BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Oil & Plug Opinions (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/2387-oil-plug-opinions.html)

Bear December 17th 03 01:09 AM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
(Bear) revised earlier message
. com...

'97 Chapparal w/ a Volvo-Penta 5.7L Carb w/ SX Outdrive

Questions:

1) Volvo pushes synthetics for crankcase and outdrive, yet all the
boat places around me (Austin - San Antonio) said to use regular
20w-50 motor oil in crankcase and non-suynthetic in outdrive...
Of course they said to change every 100 hours or per season.
Experience / Opinions?

2) Any thoughts / experience on spark plugs for this motor???

Thanks!

Ron White December 17th 03 02:24 AM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
I can't think of any reason not to use synthetic other than the cost and
this cost is of no consequence in the normal boaters budget. The loads these
automotive engines are running under in boat duty is much greater than in
the usual car or truck, so use the best oil you can find, i.e. name brand
synthetic. That said, most any good oil will do fine as they have in the
past, but why not use the best. That's my two cents.
Spark plugs? use what they recomend.

--
Ron White
My boatbuilding website is:
www.concentric.net/~knotreel



Frank Taylor, Jr. December 17th 03 04:42 AM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
Synthetic oil is definitely much better than conventional oil. My boat has
a Volvo engine and I use nothing but synthetic in the engine and in the
outdrive. I also use nothing but synthetic in my truck.

The way I see it, if you take care of it, it will take care of you.

Frank


"Bear" wrote in message
om...
(Bear) revised earlier message
. com...

'97 Chapparal w/ a Volvo-Penta 5.7L Carb w/ SX Outdrive

Questions:

1) Volvo pushes synthetics for crankcase and outdrive, yet all the
boat places around me (Austin - San Antonio) said to use regular
20w-50 motor oil in crankcase and non-suynthetic in outdrive...
Of course they said to change every 100 hours or per season.
Experience / Opinions?

2) Any thoughts / experience on spark plugs for this motor???

Thanks!




Frank Taylor, Jr. December 17th 03 11:19 PM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
30 wt refers to the viscosity charactersitics of the oil. It can still be
either conventional or synthetic. As a matter of fact, Volvo makes a
straight 30 wt synthetic oil for its marine engines.


"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On 16 Dec 2003 17:09:51 -0800, (Bear) wrote:

(Bear) revised earlier message
.com...

'97 Chapparal w/ a Volvo-Penta 5.7L Carb w/ SX Outdrive

Questions:

1) Volvo pushes synthetics for crankcase and outdrive, yet all the
boat places around me (Austin - San Antonio) said to use regular
20w-50 motor oil in crankcase and non-suynthetic in outdrive...
Of course they said to change every 100 hours or per season.
Experience / Opinions?

2) Any thoughts / experience on spark plugs for this motor???

Thanks!


Hmmm, the people I talk to in Ohio say to use straight 30 wt in my 1989
5.7.




Jim Kelly December 17th 03 11:44 PM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
Volvo does not make any oil, synthetic or conventional. Statements like
"synthetic is definitely much better" are meaningless. Synthetic lubricants
have properties which make them a better choice for certain applications. If
the application does not take advantage of these properties, there is nothing
to be gained by using them. One of their greatest attributes is a more
linear temperature vs. viscosity curve. There is a misconception that
synthetics are simply higher quality. This is not the case.

"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote:

30 wt refers to the viscosity charactersitics of the oil. It can still be
either conventional or synthetic. As a matter of fact, Volvo makes a
straight 30 wt synthetic oil for its marine engines.

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On 16 Dec 2003 17:09:51 -0800, (Bear) wrote:

(Bear) revised earlier message
.com...

'97 Chapparal w/ a Volvo-Penta 5.7L Carb w/ SX Outdrive

Questions:

1) Volvo pushes synthetics for crankcase and outdrive, yet all the
boat places around me (Austin - San Antonio) said to use regular
20w-50 motor oil in crankcase and non-suynthetic in outdrive...
Of course they said to change every 100 hours or per season.
Experience / Opinions?

2) Any thoughts / experience on spark plugs for this motor???

Thanks!


Hmmm, the people I talk to in Ohio say to use straight 30 wt in my 1989
5.7.



-v- December 17th 03 11:53 PM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 

"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote in message
...
Synthetic oil is definitely much better than conventional oil. My boat

has
a Volvo engine and I use nothing but synthetic in the engine and in the
outdrive. I also use nothing but synthetic in my truck.

The way I see it, if you take care of it, it will take care of you.

Frank


I have been driving for 34 years and boating for 14 years. I have never used
synthetic oil.

I have never had an engine failure except one raw water cooled inboard that
corroded out after 6 years and 1300 hours in salt water.

What would synthetic oil have done for me during all that time except cost a
lot of money?



Harry Krause December 18th 03 12:03 AM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
WaIIy wrote:

I understand that, I was wondering about 20-50 vs 30wt



Stick with your KY, Wally. You don't want to break the soda bottle.


--
Email sent to is never read.

Frank Taylor, Jr. December 18th 03 02:31 PM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
It would have made your engines last longer than they they did with
conventional oil.

I've never had and engine failure either. That's not the point. The point
is, do you want your rings and bearings worn out and ready for the junk yard
at 150,000 miles or at 500,000 miles.


"-v-" wrote in message
om...

"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote in message
...
Synthetic oil is definitely much better than conventional oil. My boat

has
a Volvo engine and I use nothing but synthetic in the engine and in the
outdrive. I also use nothing but synthetic in my truck.

The way I see it, if you take care of it, it will take care of you.

Frank


I have been driving for 34 years and boating for 14 years. I have never

used
synthetic oil.

I have never had an engine failure except one raw water cooled inboard

that
corroded out after 6 years and 1300 hours in salt water.

What would synthetic oil have done for me during all that time except cost

a
lot of money?





Frank Taylor, Jr. December 18th 03 02:47 PM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
Well, I'm not sure what that quart of "Volvo Duraplus Synthetic Oil" is that
is sitting right in front of me as I write this message is but it sure looks
like synthetic oil to me. I suppose that it could be manufactured by some
other company and Volvo just puts their name on it.

You are correct, that the temperature characteristics of synthetic oil are a
big advantage of synthetics but it goes much further than that. The
molecular structure of synthetic oil is also much more consistent than that
of conventional oil. Consider this analogy:

Lets say you have a bunch of steel balls of all different sizes and you
thrown them down on a concrete floor and then throw a board on top of them
and step on it. As you surf across the steel balls on top of the board, you
are really only ridinng on the large balls. The surfaces on these few balls
will soon wear down and the ride becomes rough. This is how conventional
oils works.

