"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
Doug Kanter wrote:
You know what's so pathetic about this subject? It was obvious to any
thinking person that troops would have to be moved from one campaign to
the other. If Bush a real leader, he wouldn't have waited until the press
was nipping at his heels to discuss this subject. No. He would've been
proactive and told the country what was going on up front, and explained
the reasoning behind it.

Doesn't matter. Even when it became glaringly obvious that George Bush Jr
doesn't have a clue, and cannot justify *any* of "his" policies and
actions in office, and the damage done by his administration is also made
glaringly obvious, he still won the election. After all, it's a popularity
contest and President Bush is a "likeable guy."

After his first election, I heard a news reporter on the radio, interviewing
young people around Columbia University, if I recall. She was wondering who
they voted for, and why. I think the theme of the story was how politically
astute the new crop of voters were. One female student responded "I voted
for Bush cause...like....they both...like seemed the same to be, but he has
cute ears".

puke