Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thunder,
Thanks for the links, and you are correct, nothing I read would have intimidated me or most voters, including most legitimate black voters. I do not believe anyone should use illegal means to discourage voters, but it does make sense to have party loyalist there to make sure all voter challenges are handled legally. If people understand the procedures, I don't believe anyone who has a legal right to vote will be intimidated by voter challenges. If a party loyalists see anyone using illegal methods to chase away voters, they should immediately contact the poll workers or the police to stop this activity immediately, but for Harry to suggest he will use force to stop someone whom they think is not acting in a legal manner is nothing more than anarchy. It is important to make sure that each vote and voter is legitimate. If not, both parties will just follow that age old rule of "vote early and vote often". I noticed that Dems in Florida are objecting to voter challenges of voters whose mail was returned as "undeliverable". To be able to vote, these voters need to sign an affidavit that they are legally entitled to vote. I for one think it would be a great idea to require everyone to sign such an affidavit or provide ID to verify the voter is whom he states he is, but it does not see unreasonable to request people whose mail is returned as undeliverable to verify who they are.. The use of party loyalist who volunteer to work at the polling places is used by both parties to insure that each vote is legitimate. There seems to be a move to set up national standards to insure all voters are legitimate and was to handle voter challenges. This seems very reasonable and I would support the use of a fair national standard. "thunder" wrote in message ... On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 02:56:27 +0000, Jon Smithe wrote: Can you point me to one story or link where this has been reported to a problem? Or is this a problem being hidden by a rightwing conspiracy? I'm won't say voter intimidation is widespread, but to say it doesn't happen is BS. It's important to note, that many minorities are nervous around law enforcement due to Jim Crow history. Perhaps, you and I might not find some of the following intimidating. That's not important. What is important, is that many voters do. http://www.tampatrib.com/MGBNT3H8X0E.html http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oId=16368 http://www.sundayherald.com/45159 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2004Aug25.html http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6031311/ http://www.oregonlive.com/news/orego...7864136340.xml |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT for those who want to vote (long) | ASA | |||
*** 2004 ELECTION RESULTS *** | General |