US Plans to Attack Iran in June
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Scott Ritter Says US Attack On Iran Set For June By Mark Jensen United for Peace of Pierce County (WA) 2-21-5 snip..... Anyone here with teenage sons might be advised to start immigration application to Canada ASAP. |
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:26:18 GMT, "Don White"
wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Scott Ritter Says US Attack On Iran Set For June By Mark Jensen United for Peace of Pierce County (WA) 2-21-5 snip..... Anyone here with teenage sons might be advised to start immigration application to Canada ASAP. Is Krause still spreading crap around the internet? Scott Ritter? Do you guys believe him too? Thanks for snipping whatever you snipped. And thanks for answering Krause. I get worried about the boy, and it seems you are about the only guy who responds to his posts, unless he's just posting a lot less these days. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
"Don White" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Scott Ritter Says US Attack On Iran Set For June By Mark Jensen United for Peace of Pierce County (WA) 2-21-5 snip..... Anyone here with teenage sons might be advised to start immigration application to Canada ASAP. Don, you are still a pussy! And, you should stay up in Canada where you hold the misconception that you are safe from the terrorists. |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Ritter made two shocking claims: 1) He likes little girls. 2) He likes little boys even more. |
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:27:22 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Ritter made two shocking claims: 1) He likes little girls. 2) He likes little boys even more. Hard to believe Harry is a Ritter fan. Now Tex Ritter, I could understand. He had cute pistols and sang some great songs. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Scott Ritter Says US Attack On Iran Set For June By Mark Jensen United for Peace of Pierce County (WA) 2-21-5 snip..... Anyone here with teenage sons might be advised to start immigration application to Canada ASAP. Au contraire...they should all be lined up as volunteers or draftees for Bush's Christian Soldiers. All of them. No exemptions. If we take on Iran, it will be a technological war. There are enough anti-government elements in Iran that we can simply provide aerial support and long-range missile attacks, without having to drive tanks across the border. Afghanistan was a test case for the tactics that will be employed against Iran. Our air superiority ensures that any conventional attack by Iranian forces against our troops in Afghanistan and Iraq would be suicidal. We have no intention of entering Iran to set up a Democracy. Our interest is simply in destroying their nuclear and military facilities. If the anti-government forces help to overthrow the government, then that would simply be a bonus. |
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Scott Ritter Says US Attack On Iran Set For June By Mark Jensen United for Peace of Pierce County (WA) 2-21-5 snip..... Anyone here with teenage sons might be advised to start immigration application to Canada ASAP. Au contraire...they should all be lined up as volunteers or draftees for Bush's Christian Soldiers. All of them. No exemptions. If we take on Iran, it will be a technological war. There are enough anti-government elements in Iran that we can simply provide aerial support and long-range missile attacks, without having to drive tanks across the border. Afghanistan was a test case for the tactics that will be employed against Iran. And Osama still roams free -- appears to be a failed test. Our air superiority ensures that any conventional attack by Iranian forces against our troops in Afghanistan and Iraq would be suicidal. We have no intention of entering Iran to set up a Democracy. Our interest is simply in destroying their nuclear and military facilities. If the anti-government forces help to overthrow the government, then that would simply be a bonus. Wanna buy a bridge? |
John H wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:27:22 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Ritter made two shocking claims: 1) He likes little girls. 2) He likes little boys even more. But republicans like them even more -- see http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/83.htm and click on Conspiracy Of Silence Video Hard to believe Harry is a Ritter fan. Now Tex Ritter, I could understand. He had cute pistols and sang some great songs. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:53:59 -0500, "Bert Robbins"
wrote: And, you should stay up in Canada where you hold the misconception that you are safe from the terrorists. You are absolutely right. Canada isn't safe from the Bush wackos either. bb |
"John H" wrote in message ... snip Thanks for snipping whatever you snipped. And thanks for answering Krause. I get worried about the boy, and it seems you are about the only guy who responds to his posts, unless he's just posting a lot less these days. John H My pleasure. :-) |
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... Don, you are still a pussy! And, you should stay up in Canada where you hold the misconception that you are safe from the terrorists. Ah ha...up pops our resident hard-ass jarhead........ or is it 'jughead'? I can't tell the difference. |
