![]() |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
Hi,
Thought I'd contribute to the on-topic stuff here... Last night, put down a cheque for $4500CDN as deposit on a Shiny New Universal M25XPB and matching Campbell Sailor 14x10 prop (dealer suggested 14x9, but others varied from 14x10 to 14x12 to 15x11 - I'm guessing he doesn't want me to load down the new engine). On Thursday, I pulled the old engine (it was a Good Engine...sniff!) and it's now sitting on the galley sole on 2x8's. I'm cutting the tops off the engine stringers to check for rot - only found a bit at the holes so far. Also looks like I'm in for a new exhaust system. The dealer didn't like the way Catalina did it, and after he showed me the Universal Way, I'm tempted to agree with him. For instance, there's no anti-siphon loop in the raw-water hose in the Catalina installation. So now...we wait (and mess with the stringers and exhaust...). New engine will arrive in about 3-4 weeks. Total cost including new prop and 14.5% taxes, less $1500 for the old engine: $8851.63CDN (for Harry: that's about $7K US) Lloyd Sumpter "Far Cove" Catalina 36 - currently engine-less |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
That's a fair amount of change.
Wonder what Karen would have charged you for one of her 'customized' diesel outboards? Lloyd Sumpter wrote in message ... Hi, Thought I'd contribute to the on-topic stuff here... Last night, put down a cheque for $4500CDN as deposit on a Shiny New Universal M25XPB and matching Campbell Sailor 14x10 prop (dealer suggested 14x9, but others varied from 14x10 to 14x12 to 15x11 - I'm guessing he doesn't want me to load down the new engine). On Thursday, I pulled the old engine (it was a Good Engine...sniff!) and it's now sitting on the galley sole on 2x8's. I'm cutting the tops off the engine stringers to check for rot - only found a bit at the holes so far. Also looks like I'm in for a new exhaust system. The dealer didn't like the way Catalina did it, and after he showed me the Universal Way, I'm tempted to agree with him. For instance, there's no anti-siphon loop in the raw-water hose in the Catalina installation. So now...we wait (and mess with the stringers and exhaust...). New engine will arrive in about 3-4 weeks. Total cost including new prop and 14.5% taxes, less $1500 for the old engine: $8851.63CDN (for Harry: that's about $7K US) Lloyd Sumpter "Far Cove" Catalina 36 - currently engine-less |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
Don White wrote:
That's a fair amount of change. Wonder what Karen would have charged you for one of her 'customized' diesel outboards? Lloyd Sumpter wrote in message ... Hi, Thought I'd contribute to the on-topic stuff here... Last night, put down a cheque for $4500CDN as deposit on a Shiny New Universal M25XPB and matching Campbell Sailor 14x10 prop (dealer suggested 14x9, but others varied from 14x10 to 14x12 to 15x11 - I'm guessing he doesn't want me to load down the new engine). Now, Don, would *you* buy an engine from a heroin addict? -- Email sent to is never read. |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
Naw...anyone can go to a local wrecking yard...find an old diesel engine,
hire someone to fabricate a shaft & propeller etc. The trick would be to make it as 'butt ugly' as her model. Harry Krause wrote in message ... Don White wrote: That's a fair amount of change. Wonder what Karen would have charged you for one of her 'customized' diesel outboards? Lloyd Sumpter wrote in message ... Hi, Thought I'd contribute to the on-topic stuff here... Last night, put down a cheque for $4500CDN as deposit on a Shiny New Universal M25XPB and matching Campbell Sailor 14x10 prop (dealer suggested 14x9, but others varied from 14x10 to 14x12 to 15x11 - I'm guessing he doesn't want me to load down the new engine). Now, Don, would *you* buy an engine from a heroin addict? -- Email sent to is never read. |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: That's a fair amount of change. Wonder what Karen would have charged you for one of her 'customized' diesel outboards? Lloyd Sumpter wrote in message ... Hi, Thought I'd contribute to the on-topic stuff here... Last night, put down a cheque for $4500CDN as deposit on a Shiny New Universal M25XPB and matching Campbell Sailor 14x10 prop (dealer suggested 14x9, but others varied from 14x10 to 14x12 to 15x11 - I'm guessing he doesn't want me to load down the new engine). Now, Don, would *you* buy an engine from a heroin addict? -- Email sent to is never read. Is that Slander or Libel? Forget which is the written version. |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 08:53:09 -0800, "Lloyd Sumpter"
