Nipples doubles in
the
next couple of years, (is that likely?) your $1.2mm pad will be
"worth"
$2.4mm. The bad news is that if you sell the one you've got, and
don't
elect to lower your standard of housing, you'll simply have a
higher
number attached to an asset you don't have the flexiblity to sell.

Now, it you had purchased *two* or more homes for $825k and sold
oneof
more of them for $1.225, that $400k spread would indeed be gross
profit. You'd probably walk off with about $300k net after
commissions, cap gains taxes, local conveyance taxes, etc. Selling
your
personal house, and immediately replacing it with one costing as
much
or more, does not create "profit".



Round and round we go...where it stops nobody knows.

I wonder if he agrees with asslicker that schnapps is
whiskey...........it
make as much sense.


I wonder if you'll ever answer my question to you, you low life scum
bag.


I think 'low life' should be hyphenated when used in this manner, i.e.,
"...you
low-life..." Also, I believe 'scum bag' is, in fact, one word, i.e.,
'scumbag'.

Other than that, your post was quite well written.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."



I was commenting only on the grammar, not the content!


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

[email protected] March 3rd 05 01:10 PM


P.Fritz wrote:
"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message
...
Bassy,
You need to tell NYOB that you call them mobile home communities.


Asslicker needs to 'man enough' to live up to his word regarding

posting to
this NG


What word IS that Fritz? Please show where I ever said anything
"regarding posting to this NG". Can you? Your mental condition is
concerning me. That is just another example of things that pop into
your head with absolutely NO basis of fact.
How's the kid? Is that usenet support group helping you cope with
having to be man enough to raise it?


[email protected] March 3rd 05 01:12 PM


JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


DELTETED BY CHUCK:
First of all, the quality of your argument is diminished with

your
childess
munipulation of the name of the city of Naples. It is Naples,

not
Nipples.
Grow up Chuck.

Secondly, you have to look at the end result of the real estate
process.
Let us compare owning vs. renting.

Example (real life) I have $30,000:
EXAMPLE 1:

If purchasing a house: I buy a 4 bedroom house for $150,000,

putting
$30,000 down. I owe the bank $120,000 and I put nothing into

the
house over
the years I own it other than the mortgage payment.

I then sell that house for $250,000, yielding $75,000 net after
commision,
payments to the bank and expenses. My initial investment was
$30,000. I
now have $75,000.

I then buy a house for $350,000, putting the entire $75,000

down.
I
owe the
bank $275,000 and I put nothing into the house over the years I

own
it other
than the mortgage payment.

I then sell that house for $450,000, yielding $133,000 net

after
commision,
payments to the bank and expenses. My intial investment was

$30,000.
I now
have $133,000

I downsize and look back at that $150,000 starter home I once

owned.
It is
now selling for $300,000. I buy it, put down my $133,000 in

down
payment and
thus owe the bank $167,000.

I eventually sell the house and move into a retirement

community
(paid for
by my insurance). The house sells for $325,000. After

expenses
and
commisions I net $155,000. My initial investment was $30,000.

I yielded a net profit of $125,000 on a $30,000 investment,

*and*
I
had ZERO
living expenses over all those years.


EXAMPLE 2:

If renting a house/apartment: A $30,000 investment over 30

years
at
at 5%
rate of return would yield a return of $130,000.

With an average cost of rental housing over 30 years for a 4

bedroom
apartment @ $000/month (a very low average) of $180,000, I

yield a
a
net
loss of -$50,000.

Compare to that the ownership scenario and realize almost a

$1000,000
return.

RESULTS:

A net profit of $100,000 to own.

A net loss of $50,000 to rent.

The difference....$150,000 over 30 years on a $30,000 ownership
investmet.

My scenarios were very conservative.

Real estate is not an investment? Bull****. You know

absolutely
nothing
about real estate Chuck.


***************

Funny, you would have thought I might have learned at least
something
after all these years.
I've bought and sold a total dozens of investment properties

since
the
early 70's, as well as several non investment primary

residences.
My
primary current income is from rents and royalties. Real

estate
can
be
an *excellent* investment, but your personal house is not an
investment
property in the most accurate sense of the word.

Even if you could sell your left leg, that wouldn't make in

an
"investment". You need it. Just like you need your house. If

the
food
in your kitchen cupboards doubled in price, you wouldn't be

any
richer
unless you could get by without eating. As soon as you sold

your
"appreciated" food you would need to spend an equal amount to
replace
it.

Summing up: Real estate = investment. Primary residence=

housing
expense.

This is ever so typical.

a. You delete the majority of my reply.

b. You make up things and present them as facts, then surround

your
entire
argument around those made up *facts.

c. You delete sections of the post you respond to then twist

the
facts as
they were originally presented.

Dispute the facts all you want Chuck. The facts show that you

are
wrong.

BTW: Get over it, stop whining and move on.

At least he's not a proven liar like you, Jim. It's a damned

shame
that
you and your two circle jerk buddies have resorted to the lowest

of
the
low, in that you choose to knowingly post lies about other

people,
in
order to bolster your pathetic egos.


Glad to see you survived your week in detox ok.


Yet another lie from JimH. The most prolific liar on usenet. Please
show what you know about me EVER being "in detox". What a good for
nothing ****ing liar you are.

How is your marijuana crop this year?


What "marijuana crop", Jim? Please show any evidence you have that

I
have one. Another ****ing lie, from the ****ing liar. What a nasty
little piglet you are. By the way, my wife's doing fine, and she

likes
to go fishing with me on my boat.


The one you planted after your order from Heaven's Stairway
arrived...remember?


Please show have that proves that I have a "marijuna crop", Jim. Are
you really that ****ing stupid????

If not, try this to refresh your memory: http://tinyurl.com/6kllf

And that Heaven's Stairway site is located he

http://www.hempqc.com/

So how good of crop did you have last year?


What crop, Jim? Please, tell all what you know, you no good liar. By
the way, my wife is wanting to go fishing in my boat...is yours?


[email protected] March 3rd 05 01:15 PM


NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Joe wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Yeah, how DID that happen, when you've stated here that you have

an
interest only mortgage? Not only did you NOT pay cash, you're

not
even
paying down the balance.

LOL!

You really do get dumber by the day.


Really? You don't think that NOYB has an interest only mortgage?


