![]() |
Note to boaters in NY harbor
those of you familiar with raritan bay probably know that the earle
naval weapons station is a security zone. it used to be permissible to transit this zone as long as you kept moving. that is no longer the case. if you are LUCKY, entering this zone for any reason will just result in your arrest and a $27,500 fine from the USCG. if you're UNLUCKY, you will meet up with the security force from earle. they are navy, not CG. they are instructed to treat any boats violating the security zone as hostile, and to act accordingly. they will use the rules of engagement, not 'use of force' policies that police forces and CG units use. your next of kin will be notified in due course. in addition, it is now illegal to photograph CG, and navy installations, as well as power plants, oil refineries, etc. there have been instances of trespassers 'staging' photo sessions with people posing in the foreground while someone is actually taking photos of installations in the background. if you see someone taking photos of restricted areas, report them immediately to local or federal authorities. --------------------------- to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com" and enter 'wf3h' in the field |
Note to boaters in NY harbor
jeesus dude, NWS Earle area is frickin' SHALLOW unless you are directly in the
channel. Why in the hell are you anywhere near NWS Earle? Are you in a canoe? those of you familiar with raritan bay probably know that the earle naval weapons station is a security zone. it used to be permissible to transit this zone as long as you kept moving. that is no longer the case. if you are LUCKY, entering this zone for any reason will just result in your arrest and a $27,500 fine from the USCG. if you're UNLUCKY, you will meet up with the security force from earle. they are navy, not CG. they are instructed to treat any boats violating the security zone as hostile, and to act accordingly. they will use the rules of engagement, not 'use of force' policies that police forces and CG units use. your next of kin will be notified in due course. in addition, it is now illegal to photograph CG, and navy installations, as well as power plants, oil refineries, etc. there have been instances of trespassers 'staging' photo sessions with people posing in the foreground while someone is actually taking photos of installations in the background. if you see someone taking photos of restricted areas, report them immediately to local or federal authorities. --------------------------- to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com" and enter 'wf3h' in the field |
Note to boaters in NY harbor
|
Note to boaters in NY harbor
Bob wrote:
those of you familiar with raritan bay probably know that the earle naval weapons station is a security zone. it used to be permissible to transit this zone as long as you kept moving. that is no longer the case. if you are LUCKY, entering this zone for any reason will just result in your arrest and a $27,500 fine from the USCG. if you're UNLUCKY, you will meet up with the security force from earle. they are navy, not CG. they are instructed to treat any boats violating the security zone as hostile, and to act accordingly. Another place to be careful of is the Sunny Point military depot just south of Wilmington NC. The ICW comes out of Snow's Cut into the Cape Fear River just above Sunny Point, and the channel markers can be confusing. The security team patrols this area and is pro-active in directing boats down the river instead of into the Sunny Point channel. It can be helpful but I have seen them get very unfriendly very fast with skippers who are confused about the channels. in addition, it is now illegal to photograph CG, and navy installations, as well as power plants, oil refineries, etc. there have been instances of trespassers 'staging' photo sessions with people posing in the foreground while someone is actually taking photos of installations in the background. if you see someone taking photos of restricted areas, report them immediately to local or federal authorities. Now that is spooky. Anything at all could be forbidden... usually governments that forbid taking pictures are outright dictatorships... next thing you know, Ashcroft will declare that voting has been suspended until further notice, due to terrorist threats. DSK |
Note to boaters in NY harbor
DSK wrote:
Now that is spooky. Anything at all could be forbidden... usually governments that forbid taking pictures are outright dictatorships... next thing you know, Ashcroft will declare that voting has been suspended until further notice, due to terrorist threats. Not just "usually" it is a glaring red flag indicating a totalitarian regime. We are not far away already. I would love to see the law that prohibits taking photographs though, it smacks more of Bu****e wishful thinking than practice, at least for now. Yeah, look for "internal passports" and, if the polls dictate it, something "happening" just before the election that requires martial law and a postponement of elections. Bush and his handlers are taking us into dark waters. Rick |
Note to boaters in NY harbor
Rick wrote:
DSK wrote: Now that is spooky. Anything at all could be forbidden... usually governments that forbid taking pictures are outright dictatorships... next thing you know, Ashcroft will declare that voting has been suspended until further notice, due to terrorist threats. Not just "usually" it is a glaring red flag indicating a totalitarian regime. We are not far away already. I would love to see the law that prohibits taking photographs though, it smacks more of Bu****e wishful thinking than practice, at least for now. Yeah, look for "internal passports" and, if the polls dictate it, something "happening" just before the election that requires martial law and a postponement of elections. Bush and his handlers are taking us into dark waters. Rick An historian from Spain I met recently told me the Bush Administration reminded him very much of the fascist Franco regime that held his homeland by the throat for so many years. Here are some thoughts from one of the fathers of fascism. See if you notice any parallels between what Mussolini described and what is happening now in the United States: Fascism, the more it considers and observes the future and the development of humanity quite apart from political considerations of the moment, believes neither in the possibility nor the utility of perpetual peace. It thus repudiates the doctrine of Pacifism -- born of a renunciation of the struggle and an act of cowardice in the face of sacrifice. War alone brings up to its highest tension all human energy and puts the stamp of nobility upon the peoples who have courage to meet it. All other trials are substitutes, which never really put men into the position where they have to make the great decision -- the alternative of life or death.... (Ah, yes...war