On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:07:51 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Dave Hall wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 08:21:29 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


Sex belongs in the privacy of consenting adult's bedrooms. Not on the
pages of the news, the prime time TV channels, or in "flash and
glitter" magazines.


You should have explained that to the GOP during the Clinton years.


Sigh. The clueless liberal who still thinks the whole Clinton scandal
was about sex. It was about PERJURY.


Dave

No, it wasn't. The *entire* anti-Clinton tirade was about GOP efforts to
cripple Clinton's presidency any way it could.

That may have been the initial driving force. But the fact that they
DID find something, and he LIED about it is a matter of public record.

Dave

On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:23:10 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 08:21:29 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


Sex belongs in the privacy of consenting adult's bedrooms. Not on the
pages of the news, the prime time TV channels, or in "flash and
glitter" magazines.


You should have explained that to the GOP during the Clinton years.

Sigh. The clueless liberal who still thinks the whole Clinton scandal
was about sex. It was about PERJURY.


Dave

Ask 100 people what one word they remember foremost from that period of
time. You know the word. It's a dirty one. Your elected officials turned it
into front page news.


What those 100 people say is irrelevant. The facts are that he was
impeached for the crime of perjury.

Dave

On 06 Jan 2005 23:03:53 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

Sigh. The clueless liberal who still thinks the whole Clinton scandal
was about sex. It was about PERJURY.


Dave

Sigh. Another clueless right winger who fails to realize there would have been
no perjury if the Republican Congress hadn't spent $80-million taxpayer dollars
investigating Clinton's sex life in the first place.

If you recall, the whole reason his sex life was being investigated at
all was due to credible allegations of sexual harassment by Paula
Jones, with supporting statements from Kathleen Willey, and Gennifer
Flowers. Susan McDougal went to prison rather than incriminate
Clinton. There was plenty of stuff there. Not just a "big deal"
extramarital affair.


A married mad lied about an affair. Not news. Dumb schlitz did it under oath...

That was the only thing he didn't effectively cover up.

Dave

On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:31:00 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Sigh. The clueless liberal who still thinks the whole Clinton scandal
was about sex. It was about PERJURY.


Dave

Sigh. Another clueless right winger ........

Why the need to insult Dave just because he disagrees with you?

Your first sentence in your reply to Dave is exactly what you often
complain about...a personal attack.

Will the real Chuck please stand up?


Why don't you respond to the meat of what Chuck wrote? Dave can take care of
himself.


Why thank you Doug, for the words of endorsement. ;-)

Dave

On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:53:12 -0500, DSK wrote:

Calif Bill wrote:
You forget or ignore that Clinton was not being investigated for perjury, he
and President Hillary were being investigated for fraud!

And you conveniently forget that after spending ~ $80 million and 6+
years investigating, they found nothing prosecutable.

All that proves is that Clinton was fairly good at covering his
tracks. Not that there was nothing actually wrong.

Dave

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:23:10 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 08:21:29 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


Sex belongs in the privacy of consenting adult's bedrooms. Not on the
pages of the news, the prime time TV channels, or in "flash and
glitter" magazines.


You should have explained that to the GOP during the Clinton years.

Sigh. The clueless liberal who still thinks the whole Clinton scandal
was about sex. It was about PERJURY.


Dave

Ask 100 people what one word they remember foremost from that period of
time. You know the word. It's a dirty one. Your elected officials turned
it
into front page news.


What those 100 people say is irrelevant. The facts are that he was
impeached for the crime of perjury.

Dave


Oh no. It's totally relevant, since it's a response to your comment about
how sex does not belong in the news or on prime time TV. Your boys PUT it
there, and they did so with full intent.

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:44:27 -0500, DSK wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:
Why was there a "cleanup" team put in place during Clinton's first run for
President?


Why are you so concerned about it, 12 years later?

Because it establishes precedent and provides perspective.


Isn't it more important that President Bush *still* hasn't gotten Osama
Bin Laden?

That could change at any time. But then again, Clinton had his chance
to nab OBL, but chose not to......

Dave

Bert Robbins wrote:
... Hillary is also a crook!


You are totally convinced of that, despite an $80 million prosecution
effort could find *nothing* serious enough to prefer charges.

In other words, you're full of nonsense.


Isn't it more important that President Bush *still* hasn't gotten Osama
Bin Laden?


I don't care if Pres. Bush ever gets Osama Bin Laden.

I want our military forces to chase down any and all terrorists around the
world and kill them. Terrorism is a fight that we will be involved in
forever.

More nonsense. Osama Bin Laden perpetrated the most horrific & deadly
terrorist attack on the U.S. in all history. President Bush was warned
about him and his cabinet given thick folders of intel on OBL's
operation. But they had other priorities.

You've swallowed all the malarkey whole, and are just spitting it back
up. It makes no sense and following such stupid policies cannot lead to
success.

DSK

Dave Hall wrote:
You are convinced that Bush is guilty guilty guilty, but you have no
proof as to what he is guilty of.

Quote *one* post of mine where I said President Bush is guilty of
anything...

Other than lying (which is proven by his own public statements), such as
starting a war under false pretenses. Of course, he's unquestionably
guilty of dodging service in Viet Nam, of DWI, and of various kinds of
fiscal malfeasance, all of which he's been found guilty of by our legal
system, and let slide because of his family connections & wealth.



You've often claimed to be a conservative, yet you are constantly
defending liberals

Not at all. I am pointing out the stupidity of many people who claim to
be "conservative" but are nothing other than hate-spewing morons.

Besides, President Clinton was a centrist, a moderate. That is one of
the keys to his success.

DSK

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...


Another purveyor of double standards......


Yep. You and I.