![]() |
OT--Good start for the New Year
Unemployment Claims Lowest Since Bush Became President
By Jimmy Moore Talon News January 1, 2004 Unemployment claims dropped last week to the lowest level since George W. Bush was inaugurated president, according to the latest jobless benefits report released by the Labor Department on Wednesday. New unemployment insurance requests fell to 339,000 for the week ending December 27. Jobless claims have not been this low since January 20, 2001, the day President Bush was sworn into office as president of the United States. Economists credit this good news in the job market to an increase in consumer confidence in the U.S. economy. They also say that business owners have ceased the layoffs and are beginning to hire new workers again as the economy continues to get better. Also, businesses are investing more capital in the economy, which will help the economy recover even faster. In fact, a recent Conference Board report estimates that more than one million new jobs will be created in 2004 as unemployment continues to fall significantly. Ken Mayland, president of ClearView Economics, says he sees job creation ready to explode. "There is clearly reason for optimism that we are getting on a significant job-generation track," he told the Associated Press. Talon News reported on a recent AP poll that found there to be optimism by the American people about the job market in 2004. The poll showed that 57 percent are either as confident or more confident in their job security than they were six months ago while only 42 percent say they are less confident. Most economic experts have been confounded by the noticeable fall in unemployment benefit claims over the past few months, which have been substantially better than any of them predicted. In fact, jobless claims have been below the 400,000 mark for 13 weeks in a row. Most economists view unemployment insurance claims below the 400,000 mark as a sign of a stable and strengthening job market. Talon News has reported on the steady decline in jobless claims since last spring. In mid-April, new jobless claims grew to 459,000, but the decline has been clearly evident ever since. Even Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan commented recently that he believes the decline in the job market has stabilized. Some credit the increased confidence in the economy to the tax cuts passed by Congress and signed into law by President Bush last year. Unemployment, which was as high as 6.4 percent over last summer, fell to 5.9 percent by the end of 2003. However, economists have long contended that the job market is the slowest part of the economy to recover after a recession. Regardless, Talon News has previously reported the economy grew at an astounding 8.2 percent in the third quarter, which was the best since the Reagan administration. And although the fourth quarter is not expected to be that high, the growth rate will likely be close to 5 percent and would propel the economy forward in the new year. A USA Today survey of 57 economists recently predicted 2004 will be the best year for growth in the American economy in a decade and that unemployment will dip to 5.5 percent. Additionally, these economists were unanimous in their belief that Bush will be reelected in 2004 because of the improvements in the economy and the job market. |
OT--Good start for the New Year
NOYB wrote:
Unemployment Claims Lowest Since Bush Became President By Jimmy Moore Talon News January 1, 2004 Unemployment claims dropped last week to the lowest level since George W. Bush was inaugurated president, according to the latest jobless benefits report released by the Labor Department on Wednesday. New unemployment insurance requests fell to 339,000 for the week ending December 27. Jobless claims have not been this low since January 20, 2001, the day President Bush was sworn into office as president of the United States. What's the real count of those still unemployed, those who are underemployed and those who've given up? Biggest numbers since the 1930s, I'd bet. The Bush Economy is a failure. Just like its namesake. -- Email sent to is never read. |
OT--Good start for the New Year
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: Unemployment Claims Lowest Since Bush Became President By Jimmy Moore Talon News January 1, 2004 Unemployment claims dropped last week to the lowest level since George W. Bush was inaugurated president, according to the latest jobless benefits report released by the Labor Department on Wednesday. New unemployment insurance requests fell to 339,000 for the week ending December 27. Jobless claims have not been this low since January 20, 2001, the day President Bush was sworn into office as president of the United States. What's the real count of those still unemployed, those who are underemployed and those who've given up? Biggest numbers since the 1930s, I'd bet. The Bush Economy is a failure. Just like its namesake. Or... the dems are a failure and this time next year there will not be many in office! Good news for America. Bob 4 more Jr. and 8 Jeb Can Senior run again? |
OT--Good start for the New Year
Can Senior run again?