That's not why he called you stupid. He called you stupid because

you
failed to realize that you can build equity in a house even when you

don't
pay down the principal...and then turn around and apply that equity

as a
downpayment on your next house.


Where to hell did I EVER say that you couldn't build equity in a house
with an interest only loan?? BUT, the fact remains, if you pay down the
PRINCIPAL, you are still better off, because interest is just what it
is, your cost for borrowing money. The principal is the net worth of
the house.


[email protected] March 3rd 05 01:16 PM


P.Fritz wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
NOYB wrote:

Chuck is the first person that I've heard say that a home in a
rapidly
appreciating real estate market is *not* a good investment.

****************************

I'm seriously surprised.

Your house is a house. It's not an investment. Sky high and

soaring
housing prices are only a good thing if you own other real

estate
in
addition to your primary home. You can have your home, (which

you
need), or the money tied up in it, but not both.

When you cash out an "investment" your options in life should
increase
substantially. When you cash out your house, you get to live in

a
yurt.

But a really, really nice yurt.

Of course, I could retire to Snellville, buy an entire trailer

park,
and
still put a million in my pocket.

Really? How many "trailer parks" are there in Snellville, GA? Do

you
want the answer?


Besides yours?


You'd think that asslicker would be stuffed to the gills with all the

dough
balls you've thrown him.

You'd think the liar Fritz would be stuffed from all of the **** he's
eaten from his asshole buddies.


[email protected] March 3rd 05 01:32 PM


JimH wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in

message
...
Bassy,
You need to tell NYOB that you call them mobile home

communities.

Asslicker needs to 'man enough' to live up to his word regarding

posting to
this NG


What word IS that Fritz? Please show where I ever said anything
"regarding posting to this NG". Can you? Your mental condition is
concerning me. That is just another example of things that pop into
your head with absolutely NO basis of fact.
How's the kid? Is that usenet support group helping you cope with
having to be man enough to raise it?


What was that you recently said about bringing ones family into the
discussion?


Like I said, when you are in slop with the pigs, you tend to act like
the pigs.


[email protected] March 3rd 05 01:34 PM


JimH wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in

message
...
Bassy,
You need to tell NYOB that you call them mobile home

communities.

Asslicker needs to 'man enough' to live up to his word regarding

posting to
this NG


What word IS that Fritz? Please show where I ever said anything
"regarding posting to this NG". Can you? Your mental condition is
concerning me. That is just another example of things that pop into
your head with absolutely NO basis of fact.
How's the kid? Is that usenet support group helping you cope with
having to be man enough to raise it?


What was that you recently said about bringing ones family into the
discussion?


Now, are you going to answer the questions I asked you? What evidence
do you have that I smoke pot? That I "have a crop". Hell, you
collective assholes have even alluded that I smoke pot with my kids.
Stop and think about the lies you've posted here about me, Jim. Think.


bb March 3rd 05 01:42 PM

On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 08:27:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


Bass:

Fritz is an idiot. You know it, I know it, and everyone else knows it.
He has no redeeming value here. So...why not just put him in your bozo
bin and be done with the fool? Let him rant on.


Excellent advice. Both sides of the debate could and should use it.
If you let the childish tactics of the "other side" drive you crazy,
it's your own fault for not filtering the offenders out. The old
saying about good fences make good neighbors could be changed to good
filters make good news groups.

bb

[email protected] March 3rd 05 01:43 PM


John H wrote:
On 2 Mar 2005 12:03:46 -0800, wrote:


I wonder if you'll ever be man enough to quit acting like a spoiled
little ****ing child. What a pathetic crumb of **** you are.



basskisser, a while back this post was made:
************************************************** ******
On 2 Mar 2005 06:54:20 -0800,
wrote:


John H wrote:

Here we go again. B'assikisser, it *was* kind of nice not having

you
around for
a while.


Some find it nice when YOU aren't around.

John, a few simple questions for you. Do you find it acceptable to
knowingly post lies about other people? Do you think someone who

does
so should be thought of as a person of integrity? Do you think that
someone who does this does so possibly because they've failed in

life,
and need to bolster their ego? Do you think that a person would do

such
things should should be taken seriously? Do you further think that
someone who has strange, untrue, unfactual ideas just pop into their
head (ie: thinking I beat my wife), as mentally stable?


Is this like the SAT?

basskisser, you're simply making your hole bigger. If you don't want

to read the
comments written by others, then *kill file* them. That's how easy it

is!

In answers to your questions (in order of the questions): No, so I

don't do it,
and I'm not sure that others do, unless they are making a statement

on a subject
about which I am knowledgeable. No, if they *knowingly* told a lie.

No, I don't
believe that lying is an indication of life failure or ego

bolstering. I believe
that lying will be detrimental to a person's ego. No, I don't think

liars should
be taken seriously (you should know this by now!). I don't think a

super
imagination is an indicator of a lack of mental stability.

Now. No one has said you beat your wife,


Hmm, so you think, that if someone asks "do you STILL beat your wife",
that that wouldn't conotate a lie???? Now, notice, John, he didn't ask
IF I had ever beat my wife. If he had, I would have answered. But,
being how Fritz isn't very bright, he IMPLICATED me, which is a total
lie. Do you condone that behavior? Do you think someone who would
implicate me in a total fabrication would have integrity?

nor smoke pot,
Not true. Jim has, several times. Go look. Fritz even accused me of
smoking pot with my kids. Go look again. Jim has accused me of growing
pot, of growing pot with my kids' knowledge, of buying seeds on the
internet, of having a "crop" of pot, and on and on. All lies. Do you
condone his lying about such? Do you think a person that would post
such lies would have integrity?

nor do nasty things with
your kids,


Nobody said "nasty things". See above.

nor live in a trailer,

Again, Smithers, and NOYB have, without any facts.

nor any of the other multitude of things with
which you take issue.


Again, I see that you apparently don't understand "implication". It is
a lawfully binding statement, so, that in turn means that those three
are nothing short of liars.


P.Fritz March 3rd 05 02:50 PM


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message
...
Bassy,
You need to tell NYOB that you call them mobile home communities.

Asslicker needs to 'man enough' to live up to his word regarding

posting to
this NG


What word IS that Fritz? Please show where I ever said anything
"regarding posting to this NG". Can you? Your mental condition is
concerning me. That is just another example of things that pop into
your head with absolutely NO basis of fact.
How's the kid? Is that usenet support group helping you cope with
having to be man enough to raise it?