Now you do the same thing with another bunch of balls that are all the same
exact size. Since they are all the same size, the board rides evenly across
all of the balls at the same time. Since all of the balls are supporting
the board, they do not wear down nearly as quickly and the ride starts
smoother and stays smoother for much loinger. That is what synthetic oil
does.

Yes, synthetic oil is more expensive but it's cheaper than a new eingine.

Frank


"Jim Kelly" wrote in message
...
Volvo does not make any oil, synthetic or conventional. Statements like
"synthetic is definitely much better" are meaningless. Synthetic

lubricants
have properties which make them a better choice for certain applications.

If
the application does not take advantage of these properties, there is

nothing
to be gained by using them. One of their greatest attributes is a more
linear temperature vs. viscosity curve. There is a misconception that
synthetics are simply higher quality. This is not the case.

"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote:

30 wt refers to the viscosity charactersitics of the oil. It can still

be
either conventional or synthetic. As a matter of fact, Volvo makes a
straight 30 wt synthetic oil for its marine engines.

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On 16 Dec 2003 17:09:51 -0800, (Bear) wrote:

(Bear) revised earlier message
.com...

'97 Chapparal w/ a Volvo-Penta 5.7L Carb w/ SX Outdrive

Questions:

1) Volvo pushes synthetics for crankcase and outdrive, yet all the
boat places around me (Austin - San Antonio) said to use regular
20w-50 motor oil in crankcase and non-suynthetic in outdrive...
Of course they said to change every 100 hours or per season.
Experience / Opinions?

2) Any thoughts / experience on spark plugs for this motor???

Thanks!

Hmmm, the people I talk to in Ohio say to use straight 30 wt in my

1989
5.7.





Frank Taylor, Jr. December 18th 03 02:52 PM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
It seems that for some boats (at least mine anyway) 30 wt is preferred over
multi-viscosity oils, but if you cannot find 30 wt, then 20-50 works well.
Whtever you do, you want to check your manual and see what is allowed. My
manual says that 20-50 is okay and even 10-40 is okay. It also recommends
synthetic oil over conventional oil. Using conventional oil will not void
the warranty though.

Sometimes I cannot find 30 wt in a synthetic so I will use a 20-50 synthetic
instead of going to a 30 wt conventional because that will protect my engine
better.


"WaIIy" wrote in message
...

I understand that, I was wondering about 20-50 vs 30wt


On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:19:40 -0500, "Frank Taylor, Jr."
wrote:

30 wt refers to the viscosity charactersitics of the oil. It can still

be
either conventional or synthetic. As a matter of fact, Volvo makes a
straight 30 wt synthetic oil for its marine engines.


"WaIIy" wrote in message
.. .
On 16 Dec 2003 17:09:51 -0800, (Bear) wrote:

(Bear) revised earlier message
.com...

'97 Chapparal w/ a Volvo-Penta 5.7L Carb w/ SX Outdrive

Questions:

1) Volvo pushes synthetics for crankcase and outdrive, yet all the
boat places around me (Austin - San Antonio) said to use regular
20w-50 motor oil in crankcase and non-suynthetic in outdrive...
Of course they said to change every 100 hours or per season.
Experience / Opinions?

2) Any thoughts / experience on spark plugs for this motor???

Thanks!

Hmmm, the people I talk to in Ohio say to use straight 30 wt in my

1989
5.7.






-v- December 18th 03 04:31 PM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
None ever wore out. If you change your oil and filters regularly there is no
real advantage to synthetic oil.

"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote in message
...
It would have made your engines last longer than they they did with
conventional oil.

I've never had and engine failure either. That's not the point. The

point
is, do you want your rings and bearings worn out and ready for the junk

yard
at 150,000 miles or at 500,000 miles.


"-v-" wrote in message
om...

"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote in message
...
Synthetic oil is definitely much better than conventional oil. My

boat
has
a Volvo engine and I use nothing but synthetic in the engine and in

the
outdrive. I also use nothing but synthetic in my truck.

The way I see it, if you take care of it, it will take care of you.

Frank


I have been driving for 34 years and boating for 14 years. I have never

used
synthetic oil.

I have never had an engine failure except one raw water cooled inboard

that
corroded out after 6 years and 1300 hours in salt water.

What would synthetic oil have done for me during all that time except

cost
a
lot of money?








Frank Taylor, Jr. December 18th 03 10:39 PM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
Evidently, you have reaped the benefit of taking good care of your vehicles.
Whether you use conventional or synthetic, changing your oil is important.
Here are some of the reasons why I think synthetic oil is much better:

1. My own experience - I have been using synthetic oil for about 10 years
now. Every vehicle that I have had in that time period has shown minimal
wear and lasted several hundreds of thousands of miles (I drive an awful
lot) with only minor maintenance. Although it may appear that the parts on
your engine have not worn out, they do in fact wear. A car that has driven
a hundred thousand miles on conventional oil shows significant loss in
compression in the cylinders due to wear on the piston rings whereas a car
driven the same distance on synthetic shows much less wear. This does not
mean that the car using conventional oil is no longer useful or that it even
needs the engine rebuilt. It simply means that the engine is no longer
quite as efficient and powerful as is used to be. My last car had so little
engine wear after 300,000 miles that my mechanic said that it looked more
like it only had 20,000 miles on it. He attributed it to the fact that I
use synthetic oil. Three years ago, I gave it to my brother-in-law with
328,000 miles on it. He is still driving it. And get this - It's not an
expensive car, it's a Dodge Shadow ES. I also notice that my engine runs a
lot smoother with synthetic oil. Maybe that does or does not mean anything
when it comes to how long the engine will last but it sure sounds better.

2. Planes - Yep, planes. This is where synthetic oil actually first started
being used - - - in airplane engines. Conventional oil could not hack the
harsh environment of some aircraft engines so synthetic oil was developed
for use in aircraft. I have had a chance to talk to some of the engineers
at Lockheed and one of them gave me a real good lesson in why synthetic oil
was so much better. He convinced me.

3. Test after test after test - There have been numerous independent test
that have shown time and time again that synthetic oil is superior. If you
want some more info on why it is better, you can go to
http://www.dirtroad.com/oil2.htm.

4. If conventional oil was just as good as synthetic, why do most NASCAR
teams use synthetic and why do some auto manufacturers put synthetic oil in
some of their new performance cars and require it for their warranties to
remain valid?

The fact is, that synthetic oils are better. Yes, they are more expensive
but they are also better.


"-v-" wrote in message
om...
None ever wore out. If you change your oil and filters regularly there is

no
real advantage to synthetic oil.

"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote in message
...
It would have made your engines last longer than they they did with
conventional oil.

I've never had and engine failure either. That's not the point. The

point
is, do you want your rings and bearings worn out and ready for the junk

yard
at 150,000 miles or at 500,000 miles.