Yes That good to hear. I've always admired George H.W. Bush. He was good to the Coast Guard when I was on active duty. The "coasties" always helped him out in Kennebunkport whenever he asked. Butch Ammon |
OT--Good start for the New Year
"Robert White" wrote in message news:H1FJb.2581 Can Senior run again? Yes |
OT--Good start for the New Year
"Butch Ammon" wrote in message That good to hear. Of course, 41 would be eighty-four in '08. Hardly likely. |
OT--Good start for the New Year
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... What's the real count of those still unemployed, those who are underemployed and those who've given up? Biggest numbers since the 1930s, I'd bet. The Bush Economy is a failure. Just like its namesake. What the heck is "underemployed?" And, why are you posting through a German news server? Bert |
OT--Good start for the New Year
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 19:57:27 -0500, "Bert Robbins"
wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... What's the real count of those still unemployed, those who are underemployed and those who've given up? Biggest numbers since the 1930s, I'd bet. The Bush Economy is a failure. Just like its namesake. What the heck is "underemployed?" And, why are you posting through a German news server? The Berlin server is probably the best text only free news server on the planet hands down. No binaries, the retention is excellant and they are right on top of posts - almost no delay. It's a good server. Later, Tom S. Woodstock, CT ---------- "I object to fishing tournaments less for what they do to fish than what they do to fishermen." Ted Williams - 1964 |
OT--Good start for the New Year
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 18:37:16 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: Unemployment Claims Lowest Since Bush Became President By Jimmy Moore Talon News January 1, 2004 Unemployment claims dropped last week to the lowest level since George W. Bush was inaugurated president, according to the latest jobless benefits report released by the Labor Department on Wednesday. Please have your polyana-ish predictors help our local economy.... we need the help..... in 1Q 2004 predictions 13% will hire new workers (there's your good figures to quote) and 23% will lay off..... 2:42 PM EST Wednesday Triad's unemployment rate rises in November The unemployment rate for the eight-county Triad Metropolitan Statistical Area was 6 percent in November, up from 5.8 percent in October, according to statistics released Wednesday by the state's Employment Security Commission. In all, rates rose in 86 of the 100 North Carolina counties, though ESC Chairman Harry Payne Jr. said he wasn't worried by the monthly results. "Minor monthly fluctuations in the unemployment rates are not unusual," he said. "In fact, economic trends still point the way of modest employment growth across our state." The state's unemployment rate was 6.2 percent in November, up from 6.1 percent in October. The Charlotte metro area had a 6.9 percent unemployment rate, up from 6.6 percent in October, while the Raleigh/Durham area posted a November unemployment rate of 4.3 percent, up from 4.1 percent in October. Guilford County remained one of the counties receiving the most unemployment insurance benefits, ranking third behind Mecklenburg and Wake counties. Guilford residents received $4.5 million in unemployment benefits in November, the ESC said. This was despite the fact that the unemployment rate in Guilford County actually decreased in the last month. Here's a county-by-county breakdown of November unemployment rates in the 12-county greater Triad compared to October rates: Alamance: 6.7 percent, up from 6.4 percent; Caswell: 8.4 percent, down from 8.5 percent; Davidson: 8.2 percent, up from 7.5 percent; Davie: 5.8 percent, up from 5 percent; Forsyth: 5.3 percent, up from 4.9 percent; Guilford: 5.8 percent, down from 6 percent; Montgomery: 8.8 percent, up from 8.3 percent; Randolph: 5.5 percent, up from 5.2 percent; Rockingham: 10.2 percent, up from 9.9 percent; Stokes: 6.1 percent, up from 5.5 percent; Surry: 7.7 percent, up from 7.2 percent; Yadkin: 5.9 percent, up from 5.7 percent. Financial services tanks... http://triad.bizjournals.com/triad/s...22/story1.html and this is our best effort to try and stem the tide...... http://triad.bizjournals.com/triad/s...08/daily4.html for workers displaced from NAFTA disasters that were making $25/hr now hoping to make from $7-$10/hr.... just to keep their heads above water. Note that not only do I have hourly employees in my classes, I have at least one ex-mill owner. In his words.... "I could have stayed in business if I wanted to move to China, but who the f*ck wants to live in China?" It might also help to point out that he and his partner in the (failed) knitting mill were naturalized citizens..... when America *was* a place people wanted to move to make a good living. Now, it is just better than China. Gack. (Oh, yeah, by the way...... the mill was successful from the late 60's until NAFTA.) Can you imagine the far reaching effects this has on a state's tax base? Your polyana-ish outlook on the economy distresses me...... but not as much as the human suffering does that was created by poor political/economic decisions. Quit posting half-truths... it does nothing for your credibility. You know what, Gene? I believe you've made up your mind that the economy stinks, and no statistic will convince you otherwise. The loss of manufacturing jobs has very little to do with the economy, and more to do with free trade in a world economy. In fact, during Bush's watch, and despite a recession, almost every jobs sector has had a net gain in jobs except for manufacturing.. That being said, manufacturing just posted its biggest month of growth in two decades. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp..._ge/economy_11 Manufacturing Sees Best Month in Decades Sat Jan 3, 1:35 PM ET By ADAM GELLER, AP Business Writer NEW YORK - The nation's manufacturing sector, thrashed by the recession and achingly slow to recover, finished 2003 with its most robust month of growth in two decades. The Institute for Supply Management reported Friday that its manufacturing index jumped to 66.2 in December from 62.8 the previous month, strong evidence that the economic turnaround continues to pick up steam. The new figure was the highest since December 1983 for a sector that has shed millions of jobs over the past three years. The reading, which marks the sixth consecutive month of expansion in manufacturing, was significantly higher than the 61 forecast by analysts. An index reading above 50 indicates expansion; one below 50 indicates that manufacturing activity is contracting. From March through June, the manufacturing index was below 50. Economists said the index shows that while the beleaguered factory sector still has much ground to make up, it is now firmly in recovery mode, helped along by low interest rates and a falling dollar that makes U.S.-produced goods cheaper overseas. "Manufacturing is really the last piece of the puzzle that is falling in place to produce broad-based, sustained economic growth," said Sung Won Sohn, chief economist with Wells Fargo & Co. in Minneapolis. The momentum is particularly evident in new orders to factories, said Norbert J. Ore, chairman of the institute's manufacturing business survey committee. A component index tracking new orders reached its highest level since 1950, rising to 77.6 in December from 73.7 in November, he said. "The strength in December's data provides significant encouragement for prospects in the first quarter of 2004," Ore said. An index measuring factory production also rose, to 73 from 68.3 in November. ISM's measure of factory employment rose to 55.5 from 51. Of the 20 industries making up the sector, 17 reported growth, led by instruments and photographic equipment, leather and furniture. Two industries, paper and chemicals, did not see a pickup in their business. ISM did not gather enough responses from the last remaining industry, petroleum, to gauge growth. "The month-over-month growth from November to December indicates a rapid recovery taking place in the sector, though there are still some businesses lagging and wondering when they will see the improvement that others are experiencing," Ore said. But economist Sohn noted that the growth comes in a sector that remains far from what it was a few years ago, with millions of jobs lost. Job growth at factories will continue to be limited in the coming year, with manufacturing continuing to shift overseas, he said. Stocks rose strongly following the release of the report, but major indexes ended the mixed after a bout of late-day selling. The Dow Jones industrial average ended 44 points lower at 10,410. Broader stock indicators were mixed. The Standard & Poor's 500 index fell 3 points to 1,108, while the Nasdaq composite index was up 3 points at 2,007 |
OT--Good start for the New Year
Bert Robbins wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... What's the real count of those still unemployed, those who are underemployed and those who've given up? Biggest numbers since the 1930s, I'd bet. The Bush Economy is a failure. Just like its namesake. What the heck is "underemployed?" Insufficiently employed, not used to the optimum capacity. Chiefly of persons or machinery. As when a top industrial designer is laid off, cannot find new work in his field, and is forced to accept a job doing whatever it is you do for a living. And, why are you posting through a German news server? Bert Because it is a great news server and offers portability. Why, does it bother you? If so, why? Why do you post via Comcast? -- Email sent to is never read. |