What was that you recently said about bringing ones family into the
discussion?


Poor asslicker, not "man enough" to live up to his word.........


I wonder if he stopped beating his wife yet?





Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd. March 3rd 05 03:00 PM

When you said "I quit" were you talking about substance abuse?


wrote in message
ups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message
...
Bassy,
You need to tell NYOB that you call them mobile home communities.


Asslicker needs to 'man enough' to live up to his word regarding

posting to
this NG


What word IS that Fritz? Please show where I ever said anything
"regarding posting to this NG". Can you? Your mental condition is
concerning me. That is just another example of things that pop into
your head with absolutely NO basis of fact.
How's the kid? Is that usenet support group helping you cope with
having to be man enough to raise it?




Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd. March 3rd 05 03:02 PM

Your wife and children would be very ashamed of you.


wrote in message
ups.com...

JimH wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in

message
...
Bassy,
You need to tell NYOB that you call them mobile home

communities.

Asslicker needs to 'man enough' to live up to his word regarding
posting to
this NG

What word IS that Fritz? Please show where I ever said anything
"regarding posting to this NG". Can you? Your mental condition is
concerning me. That is just another example of things that pop into
your head with absolutely NO basis of fact.
How's the kid? Is that usenet support group helping you cope with
having to be man enough to raise it?


What was that you recently said about bringing ones family into the
discussion?


Like I said, when you are in slop with the pigs, you tend to act like
the pigs.




Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd. March 3rd 05 03:03 PM

Do you any your kids smoke pot or crack together?


wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in

message
...
Bassy,
You need to tell NYOB that you call them mobile home

communities.

Asslicker needs to 'man enough' to live up to his word regarding
posting to
this NG

What word IS that Fritz? Please show where I ever said anything
"regarding posting to this NG". Can you? Your mental condition is
concerning me. That is just another example of things that pop into
your head with absolutely NO basis of fact.
How's the kid? Is that usenet support group helping you cope with
having to be man enough to raise it?


What was that you recently said about bringing ones family into the
discussion?


Now, are you going to answer the questions I asked you? What evidence
do you have that I smoke pot? That I "have a crop". Hell, you
collective assholes have even alluded that I smoke pot with my kids.
Stop and think about the lies you've posted here about me, Jim. Think.




P.Fritz March 3rd 05 03:06 PM


"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message
...
Your wife and children would be very ashamed of you.


For not being 'man enough' to keep his word. definitely


Asslicker admitting he is not being himself and trying to adapt to others
around him is a sign of very low self esteem.

What is your diagnosis?



wrote in message
ups.com...

JimH wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in

message
...
Bassy,
You need to tell NYOB that you call them mobile home

communities.

Asslicker needs to 'man enough' to live up to his word regarding
posting to
this NG

What word IS that Fritz? Please show where I ever said anything
"regarding posting to this NG". Can you? Your mental condition is
concerning me. That is just another example of things that pop into
your head with absolutely NO basis of fact.
How's the kid? Is that usenet support group helping you cope with
having to be man enough to raise it?


What was that you recently said about bringing ones family into the
discussion?


Like I said, when you are in slop with the pigs, you tend to act like
the pigs.






P.Fritz March 3rd 05 03:07 PM


"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message
...
When you said "I quit" were you talking about substance abuse?


I wonder if he stopped being his wife yet?



wrote in message
ups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message
...
Bassy,
You need to tell NYOB that you call them mobile home communities.

Asslicker needs to 'man enough' to live up to his word regarding

posting to
this NG


What word IS that Fritz? Please show where I ever said anything
"regarding posting to this NG". Can you? Your mental condition is
concerning me. That is just another example of things that pop into
your head with absolutely NO basis of fact.
How's the kid? Is that usenet support group helping you cope with
having to be man enough to raise it?






Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd. March 3rd 05 03:08 PM

Maybe that is what he meant by "I quit",


"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message
...
When you said "I quit" were you talking about substance abuse?


I wonder if he stopped being his wife yet?



wrote in message
ups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message
...
Bassy,
You need to tell NYOB that you call them mobile home communities.

Asslicker needs to 'man enough' to live up to his word regarding
posting to
this NG

What word IS that Fritz? Please show where I ever said anything
"regarding posting to this NG". Can you? Your mental condition is
concerning me. That is just another example of things that pop into
your head with absolutely NO basis of fact.
How's the kid? Is that usenet support group helping you cope with
having to be man enough to raise it?








P.Fritz March 3rd 05 03:12 PM


"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message
...
Do you any your kids smoke pot or crack together?


I'd like to know if he's stopped smoking pot with his kids.


Asslicker has a problem with answering simple yes/no questions. I think he
has something to hide.



wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in

message
...
Bassy,
You need to tell NYOB that you call them mobile home

communities.

Asslicker needs to 'man enough' to live up to his word regarding
posting to
this NG

What word IS that Fritz? Please show where I ever said anything
"regarding posting to this NG". Can you? Your mental condition is
concerning me. That is just another example of things that pop into
your head with absolutely NO basis of fact.
How's the kid? Is that usenet support group helping you cope with
having to be man enough to raise it?


What was that you recently said about bringing ones family into the
discussion?


Now, are you going to answer the questions I asked you? What evidence
do you have that I smoke pot? That I "have a crop". Hell, you
collective assholes have even alluded that I smoke pot with my kids.
Stop and think about the lies you've posted here about me, Jim. Think.






[email protected] March 3rd 05 03:23 PM


Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd. wrote:
When you said "I quit" were you talking about substance abuse?


No.


[email protected] March 3rd 05 03:24 PM


Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd. wrote:
Maybe that is what he meant by "I quit",


Wrong again. Your stupidity is shining brightly today!


[email protected] March 3rd 05 03:25 PM


P.Fritz wrote:
"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message
...
Do you any your kids smoke pot or crack together?


I'd like to know if he's stopped smoking pot with his kids.


Asslicker has a problem with answering simple yes/no questions. I

think he
has something to hide.


That just goes to show how truly ignorant you are. You see, you are too
dumb to ask a question in a manner that isn't already implicatory, so,
there really is no answer.


[email protected] March 3rd 05 03:27 PM


Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd. wrote:
Do you any your kids smoke pot or crack together?


