![]() |
"NOYB" wrote in message .net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message .net... "thunder" wrote in message ... On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:42:10 +0000, Calif Bill wrote: I will answer yours even though you avoid answering mine. Build lots of nuclear power plants. Same thing we should be doing now. Wind and solar are not efficient enough to supply the countries needs. Then we could save the oil for the items that require them. And energy is not the only use of petroleum. I would agree that nuclear energy has an important role in our future, but we must be careful. Switching from one unsustainable energy source to another is not the answer. To Nuclear energy is not unsustainable. It takes a miniscule amount of nuclear material (U-233, U-235, and Pu-239) to create a sustainable fissile reaction. Mind if we bury the waste in your town? Once we pump all of the oil out of the ground in the Middle East, we can pump it underground in the vacant caves. Zzzzzzzzzzzz.................. Bait someone else. |
"Don White" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message . net... Remove the other nations competing for the oil from the face of the map. That should free up another 5 decades of the stuff. ......or..if the super wasteful US was removed from the equation...the supply might last another millennium. Hey....let's get sumthin straight there, Canadian boy. Everyone's got a god-given right to own a HUMV, even if we have no family and never carry anything but 3 bags of groceries. Sez so right thar in the bible. |
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... Hey....let's get sumthin straight there, Canadian boy. Everyone's got a god-given right to own a HUMV, even if we have no family and never carry anything but 3 bags of groceries. Sez so right thar in the bible. That's a very good place to start. people should require a 'special' license to operate anything above a compact car or small pickup. I feel that gasoline should be rationed to encourage less waste. Let's say..the first 20 gallons a week at a affordable price...increasing to double that for anything over..(a form of luxury tax). |
"Don White" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... Hey....let's get sumthin straight there, Canadian boy. Everyone's got a god-given right to own a HUMV, even if we have no family and never carry anything but 3 bags of groceries. Sez so right thar in the bible. That's a very good place to start. people should require a 'special' license to operate anything above a compact car or small pickup. I feel that gasoline should be rationed to encourage less waste. Let's say..the first 20 gallons a week at a affordable price...increasing to double that for anything over..(a form of luxury tax). Gawd, am I glad I live in America where I have the right to buy whatever vehicle I want and use as much gas as I want to. Gotta luv those HumVees and 59' Cadillacs. |
"Don White" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... Hey....let's get sumthin straight there, Canadian boy. Everyone's got a god-given right to own a HUMV, even if we have no family and never carry anything but 3 bags of groceries. Sez so right thar in the bible. That's a very good place to start. people should require a 'special' license to operate anything above a compact car or small pickup. I feel that gasoline should be rationed to encourage less waste. Let's say..the first 20 gallons a week at a affordable price...increasing to double that for anything over..(a form of luxury tax). Are you going to take away Eisboch's and his wife's fuel guzzling boats too? Are you going to limit the amount of gas for folks that rely on their car for business use? Should air travel be banned? Should we all be forced to buy MiniCoopers? Should we limit the amount of electricity we can use? Electric power plants burn plenty of fuel. Better not buy that 5 hp Honda gas snowblower....you will be using up *your* allotment of gas.;-) |
"JimH" wrote in message ... Gawd, am I glad I live in America where I have the right to buy whatever vehicle I want and use as much gas as I want to. Gotta luv those HumVees and 59' Cadillacs. That's the good thing about our age. We'll probably be 6 feet under by the time the crisis hits. |
"P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "Calif Bill" wrote in message ink.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message .net... "thunder" wrote in message ... On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:42:10 +0000, Calif Bill wrote: I will answer yours even though you avoid answering mine. Build lots of nuclear power plants. Same thing we should be doing now. Wind and solar are not efficient enough to supply the countries needs. Then we could save the oil for the items that require them. And energy is not the only use of petroleum. I would agree that nuclear energy has an important role in our future, but we must be careful. Switching from one unsustainable energy source to another is not the answer. To Nuclear energy is not unsustainable. It takes a miniscule amount of nuclear material (U-233, U-235, and Pu-239) to create a sustainable fissile reaction. Mind if we bury the waste in your town? There are places in the US where we can safely bury the waste. As to high level waste, there is really very little of it. As to radiation pollution, coal mining and burning releases exponentially more radiation than Nuclear plants. There are stable mountains in Nevada, Salt Mines in several other states. Encased in lead and glass, makes for a stable storage package. If you are going to live within the constraints of the energy available to us with out fission or fusion, then figure about 1/2 the people on earth will have to leave. Oil and natural gas is also used for plastic, medicine, fertilizer outside the energy area. Thunder asked about the Olduvai Theory, is a theory same as a lot of theories. Is not a given or provable. There is going to be a major upheaval in the world as oil production decreases. Middle East will be a violent place, and we will have to fend them off. They get their food and manufactured goods from the West and East now. But with no oil money, there are going to have to try to take over arable lands outside their area. They have not done well in the last 2000 years since they started as the cradle of civilization, been going downhill since. They could learn from the Israelis on how to produce food in less than ideal conditions and with brackish water. But religion and extremists prevent that. 50-100 years from now will be very interesting times for mankind. Hope they survive. The end of oil reservees in the near future has been predicted for years. THe fact is that there are fstill plenty of sources that are currnetly not economical to develop. As the readily available sources become scarcer, those known deposits will become economically viable, as will alternate energy sources.......synthetics, etc. Aren't we coming up on "the" 30 years. Thirty years of oil left in the ground and once it is gone we will have used it all up yet. |
"Don White" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... Hey....let's get sumthin straight there, Canadian boy. Everyone's got a god-given right to own a HUMV, even if we have no family and never carry anything but 3 bags of groceries. Sez so right thar in the bible. That's a very good place to start. people should require a 'special' license to operate anything above a compact car or small pickup. I feel that gasoline should be rationed to encourage less waste. Let's say..the first 20 gallons a week at a affordable price...increasing to double that for anything over..(a form of luxury tax). Probably a DINK (at least before retiring) with no decent sized boat to tow. |
"JimH" wrote in message
... Are you going to limit the amount of gas for folks that rely on their car for business use? Probably not, but how about the moron who buys a full-size diesel pickup and adds 1100 lbs of chrome accessories, but tows nothing, hauls nothing, and doesn't need the truck for work in any way, shape or form. Just wants it because the vertical back window shows off his collection of 100 decals he bought at state fairs. |
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "JimH" wrote in message ... Are you going to limit the amount of gas for folks that rely on their car for business use? Probably not, but how about the moron who buys a full-size diesel pickup and adds 1100 lbs of chrome accessories, but tows nothing, hauls nothing, and doesn't need the truck for work in any way, shape or form. Just wants it because the vertical back window shows off his collection of 100 decals he bought at state fairs. IT is his truck. And he probably uses less fuel than if he towed a boat with it. More fuel while towing and even more fuel in the boat. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com