OT--Good start for the New Year
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Bert Robbins wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... What's the real count of those still unemployed, those who are underemployed and those who've given up? Biggest numbers since the 1930s, I'd bet. The Bush Economy is a failure. Just like its namesake. What the heck is "underemployed?" Insufficiently employed, not used to the optimum capacity. Chiefly of persons or machinery. As when a top industrial designer is laid off, cannot find new work in his field, and is forced to accept a job doing whatever it is you do for a living. Nobody "is forced to accept a job", you choose to accept a job. Professions and lines of work have come and gone throughout time and their is no guarantee that your particular profession or line of work will be in demand in the future. How many wheelwright jobs are there today? And, why are you posting through a German news server? Because it is a great news server and offers portability. Why, does it bother you? If so, why? Why do you post via Comcast? Just curious. Bert |
OT--Good start for the New Year
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 02:06:34 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: You know what, Gene? I believe you've made up your mind that the economy stinks, and no statistic will convince you otherwise. When you are peeing on my leg and telling me it is raining, I'm supposed to believe it is cloudy because somebody said there was a 98% chance of rain? You are stranger than I thought.... and I'd be a total idiot if I bought into your scenario. Geesh... The loss of manufacturing jobs has very little to do with the economy, and more to do with free trade in a world economy. That is the most incredible "fact" I have ever heard. You are simply not a rational person. There is nothing in this world that would indicate to you that this economy is not as good as the statistics you choose "proves" it to be. This is crazy. Are you kidding me? *EVERY* single economic indicator that we've used to gauge our economy for the last 50 or so years have been trending upward. What is crazy is that you choose to ignore *all* of them...and then try to prove that you know better than all of the indicators because of what's happening your small corner of the world. A few anecdotal stories don't paint the whole picture. I thought you were smarter than that. Look at the national overall trend of the major economic indicators...and then tell me the economy hasn't been improving for the last 4-6 months. |
OT--Good start for the New Year
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message Been boating lately? Sure. I put 45+ hours on the motor since the 17th of December...and went out fishing at least 6 times. How about you? Any boating stories to share? As crabby as you doomsayers have been lately about the strongly improving economy, I was afraid to depress you further with wonderful boating stories while you guys are in drydock for the winter...but here goes: Seas were the calmest I've ever seen them the past week. Red and gag grouper bite is tremendous, but you have to go out at least 20 miles before you start to consistently see keeper-size fish. Got my first "keeper" black tip shark yesterday (about 5 foot long). Took my 2 and 4 year old, and my mom out today and caught a half-dozen snapper. Is that better? |
OT--Good start for the New Year
On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 23:04:37 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 02:06:34 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: You know what, Gene? I believe you've made up your mind that the economy stinks, and no statistic will convince you otherwise. When you are peeing on my leg and telling me it is raining, I'm supposed to believe it is cloudy because somebody said there was a 98% chance of rain? You are stranger than I thought.... and I'd be a total idiot if I bought into your scenario. Geesh... The loss of manufacturing jobs has very little to do with the economy, and more to do with free trade in a world economy. That is the most incredible "fact" I have ever heard. You are simply not a rational person. There is nothing in this world that would indicate to you that this economy is not as good as the statistics you choose "proves" it to be. This is crazy. Are you kidding me? *EVERY* single economic indicator that we've used to gauge our economy for the last 50 or so years have been trending upward. What is crazy is that you choose to ignore *all* of them...and then try to prove that you know better than all of the indicators because of what's happening your small corner of the world. A few anecdotal stories don't paint the whole picture. I thought you were smarter than that. Look at the national overall trend of the major economic indicators...and then tell me the economy hasn't been improving for the last 4-6 months. Do you mean to tell me that when NBC interviews Billy Bob in West Virginia who says, " My brother has been out of work for six months and can't find nothin' to do...," that his statement doesn't represent the entire USA? NBC seems to imply that it does! What gives here? John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
