"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...
"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Yeah, you'll notice, of course, that the national debt always declined
during Democrat administrations. Or am I reading it wrongly?

John H

Bush the Second absolutley outperformed
Bill Clinton in the national debt category.
Bush the Second was able to increase the debt as much in *four* years
as
it
increased in *eight* under Clinton.

Discretionary spending (aka--pork-barrel spending) was lower under Bush
than
it was under Clinton. The debt is a result of decreased revenue from a
recession, and increased military and homeland security spending.

So, you are admitting that the current state of the economy IS Bush's
fault. I'm glad you finally realize that.

Yes, Bush can take credit for 3 straight years of solid GDP growth, and 15
straight months of net jobs growth.