I don't understand. IF you meant *Do you AND your kids smoke pot or
crack together, the answer is no.

Do your kids watch while you stuff your nose up Fritz's ass? Does your
wife?


John H March 3rd 05 04:36 PM

On 3 Mar 2005 05:43:38 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 2 Mar 2005 12:03:46 -0800,
wrote:



Now. No one has said you beat your wife,


Hmm, so you think, that if someone asks "do you STILL beat your wife",
that that wouldn't conotate a lie????


That is correct.


Now, notice, John, he didn't ask
IF I had ever beat my wife. If he had, I would have answered. But,
being how Fritz isn't very bright, he IMPLICATED me, which is a total
lie. Do you condone that behavior? Do you think someone who would
implicate me in a total fabrication would have integrity?

He could have tremendous integrity and be pulling your chain just to see how
loudly you ring.

nor smoke pot,
Not true. Jim has, several times. Go look. Fritz even accused me of
smoking pot with my kids. Go look again. Jim has accused me of growing
pot, of growing pot with my kids' knowledge, of buying seeds on the
internet, of having a "crop" of pot, and on and on. All lies. Do you
condone his lying about such? Do you think a person that would post
such lies would have integrity?


Show me where Jim has said that you smoke pot.


nor do nasty things with
your kids,


Nobody said "nasty things". See above.

nor live in a trailer,

Show me one instance where they've said you live in a trailer.


Again, Smithers, and NOYB have, without any facts.

nor any of the other multitude of things with
which you take issue.


Again, I see that you apparently don't understand "implication". It is
a lawfully binding statement, so, that in turn means that those three
are nothing short of liars.



You're missing the point, and you're trying my patience.

Suppose I said, "Basskisser, have you stopped eating what you pick out of your
nose?"

There would be an *implication* that you had been eating whatever you picked out
of your nose. Now, you know that you've *never* even picked your nose, and
therefore the implication is patently ridiculous. It can't be true or false.
It's not a statement of fact. It's a question.

Should you ask me such a question, I would not accuse you of lying. You simply
asked me a question. If you asked me the question, I could:

- do nothing

- respond with something like, "I've never eaten the stuff I pick out of my
nose."

-go TOTALLY ****ING BANANAS and start asking you to PROVE your WILD ASSED
allegations and tell you what a LYING ASSHOLE you are and get the whole damn
group LAUGHING at me for getting caught again.

Do you get my drift?


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

P.Fritz March 3rd 05 04:43 PM


"John H" wrote in message
...
On 3 Mar 2005 05:43:38 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 2 Mar 2005 12:03:46 -0800,
wrote:



Now. No one has said you beat your wife,


Hmm, so you think, that if someone asks "do you STILL beat your wife",
that that wouldn't conotate a lie????


That is correct.


Now, notice, John, he didn't ask
IF I had ever beat my wife. If he had, I would have answered. But,
being how Fritz isn't very bright, he IMPLICATED me, which is a total
lie. Do you condone that behavior? Do you think someone who would
implicate me in a total fabrication would have integrity?

He could have tremendous integrity and be pulling your chain just to see
how
loudly you ring.

nor smoke pot,
Not true. Jim has, several times. Go look. Fritz even accused me of
smoking pot with my kids. Go look again. Jim has accused me of growing
pot, of growing pot with my kids' knowledge, of buying seeds on the
internet, of having a "crop" of pot, and on and on. All lies. Do you
condone his lying about such? Do you think a person that would post
such lies would have integrity?


Show me where Jim has said that you smoke pot.


nor do nasty things with
your kids,


Nobody said "nasty things". See above.

nor live in a trailer,

Show me one instance where they've said you live in a trailer.


Again, Smithers, and NOYB have, without any facts.

nor any of the other multitude of things with
which you take issue.


Again, I see that you apparently don't understand "implication". It is
a lawfully binding statement, so, that in turn means that those three
are nothing short of liars.



You're missing the point, and you're trying my patience.

Suppose I said, "Basskisser, have you stopped eating what you pick out of
your
nose?"

There would be an *implication* that you had been eating whatever you
picked out
of your nose. Now, you know that you've *never* even picked your nose, and
therefore the implication is patently ridiculous. It can't be true or
false.
It's not a statement of fact. It's a question.

Should you ask me such a question, I would not accuse you of lying. You
simply
asked me a question. If you asked me the question, I could:

- do nothing

- respond with something like, "I've never eaten the stuff I pick out of
my
nose."

-go TOTALLY ****ING BANANAS and start asking you to PROVE your WILD ASSED
allegations and tell you what a LYING ASSHOLE you are and get the whole
damn
group LAUGHING at me for getting caught again.

Do you get my drift?


Asslicker is still trying to figure out that loud
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMM MMMMMM
he keeps hearing over his head.


More evidence that he rightly deserves the title of "King of the NG idiots"




John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."




[email protected] March 3rd 05 05:24 PM


John H wrote:
On 3 Mar 2005 05:43:38 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 2 Mar 2005 12:03:46 -0800,
wrote:



Now. No one has said you beat your wife,


Hmm, so you think, that if someone asks "do you STILL beat your

wife",
that that wouldn't conotate a lie????


That is correct.


Now, notice, John, he didn't ask
IF I had ever beat my wife. If he had, I would have answered. But,
being how Fritz isn't very bright, he IMPLICATED me, which is a

total
lie. Do you condone that behavior? Do you think someone who would
implicate me in a total fabrication would have integrity?

He could have tremendous integrity and be pulling your chain just to

see how
loudly you ring.

nor smoke pot,
Not true. Jim has, several times. Go look. Fritz even accused me of
smoking pot with my kids. Go look again. Jim has accused me of

growing
pot, of growing pot with my kids' knowledge, of buying seeds on the
internet, of having a "crop" of pot, and on and on. All lies. Do you
condone his lying about such? Do you think a person that would post
such lies would have integrity?


Show me where Jim has said that you smoke pot.


Here is where Smithers has STATED that I have a crop of pot, and suffer
from substance abuse, a TOTAL LIE:
Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd. wrote:
I am very concerned about his inability to control his temper, he

seems to
be snapping at everyone lately. I know this can be a side effect of

FAS,
but I think the drug abuse has aggravated it.


I hope no one turns him into Child Services. They would freak if

they found
his garden full of weed.




nor do nasty things with
your kids,


Nobody said "nasty things". See above.

nor live in a trailer,

Show me one instance where they've said you live in a trailer.