alone...a prestatement of the "Bush Doctrine") ....The Fascist accepts life and loves it, knowing nothing of and despising suicide: he rather conceives of life as duty and struggle and conquest, but above all for others -- those who are at hand and those who are far distant, contemporaries, and those who will come after... (Getting nervous yet?) ....Fascism combats the whole complex system of democratic ideology, and repudiates it, whether in its theoretical premises or in its practical application. Fascism denies that the majority, by the simple fact that it is a majority, can direct human society; it denies that numbers alone can govern by means of a periodical consultation, and it affirms the immutable, beneficial, and fruitful inequality of mankind, which can never be permanently leveled through the mere operation of a mechanical process such as universal suffrage.... (Well?) ....Fascism denies, in democracy, the absur[d] conventional untruth of political equality dressed out in the garb of collective irresponsibility, and the myth of "happiness" and indefinite progress.... ....Given that the nineteenth century was the century of Socialism, of Liberalism, and of Democracy, it does not necessarily follow that the twentieth century must also be a century of Socialism, Liberalism and Democracy: political doctrines pass, but humanity remains, and it may rather be expected that this will be a century of authority...a century of Fascism. For if the nineteenth century was a century of individualism it may be expected that this will be the century of collectivism and hence the century of the State.... (A Century of Authority, from the Republican right-wing, no less) The foundation of Fascism is the conception of the State, its character, its duty, and its aim. Fascism conceives of the State as an absolute, in comparison with which all individuals or groups are relative, only to be conceived of in their relation to the State. (John Ashcroft uber alles...) The conception of the Liberal State is not that of a directing force, guiding the play and development, both material and spiritual, of a collective body, but merely a force limited to the function of recording results: on the other hand, the Fascist State is itself conscious and has itself a will and a personality -- thus it may be called the "ethic" State.... (Ah, yes...the "ethic" state...) ....The Fascist State organizes the nation, but leaves a sufficient margin of liberty to the individual; the latter is deprived of all useless and possibly harmful freedom, but retains what is essential; the deciding power in this question cannot be the individual, but the State alone.... (Are we under orange alert? May we read and carry our almanacs again?) ....For Fascism, the growth of empire, that is to say the expansion of the nation, is an essential manifestation of vitality, and its opposite a sign of decadence. (Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria(?), the Moon...) Peoples which are rising, or rising again after a period of decadence, are always imperialist; and renunciation is a sign of decay and of death. Fascism is the doctrine best adapted to represent the tendencies and the aspirations of a people, like the people of Italy, who are rising again after many centuries of abasement and foreign servitude. But empire demands discipline, the coordination of all forces and a deeply felt sense of duty and sacrifice: this fact explains many aspects of the practical working of the regime, the character of many forces in the State, and the necessarily severe measures which must be taken against those who would oppose this spontaneous and inevitable movement of Italy in the twentieth century, and would oppose it by recalling the outworn ideology of the nineteenth century - repudiated wheresoever there has been the courage to undertake great experiments of social and political transformation; for never before has the nation stood more in need of authority, of direction and order. (Severe measures, indeed...) If every age has its own characteristic doctrine, there are a thousand signs which point to Fascism as the characteristic doctrine of our time. For if a doctrine must be a living thing, this is proved by the fact that Fascism has created a living faith; and that this faith is very powerful in the minds of men is demonstrated by those who have suffered and died for it. (We're becoming what we fought in World War II. ) -- Email sent to is never read. |
Note to boaters in NY harbor
Harry Krause wrote:
Some very chilling words that have come back to live in a very different America. (We're becoming what we fought in World War II. ) I have thought that for years since living, working, and traveling in Europe for a period of years in the 1970's. I always hoped and halfway believed it would not come so quickly and so blatantly as it has. We need only read the patriotic literature of the 1940's and 50's to see just how inverted our political and social rhetoric has become. When the strength of our national ego is built on military adventure at the cost of domestic health and security we have become our fathers' enemies. Rick |
Note to boaters in NY harbor
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 03:13:46 +0000, Rick wrote:
Yeah, look for "internal passports" and, if the polls dictate it, something "happening" just before the election that requires martial law and a postponement of elections. Bush and his handlers are taking us into dark waters. I don't buy it. I'm not saying that there are not elements in this administration that are at least bordering on fascism, and a percentage of the population that would prefer a tyrant, but this country is remarkably resilient. I remember the 60/70s, race riots, mass demonstrations, citizens murdered. We survived that period of time, we will also survive this period of time. |
Note to boaters in NY harbor
I don't buy it. I'm not saying that there are not elements in this
administration that are at least bordering on fascism, and a percentage of the population that would prefer a tyrant, but this country is remarkably resilient. I remember the 60/70s, race riots, mass demonstrations, citizens murdered. We survived that period of time, we will also survive this period of time. I'm with that. :-) May the Bush administration be viewed by history as the period of time when America tried, and then rejeceted, the arch-conservative philosophy. |
Note to boaters in NY harbor
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:40:09 +0000, Gould 0738 wrote:
May the Bush administration be viewed by history as the period of time when America tried, and then rejeceted, the arch-conservative philosophy. Not *the* period, *a* period of time, there was also the time the Duponts and Morgans planned a coup against Roosevelt. We survived that too. http://www.webcom.com/ctka/pr399-fdr.html |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com