OT--Good start for the New Year
On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 23:18:53 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message Been boating lately? Sure. I put 45+ hours on the motor since the 17th of December...and went out fishing at least 6 times. How about you? Any boating stories to share? As crabby as you doomsayers have been lately about the strongly improving economy, I was afraid to depress you further with wonderful boating stories while you guys are in drydock for the winter...but here goes: Seas were the calmest I've ever seen them the past week. Red and gag grouper bite is tremendous, but you have to go out at least 20 miles before you start to consistently see keeper-size fish. Got my first "keeper" black tip shark yesterday (about 5 foot long). Took my 2 and 4 year old, and my mom out today and caught a half-dozen snapper. Is that better? Where, dammit??? John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
OT--Good start for the New Year
"John H" wrote in message ... On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 23:04:37 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: "Gene Kearns" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 02:06:34 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: You know what, Gene? I believe you've made up your mind that the economy stinks, and no statistic will convince you otherwise. When you are peeing on my leg and telling me it is raining, I'm supposed to believe it is cloudy because somebody said there was a 98% chance of rain? You are stranger than I thought.... and I'd be a total idiot if I bought into your scenario. Geesh... The loss of manufacturing jobs has very little to do with the economy, and more to do with free trade in a world economy. That is the most incredible "fact" I have ever heard. You are simply not a rational person. There is nothing in this world that would indicate to you that this economy is not as good as the statistics you choose "proves" it to be. This is crazy. Are you kidding me? *EVERY* single economic indicator that we've used to gauge our economy for the last 50 or so years have been trending upward. What is crazy is that you choose to ignore *all* of them...and then try to prove that you know better than all of the indicators because of what's happening your small corner of the world. A few anecdotal stories don't paint the whole picture. I thought you were smarter than that. Look at the national overall trend of the major economic indicators...and then tell me the economy hasn't been improving for the last 4-6 months. Do you mean to tell me that when NBC interviews Billy Bob in West Virginia who says, " My brother has been out of work for six months and can't find nothin' to do...," that his statement doesn't represent the entire USA? NBC seems to imply that it does! And Gene just goes right along agreeing with Billy Bob, NBC, and Harry. |
OT--Good start for the New Year
"John H" wrote in message ... On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 23:18:53 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: "Gene Kearns" wrote in message Been boating lately? Sure. I put 45+ hours on the motor since the 17th of December...and went out fishing at least 6 times. How about you? Any boating stories to share? As crabby as you doomsayers have been lately about the strongly improving economy, I was afraid to depress you further with wonderful boating stories while you guys are in drydock for the winter...but here goes: Seas were the calmest I've ever seen them the past week. Red and gag grouper bite is tremendous, but you have to go out at least 20 miles before you start to consistently see keeper-size fish. Got my first "keeper" black tip shark yesterday (about 5 foot long). Took my 2 and 4 year old, and my mom out today and caught a half-dozen snapper. Is that better? Where, dammit??? Caught the black tip about 8 miles SW of Sanibel Island. Caught the red and gag grouper (over 70 of them total...but just one keeper) about 30 miles west of Ft. Myers Beach. Water temps had fallen to 60 degrees the week before Christmas, but were back up to 68 degrees yesterday. The fish are starting to come out of their lethargy. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com