"bb" wrote in message ... You are absolutely right. Canada isn't safe from the Bush wackos either. bb That's for sure! An aggressive bullying US is a lot more dangerous to us than a handful of terrorists. |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... You really have to wonder about some of these "former" Marines. Apparently the IQ required for admission is in the double digits. Come to think of it, that kind of makes sense. I would think it's the 'brainwashing' during basic training. Necessary to prepare them for a tour of shootin' & killin', but troublesome after the marine is drummed out of service back to civy street. |
"Don White" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... You really have to wonder about some of these "former" Marines. Apparently the IQ required for admission is in the double digits. Come to think of it, that kind of makes sense. I would think it's the 'brainwashing' during basic training. Necessary to prepare them for a tour of shootin' & killin', but troublesome after the marine is drummed out of service back to civy street. It's not brain washing, it's de-programming from the liberal public school system. It's not basic training, it's boot-camp! It's not "shootin' & killin'" it's learning marksmanship and demonstrating the one shot one kill method of fire discpline. At least I put my ass on the line for my country, unlike you where you just want to suckle at the government and union teat. |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Bert Robbins wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... You really have to wonder about some of these "former" Marines. Apparently the IQ required for admission is in the double digits. Come to think of it, that kind of makes sense. I would think it's the 'brainwashing' during basic training. Necessary to prepare them for a tour of shootin' & killin', but troublesome after the marine is drummed out of service back to civy street. It's not brain washing, it's de-programming from the liberal public school system. It's not basic training, it's boot-camp! It's not "shootin' & killin'" it's learning marksmanship and demonstrating the one shot one kill method of fire discpline. At least I put my ass on the line for my country, unlike you where you just want to suckle at the government and union teat. Oh? Didn't you say you served stateside, Bertie? Was it tough hanging out in those bars? You are a ****ing genius, figure out the literary meaning of "putting my ass on the line." |
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:12:48 GMT, "Jim," wrote:
John H wrote: On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:27:22 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Ritter made two shocking claims: 1) He likes little girls. 2) He likes little boys even more. But republicans like them even more -- see http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/83.htm and click on Conspiracy Of Silence Video Hard to believe Harry is a Ritter fan. Now Tex Ritter, I could understand. He had cute pistols and sang some great songs. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes Jimcomma, your links aren't worthy of one click, let alone the two it would take me to get there! Believe what you must for whatever it gets you - serenity, I hope! John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Bert Robbins wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Bert Robbins wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... You really have to wonder about some of these "former" Marines. Apparently the IQ required for admission is in the double digits. Come to think of it, that kind of makes sense. I would think it's the 'brainwashing' during basic training. Necessary to prepare them for a tour of shootin' & killin', but troublesome after the marine is drummed out of service back to civy street. It's not brain washing, it's de-programming from the liberal public school system. It's not basic training, it's boot-camp! It's not "shootin' & killin'" it's learning marksmanship and demonstrating the one shot one kill method of fire discpline. At least I put my ass on the line for my country, unlike you where you just want to suckle at the government and union teat. Oh? Didn't you say you served stateside, Bertie? Was it tough hanging out in those bars? You are a ****ing genius, figure out the literary meaning of "putting my ass on the line." Holding down a barstool as you did is not putting your ass on the line, although it might give you hemmorhoids. Being a firefighter and rushing into a burning building is putting your ass on the line. I'm sure you are an expert at the barstool sitting thing. |
|
|
|
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... If we take on Iran, it will be a technological war. ...we can simply provide aerial support... ...and long-range missile attacks, without having to drive tanks... Our interest is simply in destroying their nuclear and military facilities. It all sounds so simple and clean, doesn't it? |
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:47:16 +0000, NOYB wrote:
We have no intention of entering Iran to set up a Democracy. Our interest is simply in destroying their nuclear and military facilities. If the anti-government forces help to overthrow the government, then that would simply be a bonus. Flowers and dancing in the streets redux? I wouldn't be at all sure those "anti-government", pro-democracy "forces" are also pro-American. Some Iranians may have a longer memory than you do. Perhaps they can remember back to when Iran *was* a democracy. You know, before our CIA overthrew the government and installed the Shah and his ever popular Savak. http://www.angelfire.com/home/iran/savak.html |
Hey Krause:
I'll make you a sporting proposition. I'll bet you $1,000 dollars that June 2005 comes and goes without a single US bomb being dropped on Iran. We'll let your banker hold the money. Each of us will send your banker a cashiers check for $1,000. He will hold the $2,000 in escrow and remit the entire amount to the winner of the bet on July 1, 2005. Or if you're even more confident, I'll go up to $10,000. Yes or no, Krause? William Bruce "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Scott Ritter Says US Attack On Iran Set For June By Mark Jensen United for Peace of Pierce County (WA) 2-21-5 On Friday evening in Olympia, former UNSCOM weapons inspector Scott Ritter appeared with journalist Dahr Jamail. -- Ritter made two shocking claims: George W. Bush has "signed off" on plans to bomb Iran in June 2005, and the U.S. manipulated the results of the Jan. 30 elections in Iraq.... Scott Ritter, appearing with journalist Dahr Jamail yesterday in Washington State, dropped two shocking bombshells in a talk delivered to a packed house in Olympia's Capitol Theater. The ex-Marine turned UNSCOM weapons inspector said that George W. Bush has "signed off" on plans to bomb Iran in June 2005, and claimed the U.S. manipulated the results of the recent Jan. 30 elections in Iraq. Olympians like to call the Capitol Theater "historic," but it's doubtful whether the eighty-year-old edifice has ever been the scene of more portentous revelations. The principal theme of Scott Ritter's talk was Americans' duty to protect the U.S. Constitution by taking action to bring an end to the illegal war in Iraq. But in passing, the former UNSCOM weapons inspector stunned his listeners with two pronouncements. Ritter said plans for a June attack on Iran have been submitted to President George W. Bush, and that the president has approved them. He also asserted that knowledgeable sources say U.S. officials "cooked" the results of the Jan. 30 elections in Iraq. On Iran, Ritter said that President George W. Bush has received and signed off on orders for an aerial attack on Iran planned for June 2005. Its purported goal is the destruction of Iran's alleged program to develop nuclear weapons, but Ritter said neoconservatives in the administration also expected that the attack would set in motion a chain of events leading to regime change in the oil-rich nation of 70 million -- a possibility Ritter regards with the greatest skepticism. The former Marine also said that the Jan. 30 elections, which George W. Bush has called "a turning point in the history of Iraq, a milestone in the advance of freedom," were not so free after all. Ritter said that U.S. authorities in Iraq had manipulated the results in order to reduce the percentage of the vote received by the United Iraqi Alliance from 56% to 48%. Asked by UFPPC's Ted Nation about this shocker, Ritter said an official involved in the manipulation was the source, and that this would soon be reported by a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist in a major metropolitan magazine -- an obvious allusion to New Yorker reporter Seymour M. Hersh. On Jan. 17, the New Yorker posted an article by Hersh entitled The Coming Wars (New Yorker, January 24-31, 2005). In it, the well-known investigative journalist claimed that for the Bush administration, "The next strategic target [is] Iran." Hersh also reported that "The Administration has been conducting secret reconnaissance missions inside Iran at least since last summer." According to Hersh, "Defense Department civilians, under the leadership of Douglas Feith, have been working with Israeli planners and consultants to develop and refine potential nuclear, chemical-weapons, and missile targets inside Iran. . . . Strategists at the headquarters of the U.S. Central Command, in Tampa, Florida, have been asked to revise the military's war plan, providing for a maximum ground and air invasion of Iran. . . . The hawks in the Administration believe that it will soon become clear that the Europeans' negotiated approach [to Iran] cannot succeed, and that at that time the Administration will act." Scott Ritter said that although the peace movement failed to stop the war in Iraq, it had a chance to stop the expansion of the war to other nations like Iran and Syria. He held up the specter of a day when the Iraq war might be remembered as a relatively minor event that preceded an even greater conflagration. Scott Ritter's talk was the culmination of a long evening devoted to discussion of Iraq and U.S. foreign policy. Before Ritter spoke, Dahr Jamail narrated a slide show on Iraq focusing on Fallujah. He showed more than a hundred vivid photographs taken in Iraq, mostly by himself. Many of them showed the horrific slaughter of civilians. Dahr Jamail argued that U.S. mainstream media sources are complicit in the war and help sustain support for it by deliberately downplaying the truth about the devastation and death it is causing. Jamail was, until recently, one of the few unembedded journalists in Iraq and one of the only independent ones. His reports have gained a substantial following and are available online at dahrjamailiraq.com. Friday evening's event in Olympia was sponsored by South Puget Sound Community College's Student Activities Board, Veterans for Peace, 100 Thousand and Counting, Olympia Movement for Justice & Peace, and United for Peace of Pierce County. |
He would not take my $10,000 bet that he does not own a custom made 36 foot