"-v-" wrote in message
om...

"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote in message
...
Synthetic oil is definitely much better than conventional oil. My

boat
has
a Volvo engine and I use nothing but synthetic in the engine and in

the
outdrive. I also use nothing but synthetic in my truck.

The way I see it, if you take care of it, it will take care of you.

Frank

I have been driving for 34 years and boating for 14 years. I have

never
used
synthetic oil.

I have never had an engine failure except one raw water cooled inboard

that
corroded out after 6 years and 1300 hours in salt water.

What would synthetic oil have done for me during all that time except

cost
a
lot of money?










Jim Kelly December 19th 03 01:34 AM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
I think you are getting your balls in a bunch. You are confusing extreme
pressure properties of certain types of lubricants with the ability of both
synthetic and conventional oils to operate satisfactorily in the typical
boundary layer lubrication environment of an internal combustion engine. You
need to read up on tribology and the mechanics of an oil film in plain bearing
applications as well as sliding motion applications. The most detrimental
aspect of lubrication in an internal combustion engine is contamination from the
combustion process. Unlike a gear box application, the oil in an engine is
subject to the byproducts of the combustion process as well as unburnt fuel.
For this reason, changing the oil and filter on a regular basis is much more
important than the type of oil used.



"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote:

Well, I'm not sure what that quart of "Volvo Duraplus Synthetic Oil" is that
is sitting right in front of me as I write this message is but it sure looks
like synthetic oil to me. I suppose that it could be manufactured by some
other company and Volvo just puts their name on it.

You are correct, that the temperature characteristics of synthetic oil are a
big advantage of synthetics but it goes much further than that. The
molecular structure of synthetic oil is also much more consistent than that
of conventional oil. Consider this analogy:

Lets say you have a bunch of steel balls of all different sizes and you
thrown them down on a concrete floor and then throw a board on top of them
and step on it. As you surf across the steel balls on top of the board, you
are really only ridinng on the large balls. The surfaces on these few balls
will soon wear down and the ride becomes rough. This is how conventional
oils works.

Now you do the same thing with another bunch of balls that are all the same
exact size. Since they are all the same size, the board rides evenly across
all of the balls at the same time. Since all of the balls are supporting
the board, they do not wear down nearly as quickly and the ride starts
smoother and stays smoother for much loinger. That is what synthetic oil
does.

Yes, synthetic oil is more expensive but it's cheaper than a new eingine.

Frank

"Jim Kelly" wrote in message
...
Volvo does not make any oil, synthetic or conventional. Statements like
"synthetic is definitely much better" are meaningless. Synthetic

lubricants
have properties which make them a better choice for certain applications.

If
the application does not take advantage of these properties, there is

nothing
to be gained by using them. One of their greatest attributes is a more
linear temperature vs. viscosity curve. There is a misconception that
synthetics are simply higher quality. This is not the case.

"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote:

30 wt refers to the viscosity charactersitics of the oil. It can still

be
either conventional or synthetic. As a matter of fact, Volvo makes a
straight 30 wt synthetic oil for its marine engines.

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On 16 Dec 2003 17:09:51 -0800, (Bear) wrote:

(Bear) revised earlier message
.com...

'97 Chapparal w/ a Volvo-Penta 5.7L Carb w/ SX Outdrive

Questions:

1) Volvo pushes synthetics for crankcase and outdrive, yet all the
boat places around me (Austin - San Antonio) said to use regular
20w-50 motor oil in crankcase and non-suynthetic in outdrive...
Of course they said to change every 100 hours or per season.
Experience / Opinions?

2) Any thoughts / experience on spark plugs for this motor???

Thanks!

Hmmm, the people I talk to in Ohio say to use straight 30 wt in my

1989
5.7.




Frank Taylor, Jr. December 19th 03 02:57 AM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
Jim,

You sound like you are well versed in the matters of internal combustion
engine lubrication. You are correct that oil contamination is a major
factor in oil breakdown and that is why oil should be changed regularly.
Although many synthetic oil users believe in extended periods between oil
changes, that is one thing that I do not buy into mainly because of the
issues that you mentioned. In addition to contamination, heat and
mechanical forces are also causes of oil breakdown.

The fact is, that no matter whant kind of oil you use, as soon as you put it
in and start the engine, the breakdown process starts and conventional oil
will break down faster than synthetic. Even after only 1,000 miles,
conventional oils will have lost much more of their protective properties
than synthetic oils.

I suspect that you are also aware of the fact that for the typical
automotive engine, a large amount of wear occurs during engine startup when
all of the oil is still in the pan. Because of the molecular properties of
synthetic oil, it adheres to engine components much better than conventional
oil thus providing more protection at startup.

"Jim Kelly" wrote in message
...
I think you are getting your balls in a bunch. You are confusing extreme
pressure properties of certain types of lubricants with the ability of

both
synthetic and conventional oils to operate satisfactorily in the typical
boundary layer lubrication environment of an internal combustion engine.

You
need to read up on tribology and the mechanics of an oil film in plain

bearing
applications as well as sliding motion applications. The most detrimental
aspect of lubrication in an internal combustion engine is contamination

from the
combustion process. Unlike a gear box application, the oil in an engine

is
subject to the byproducts of the combustion process as well as unburnt

fuel.
For this reason, changing the oil and filter on a regular basis is much

more
important than the type of oil used.



"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote:

Well, I'm not sure what that quart of "Volvo Duraplus Synthetic Oil" is

that
is sitting right in front of me as I write this message is but it sure

looks
like synthetic oil to me. I suppose that it could be manufactured by

some
other company and Volvo just puts their name on it.

You are correct, that the temperature characteristics of synthetic oil

are a
big advantage of synthetics but it goes much further than that. The
molecular structure of synthetic oil is also much more consistent than

that
of conventional oil. Consider this analogy:

Lets say you have a bunch of steel balls of all different sizes and you
thrown them down on a concrete floor and then throw a board on top of

them
and step on it. As you surf across the steel balls on top of the board,

you
are really only ridinng on the large balls. The surfaces on these few

balls
will soon wear down and the ride becomes rough. This is how

conventional
oils works.

Now you do the same thing with another bunch of balls that are all the

same
exact size. Since they are all the same size, the board rides evenly

across
all of the balls at the same time. Since all of the balls are

supporting
the board, they do not wear down nearly as quickly and the ride starts
smoother and stays smoother for much loinger. That is what synthetic

oil
does.

Yes, synthetic oil is more expensive but it's cheaper than a new

eingine.

Frank

"Jim Kelly" wrote in message
...
Volvo does not make any oil, synthetic or conventional. Statements

like
"synthetic is definitely much better" are meaningless. Synthetic

lubricants
have properties which make them a better choice for certain

applications.
If
the application does not take advantage of these properties, there is

nothing
to be gained by using them. One of their greatest attributes is a

more
linear temperature vs. viscosity curve. There is a misconception that
synthetics are simply higher quality. This is not the case.

