Some OT Good News for a Saturday!
 

Tuuuk wrote:
ya,,, krause,, you moron

Blah. . .blah. . .

It boils my blood that you think that the opposing position is failure.

We all want success. It is apparent to some of us that we are spending
our fortunes on a venture that could have been done better on almost
every point.

JimH wrote:

Add Chuck to the sky is falling world that Krause lives in.


A year ago these folks were saying that there would be no wa=ADy an
election
could be held.


3 months ago these folks were saying that there would be no =ADway the
elections could be held at the end of January.


***********

You lie like a rug.

I'd like to see my post from a year ago stating there was "no way an
election could be held."
Put up or shut up.

I'd like to see my post from three months ago stating there was no way
the elections could be held at the end of January. Once again, put up
or shut up.

So many of you Bush guys are all alike. A lie is as good as the truth
if it suits your purposes. Maybe even better. And if something is said
that is negative about a liberal- it has to be true so there's no need
to back it up or check it out.


************
JimH also wrote:

Today, after a successful election these folks are saying th=ADat
election was
a joke....despite a 72% voter turnout.


*********

72% of what? The tiny percentage of the populace that was registered to
vote?

On 30 Jan 2005 09:40:07 -0800, wrote:

JimH wrote:

Add Chuck to the sky is falling world that Krause lives in.


A year ago these folks were saying that there would be no wa? an
election
could be held.


3 months ago these folks were saying that there would be no ?ay the
elections could be held at the end of January.


***********

You lie like a rug.

I'd like to see my post from a year ago stating there was "no way an
election could be held."
Put up or shut up.

I'd like to see my post from three months ago stating there was no way
the elections could be held at the end of January. Once again, put up
or shut up.

So many of you Bush guys are all alike. A lie is as good as the truth
if it suits your purposes. Maybe even better. And if something is said
that is negative about a liberal- it has to be true so there's no need
to back it up or check it out.


************
JimH also wrote:

Today, after a successful election these folks are saying th?t
election was
a joke....despite a 72% voter turnout.


*********

72% of what? The tiny percentage of the populace that was registered to
vote?

Fourteen million elligible, eight million registered (+ or -) as
reported on the news. That's a tiny percentage? Is it lower than the
percentage in the USA? I doubt if it's by much, Chuck.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 12:47:05 -0500, JohnH
wrote:

On 30 Jan 2005 09:40:07 -0800, wrote:

JimH wrote:

Add Chuck to the sky is falling world that Krause lives in.


A year ago these folks were saying that there would be no wa? an
election
could be held.


3 months ago these folks were saying that there would be no ?ay the
elections could be held at the end of January.


***********

You lie like a rug.

I'd like to see my post from a year ago stating there was "no way an
election could be held."
Put up or shut up.

I'd like to see my post from three months ago stating there was no way
the elections could be held at the end of January. Once again, put up
or shut up.

So many of you Bush guys are all alike. A lie is as good as the truth
if it suits your purposes. Maybe even better. And if something is said
that is negative about a liberal- it has to be true so there's no need
to back it up or check it out.


************
JimH also wrote:

Today, after a successful election these folks are saying th?t
election was
a joke....despite a 72% voter turnout.


*********

72% of what? The tiny percentage of the populace that was registered to
vote?

Fourteen million elligible, eight million registered (+ or -) as
reported on the news. That's a tiny percentage? Is it lower than the
percentage in the USA? I doubt if it's by much, Chuck.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Whoops, MSNBC just said there were eight million registered of
*thirteen* million eligible. Thirteen million is a little over half
the population of twenty-five million. I'll bet the percentages are
pretty close to US percentages, Chuck.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Running for cover after being called on his BS, JimH wrote:

Where did I say my reply was about you Chuck? My world does=AD not
revolve
around you.


Now wipe the foaming spit from the corner of your mouth and =ADrelax.

************************************************** *************************=
***************

Duh, gahuk, gahuk.......think maybe it was right about here?