lobster boat. I was even willing to fly in at my own expense on whatever day worked out best for him. Yet, he wanted to bet me $1,000 that he owns a 25 foot fishing boat. Makes sense, eh? "William Bruce" wrote in message . .. Hey Krause: I'll make you a sporting proposition. I'll bet you $1,000 dollars that June 2005 comes and goes without a single US bomb being dropped on Iran. We'll let your banker hold the money. Each of us will send your banker a cashiers check for $1,000. He will hold the $2,000 in escrow and remit the entire amount to the winner of the bet on July 1, 2005. Or if you're even more confident, I'll go up to $10,000. Yes or no, Krause? William Bruce "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Scott Ritter Says US Attack On Iran Set For June By Mark Jensen United for Peace of Pierce County (WA) 2-21-5 On Friday evening in Olympia, former UNSCOM weapons inspector Scott Ritter appeared with journalist Dahr Jamail. -- Ritter made two shocking claims: George W. Bush has "signed off" on plans to bomb Iran in June 2005, and the U.S. manipulated the results of the Jan. 30 elections in Iraq.... Scott Ritter, appearing with journalist Dahr Jamail yesterday in Washington State, dropped two shocking bombshells in a talk delivered to a packed house in Olympia's Capitol Theater. The ex-Marine turned UNSCOM weapons inspector said that George W. Bush has "signed off" on plans to bomb Iran in June 2005, and claimed the U.S. manipulated the results of the recent Jan. 30 elections in Iraq. Olympians like to call the Capitol Theater "historic," but it's doubtful whether the eighty-year-old edifice has ever been the scene of more portentous revelations. The principal theme of Scott Ritter's talk was Americans' duty to protect the U.S. Constitution by taking action to bring an end to the illegal war in Iraq. But in passing, the former UNSCOM weapons inspector stunned his listeners with two pronouncements. Ritter said plans for a June attack on Iran have been submitted to President George W. Bush, and that the president has approved them. He also asserted that knowledgeable sources say U.S. officials "cooked" the results of the Jan. 30 elections in Iraq. On Iran, Ritter said that President George W. Bush has received and signed off on orders for an aerial attack on Iran planned for June 2005. Its purported goal is the destruction of Iran's alleged program to develop nuclear weapons, but Ritter said neoconservatives in the administration also expected that the attack would set in motion a chain of events leading to regime change in the oil-rich nation of 70 million -- a possibility Ritter regards with the greatest skepticism. The former Marine also said that the Jan. 30 elections, which George W. Bush has called "a turning point in the history of Iraq, a milestone in the advance of freedom," were not so free after all. Ritter said that U.S. authorities in Iraq had manipulated the results in order to reduce the percentage of the vote received by the United Iraqi Alliance from 56% to 48%. Asked by UFPPC's Ted Nation about this shocker, Ritter said an official involved in the manipulation was the source, and that this would soon be reported by a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist in a major metropolitan magazine -- an obvious allusion to New Yorker reporter Seymour M. Hersh. On Jan. 17, the New Yorker posted an article by Hersh entitled The Coming Wars (New Yorker, January 24-31, 2005). In it, the well-known investigative journalist claimed that for the Bush administration, "The next strategic target [is] Iran." Hersh also reported that "The Administration has been conducting secret reconnaissance missions inside Iran at least since last summer." According to Hersh, "Defense Department civilians, under the leadership of Douglas Feith, have been working with Israeli planners and consultants to develop and refine potential nuclear, chemical-weapons, and missile targets inside Iran. . . . Strategists at the headquarters of the U.S. Central Command, in Tampa, Florida, have been asked to revise the military's war plan, providing for a maximum ground and air invasion of Iran. . . . The hawks in the Administration believe that it will soon become clear that the Europeans' negotiated approach [to Iran] cannot succeed, and that at that time the Administration will act." Scott Ritter said that although the peace movement failed to stop the war in Iraq, it had a chance to stop the expansion of the war to other nations like Iran and Syria. He held up the specter of a day when the Iraq war might be remembered as a relatively minor event that preceded an even greater conflagration. Scott Ritter's talk was the culmination of a long evening devoted to discussion of Iraq and U.S. foreign policy. Before Ritter spoke, Dahr Jamail narrated a slide show on Iraq focusing on Fallujah. He showed more than a hundred vivid photographs taken in Iraq, mostly by himself. Many of them showed the horrific slaughter of civilians. Dahr Jamail argued that U.S. mainstream media sources are complicit in the war and help sustain support for it by deliberately downplaying the truth about the devastation and death it is causing. Jamail was, until recently, one of the few unembedded journalists in Iraq and one of the only independent ones. His reports have gained a substantial following and are available online at dahrjamailiraq.com. Friday evening's event in Olympia was sponsored by South Puget Sound Community College's Student Activities Board, Veterans for Peace, 100 Thousand and Counting, Olympia Movement for Justice & Peace, and United for Peace of Pierce County. |
"JimH" wrote in message ... He would not take my $10,000 bet that he does not own a custom made 36 foot lobster boat. I was even willing to fly in at my own expense on whatever day worked out best for him. Yet, he wanted to bet me $1,000 that he owns a 25 foot fishing boat. Makes sense, eh? He weaseled on my offer to put his money where his mouth is. Now he's exposed as nothing but an old blowhard. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com