"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote:

30 wt refers to the viscosity charactersitics of the oil. It can

still
be
either conventional or synthetic. As a matter of fact, Volvo makes

a
straight 30 wt synthetic oil for its marine engines.

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On 16 Dec 2003 17:09:51 -0800, (Bear) wrote:

(Bear) revised earlier message
.com...

'97 Chapparal w/ a Volvo-Penta 5.7L Carb w/ SX Outdrive

Questions:

1) Volvo pushes synthetics for crankcase and outdrive, yet all

the
boat places around me (Austin - San Antonio) said to use

regular
20w-50 motor oil in crankcase and non-suynthetic in

outdrive...
Of course they said to change every 100 hours or per season.
Experience / Opinions?

2) Any thoughts / experience on spark plugs for this motor???

Thanks!

Hmmm, the people I talk to in Ohio say to use straight 30 wt in

my
1989
5.7.





Bear December 19th 03 03:29 AM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote in message ...
Evidently, you have reaped the benefit of taking good care of your vehicles.
Whether you use conventional or synthetic, changing your oil is important.
Here are some of the reasons why I think synthetic oil is much better:

1. My own experience - I have been using synthetic oil for about 10 years
now. Every vehicle that I have had in that time period has shown minimal
wear and lasted several hundreds of thousands of miles (I drive an awful
lot) with only minor maintenance. Although it may appear that the parts on
your engine have not worn out, they do in fact wear. A car that has driven
a hundred thousand miles on conventional oil shows significant loss in
compression in the cylinders due to wear on the piston rings whereas a car
driven the same distance on synthetic shows much less wear. This does not
mean that the car using conventional oil is no longer useful or that it even
needs the engine rebuilt. It simply means that the engine is no longer
quite as efficient and powerful as is used to be. My last car had so little
engine wear after 300,000 miles that my mechanic said that it looked more
like it only had 20,000 miles on it. He attributed it to the fact that I
use synthetic oil. Three years ago, I gave it to my brother-in-law with
328,000 miles on it. He is still driving it. And get this - It's not an
expensive car, it's a Dodge Shadow ES. I also notice that my engine runs a
lot smoother with synthetic oil. Maybe that does or does not mean anything
when it comes to how long the engine will last but it sure sounds better.

2. Planes - Yep, planes. This is where synthetic oil actually first started
being used - - - in airplane engines. Conventional oil could not hack the
harsh environment of some aircraft engines so synthetic oil was developed
for use in aircraft. I have had a chance to talk to some of the engineers
at Lockheed and one of them gave me a real good lesson in why synthetic oil
was so much better. He convinced me.

3. Test after test after test - There have been numerous independent test
that have shown time and time again that synthetic oil is superior. If you
want some more info on why it is better, you can go to
http://www.dirtroad.com/oil2.htm.

4. If conventional oil was just as good as synthetic, why do most NASCAR
teams use synthetic and why do some auto manufacturers put synthetic oil in
some of their new performance cars and require it for their warranties to
remain valid?

The fact is, that synthetic oils are better. Yes, they are more expensive
but they are also better.


"-v-" wrote in message
om...
None ever wore out. If you change your oil and filters regularly there is

no
real advantage to synthetic oil.

"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote in message
...
It would have made your engines last longer than they they did with
conventional oil.

I've never had and engine failure either. That's not the point. The

point
is, do you want your rings and bearings worn out and ready for the junk

yard
at 150,000 miles or at 500,000 miles.


"-v-" wrote in message
om...

"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote in message
...
Synthetic oil is definitely much better than conventional oil. My

boat
has
a Volvo engine and I use nothing but synthetic in the engine and in

the
outdrive. I also use nothing but synthetic in my truck.

The way I see it, if you take care of it, it will take care of you.

Frank

I have been driving for 34 years and boating for 14 years. I have

never
used
synthetic oil.

I have never had an engine failure except one raw water cooled inboard

that
corroded out after 6 years and 1300 hours in salt water.

What would synthetic oil have done for me during all that time except

cost
a
lot of money?







Thanks - you have me convinced!!! But, after a recent trip to
AutoZone, and seeing ALL the synthetic oil vendors...is one superior
to the others?

Jim Kelly December 19th 03 04:35 AM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
Gene,
Hydrodynamic lubrication takes place regardless of the type of oil used. In the case of a plain
bearing such as those used on the crankshaft, there are conditions when boundary layer lubrication is
present such as upon start up. After the crank picks up speed, a wedge shaped film of oil is present
that is created by the hydrodynamic forces. At this point, their is full film lubrication. The
additives you mention do not change this. If their never existed a boundary layer condition, there
would never be any bearing or journal wear and the bearings would last indefinitely. Whether you use
conventional or synthetic, this is not the case. Crusader Marine Engines did a study on this a few
years ago and came to the conclusion that, under normal operating conditions, there was no benefit to
using synthetics in their engines.

Gene Kearns wrote:

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 01:34:58 GMT, Jim Kelly wrote:

I think you are getting your balls in a bunch. You are confusing extreme
pressure properties of certain types of lubricants with the ability of both
synthetic and conventional oils to operate satisfactorily in the typical
boundary layer lubrication environment of an internal combustion engine. You
need to read up on tribology and the mechanics of an oil film in plain bearing
applications as well as sliding motion applications. The most detrimental
aspect of lubrication in an internal combustion engine is contamination from the
combustion process. Unlike a gear box application, the oil in an engine is
subject to the byproducts of the combustion process as well as unburnt fuel.
For this reason, changing the oil and filter on a regular basis is much more
important than the type of oil used.




Jim,

Your confusion seems to be in relying on the boundary layer type of
lubrication. Modern synthetic lubrication relies on hydrodynamic
lubrication. Boundary layer lubrication is handled by tri phenyl
phosphate or (of late) tricresyl phosphate and is a last resort.

Use synthetic lubricants and metal-to-metal contact, most likely,
won't be an issue.

--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Southport, NC.

http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/cavern/ Homepage
http://www.southharbourvillage.com/directions.asp Where Southport,NC is located.
http://www.southharbourvillage.com/autoupdater.htm Real Time Pictures at My Marina
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide



Jim Kelly December 19th 03 04:54 AM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
Frank,
Yes, I am aware of the wear that takes place during start up. However, I know
of no evidence that synthetic oil possesses adhesive properties that reduce wear
during this time. For years, additive manufacturers have been displaying
plastic gear arrangements in a clear box. The hand crank is turned and the oil
with their additive ribbons around the gears while the oil without drips off.
Although impressive, it does not indicate what is happening at the gear mesh.
In both cases, there is full film lubrication at the mesh and the additive
provides no additional benefit. As I mentioned in my response to Gene, Crusader
Marine came to the conclusion that there was no benefit to using synthetics in
their engines under normal operating conditions. Obviously, if they felt that
there was any chance that warranty claims might be reduced with the use of
synthetics, they would certainly recommend, if not require, their use.