JimH wrote:

Add Chuck to the sky is falling world that Krause lives in.


A year ago these folks were saying that there would be no wa=ADy an
election=20
could be held.

***********************

wrote in message
ups.com...
Running for cover after being called on his BS, JimH wrote:

Where did I say my reply was about you Chuck? My world does not
revolve
around you.


Now wipe the foaming spit from the corner of your mouth and relax.

************************************************** ****************************************

Duh, gahuk, gahuk.......think maybe it was right about here?


JimH wrote:

Add Chuck to the sky is falling world that Krause lives in.


A year ago these folks were saying that there would be no way an
election
could be held.

***********************

Remind me again where I said *you* said these things.

JohnH wrote:


Ah, the trap. Is *anything* worth the life of even *one* American
soldier?


Depends on the soldier, eh? I mean, if you were ordered up a tree to
rescue someone's cat, and the cat survived and you didn't, well, it
would be worth it.*


*This assumes you were sober enough to climb the tree and had the upper
body strength...and I wouldn't bet on either.

Tuuuk wrote:


Tell me krause,,, when you report all your crap to the sheriff down the
way,, the good old fellow, nice guy, the one who screens your visitors,, the
picnickers,,, does he advise you to make threats including your loaded shot
guns you have strategically placed around the house? I mean does he suggest
it a good idea to invite someone then tell them you will blow them dead??
wouldn't that be some type of premeditated murder?? krause,,, and you an
expert in law?? hmmmmmmm


Remember, crap-for-brains, you've been warned, you've acknowledged the
warnings, and you know that if you step onto my property, you'll be
trespassing, and, since you have made threats, if you enter my house you
will be treated as a home invader.

You weren't invited here. You were told to stay away. If you show up
here, at the very least, it will be unpleasant for you. If you invade
the premises, you'll be treated accordingly. I'll send your mommy the
bill for cleaning the rug.

Oh...I'm not a lawyer, crap-for-brains, nor have I claimed any
professional's expertise in law. I suspect you believe this because you
have found yet another person with a first and last name similar to mine
who either is a lawyer or has written something that pertains to the law.

Is that it, crap-for-brains? I'll bet it is. So, at the same time you
think I'm a 76-year-old print shop retiree living in Gambrills, I'm also
a published expert on domestic law?

You really truly are as dumb as a post.

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:44:38 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:


Ah, the trap. Is *anything* worth the life of even *one* American
soldier?


Depends on the soldier, eh? I mean, if you were ordered up a tree to
rescue someone's cat, and the cat survived and you didn't, well, it
would be worth it.*


*This assumes you were sober enough to climb the tree and had the upper
body strength...and I wouldn't bet on either.

It's not about cats, Harry. It's about integrity, that which your
character lacks.

You're a ****ing liar, Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:56:08 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Tuuuk wrote:


Tell me krause,,, when you report all your crap to the sheriff down the
way,, the good old fellow, nice guy, the one who screens your visitors,, the
picnickers,,, does he advise you to make threats including your loaded shot
guns you have strategically placed around the house? I mean does he suggest
it a good idea to invite someone then tell them you will blow them dead??
wouldn't that be some type of premeditated murder?? krause,,, and you an
expert in law?? hmmmmmmm


Remember, crap-for-brains, you've been warned, you've acknowledged the
warnings, and you know that if you step onto my property, you'll be
trespassing, and, since you have made threats, if you enter my house you
will be treated as a home invader.

You weren't invited here. You were told to stay away. If you show up
here, at the very least, it will be unpleasant for you. If you invade
the premises, you'll be treated accordingly. I'll send your mommy the
bill for cleaning the rug.

Oh...I'm not a lawyer, crap-for-brains, nor have I claimed any
professional's expertise in law. I suspect you believe this because you
have found yet another person with a first and last name similar to mine
who either is a lawyer or has written something that pertains to the law.