Again, Smithers, and NOYB have, without any facts.

nor any of the other multitude of things with
which you take issue.


Again, I see that you apparently don't understand "implication". It

is
a lawfully binding statement, so, that in turn means that those

three
are nothing short of liars.



You're missing the point, and you're trying my patience.

Suppose I said, "Basskisser, have you stopped eating what you pick

out of your
nose?"

There would be an *implication* that you had been eating whatever you

picked out
of your nose. Now, you know that you've *never* even picked your

nose, and
therefore the implication is patently ridiculous. It can't be true or

false.
It's not a statement of fact. It's a question.


But, the implication was still there, John. That is the part you aren't
grasping. An implication IS an accusation, and fully admissible in a
court of law. As such, Fritz, JimH, and Smithers are low class liars.
You see, by implication, if one is asked if he has *stopped* something,
it is then IMPLIED that he is doing that, or how else could he STOP?
It's not hard, I know it's going over Fritz's head, he doesn't realize
that by implication, he is a low life liar, but honestly, I thought
you'd have enough intelligence to understand.

Should you ask me such a question, I would not accuse you of lying.

You simply
asked me a question. If you asked me the question, I could:

- do nothing

- respond with something like, "I've never eaten the stuff I pick out

of my
nose."



Ah, so you DO condone, tolerate, and even like the idea of people lying
about other people?


John H March 3rd 05 05:36 PM

On 3 Mar 2005 09:24:22 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:



Again, I see that you apparently don't understand "implication". It

is
a lawfully binding statement, so, that in turn means that those

three
are nothing short of liars.


An 'implication' is a lawfully binding statement? Where did that come from? Do
you mean to tell me that my 'nose-picking' question is somehow 'lawfully
binding'? How? To what am I bound?

You're missing the point, and you're trying my patience.

Suppose I said, "Basskisser, have you stopped eating what you pick

out of your
nose?"

There would be an *implication* that you had been eating whatever you

picked out
of your nose. Now, you know that you've *never* even picked your

nose, and
therefore the implication is patently ridiculous. It can't be true or

false.
It's not a statement of fact. It's a question.


But, the implication was still there, John. That is the part you aren't
grasping. An implication IS an accusation, and fully admissible in a
court of law.


Again, where did you come up with this idea that a question such as I asked IS
an accusation? It is fully admissible in a court of law as what? A question? An
accusation? I think not.

As such, Fritz, JimH, and Smithers are low class liars.
You see, by implication, if one is asked if he has *stopped* something,
it is then IMPLIED that he is doing that, or how else could he STOP?


OR (now listen!) it is a question designed to pull someone's chain!

It's not hard, I know it's going over Fritz's head, he doesn't realize
that by implication, he is a low life liar, but honestly, I thought
you'd have enough intelligence to understand.


I don't really think my intelligence is the issue. Why are you 'implying' that I
don't have the intelligence to understand?

Should you ask me such a question, I would not accuse you of lying.

You simply
asked me a question. If you asked me the question, I could:

- do nothing

- respond with something like, "I've never eaten the stuff I pick out

of my
nose."



Ah, so you DO condone, tolerate, and even like the idea of people lying
about other people?


I condone and tolerate and sometimes laugh my ass off when people ask ridiculous
questions and someone else goes off the deep end.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

P.Fritz March 3rd 05 05:55 PM


"John H" wrote in message
...
On 3 Mar 2005 09:24:22 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:



Again, I see that you apparently don't understand "implication". It

is
a lawfully binding statement, so, that in turn means that those

three
are nothing short of liars.


An 'implication' is a lawfully binding statement? Where did that come
from? Do
you mean to tell me that my 'nose-picking' question is somehow 'lawfully
binding'? How? To what am I bound?

You're missing the point, and you're trying my patience.

Suppose I said, "Basskisser, have you stopped eating what you pick

out of your
nose?"

There would be an *implication* that you had been eating whatever you

picked out
of your nose. Now, you know that you've *never* even picked your

nose, and
therefore the implication is patently ridiculous. It can't be true or

false.
It's not a statement of fact. It's a question.


But, the implication was still there, John. That is the part you aren't
grasping. An implication IS an accusation, and fully admissible in a
court of law.


Again, where did you come up with this idea that a question such as I
asked IS
an accusation? It is fully admissible in a court of law as what? A
question? An
accusation? I think not.

As such, Fritz, JimH, and Smithers are low class liars.
You see, by implication, if one is asked if he has *stopped* something,
it is then IMPLIED that he is doing that, or how else could he STOP?


OR (now listen!) it is a question designed to pull someone's chain!


Or designed to make asslicker drink his own bitter medicine.

It's not hard, I know it's going over Fritz's head, he doesn't realize
that by implication, he is a low life liar, but honestly, I thought
you'd have enough intelligence to understand.


I don't really think my intelligence is the issue. Why are you 'implying'
that I
don't have the intelligence to understand?


Pretty comical from someone who believes schnapps is whiskey.

(And he wonders why he retains the title of "King of the NG idiots")



Should you ask me such a question, I would not accuse you of lying.

You simply
asked me a question. If you asked me the question, I could:

- do nothing

- respond with something like, "I've never eaten the stuff I pick out

of my
nose."



Ah, so you DO condone, tolerate, and even like the idea of people lying
about other people?


I condone and tolerate and sometimes laugh my ass off when people ask
ridiculous
questions and someone else goes off the deep end.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."




JimH March 3rd 05 06:32 PM


wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd. wrote:
When you said "I quit" were you talking about substance abuse?


No.


I thought you stopped drinking and smoking dope.



Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd. March 3rd 05 06:36 PM

No, he said he has not quit. I am sure his wife and kids wished their daddy
would get off the stuff.


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd. wrote:
When you said "I quit" were you talking about substance abuse?


No.


I thought you stopped drinking and smoking dope.




JimH March 3rd 05 06:36 PM


wrote in message
ps.com...

John H wrote:
On 2 Mar 2005 12:03:46 -0800, wrote:


I wonder if you'll ever be man enough to quit acting like a spoiled
little ****ing child. What a pathetic crumb of **** you are.



basskisser, a while back this post was made:
************************************************** ******
On 2 Mar 2005 06:54:20 -0800,
wrote:


John H wrote:

Here we go again. B'assikisser, it *was* kind of nice not having

you
around for
a while.

