"Jack Goff" wrote in message
. com...

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...

"Jack Goff" wrote in message
. com...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Robert White wrote:
I see the same cowards are still on a boat group spouting
treasonous
****.

That's right...we're still infested with a plague of right-wing
chickenhawks here.

KKKrause and
asskisser with there canadian butt buddy are hating it.

The country is going down the toilet. Part of the cynic in me
thinks
it
may be interesting to watcy.

"... interesting to watcy."??

Off your meds, Krause?

you missed 'cynic'


Yeah, but it's enough to expose the buffoon...

He exposes himself every time he posts.

But then, somebody as got to give asslicker competition

"Jack Goff" wrote in message
. com...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Robert White" wrote in message
...
snip verbal diaheria
. KKKrause and asskisser with there canadian butt buddy are hating it.
Patriots in the

superbowl and terrorist loving, baby killers crying. Life is good!


"with there canadian...." ???
Are you any relation to Tuuk??


Nost of the right-wing trash is part of the mindless BORG collective...

"Nost of the..." ???

Are you Tuuk in drag?


You can almost smell the DNA match between Krause and Tuuk...

"basskisser" wrote in message

....refrain from childish name calling. It has a
negative affect on your credibility.

What's that noise? Do you hear it? Oh!!! It's the hypocrisy alarm going
off.

"basskisser" wrote in message

....is either a traitor, or treasonous.

Pray, explain the distinction.

Some Guy wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message

....refrain from childish name calling. It has a
negative affect on your credibility.

What's that noise? Do you hear it? Oh!!! It's the hypocrisy alarm
going
off.

Please, show what name I've called Paul, or you for that matter. And
before you show how much you don't know, no, I didn't call him a child.
I simply stated that name calling is, indeed, childish. Would you not
agree?

P. Fritz wrote:
"Jack Goff" wrote in message
. com...

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...

"Jack Goff" wrote in message
. com...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Robert White wrote:
I see the same cowards are still on a boat group spouting
treasonous
****.

That's right...we're still infested with a plague of
right-wing
chickenhawks here.

KKKrause and
asskisser with there canadian butt buddy are hating it.

The country is going down the toilet. Part of the cynic in
me
thinks
it
may be interesting to watcy.

"... interesting to watcy."??

Off your meds, Krause?

you missed 'cynic'


Yeah, but it's enough to expose the buffoon...

He exposes himself every time he posts.

But then, somebody as got to give asslicker competition

Paul, I see that you still aren't adult enough to post something of any
substance, other than childish name calling. Maybe you should reach out
to a couple more usenet support groups. You know, like the ones that
help you with your divorce, and raising your kid.

Some Guy wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message

....is either a traitor, or treasonous.

Pray, explain the distinction.

No problem. Treason is a traitorous act, and a traitor is the person
committing the traitorous act.

If you have any other questions such as the above, perhaps you can look
them up at dictionary.com, to save yourself some embarrassment.

"basskisser" wrote in message
..
I simply stated that name calling is, indeed, childish. Would you not
agree?

Wholeheartedly. And a cursory review of your own posts over the past couple
of years, should you or anyone else care to conduct one, would show you to
be a leading practitioner.

"Some Guy" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message

....refrain from childish name calling. It has a
negative affect on your credibility.

What's that noise? Do you hear it? Oh!!! It's the hypocrisy alarm going
off.




Shhhhh.....you are going tro ruin the fun of watching asslicker make a daily
fool of himself

"basskisser" wrote in message

No problem. Treason is a traitorous act, and a traitor is the person
committing the traitorous act.

That much is obvious, but your chosen usage belies a poor grasp of your
[presumably] native language, if not, as so often in the past, the facts of
a particular issue.

Your original quote was "...Yeah, yeah, anybody who doesn't goose step to
the party is either a traitor, or treasonous..." So, this particular
person is either a traitor or treasonous. As the two words are merely
different form of the same root, the former the noun and the latter the
adjective, your statement is akin to saying "That car is either red or red".
A traitor has, by implication, performed a treasonous act. One who has
performed a treasonous act is, by definition, a traitor.

Given that your statement makes no sense in the original format, my query
was simply an attempt to ascertain your intended meaning. Perhaps a
pointless endeavor.

...perhaps you can look
them up at dictionary.com, to save yourself some embarrassment.

Hmmm. Yes, perhaps.