John H wrote:
On 17 Feb 2005 07:53:28 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


John H wrote:
On 17 Feb 2005 05:18:18 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 Feb 2005 12:41:56 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 Feb 2005 12:18:30 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


John H wrote:


Kinda makes one wonder why all the fuss now!

John H

How about these a

href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=11&k=flip%20flops"
onmouseover="window.status='a

href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=11&k=flip%20flops"
onmouseover="window.status='a
href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=11&k=flip%20flops"
onmouseover="window.status='a
href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=11&k=flip%20flops"
onmouseover="window.status='flip-flops'; return true;"
onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"flip-flops/a'; return
true;"
onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"flip-flops/a'; return
true;"
onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"flip-flops/a';
return
true;"
onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"flip-flops/a
about
fiscal
responsibility:
http://democraticwhip.house.gov/docuploads/a

href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=11&k=flip%20flop"
onmouseover="window.status='a

href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=11&k=flip%20flop"
onmouseover="window.status='a
href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=11&k=flip%20flop"
onmouseover="window.status='a
href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=11&k=flip%20flop"
onmouseover="window.status='flip_flop'; return true;"
onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"flip_flop/a'; return
true;"
onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"flip_flop/a'; return
true;"
onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"flip_flop/a';
return
true;"
onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"flip_flop/a.pdf

Is there something bearing on the Social Security debate
there?

John H

No, why, did I say that there was?

No, but you were responding to a post about Social Security.
Perhaps
you just
overlooked that, or perhaps I wasn't very clear.

John H

And while I have your attention, do you remember awhile back,
when
you
completely lost it, and called Harry a "****ing liar" about 100
times?
Why don't you do the same to JimH and Fritz? They've both PROVEN
themselves liars.

I was in a position to make a judgement on Harry's comments. I'm
not
in a
position to judge comments about you made by anyone other than
myself.

John H

Oh, really? And why IS that? Don't believe me? You need to read the
posts from JimH and Fritz yesterday. It's all too obvious that they
are
liars. They proved it yesterday. So, why are you NOT "in a position
to
make judgement"? Is it that you are only in that position when it
reflects well on the the rest of the right wing circle jerk club?

Is there some reason I should give what you say some credibility? Did
you not
comment that Fritz's ex-wife was, "...good, very good..." or words to
that
effect.
You'd better go back and read what I said, in it's entirety, you are
WAY out of context.

You spend your life being as derogatory as possible to others in the
group.
There is only one other who compares to your continuous derogatory
posts about
anyone who disagrees with you, and I have him kill filed so as not to
see his
crap..

Oh, really, take a damned good look back, John. Go ahead, take a good,
hard look at Fritz's posts to me. Now, want to know something? I never,
ever posted anything to him, good or bad, until he responded to
something I said. And, of course, that response was childish name
calling, right from the beginning. The same with JimH. Go ahead, look.
The first conversation I EVER had with him, he made a ****ty comment
about me, because I pasted and article from SFGate.

Are comments such as, "...right wing circle jerk club" supposed to
lend
credibility to your posts?

Yes. When you scheme together, pounce like drunken parahnas together,
you certainly qualify for a handle for you little clique.