On the other hand, there are industrial applications where synthetic oils and
greases have proven to be far superior to their conventional counterparts.

"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote:

Jim,

You sound like you are well versed in the matters of internal combustion
engine lubrication. You are correct that oil contamination is a major
factor in oil breakdown and that is why oil should be changed regularly.
Although many synthetic oil users believe in extended periods between oil
changes, that is one thing that I do not buy into mainly because of the
issues that you mentioned. In addition to contamination, heat and
mechanical forces are also causes of oil breakdown.

The fact is, that no matter whant kind of oil you use, as soon as you put it
in and start the engine, the breakdown process starts and conventional oil
will break down faster than synthetic. Even after only 1,000 miles,
conventional oils will have lost much more of their protective properties
than synthetic oils.

I suspect that you are also aware of the fact that for the typical
automotive engine, a large amount of wear occurs during engine startup when
all of the oil is still in the pan. Because of the molecular properties of
synthetic oil, it adheres to engine components much better than conventional
oil thus providing more protection at startup.

"Jim Kelly" wrote in message
...
I think you are getting your balls in a bunch. You are confusing extreme
pressure properties of certain types of lubricants with the ability of

both
synthetic and conventional oils to operate satisfactorily in the typical
boundary layer lubrication environment of an internal combustion engine.

You
need to read up on tribology and the mechanics of an oil film in plain

bearing
applications as well as sliding motion applications. The most detrimental
aspect of lubrication in an internal combustion engine is contamination

from the
combustion process. Unlike a gear box application, the oil in an engine

is
subject to the byproducts of the combustion process as well as unburnt

fuel.
For this reason, changing the oil and filter on a regular basis is much

more
important than the type of oil used.



"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote:

Well, I'm not sure what that quart of "Volvo Duraplus Synthetic Oil" is

that
is sitting right in front of me as I write this message is but it sure

looks
like synthetic oil to me. I suppose that it could be manufactured by

some
other company and Volvo just puts their name on it.

You are correct, that the temperature characteristics of synthetic oil

are a
big advantage of synthetics but it goes much further than that. The
molecular structure of synthetic oil is also much more consistent than

that
of conventional oil. Consider this analogy:

Lets say you have a bunch of steel balls of all different sizes and you
thrown them down on a concrete floor and then throw a board on top of

them
and step on it. As you surf across the steel balls on top of the board,

you
are really only ridinng on the large balls. The surfaces on these few

balls
will soon wear down and the ride becomes rough. This is how

conventional
oils works.

Now you do the same thing with another bunch of balls that are all the

same
exact size. Since they are all the same size, the board rides evenly

across
all of the balls at the same time. Since all of the balls are

supporting
the board, they do not wear down nearly as quickly and the ride starts
smoother and stays smoother for much loinger. That is what synthetic

oil
does.

Yes, synthetic oil is more expensive but it's cheaper than a new

eingine.

Frank

"Jim Kelly" wrote in message
...
Volvo does not make any oil, synthetic or conventional. Statements

like
"synthetic is definitely much better" are meaningless. Synthetic
lubricants
have properties which make them a better choice for certain

applications.
If
the application does not take advantage of these properties, there is
nothing
to be gained by using them. One of their greatest attributes is a

more
linear temperature vs. viscosity curve. There is a misconception that
synthetics are simply higher quality. This is not the case.

"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote:

30 wt refers to the viscosity charactersitics of the oil. It can

still
be
either conventional or synthetic. As a matter of fact, Volvo makes

a
straight 30 wt synthetic oil for its marine engines.

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On 16 Dec 2003 17:09:51 -0800, (Bear) wrote:

(Bear) revised earlier message
.com...

'97 Chapparal w/ a Volvo-Penta 5.7L Carb w/ SX Outdrive

Questions:

1) Volvo pushes synthetics for crankcase and outdrive, yet all

the
boat places around me (Austin - San Antonio) said to use

regular
20w-50 motor oil in crankcase and non-suynthetic in

outdrive...
Of course they said to change every 100 hours or per season.
Experience / Opinions?

2) Any thoughts / experience on spark plugs for this motor???

Thanks!

Hmmm, the people I talk to in Ohio say to use straight 30 wt in

my
1989
5.7.




Frank Taylor, Jr. December 19th 03 02:56 PM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
I prefer to use Mobil 1 because it has a very good reputation and all of the
tests I have seen also put it either at or near the top.

Amsoil is rated pretty high too but unless you know of an Amsoil
distributor, or are willing to buy it on the web and have it shipped, you
may not be able to find it. I have heard that there are a few stores that
stock it but I have not seen it in any myself.

Good luck

Frank

"Bear" wrote in message
om...
"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote in message

...
Evidently, you have reaped the benefit of taking good care of your

vehicles.
Whether you use conventional or synthetic, changing your oil is

important.
Here are some of the reasons why I think synthetic oil is much better:

1. My own experience - I have been using synthetic oil for about 10

years
now. Every vehicle that I have had in that time period has shown

minimal
wear and lasted several hundreds of thousands of miles (I drive an awful
lot) with only minor maintenance. Although it may appear that the parts

on
your engine have not worn out, they do in fact wear. A car that has

driven
a hundred thousand miles on conventional oil shows significant loss in
compression in the cylinders due to wear on the piston rings whereas a

car
driven the same distance on synthetic shows much less wear. This does

not
mean that the car using conventional oil is no longer useful or that it

even
needs the engine rebuilt. It simply means that the engine is no longer
quite as efficient and powerful as is used to be. My last car had so

little
engine wear after 300,000 miles that my mechanic said that it looked

more
like it only had 20,000 miles on it. He attributed it to the fact that

I
use synthetic oil. Three years ago, I gave it to my brother-in-law with
328,000 miles on it. He is still driving it. And get this - It's not

an
expensive car, it's a Dodge Shadow ES. I also notice that my engine

runs a
lot smoother with synthetic oil. Maybe that does or does not mean

anything
when it comes to how long the engine will last but it sure sounds

better.

2. Planes - Yep, planes. This is where synthetic oil actually first

started
being used - - - in airplane engines. Conventional oil could not hack

the
harsh environment of some aircraft engines so synthetic oil was

developed
for use in aircraft. I have had a chance to talk to some of the

engineers
at Lockheed and one of them gave me a real good lesson in why synthetic

oil
was so much better. He convinced me.