wrote: Hi, Thought I'd contribute to the on-topic stuff here... Last night, put down a cheque for $4500CDN as deposit on a Shiny New Universal M25XPB and matching Campbell Sailor 14x10 prop (dealer suggested 14x9, but others varied from 14x10 to 14x12 to 15x11 - I'm guessing he doesn't want me to load down the new engine). Very nice - I love diesels - have one in my pickup in fact. Do you use the bio fuels (diesel mixed with used fry oil)? Later, Tom S. Woodstock, CT ---------- "I object to fishing tournaments less for what they do to fish than what they do to fishermen." Ted Williams - 1964 |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
Calif Bill wrote:
Now, Don, would *you* buy an engine from a heroin addict? Is that Slander or Libel? Forget which is the written version. It is merely a question. Rick |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 22:34:13 +0000, Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 08:53:09 -0800, "Lloyd Sumpter" wrote: Hi, Thought I'd contribute to the on-topic stuff here... Last night, put down a cheque for $4500CDN as deposit on a Shiny New Universal M25XPB and matching Campbell Sailor 14x10 prop (dealer suggested 14x9, but others varied from 14x10 to 14x12 to 15x11 - I'm guessing he doesn't want me to load down the new engine). Very nice - I love diesels - have one in my pickup in fact. Do you use the bio fuels (diesel mixed with used fry oil)? I was thinking about using the old engine for some tests before using an unknown fuel on a $10K engine. But, the dealer agreed to take it in trade... Donno about biodiesel. Looks good on paper, but...A guy on Bowen Island wanted to sell some to the local gas station. The gas station said "OK - guarantee 1000 gals/day" (which is about how much gas he sold). That's a LOT of McDonalds fat-fry oil! Reality is, in order to make enough to satisfy our craving for crushed dinosaur, you'd have to have square miles of corn to make the corn oil (and have you noticed how expensive vegetable oil is compared to gas or diesel?) Lloyd |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 19:34:48 -0800, "Lloyd Sumpter"
wrote: On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 22:34:13 +0000, Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 08:53:09 -0800, "Lloyd Sumpter" wrote: Hi, Thought I'd contribute to the on-topic stuff here... Last night, put down a cheque for $4500CDN as deposit on a Shiny New Universal M25XPB and matching Campbell Sailor 14x10 prop (dealer suggested 14x9, but others varied from 14x10 to 14x12 to 15x11 - I'm guessing he doesn't want me to load down the new engine). Very nice - I love diesels - have one in my pickup in fact. Do you use the bio fuels (diesel mixed with used fry oil)? I was thinking about using the old engine for some tests before using an unknown fuel on a $10K engine. But, the dealer agreed to take it in trade... Donno about biodiesel. Looks good on paper, but...A guy on Bowen Island wanted to sell some to the local gas station. The gas station said "OK - guarantee 1000 gals/day" (which is about how much gas he sold). That's a LOT of McDonalds fat-fry oil! Reality is, in order to make enough to satisfy our craving for crushed dinosaur, you'd have to have square miles of corn to make the corn oil (and have you noticed how expensive vegetable oil is compared to gas or diesel?) Yeah - well, that's what I thought, but there is a marina down in the Stonington area of CT that had it over the summer testing it. I understand that you have to have special filters for it - not sure why - and you still have to add diesel. There is also an interesting "by-product" in that the exhaust smells lilke peanuts - at least that is what it smelled like to me. My wife is seriously bugging me to sell the Contender and buy a more "family" oriented boat for grandkids and the like - IF I do, it will be diesel that's for sure. Notice the BIG if. :) Later, Tom S. Woodstock, CT ---------- "I object to fishing tournaments less for what they do to fish than what they do to fishermen." Ted Williams - 1964 |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
"Rick" wrote in message hlink.net... Calif Bill wrote: Now, Don, would *you* buy an engine from a heroin addict? Is that Slander or Libel? Forget which is the written version. It is merely a question. Rick Yes it is a question. Which is it, Slander or Libel? |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
Calif Bill wrote:
