![]() |
Albermarle, (31 ft)
|
Depending on how strictly you define "walkaround", you might like the
Luhrs 30. Great little diesel fishing boat. |
Rampage also has a new diesel powered 30-foot "walkaround".
|
wrote in message oups.com... Depending on how strictly you define "walkaround", you might like the Luhrs 30. Great little diesel fishing boat. I like that boat a lot. Boating had retail on it listed at $99k. Is that right? Sounds cheap. |
wrote in message oups.com... Rampage also has a new diesel powered 30-foot "walkaround". Carolina Classic has a 28 and a 32. The problem with all of these "walkarounds" is that you really can't walk around them when fighting a fish. The Contender 31 Center Cabin is a true "walkaround". The True World has adequate foot space to walk around on too. believe that the only true diesel walkaround out there is the True World. |
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:26:44 -0500, "NOYB" wrote:
wrote in message roups.com... Rampage also has a new diesel powered 30-foot "walkaround". Carolina Classic has a 28 and a 32. The problem with all of these "walkarounds" is that you really can't walk around them when fighting a fish. The Contender 31 Center Cabin is a true "walkaround". The True World has adequate foot space to walk around on too. believe that the only true diesel walkaround out there is the True World. I have a Proline 211 walkaround cuddy. I have gone around the cuddy many times fighting fish without a problem. Of course, the waves weren't in the 3-5' range either. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
like that boat a lot. Boating had retail on it listed at $99k. Is
that right? Sounds cheap. ************ I'm not sure what the retail is on a new one, but I agree that $99k sounds cheap- almost like a gas engine price. |
|
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:58:05 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: I'm still not convinced that diesels are cheaper to run than the DI type outboards. =================================== Usually the real issue is range, not running cost. For the same tank capacity range is about double with a diesel. Reliabilty/longevity is usually better with diesel also. |
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:27:56 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:58:05 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: I'm still not convinced that diesels are cheaper to run than the DI type outboards. =================================== Usually the real issue is range, not running cost. For the same tank capacity range is about double with a diesel. Reliabilty/longevity is usually better with diesel also. But doesn't range equate to efficiency? Later, Tom |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:54 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com