Is that it, crap-for-brains? I'll bet it is. So, at the same time you
think I'm a 76-year-old print shop retiree living in Gambrills, I'm also
a published expert on domestic law?

You really truly are as dumb as a post.

I've got a dog that's pretty dumb. No problem though, 'cause it's not
about dumbness, Harry, but about your total lack of anything remotely
like integrity.

To keep it simple, Harry, you are a ****ing liar.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:00:55 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:44:38 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:


Ah, the trap. Is *anything* worth the life of even *one* American
soldier?


Depends on the soldier, eh? I mean, if you were ordered up a tree to
rescue someone's cat, and the cat survived and you didn't, well, it
would be worth it.*


*This assumes you were sober enough to climb the tree and had the upper
body strength...and I wouldn't bet on either.


It's not about cats, Harry. It's about integrity, that which your
character lacks.

You're a ****ing liar, Krause.

John H



Poor Herring. Mustered out of the army, drunk, unemployable except as a
babysitter for the school board, and permanently ****ed off because of
his lot in life.

Not babysitting, Krause, lying. Lying about yourself or lying about
others, it's all the same. You are a liar. I shouldn't say '****ing'
'cause you probably can't. Despicable works though.

You're a despicable liar, Mr. Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

JimH feigned innocence, depending upon what the definition of "is" is,
with the following weak remark:

Remind me again where I said *you* said these things.

**********************


Basic English class for JimH.

1. You identified a group. This group specifically consisted of myself
and Harry Krause, and perhaps other by implication.

2. You then continued with "These people said..........."

If you still don't get it, never mind. It's like hollering down a well.

wrote in message
oups.com...
JimH feigned innocence, depending upon what the definition of "is" is,
with the following weak remark:

Remind me again where I said *you* said these things.

**********************


Basic English class for JimH.

1. You identified a group. This group specifically consisted of myself
and Harry Krause, and perhaps other by implication.

2. You then continued with "These people said..........."

If you still don't get it, never mind. It's like hollering down a well.


Sorry Chuck, even with your need to throw insults at me you are still wrong.
I never said *you* said those things.

Let me play you a line from a popular song from the '80's as it seems to
fit.

"You're so vain...you probably think this song is about you....."

Get a life already. Your whining is almost deafening.

wrote in message
oups.com...
JimH feigned innocence, depending upon what the definition of "is" is,
with the following weak remark:

Remind me again where I said *you* said these things.

**********************


Basic English class for JimH.

1. You identified a group. This group specifically consisted of myself
and Harry Krause, and perhaps other by implication.

2. You then continued with "These people said..........."

If you still don't get it, never mind. It's like hollering down a well.


What's the matter Chuckie, you don't like being painted with a broad brush?

wrote in message
oups.com...
JimH feigned innocence, depending upon what the definition of "is" is,
with the following weak remark:

Remind me again where I said *you* said these things.

**********************


Basic English class for JimH.

1. You identified a group. This group specifically consisted of myself
and Harry Krause, and perhaps other by implication.

2. You then continued with "These people said..........."

If you still don't get it, never mind. It's like hollering down a well.


Here is a link that might start you on the right track Chuck. Some useful
ideas for you.

http://shorl.com/bonuderugroni

JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
JimH feigned innocence, depending upon what the definition of "is"
is,
with the following weak remark:

Remind me again where I said *you* said these things.

**********************


Basic English class for JimH.

1. You identified a group. This group specifically consisted of
myself
and Harry Krause, and perhaps other by implication.

2. You then continued with "These people said..........."

If you still don't get it, never mind. It's like hollering down a
well.


Sorry Chuck, even with your need to throw insults at me you are still
wrong.
I never said *you* said those things.

Let me play you a line from a popular song from the '80's as it seems
to
fit.

"You're so vain...you probably think this song is about you....."

Get a life already. Your whining is almost deafening.
Holy Cow!!!! Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!!!!!