Some find it nice when YOU aren't around.

John, a few simple questions for you. Do you find it acceptable to
knowingly post lies about other people? Do you think someone who

does
so should be thought of as a person of integrity? Do you think that
someone who does this does so possibly because they've failed in

life,
and need to bolster their ego? Do you think that a person would do

such
things should should be taken seriously? Do you further think that
someone who has strange, untrue, unfactual ideas just pop into their
head (ie: thinking I beat my wife), as mentally stable?


Is this like the SAT?

basskisser, you're simply making your hole bigger. If you don't want

to read the
comments written by others, then *kill file* them. That's how easy it

is!

In answers to your questions (in order of the questions): No, so I

don't do it,
and I'm not sure that others do, unless they are making a statement

on a subject
about which I am knowledgeable. No, if they *knowingly* told a lie.

No, I don't
believe that lying is an indication of life failure or ego

bolstering. I believe
that lying will be detrimental to a person's ego. No, I don't think

liars should
be taken seriously (you should know this by now!). I don't think a

super
imagination is an indicator of a lack of mental stability.

Now. No one has said you beat your wife,


Hmm, so you think, that if someone asks "do you STILL beat your wife",
that that wouldn't conotate a lie???? Now, notice, John, he didn't ask
IF I had ever beat my wife. If he had, I would have answered. But,
being how Fritz isn't very bright, he IMPLICATED me, which is a total
lie. Do you condone that behavior? Do you think someone who would
implicate me in a total fabrication would have integrity?

nor smoke pot,
Not true. Jim has, several times. Go look. Fritz even accused me of
smoking pot with my kids. Go look again. Jim has accused me of growing
pot, of growing pot with my kids' knowledge, of buying seeds on the
internet, of having a "crop" of pot, and on and on. All lies.



http://tinyurl.com/6kllf

And that Heaven's Stairway site is located he http://www.hempqc.com/

So how good of crop did you have last year?



P.Fritz March 3rd 05 06:40 PM


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd. wrote:
When you said "I quit" were you talking about substance abuse?


No.


I thought you stopped drinking and smoking dope.


LMAO

Poor asslicker, once again he proves why he deserves the title of "King of
the NG idiots"





[email protected] March 3rd 05 06:41 PM


JimH wrote:
wrote in message
ps.com...

John H wrote:
On 2 Mar 2005 12:03:46 -0800, wrote:


I wonder if you'll ever be man enough to quit acting like a

spoiled
little ****ing child. What a pathetic crumb of **** you are.


basskisser, a while back this post was made:
************************************************** ******
On 2 Mar 2005 06:54:20 -0800,
wrote:


John H wrote:

Here we go again. B'assikisser, it *was* kind of nice not

having
you
around for
a while.

Some find it nice when YOU aren't around.

John, a few simple questions for you. Do you find it acceptable

to
knowingly post lies about other people? Do you think someone who

does
so should be thought of as a person of integrity? Do you think

that
someone who does this does so possibly because they've failed in

life,
and need to bolster their ego? Do you think that a person would

do
such
things should should be taken seriously? Do you further think

that
someone who has strange, untrue, unfactual ideas just pop into

their
head (ie: thinking I beat my wife), as mentally stable?

Is this like the SAT?

basskisser, you're simply making your hole bigger. If you don't

want
to read the
comments written by others, then *kill file* them. That's how easy

it
is!

In answers to your questions (in order of the questions): No, so I

don't do it,
and I'm not sure that others do, unless they are making a

statement
on a subject
about which I am knowledgeable. No, if they *knowingly* told a

lie.
No, I don't
believe that lying is an indication of life failure or ego

bolstering. I believe
that lying will be detrimental to a person's ego. No, I don't

think
liars should
be taken seriously (you should know this by now!). I don't think a

super
imagination is an indicator of a lack of mental stability.

Now. No one has said you beat your wife,


Hmm, so you think, that if someone asks "do you STILL beat your

wife",
that that wouldn't conotate a lie???? Now, notice, John, he didn't

ask
IF I had ever beat my wife. If he had, I would have answered. But,
being how Fritz isn't very bright, he IMPLICATED me, which is a

total
lie. Do you condone that behavior? Do you think someone who would
implicate me in a total fabrication would have integrity?

nor smoke pot,
Not true. Jim has, several times. Go look. Fritz even accused me of
smoking pot with my kids. Go look again. Jim has accused me of

growing
pot, of growing pot with my kids' knowledge, of buying seeds on the
internet, of having a "crop" of pot, and on and on. All lies.



http://tinyurl.com/6kllf

And that Heaven's Stairway site is located he

http://www.hempqc.com/

So how good of crop did you have last year?


Crop of what?


[email protected] March 3rd 05 06:44 PM


P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd. wrote:
When you said "I quit" were you talking about substance abuse?

No.


I thought you stopped drinking and smoking dope.


LMAO

Poor asslicker, once again he proves why he deserves the title of

"King of
the NG idiots"

How ironic, Fritz. You call ME an idiot, because, when I said "I quit",
somehow your pea sized brain interpreted that to mean that I wasn't
going to post to a newsgroup anymore??????

That's kind of like someone asking you, Hey, how's things going with
that juvenile delequent kid of yours? And you answer "orange".


[email protected] March 3rd 05 06:45 PM


JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd. wrote:
When you said "I quit" were you talking about substance abuse?


No.


I thought you stopped drinking and smoking dope.


What on earth would make you think I ever started, Jim? You need mental
help, I don't understand how this stuff gets in you head.


P.Fritz March 3rd 05 06:46 PM


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ps.com...

John H wrote:
On 2 Mar 2005 12:03:46 -0800, wrote:


I wonder if you'll ever be man enough to quit acting like a spoiled
little ****ing child. What a pathetic crumb of **** you are.


basskisser, a while back this post was made:
************************************************** ******
On 2 Mar 2005 06:54:20 -0800,
wrote:


John H wrote:

Here we go again. B'assikisser, it *was* kind of nice not having

you
around for
a while.

Some find it nice when YOU aren't around.

John, a few simple questions for you. Do you find it acceptable to
knowingly post lies about other people? Do you think someone who

does
so should be thought of as a person of integrity? Do you think that
someone who does this does so possibly because they've failed in

life,
and need to bolster their ego? Do you think that a person would do

such
things should should be taken seriously? Do you further think that
someone who has strange, untrue, unfactual ideas just pop into their
head (ie: thinking I beat my wife), as mentally stable?