"Rick" wrote in message hlink.net... Calif Bill wrote: Now, Don, would *you* buy an engine from a heroin addict? Is that Slander or Libel? Forget which is the written version. It is merely a question. Rick Yes it is a question. Which is it, Slander or Libel? Neither, Bill, and the reasons why are too sophisticated and complicated for a binary fellow like you to understand. -- Email sent to is never read. |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "Rick" wrote in message hlink.net... Calif Bill wrote: Now, Don, would *you* buy an engine from a heroin addict? Is that Slander or Libel? Forget which is the written version. It is merely a question. Rick Yes it is a question. Which is it, Slander or Libel? Neither, Bill, and the reasons why are too sophisticated and complicated for a binary fellow like you to understand. -- Email sent to is never read. I guess you have to be a know it all like you. |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
Calif Bill wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "Rick" wrote in message hlink.net... Calif Bill wrote: Now, Don, would *you* buy an engine from a heroin addict? Is that Slander or Libel? Forget which is the written version. It is merely a question. Rick Yes it is a question. Which is it, Slander or Libel? Neither, Bill, and the reasons why are too sophisticated and complicated for a binary fellow like you to understand. -- Email sent to is never read. I guess you have to be a know it all like you. I'm not a know-it-all, Bill. But I also am not boxed in by binary thinking, as you and so many other conservatives seem to be. In my younger days as a newspaper and wire service reporter, I was instructed at length in the ins and outs of libel and slander. The unnamed subject of your inquiry might be able to initiate a lawsuit for libel. After all, in the United States, anyone may be sued for just about anything. But the suit would get nowhere, it would be dismissed, probably with prejudice, and, in the end, the subject could be countersued for bringing forward a nuisance lawsuit. If that happened, the subject likely would lose. But I suspect the subject is suit-proof, as it were, because the subject is without assets. There's little sense in pursuing a civil suit against an entity with no assets. Email sent to is never read. |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "Rick" wrote in message hlink.net... Calif Bill wrote: Now, Don, would *you* buy an engine from a heroin addict? Is that Slander or Libel? Forget which is the written version. It is merely a question. Rick Yes it is a question. Which is it, Slander or Libel? Neither, Bill, and the reasons why are too sophisticated and complicated for a binary fellow like you to understand. -- Email sent to is never read. I guess you have to be a know it all like you. I'm not a know-it-all, Bill. But I also am not boxed in by binary thinking, as you and so many other conservatives seem to be. In my younger days as a newspaper and wire service reporter, I was instructed at length in the ins and outs of libel and slander. The unnamed subject of your inquiry might be able to initiate a lawsuit for libel. After all, in the United States, anyone may be sued for just about anything. But the suit would get nowhere, it would be dismissed, probably with prejudice, and, in the end, the subject could be countersued for bringing forward a nuisance lawsuit. If that happened, the subject likely would lose. But I suspect the subject is suit-proof, as it were, because the subject is without assets. There's little sense in pursuing a civil suit against an entity with no assets. Email sent to is never read. Actually she could sue as you accused her of being a heroin addict, in a public forum, just to spite her. Seems as if there is a case, so no nuisance ruling. Maybe you have no assets, so you don't get sued. |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
Calif Bill wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "Rick" wrote in message hlink.net... Calif Bill wrote: Now, Don, would *you* buy an engine from a heroin addict? Is that Slander or Libel? Forget which is the written version. It is merely a question. Rick Yes it is a question. Which is it, Slander or Libel? Neither, Bill, and the reasons why are too sophisticated and complicated for a binary fellow like you to understand. -- Email sent to is never read. I guess you have to be a know it all like you. I'm not a know-it-all, Bill. But I also am not boxed in by binary thinking, as you and so many other conservatives seem to be. In my younger days as a newspaper and wire service reporter, I was instructed at length in the ins and outs of libel and slander. The unnamed subject of your inquiry might be able to initiate a lawsuit for libel. After all, in the United States, anyone may be sued for just about anything. But the