Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My boat policy is about to renew and I thought I'd do a little shopping
based on posts I've read about Boat US being a reasonable alternative. Everything looked pretty much the same (including cost of coverage) until I got to "uninsured boater" line. My present policy assumes $50,000 and the Boat US is $300,000. I assume that if my vessel is a total loss with someone else at fault, the max. payout with my present policy is $50K (and the boat is worth significantly more). I'm mystified why my broker would write the policy this way and disappointed that I didn't see this previously. Anyone have any insight? Is my broker shortsighted or what? jps |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It sounds like your broker was shortsighted. At least you caught it.
-W "jps" wrote in message ... My boat policy is about to renew and I thought I'd do a little shopping based on posts I've read about Boat US being a reasonable alternative. Everything looked pretty much the same (including cost of coverage) until I got to "uninsured boater" line. My present policy assumes $50,000 and the Boat US is $300,000. I assume that if my vessel is a total loss with someone else at fault, the max. payout with my present policy is $50K (and the boat is worth significantly more). I'm mystified why my broker would write the policy this way and disappointed that I didn't see this previously. Anyone have any insight? Is my broker shortsighted or what? jps |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had State Farm. They had the best price for my boat at the time when I
shopped them, Boat US, and Progressive. They sent my renewal and the premium was over 30% higher than the previous year with zero claims. They also had a nice, glossy, brochure explaining the reason for their large increase in Florida. I resubmitted my applications to Boat US and Progressive and Progressive came in lower than last year's premium with State Farm. I called them to make sure the limits were comparable and asked them why they were so much cheaper that the last time I shopped them. They said that they had expanded their "specialty" insurance coverages (boats, motorcycles, and even Segways!). I ended up switching and increasing my liability limits at the same time. I still saved over $300 from State Farms's new rate. Boat US came in much higher than Progressive but a tiny bit lower than State Farm. Dan jps wrote: My boat policy is about to renew and I thought I'd do a little shopping based on posts I've read about Boat US being a reasonable alternative. Everything looked pretty much the same (including cost of coverage) until I got to "uninsured boater" line. My present policy assumes $50,000 and the Boat US is $300,000. I assume that if my vessel is a total loss with someone else at fault, the max. payout with my present policy is $50K (and the boat is worth significantly more). I'm mystified why my broker would write the policy this way and disappointed that I didn't see this previously. Anyone have any insight? Is my broker shortsighted or what? jps |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I use State Farm myself. I have a "multi-multi" discount for autos,
homeowner's, business, and boat which make the overall package very attractive. My boat's insurance is 145/mo for 125k + liability, lost equipment, and weather / windstorm. (It does include 2 million flood which crosses over to home.) and there is an "up to" 500k medical per incident as well. My boat is valued at 195k. Perhaps you can save a little by buying more. Two Axioms for you: 1. Flares are like blessings, you can never have enough. 2. Better to be over insured then under insured. Do all the math before making a decision. BTW, Boat US will drop you like a hot rivet if you ever make a claim. Regards, Capt. Frank http://www.home.earthlink.net/~aartworks jps wrote: My boat policy is about to renew and I thought I'd do a little shopping based on posts I've read about Boat US being a reasonable alternative. Everything looked pretty much the same (including cost of coverage) until I got to "uninsured boater" line. My present policy assumes $50,000 and the Boat US is $300,000. I assume that if my vessel is a total loss with someone else at fault, the max. payout with my present policy is $50K (and the boat is worth significantly more). I'm mystified why my broker would write the policy this way and disappointed that I didn't see this previously. Anyone have any insight? Is my broker shortsighted or what? jps |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, jps wrote:
My boat policy is about to renew and I thought I'd do a little shopping based on posts I've read about Boat US being a reasonable alternative. Everything looked pretty much the same (including cost of coverage) until I got to "uninsured boater" line. My present policy assumes $50,000 and the Boat US is $300,000. I assume that if my vessel is a total loss with someone else at fault, the max. payout with my present policy is $50K (and the boat is worth significantly more). I'm mystified why my broker would write the policy this way and disappointed that I didn't see this previously. Anyone have any insight? yes, you're an asshole Is my broker shortsighted or what? no, you're an asshole, starting a normal thread to try and convince people that you're not such an asshole (but you are) jps |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
jps wrote in message .. .
My boat policy is about to renew and I thought I'd do a little shopping based on posts I've read about Boat US being a reasonable alternative. Everything looked pretty much the same (including cost of coverage) until I got to "uninsured boater" line. My present policy assumes $50,000 and the Boat US is $300,000. I assume that if my vessel is a total loss with someone else at fault, the max. payout with my present policy is $50K (and the boat is worth significantly more). I'm mystified why my broker would write the policy this way and disappointed that I didn't see this previously. Anyone have any insight? Is my broker shortsighted or what? "Uninsured Boater" coverage does not cover your boat. The hull value is covered by "Boat and Boating Equipment Coverage", which the Boat US policy equivalent to Collision and Comprehensive on your car. Just like if you're hit in your car by an uninsured driver - it's your collision coverage that repairs your car, not your unisured motorist coverage. "Uninsured Boater" covers those damages for which the uninsured boater may be liable to you, except your boat itself. It would cover, for example, medical expenses for you if the uninsured other guy was at fault in a collision. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() My two boats are insured as part of the house/car/personal liability package, both boats are insured for full replacement value (new) and about a zillion dollars liability and under-insured boater. The full replacement value trick insures that I will at least get what I paid for the boats without any deduction. Sounds like perhaps you're with Encompass, formerly known as CNA? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
offshore fishing | General | |||
Harry's lobster boat? | General | |||
Where to find ramp stories? | General | |||
Dealing with a boat fire, checking for a common cause | General | |||
Repost from Merc group | General |