Is this like the SAT?

basskisser, you're simply making your hole bigger. If you don't want

to read the
comments written by others, then *kill file* them. That's how easy it

is!

In answers to your questions (in order of the questions): No, so I

don't do it,
and I'm not sure that others do, unless they are making a statement

on a subject
about which I am knowledgeable. No, if they *knowingly* told a lie.

No, I don't
believe that lying is an indication of life failure or ego

bolstering. I believe
that lying will be detrimental to a person's ego. No, I don't think

liars should
be taken seriously (you should know this by now!). I don't think a

super
imagination is an indicator of a lack of mental stability.

Now. No one has said you beat your wife,


Hmm, so you think, that if someone asks "do you STILL beat your wife",
that that wouldn't conotate a lie???? Now, notice, John, he didn't ask
IF I had ever beat my wife. If he had, I would have answered. But,
being how Fritz isn't very bright, he IMPLICATED me, which is a total
lie. Do you condone that behavior? Do you think someone who would
implicate me in a total fabrication would have integrity?

nor smoke pot,
Not true. Jim has, several times. Go look. Fritz even accused me of
smoking pot with my kids. Go look again. Jim has accused me of growing
pot, of growing pot with my kids' knowledge, of buying seeds on the
internet, of having a "crop" of pot, and on and on. All lies.



http://tinyurl.com/6kllf

And that Heaven's Stairway site is located he http://www.hempqc.com/

So how good of crop did you have last year?


Have you noticed how disjointed asslicker's thought pattern has been?

His FAS much be kicking in again. Too bad the week of detoxic didn't do
any good, since he admited he has not stopped smoking dope or stopped
drinking.







[email protected] March 3rd 05 06:54 PM


Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd. wrote:
No, he said he has not quit. I am sure his wife and kids wished

their daddy
would get off the stuff.


My god you are stupid. Where did I say that? Your DIRECT STATEMENT:
"No, he said he has not quit". Now, where did I say that, you lying
piece of ****? I'll bet your wife wishes you'd quit jacking off to
Hertvik posts. But, then, has she ever stopped giving your neighbor
blow jobs? Does she still let your kids watch?


[email protected] March 3rd 05 06:55 PM


P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ps.com...

John H wrote:
On 2 Mar 2005 12:03:46 -0800, wrote:


I wonder if you'll ever be man enough to quit acting like a

spoiled
little ****ing child. What a pathetic crumb of **** you are.


basskisser, a while back this post was made:
************************************************** ******
On 2 Mar 2005 06:54:20 -0800,
wrote:


John H wrote:

Here we go again. B'assikisser, it *was* kind of nice not

having
you
around for
a while.

Some find it nice when YOU aren't around.

John, a few simple questions for you. Do you find it acceptable

to
knowingly post lies about other people? Do you think someone who
does
so should be thought of as a person of integrity? Do you think

that
someone who does this does so possibly because they've failed in
life,
and need to bolster their ego? Do you think that a person would

do
such
things should should be taken seriously? Do you further think

that
someone who has strange, untrue, unfactual ideas just pop into

their
head (ie: thinking I beat my wife), as mentally stable?

Is this like the SAT?

basskisser, you're simply making your hole bigger. If you don't

want
to read the
comments written by others, then *kill file* them. That's how

easy it
is!

In answers to your questions (in order of the questions): No, so

I
don't do it,
and I'm not sure that others do, unless they are making a

statement
on a subject
about which I am knowledgeable. No, if they *knowingly* told a

lie.
No, I don't
believe that lying is an indication of life failure or ego
bolstering. I believe
that lying will be detrimental to a person's ego. No, I don't

think
liars should
be taken seriously (you should know this by now!). I don't think

a
super
imagination is an indicator of a lack of mental stability.

Now. No one has said you beat your wife,

Hmm, so you think, that if someone asks "do you STILL beat your

wife",
that that wouldn't conotate a lie???? Now, notice, John, he didn't

ask
IF I had ever beat my wife. If he had, I would have answered. But,
being how Fritz isn't very bright, he IMPLICATED me, which is a

total
lie. Do you condone that behavior? Do you think someone who would
implicate me in a total fabrication would have integrity?

nor smoke pot,
Not true. Jim has, several times. Go look. Fritz even accused me

of
smoking pot with my kids. Go look again. Jim has accused me of

growing
pot, of growing pot with my kids' knowledge, of buying seeds on

the
internet, of having a "crop" of pot, and on and on. All lies.



http://tinyurl.com/6kllf

And that Heaven's Stairway site is located he

http://www.hempqc.com/

So how good of crop did you have last year?


Have you noticed how disjointed asslicker's thought pattern has been?

His FAS much be kicking in again. Too bad the week of detoxic

didn't do
any good, since he admited he has not stopped smoking dope or stopped


drinking.


Fritz, perhaps if you wouldn't keep having those homosexual affairs,
you'd still have a wife, and your kid would show you a little respect.


[email protected] March 3rd 05 07:04 PM


P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ps.com...

John H wrote:
On 2 Mar 2005 12:03:46 -0800, wrote:


I wonder if you'll ever be man enough to quit acting like a

spoiled
little ****ing child. What a pathetic crumb of **** you are.


basskisser, a while back this post was made:
************************************************** ******
On 2 Mar 2005 06:54:20 -0800,
wrote:


John H wrote:

Here we go again. B'assikisser, it *was* kind of nice not

having
you
around for
a while.

Some find it nice when YOU aren't around.

John, a few simple questions for you. Do you find it acceptable

to
knowingly post lies about other people? Do you think someone who
does
so should be thought of as a person of integrity? Do you think

that
someone who does this does so possibly because they've failed in
life,
and need to bolster their ego? Do you think that a person would

do
such
things should should be taken seriously? Do you further think

that
someone who has strange, untrue, unfactual ideas just pop into

their
head (ie: thinking I beat my wife), as mentally stable?

Is this like the SAT?

basskisser, you're simply making your hole bigger. If you don't

want
to read the
comments written by others, then *kill file* them. That's how

easy it
is!