3. Test after test after test - There have been numerous independent

test
that have shown time and time again that synthetic oil is superior. If

you
want some more info on why it is better, you can go to
http://www.dirtroad.com/oil2.htm.

4. If conventional oil was just as good as synthetic, why do most

NASCAR
teams use synthetic and why do some auto manufacturers put synthetic oil

in
some of their new performance cars and require it for their warranties

to
remain valid?

The fact is, that synthetic oils are better. Yes, they are more

expensive
but they are also better.


"-v-" wrote in message
om...
None ever wore out. If you change your oil and filters regularly there

is
no
real advantage to synthetic oil.

"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote in message
...
It would have made your engines last longer than they they did with
conventional oil.

I've never had and engine failure either. That's not the point.

The
point
is, do you want your rings and bearings worn out and ready for the

junk
yard
at 150,000 miles or at 500,000 miles.


"-v-" wrote in message
om...

"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote in message
...
Synthetic oil is definitely much better than conventional oil.

My
boat
has
a Volvo engine and I use nothing but synthetic in the engine and

in
the
outdrive. I also use nothing but synthetic in my truck.

The way I see it, if you take care of it, it will take care of

you.

Frank

I have been driving for 34 years and boating for 14 years. I have

never
used
synthetic oil.

I have never had an engine failure except one raw water cooled

inboard
that
corroded out after 6 years and 1300 hours in salt water.

What would synthetic oil have done for me during all that time

except
cost
a
lot of money?







Thanks - you have me convinced!!! But, after a recent trip to
AutoZone, and seeing ALL the synthetic oil vendors...is one superior
to the others?




Frank Taylor, Jr. December 19th 03 03:11 PM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
Hey Jim,

I agree with you on one thing. Those little displays with three wheels and
and ounce of oil sitting on the parts counter are useful for just one thing
.. . . a toy to play with while you are waiting for them to find the part you
want.

I have seen the results of some of the tests that show how synthetic oil
"clings" to mechanical parts better than conventional oil. It was part of
the data that convinced me to start using it. In addition to this,
synthetic oil flows more freely at low temperatures. For this reason, even
with out the increased molecular bonding, synthetic oil will start
circulating and lubricating faster that conventional oil will on a cold
morning when the temp is 15 degrees.


"Jim Kelly" wrote in message
...
Frank,
Yes, I am aware of the wear that takes place during start up. However, I

know
of no evidence that synthetic oil possesses adhesive properties that

reduce wear
during this time. For years, additive manufacturers have been displaying
plastic gear arrangements in a clear box. The hand crank is turned and

the oil
with their additive ribbons around the gears while the oil without drips

off.
Although impressive, it does not indicate what is happening at the gear

mesh.
In both cases, there is full film lubrication at the mesh and the additive
provides no additional benefit. As I mentioned in my response to Gene,

Crusader
Marine came to the conclusion that there was no benefit to using

synthetics in
their engines under normal operating conditions. Obviously, if they felt

that
there was any chance that warranty claims might be reduced with the use of
synthetics, they would certainly recommend, if not require, their use.

On the other hand, there are industrial applications where synthetic oils

and
greases have proven to be far superior to their conventional counterparts.

"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote:

Jim,

You sound like you are well versed in the matters of internal combustion
engine lubrication. You are correct that oil contamination is a major
factor in oil breakdown and that is why oil should be changed regularly.
Although many synthetic oil users believe in extended periods between

oil
changes, that is one thing that I do not buy into mainly because of the
issues that you mentioned. In addition to contamination, heat and
mechanical forces are also causes of oil breakdown.

The fact is, that no matter whant kind of oil you use, as soon as you

put it
in and start the engine, the breakdown process starts and conventional

oil
will break down faster than synthetic. Even after only 1,000 miles,
conventional oils will have lost much more of their protective

properties
than synthetic oils.

I suspect that you are also aware of the fact that for the typical
automotive engine, a large amount of wear occurs during engine startup

when
all of the oil is still in the pan. Because of the molecular properties

of
synthetic oil, it adheres to engine components much better than

conventional
oil thus providing more protection at startup.

"Jim Kelly" wrote in message
...
I think you are getting your balls in a bunch. You are confusing

extreme
pressure properties of certain types of lubricants with the ability of

both
synthetic and conventional oils to operate satisfactorily in the

typical
boundary layer lubrication environment of an internal combustion

engine.
You
need to read up on tribology and the mechanics of an oil film in plain

bearing
applications as well as sliding motion applications. The most

detrimental
aspect of lubrication in an internal combustion engine is

contamination
from the
combustion process. Unlike a gear box application, the oil in an

engine
is
subject to the byproducts of the combustion process as well as unburnt

fuel.
For this reason, changing the oil and filter on a regular basis is

much
more
important than the type of oil used.



"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote:

Well, I'm not sure what that quart of "Volvo Duraplus Synthetic Oil"

is
that
is sitting right in front of me as I write this message is but it

sure
looks
like synthetic oil to me. I suppose that it could be manufactured

by
some
other company and Volvo just puts their name on it.

You are correct, that the temperature characteristics of synthetic

oil
are a
big advantage of synthetics but it goes much further than that. The
molecular structure of synthetic oil is also much more consistent

than
that
of conventional oil. Consider this analogy:

Lets say you have a bunch of steel balls of all different sizes and

you
thrown them down on a concrete floor and then throw a board on top

of
them
and step on it. As you surf across the steel balls on top of the

board,
you
are really only ridinng on the large balls. The surfaces on these

few
balls
will soon wear down and the ride becomes rough. This is how

conventional
oils works.

Now you do the same thing with another bunch of balls that are all

the
same
exact size. Since they are all the same size, the board rides

evenly
across
all of the balls at the same time. Since all of the balls are

supporting
the board, they do not wear down nearly as quickly and the ride

starts
smoother and stays smoother for much loinger. That is what

synthetic
oil
does.

Yes, synthetic oil is more expensive but it's cheaper than a new

eingine.

Frank

"Jim Kelly" wrote in message
...
Volvo does not make any oil, synthetic or conventional.

Statements
like
"synthetic is definitely much better" are meaningless. Synthetic
lubricants
have properties which make them a better choice for certain

applications.
If
the application does not take advantage of these properties, there

is
nothing
to be gained by using them. One of their greatest attributes is

a
more
linear temperature vs. viscosity curve. There is a misconception

that
synthetics are simply higher quality. This is not the case.

"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote:

30 wt refers to the viscosity charactersitics of the oil. It

can
still
be
either conventional or synthetic. As a matter of fact, Volvo

makes
a
straight 30 wt synthetic oil for its marine engines.

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On 16 Dec 2003 17:09:51 -0800, (Bear)

wrote:

(Bear) revised earlier message
.com...

