BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Water pressure question (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/25682-water-pressure-question.html)

dixon November 29th 04 11:39 PM

Water pressure question
 

I have a question that has me questioning the laws of fluid physics. I will
be posting the question in a day or so, but first I want to get some others
input regarding water pressure at different depths. First, do we all agree
that pressure is only dependant on depth of water? Lets say you had an
aquarium that was 3 feet high and 3 feet long and 2 feet front to back.
Fluid laws say it would not matter what the front to back measurement is.
The pressure on the front glass would be the same if the back of the
aquarium was two feet or 200 feet or 200 miles away, right?
Dixon
--



James Gemmill November 29th 04 11:58 PM

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:39:21 GMT, "dixon"
wrote:


I have a question that has me questioning the laws of fluid physics. I will
be posting the question in a day or so, but first I want to get some others
input regarding water pressure at different depths. First, do we all agree
that pressure is only dependant on depth of water? Lets say you had an
aquarium that was 3 feet high and 3 feet long and 2 feet front to back.
Fluid laws say it would not matter what the front to back measurement is.
The pressure on the front glass would be the same if the back of the
aquarium was two feet or 200 feet or 200 miles away, right?
Dixon

That's correct. Otherwise dams on rivers like the Colorado would
burst.

Mark November 30th 04 01:13 AM

I would have agreed with the width/length of the tank/dam doesn't matter ...
but ... then why are dams so thick at the top? Dams can be 20 / 30 / ...
feet thick at the top where the water is only a few inches deep. There is
more to this than me thinks!



DSK November 30th 04 01:14 AM

dixon wrote:
I have a question that has me questioning the laws of fluid physics. I will
be posting the question in a day or so, but first I want to get some others
input regarding water pressure at different depths.


Paging Jax!

.... First, do we all agree
that pressure is only dependant on depth of water?


Those of us who are not bull****ting pinheads, yes.

.... Lets say you had an
aquarium that was 3 feet high and 3 feet long and 2 feet front to back.
Fluid laws say it would not matter what the front to back measurement is.
The pressure on the front glass would be the same if the back of the
aquarium was two feet or 200 feet or 200 miles away, right?


Correct. The vertical distance between the given point and the surface
of the water is the determining factor... when the system is static...

Regards
Doug King


Gould 0738 November 30th 04 01:21 AM

I would have agreed with the width/length of the tank/dam doesn't matter ...
but ... then why are dams so thick at the top? Dams can be 20 / 30 / ...
feet thick at the top where the water is only a few inches deep. There is
more to this than me thinks!



Many dams have a service road across the top, a place to stage heavy equipment
if need be for repairs, etc. That will require a certain practical width. You
also need some structural mass to frame spillway gates, etc- often located near
the top of the dam. Hoover Dam has a highway across the top, and so is probably
75 feet "thick" many feet above the surface. :-)

Lloyd Sumpter November 30th 04 01:46 AM

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:58:51 -0700, James Gemmill wrote:

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:39:21 GMT, "dixon"
wrote:


I have a question that has me questioning the laws of fluid physics. I will
be posting the question in a day or so, but first I want to get some others
input regarding water pressure at different depths. First, do we all agree
that pressure is only dependant on depth of water?


Notwithstanding:
- density of the water (salt, fresh...)
- Pressure at the surface of the water (ie we're talking differential
pressure, open tank)
- Changes to gravity, either from location (earth vs moon), acceleration,
or maybe Kurt Vonnigut is right and the gravitational "constant" isn't...

:)
Lloyd


dixon November 30th 04 03:16 AM



--

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
dixon wrote:
I have a question that has me questioning the laws of fluid physics. I

will
be posting the question in a day or so, but first I want to get some

others
input regarding water pressure at different depths.


Paging Jax!

.... First, do we all agree
that pressure is only dependant on depth of water?


Those of us who are not bull****ting pinheads, yes.

.... Lets say you had an
aquarium that was 3 feet high and 3 feet long and 2 feet front to back.
Fluid laws say it would not matter what the front to back measurement

is.
The pressure on the front glass would be the same if the back of the
aquarium was two feet or 200 feet or 200 miles away, right?


Correct. The vertical distance between the given point and the surface
of the water is the determining factor... when the system is static...

Regards
Doug King


Okay, looks like we are in agreement. I'll post my "mental dilemma" tomorrow
(11-30-04). It has troubled me for years. Get your thinking caps ready!
Dixon



Calif Bill November 30th 04 06:02 AM


"dixon" wrote in message
news:JqOqd.110213$V41.105580@attbi_s52...

I have a question that has me questioning the laws of fluid physics. I

will
be posting the question in a day or so, but first I want to get some

others
input regarding water pressure at different depths. First, do we all agree
that pressure is only dependant on depth of water? Lets say you had an
aquarium that was 3 feet high and 3 feet long and 2 feet front to back.
Fluid laws say it would not matter what the front to back measurement is.
The pressure on the front glass would be the same if the back of the
aquarium was two feet or 200 feet or 200 miles away, right?
Dixon
--



Yes. You are really looking at the PSI at the bottom of a column.



Calif Bill November 30th 04 06:06 AM


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
I would have agreed with the width/length of the tank/dam doesn't matter

....
but ... then why are dams so thick at the top? Dams can be 20 / 30 / ...
feet thick at the top where the water is only a few inches deep. There is
more to this than me thinks!



Many dams have a service road across the top, a place to stage heavy

equipment
if need be for repairs, etc. That will require a certain practical width.

You
also need some structural mass to frame spillway gates, etc- often located

near
the top of the dam. Hoover Dam has a highway across the top, and so is

probably
75 feet "thick" many feet above the surface. :-)



And parts of the dam are hollow. Inspection galleys, equipment areas, and
there are also waves hitting the top above normal water level. These have a
side force.



Calif Bill November 30th 04 06:07 AM


"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:13:54 -0800, "Mark" wrote:

I would have agreed with the width/length of the tank/dam doesn't matter

....
but ... then why are dams so thick at the top? Dams can be 20 / 30 / ...
feet thick at the top where the water is only a few inches deep. There is
more to this than me thinks!


Dams are thicker on the bottom, not the top.


True, but they can be thick at the top also.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com