In answers to your questions (in order of the questions): No, so

I
don't do it,
and I'm not sure that others do, unless they are making a

statement
on a subject
about which I am knowledgeable. No, if they *knowingly* told a

lie.
No, I don't
believe that lying is an indication of life failure or ego
bolstering. I believe
that lying will be detrimental to a person's ego. No, I don't

think
liars should
be taken seriously (you should know this by now!). I don't think

a
super
imagination is an indicator of a lack of mental stability.

Now. No one has said you beat your wife,

Hmm, so you think, that if someone asks "do you STILL beat your

wife",
that that wouldn't conotate a lie???? Now, notice, John, he didn't

ask
IF I had ever beat my wife. If he had, I would have answered. But,
being how Fritz isn't very bright, he IMPLICATED me, which is a

total
lie. Do you condone that behavior? Do you think someone who would
implicate me in a total fabrication would have integrity?

nor smoke pot,
Not true. Jim has, several times. Go look. Fritz even accused me

of
smoking pot with my kids. Go look again. Jim has accused me of

growing
pot, of growing pot with my kids' knowledge, of buying seeds on

the
internet, of having a "crop" of pot, and on and on. All lies.



http://tinyurl.com/6kllf

And that Heaven's Stairway site is located he

http://www.hempqc.com/

So how good of crop did you have last year?


Have you noticed how disjointed asslicker's thought pattern has been?

His FAS much be kicking in again. Too bad the week of detoxic

didn't do
any good, since he admited he has not stopped smoking dope or stopped


drinking.


You need to learn to read, you idiot! Please show where I "admitted (I)
have not stopped smoking dope or stopped drinking". What a dumb ****
you truly are. No damned wonder you are too stupid to raise a kid, or
keep a wife. Now, there IS REAL help for you chronic liars:
http://cms.psychologytoday.com/artic...01-000033.html


[email protected] March 3rd 05 07:23 PM


John H wrote:
On 3 Mar 2005 09:24:22 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:



Again, I see that you apparently don't understand "implication".

It
is
a lawfully binding statement, so, that in turn means that those

three
are nothing short of liars.


An 'implication' is a lawfully binding statement? Where did that come

from? Do
you mean to tell me that my 'nose-picking' question is somehow

'lawfully
binding'? How? To what am I bound?


You can be implicated of a crime and thus convicted of a crime, PURELY
by implication, in just about any court in the U.S. Read this:
http://www.crimeweek.com/cja/0603preponderance.html (a preponderance of
implication)
Now, from the U.C.M.J. Article 79: (1) In general. A lesser offense is
included in a charged offense when the specification contains
alle;gations which either expressly or by fair implication put the
accused on notice to be prepared to defend against it ......
Here's one from Missouri, a case of guilt by implication:
http://www.courts.mo.gov/SUP/index.nsf/0/81efeb4984c10c9d86256c62007e99ae/$FILE/SC84581%20Bahrenburg's%20brief.PDF
From Kobe Bryant's trial, a ruling by a judge on IMPLIED GUILT: The

woman who has accused Kobe Bryant of rape can not be referred to at
trial as a "victim," according to a ruling by the Colorado judge
overseeing the NBA star's criminal case. In the below decision,
District Judge Terry Ruckriegle sided with Bryant's attorneys, who
argued that the term implied guilt on the 25-year-old athlete's part
and essentially robbed him of the presumption of innocence.

So, you see, you can be guilty, in a court of law, purely by
implication.


[email protected] March 3rd 05 07:33 PM


JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ps.com...

John H wrote:
On 2 Mar 2005 12:03:46 -0800, wrote:


I wonder if you'll ever be man enough to quit acting like a

spoiled
little ****ing child. What a pathetic crumb of **** you are.


basskisser, a while back this post was made:
************************************************** ******
On 2 Mar 2005 06:54:20 -0800,
wrote:


John H wrote:

Here we go again. B'assikisser, it *was* kind of nice not

having
you
around for
a while.

Some find it nice when YOU aren't around.

John, a few simple questions for you. Do you find it

acceptable
to
knowingly post lies about other people? Do you think someone

who
does
so should be thought of as a person of integrity? Do you

think
that
someone who does this does so possibly because they've failed

in
life,
and need to bolster their ego? Do you think that a person

would
do
such
things should should be taken seriously? Do you further think

that
someone who has strange, untrue, unfactual ideas just pop

into
their
head (ie: thinking I beat my wife), as mentally stable?

Is this like the SAT?

basskisser, you're simply making your hole bigger. If you

don't
want
to read the
comments written by others, then *kill file* them. That's how

easy it
is!

In answers to your questions (in order of the questions): No,

so
I
don't do it,
and I'm not sure that others do, unless they are making a

statement
on a subject
about which I am knowledgeable. No, if they *knowingly* told a

lie.
No, I don't
believe that lying is an indication of life failure or ego
bolstering. I believe
that lying will be detrimental to a person's ego. No, I don't

think
liars should
be taken seriously (you should know this by now!). I don't

think
a
super
imagination is an indicator of a lack of mental stability.

Now. No one has said you beat your wife,

Hmm, so you think, that if someone asks "do you STILL beat your

wife",
that that wouldn't conotate a lie???? Now, notice, John, he

didn't
ask
IF I had ever beat my wife. If he had, I would have answered.

But,
being how Fritz isn't very bright, he IMPLICATED me, which is a

total
lie. Do you condone that behavior? Do you think someone who

would
implicate me in a total fabrication would have integrity?

nor smoke pot,
Not true. Jim has, several times. Go look. Fritz even accused

me
of
smoking pot with my kids. Go look again. Jim has accused me of

growing
pot, of growing pot with my kids' knowledge, of buying seeds on

the
internet, of having a "crop" of pot, and on and on. All lies.


http://tinyurl.com/6kllf

And that Heaven's Stairway site is located he

http://www.hempqc.com/

So how good of crop did you have last year?

Have you noticed how disjointed asslicker's thought pattern has

been?

His FAS much be kicking in again. Too bad the week of detoxic

didn't do
any good, since he admited he has not stopped smoking dope or

stopped

drinking.


You need to learn to read, you idiot! Please show where I "admitted

(I)
have not stopped smoking dope or stopped drinking". What a dumb

****
you truly are.


So you again admit you have not stopped smoking dope or drinking.

Thanks
for the clarification.


Boy, you ARE stupid!!!! And a liar. How's the wife and boat?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com