'97 Chapparal w/ a Volvo-Penta 5.7L Carb w/ SX Outdrive

Questions:

1) Volvo pushes synthetics for crankcase and outdrive, yet

all
the
boat places around me (Austin - San Antonio) said to use

regular
20w-50 motor oil in crankcase and non-suynthetic in

outdrive...
Of course they said to change every 100 hours or per

season.
Experience / Opinions?

2) Any thoughts / experience on spark plugs for this

motor???

Thanks!

Hmmm, the people I talk to in Ohio say to use straight 30 wt

in
my
1989
5.7.






Fred December 19th 03 03:14 PM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
My Mercruiser owners manual specifically does not recommend synthetic oil.
"The use of non-detergent oils, multi-viscosity oils (other than Quicksilver
25W-40), synthetic oils, low quality oils, or oils that contain solid
additives are specifically not recommended."


"Jim Kelly" wrote in message
...
I think you are getting your balls in a bunch. You are confusing extreme
pressure properties of certain types of lubricants with the ability of

both
synthetic and conventional oils to operate satisfactorily in the typical
boundary layer lubrication environment of an internal combustion engine.

You
need to read up on tribology and the mechanics of an oil film in plain

bearing
applications as well as sliding motion applications. The most detrimental
aspect of lubrication in an internal combustion engine is contamination

from the
combustion process. Unlike a gear box application, the oil in an engine

is
subject to the byproducts of the combustion process as well as unburnt

fuel.
For this reason, changing the oil and filter on a regular basis is much

more
important than the type of oil used.



"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote:

Well, I'm not sure what that quart of "Volvo Duraplus Synthetic Oil" is

that
is sitting right in front of me as I write this message is but it sure

looks
like synthetic oil to me. I suppose that it could be manufactured by

some
other company and Volvo just puts their name on it.

You are correct, that the temperature characteristics of synthetic oil

are a
big advantage of synthetics but it goes much further than that. The
molecular structure of synthetic oil is also much more consistent than

that
of conventional oil. Consider this analogy:

Lets say you have a bunch of steel balls of all different sizes and you
thrown them down on a concrete floor and then throw a board on top of

them
and step on it. As you surf across the steel balls on top of the board,

you
are really only ridinng on the large balls. The surfaces on these few

balls
will soon wear down and the ride becomes rough. This is how

conventional
oils works.

Now you do the same thing with another bunch of balls that are all the

same
exact size. Since they are all the same size, the board rides evenly

across
all of the balls at the same time. Since all of the balls are

supporting
the board, they do not wear down nearly as quickly and the ride starts
smoother and stays smoother for much loinger. That is what synthetic

oil
does.

Yes, synthetic oil is more expensive but it's cheaper than a new

eingine.

Frank

"Jim Kelly" wrote in message
...
Volvo does not make any oil, synthetic or conventional. Statements

like
"synthetic is definitely much better" are meaningless. Synthetic

lubricants
have properties which make them a better choice for certain

applications.
If
the application does not take advantage of these properties, there is

nothing
to be gained by using them. One of their greatest attributes is a

more
linear temperature vs. viscosity curve. There is a misconception that
synthetics are simply higher quality. This is not the case.

"Frank Taylor, Jr." wrote:

30 wt refers to the viscosity charactersitics of the oil. It can

still
be
either conventional or synthetic. As a matter of fact, Volvo makes

a
straight 30 wt synthetic oil for its marine engines.

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On 16 Dec 2003 17:09:51 -0800, (Bear) wrote:

(Bear) revised earlier message
.com...

'97 Chapparal w/ a Volvo-Penta 5.7L Carb w/ SX Outdrive

Questions:

1) Volvo pushes synthetics for crankcase and outdrive, yet all

the
boat places around me (Austin - San Antonio) said to use

regular
20w-50 motor oil in crankcase and non-suynthetic in

outdrive...
Of course they said to change every 100 hours or per season.
Experience / Opinions?

2) Any thoughts / experience on spark plugs for this motor???

Thanks!

Hmmm, the people I talk to in Ohio say to use straight 30 wt in

my
1989
5.7.





Jim Kelly December 19th 03 11:54 PM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
Clearly, the engineering staff at PCM/Crusader was remiss in not consulting you prior to publishing their
conclusions. I feel that you would be doing the boating public a service by contacting these engineers
and letting them know how stupid they are.

Gene Kearns wrote:

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 04:35:22 GMT, Jim Kelly wrote:

Gene,
Hydrodynamic lubrication takes place regardless of the type of oil used.


Only in a perfect world. If such were the case there never would be
any engine wear.

In the case of a plain
bearing such as those used on the crankshaft, there are conditions when boundary layer lubrication is
present such as upon start up. After the crank picks up speed, a wedge shaped film of oil is present
that is created by the hydrodynamic forces. At this point, their is full film lubrication.


This doesn't explain other parts of the engine subject to extreme
pressures, like cam-tappet wear surfaces. Everybody seems to think in
terms of "cold pumpability," but the fact of the matters is a lot of
engine parts are lubricated via splash. Molasses thick cold oil
doesn't splash very well (and too-hot oil will stick rings in a
jiffy).

The
additives you mention do not change this. If their never existed a boundary layer condition, there
would never be any bearing or journal wear and the bearings would last indefinitely. Whether you use
conventional or synthetic, this is not the case.


True, but the additives I mentioned will prevent galling and help the
wear parts over that inevitable metal-metal touch. You seem, now, to
me making my point. Why would getting the oil pumped to operating
pressure faster not force a quicker move from boundary to hydrodynamic
lubrication? Wouldn't that help prevent boundary lubrication problems?
You seem to be on both sides of the synthetic/dino fence, now!

Crusader Marine Engines did a study on this a few
years ago and came to the conclusion that, under normal operating conditions, there was no benefit to
using synthetics in their engines.


Yeah, there verbiage is:

"Synthetic engine oils are not recommended for use
in Crusader Engines. Synthetics may offer advantages
in cold temperature pumpability and high temperature
oxidation-resistance. However, synthetic oils have not
proven to provide operational or economic benefits over
conventional petroleum-based oils in Crusader Engines.
Their use does not permit the extension of oil change
intervals."

My issue with them is, "in a perfect world - not too hot, not too cold
synthetics just aren't necessary in our engines." Well, duh! I plan
for Murphy's Law, not Pollyanna's law of engine dynamics.... and at
the acquisition and repair costs of these engines, everyone would be
well advised to do likewise..

Oil is a helluva lot cheaper than repair and replacement.