suit would get nowhere, it would be dismissed, probably with prejudice, and, in the end, the subject could be countersued for bringing forward a nuisance lawsuit. If that happened, the subject likely would lose. But I suspect the subject is suit-proof, as it were, because the subject is without assets. There's little sense in pursuing a civil suit against an entity with no assets. Email sent to is never read. Actually she could sue as you accused her of being a heroin addict, in a public forum, just to spite her. Seems as if there is a case, so no nuisance ruling. Maybe you have no assets, so you don't get sued. Bill, I have already stated that anyone can sue anyone in this country. That's not news. Ahh, but Bill, I never stated the reason *why* your subject's case would be dismissed. I only stated it would be dismissed. Try to think outside the box. Try. -- Email sent to is never read. |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "Rick" wrote in message hlink.net... Calif Bill wrote: Now, Don, would *you* buy an engine from a heroin addict? Is that Slander or Libel? Forget which is the written version. It is merely a question. Rick Yes it is a question. Which is it, Slander or Libel? Neither, Bill, and the reasons why are too sophisticated and complicated for a binary fellow like you to understand. -- Email sent to is never read. I guess you have to be a know it all like you. I'm not a know-it-all, Bill. But I also am not boxed in by binary thinking, as you and so many other conservatives seem to be. In my younger days as a newspaper and wire service reporter, I was instructed at length in the ins and outs of libel and slander. The unnamed subject of your inquiry might be able to initiate a lawsuit for libel. After all, in the United States, anyone may be sued for just about anything. But the suit would get nowhere, it would be dismissed, probably with prejudice, and, in the end, the subject could be countersued for bringing forward a nuisance lawsuit. If that happened, the subject likely would lose. But I suspect the subject is suit-proof, as it were, because the subject is without assets. There's little sense in pursuing a civil suit against an entity with no assets. Email sent to is never read. Actually she could sue as you accused her of being a heroin addict, in a public forum, just to spite her. Seems as if there is a case, so no nuisance ruling. Maybe you have no assets, so you don't get sued. Bill, I have already stated that anyone can sue anyone in this country. That's not news. Ahh, but Bill, I never stated the reason *why* your subject's case would be dismissed. I only stated it would be dismissed. Try to think outside the box. Try. Sure it may be dismissed, but not with prejudice. Why don't you try to think. Instead of being 1/2 of binary. Single track. |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
Calif Bill wrote:
Instead of being 1/2 of binary. Single track. Binary doesn't "have" halves. It means two states or conditions. A track is a linear concept, it is not a condition or state. A track originates in one place and leads to another. A binary state is static, it does not move or exhibit variation or degrees of condition. It is the refuge of the political and religious fundamentalist. It is or is not, there is no allowance for thought that would occasion the intrusion of the disturbing variability of truth. Rick |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
Calif Bill wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "Rick" wrote in message hlink.net... Calif Bill wrote: Now, Don, would *you* buy an engine from a heroin addict? Is that Slander or Libel? Forget which is the written version. It is merely a question. Rick Yes it is a question. Which is it, Slander or Libel? Neither, Bill, and the reasons why are too sophisticated and complicated for a binary fellow like you to understand. -- Email sent to is never read. I guess you have to be a know it all like you. I'm not a know-it-all, Bill. But I also am not boxed in by binary thinking, as you and so many other conservatives seem to be. In my younger days as a newspaper and wire service reporter, I was instructed at length in the ins and outs of libel and slander. The unnamed subject of your inquiry might be able to initiate a lawsuit for libel. After all, in the United States, anyone may be sued for just about anything. But the suit would get nowhere, it would be dismissed, probably with prejudice, and, in the end, the subject could be countersued for bringing forward a nuisance lawsuit. If that happened, the subject likely would lose. But I suspect the subject is suit-proof, as it were, because the subject is without assets. There's little sense in pursuing a civil suit against an entity with no assets. Email sent to is never read. Actually she could sue as you accused her of being a heroin addict, in a public forum, just to spite her. Seems as if there is a case, so no nuisance ruling. Maybe you have no assets, so you don't get sued. Bill, I have already stated that anyone can sue anyone in this country. That's not news. Ahh, but Bill, I never stated the reason *why* your subject's case would be dismissed. I only stated it would be dismissed. Try to think outside the box. Try. Sure it may be dismissed, but not with prejudice. Why don't you try to think. Instead of being 1/2 of binary. Single track. Sheesh. I didn't say it "may" be dismissed with prejudice. I wrote it *would* be dismissed with prejudice. And you apparently still don't understand why. As for my "thinking," I suggest you spend some time researching the concept of "binary logic" as it applies to the human mind. One half of binary? Single track? Nonsense. It is this kind of absurdity -binary thinking- that drives you right-wingers, including your simple-minded fool of a president, George W. Bush. -- Email sent to is never read. |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
For both Rick and Harry. Binary covers all numbers. Just add more ones and
zeros. Binary is base 2. 1/2 binary is base 1!!!!. A single state. A zero. Unchanging. Covers both of you. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "Rick" wrote in message hlink.net... Calif Bill wrote: Now, Don, would *you* buy an engine from a heroin addict? Is that Slander or Libel? Forget which is the written version. It is merely a question. Rick Yes it is a question. Which is it, Slander or Libel? Neither, Bill, and the reasons why are too sophisticated and complicated for a binary fellow like you to understand. -- Email sent to is never read. I guess you have to be a know it all like you. I'm not a know-it-all, Bill. But I also am not boxed in by binary thinking, as you and so many other conservatives seem to be. In my younger days as a newspaper and wire service reporter, I was instructed at length in the ins and outs of libel and slander. The unnamed subject of your inquiry might be able to initiate a lawsuit for libel. After all, in the United States, anyone may be sued for just about anything. But the suit would get nowhere, it would be dismissed, probably with prejudice, and, in the end, the subject could be countersued for bringing forward a nuisance lawsuit. If that happened, the subject likely would lose. But I suspect the subject is suit-proof, as it were, because the subject is without assets. There's little sense in pursuing a civil suit against an entity with no assets. Email sent to is never read. Actually she could sue as you accused her of being a heroin addict, in a public forum, just to spite her. Seems as if there is a case, so no nuisance ruling. Maybe you have no assets, so you don't get sued. Bill, I have already stated that anyone can sue anyone in this country. That's not news. Ahh, but Bill, I never stated the reason *why* your subject's case would be dismissed. I only stated it would be dismissed. Try to think outside the box. Try. Sure it may be dismissed, but not with prejudice. Why don't you try to think. Instead of being 1/2 of binary. Single track. Sheesh. I didn't say it "may" be dismissed with prejudice. I wrote it *would* be dismissed with prejudice. And you apparently still don't understand why. As for my "thinking," I suggest you spend some time researching the concept of "binary logic" as it applies to the human mind. One half of binary? Single track? Nonsense. It is this kind of absurdity -binary thinking- that drives you right-wingers, including your simple-minded fool of a president, George W. Bush. -- Email sent to is never read. |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
Calif Bill wrote:
For both Rick and Harry. Binary covers all numbers. Go boating. Get out of the house. Take a break. Rick |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
"Rick" wrote in message link.net... Calif Bill wrote: For both Rick and Harry. Binary covers all numbers. Go boating. Get out of the house. Take a break. Rick Same advice for you. I went out Friday. But had a whine in the engine compartment, and a low battery. Low water in main battery and pulled and checked U-joints. Gong tomorrow, after doing honey-dos today and watching the #1 BCS teams look like crap. USC #1. Bill |
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
|
New Engine for Far Cove - it's Official!
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com