--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Southport, NC.

http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/cavern/ Homepage
http://www.southharbourvillage.com/directions.asp Where Southport,NC is located.
http://www.southharbourvillage.com/autoupdater.htm Real Time Pictures at My Marina
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide



Jim Kelly December 20th 03 12:26 AM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
Looks like you need to add the engineering staff of Mercruiser to the list of idiots that you need to
straighten out. Good thing Yamaha and OMC are out of the stern drive business or you would, no doubt,
have to educate and enlighten them out too!

Gene Kearns wrote:

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 23:16:31 GMT, WaIIy
wrote:

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:21:01 -0500, Gene Kearns
wrote:

Yeah, there verbiage is:

"Synthetic engine oils are not recommended for use
in Crusader Engines. Synthetics may offer advantages
in cold temperature pumpability and high temperature
oxidation-resistance. However, synthetic oils have not
proven to provide operational or economic benefits over
conventional petroleum-based oils in Crusader Engines.
Their use does not permit the extension of oil change
intervals."


My issue with them is, "in a perfect world - not too hot, not too cold
synthetics just aren't necessary in our engines." Well, duh! I plan
for Murphy's Law, not Pollyanna's law of engine dynamics.... and at
the acquisition and repair costs of these engines, everyone would be
well advised to do likewise..

Oil is a helluva lot cheaper than repair and replacement.


Mercury chimes in...

MPORTANT: The use of non-detergent oils, multi-viscosity oils (other
than Quicksilver 25W-40 or a good quality 20W-40 or 20W-50), synthetic
oils, low quality oils or oils that contain solid additives are
specifically NOT recommended.
http://www.mercurymarine.com/fueloil...mendation_faqs


If you read what they have written.... they don't recommend using
*any* type of oil but a straight weight, detergent dino oil. What is
so special (and different) about their engines?

I don't understand any more about the *why* for this "recommendation"
than I understand the *why* for them calling their Quicksilver 25W-40
a multiviscosity oil... when you get past their mumblespeak that
Skipper used to post every 3 months it is obviously a single viscosity
oil.

In fact, for the first time, it appears they have slipped up and
admitted as much: "...25W-40 Marine Engine Oil. This oil is a special
blend of 25-weight and 40-weight oils..."

--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Southport, NC.

http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/cavern/ Homepage
http://www.southharbourvillage.com/directions.asp Where Southport,NC is located.
http://www.southharbourvillage.com/autoupdater.htm Real Time Pictures at My Marina
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide



Harry Krause December 20th 03 12:34 AM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
Gene Kearns wrote:

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 23:16:31 GMT, WaIIy
wrote:

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:21:01 -0500, Gene Kearns
wrote:

Yeah, there verbiage is:

"Synthetic engine oils are not recommended for use
in Crusader Engines. Synthetics may offer advantages
in cold temperature pumpability and high temperature
oxidation-resistance. However, synthetic oils have not
proven to provide operational or economic benefits over
conventional petroleum-based oils in Crusader Engines.
Their use does not permit the extension of oil change
intervals."


My issue with them is, "in a perfect world - not too hot, not too cold
synthetics just aren't necessary in our engines." Well, duh! I plan
for Murphy's Law, not Pollyanna's law of engine dynamics.... and at
the acquisition and repair costs of these engines, everyone would be
well advised to do likewise..

Oil is a helluva lot cheaper than repair and replacement.


Mercury chimes in...

MPORTANT: The use of non-detergent oils, multi-viscosity oils (other
than Quicksilver 25W-40 or a good quality 20W-40 or 20W-50), synthetic
oils, low quality oils or oils that contain solid additives are
specifically NOT recommended.
http://www.mercurymarine.com/fueloil...mendation_faqs



If you read what they have written.... they don't recommend using
*any* type of oil but a straight weight, detergent dino oil. What is
so special (and different) about their engines?

I don't understand any more about the *why* for this "recommendation"
than I understand the *why* for them calling their Quicksilver 25W-40
a multiviscosity oil... when you get past their mumblespeak that
Skipper used to post every 3 months it is obviously a single viscosity
oil.

In fact, for the first time, it appears they have slipped up and
admitted as much: "...25W-40 Marine Engine Oil. This oil is a special
blend of 25-weight and 40-weight oils..."



The service manual for my Yamaha F225 only mentions using ordinary
four-cycle engine oil, never a four-cycle oil by brand. I have not come
across any references to non-dino oil, either. And Yamaha, like every
other outboard maker, has its own private-label oils.

--
Email sent to is never read.

Jim Kelly December 20th 03 12:58 AM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
What are you talking about, "attack"? I am commending you for your tireless efforts! However, I am surprised
that you haven't mentioned the most important reason for using synthetics. As you know, it eliminates the
senseless slaughter of dinosaurs for their oil.

Gene Kearns wrote:

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 23:54:24 GMT, Jim Kelly wrote:

Clearly, the engineering staff at PCM/Crusader was remiss in not consulting you prior to publishing their
conclusions. I feel that you would be doing the boating public a service by contacting these engineers
and letting them know how stupid they are.



Not a problem, Jim. When you run out of facts in a discussion it *is*
a wise course to attack the poster.

--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Southport, NC.

http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/cavern/ Homepage
http://www.southharbourvillage.com/directions.asp Where Southport,NC is located.
http://www.southharbourvillage.com/autoupdater.htm Real Time Pictures at My Marina
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide



Jim Kelly December 20th 03 01:26 AM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
THAT, I will agree with!

Gene Kearns wrote:

On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 00:26:42 GMT, Jim Kelly wrote:

Looks like you need to add the engineering staff of Mercruiser to the list of idiots that you need to
straighten out. Good thing Yamaha and OMC are out of the stern drive business or you would, no doubt,
have to educate and enlighten them out too!


If you'll have them call me I'll try to help them, but I don't know if
they'll get it.

Anyway, however inane and pointless this discussion has become, it
*IS*, at least, on topic..... and after I just killed about 35,
liberals suck, conservatives suck, democrats suck, republicans suck,
WMD, IRAQ, (ad nauseam) threads........ and found very little left....

maybe there is some merit.

--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Southport, NC.

http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/cavern/ Homepage
http://www.southharbourvillage.com/directions.asp Where Southport,NC is located.
http://www.southharbourvillage.com/autoupdater.htm Real Time Pictures at My Marina
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide



Harry Krause December 20th 03 03:24 AM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
Gene Kearns wrote:

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:34:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


The service manual for my Yamaha F225 only mentions using ordinary
four-cycle engine oil, never a four-cycle oil by brand. I have not come
across any references to non-dino oil, either. And Yamaha, like every
other outboard maker, has its own private-label oils.


Ditto my Suzukis.... except they do label their own brand.

I did, however, call Suzuki about using synthetics and they didn't
recommend them. When I reminded them that synthetics and dino oil all
had to meet the same SAE and API specs and that none of their
literature led me to believe otherwise.... and thus, "Why not?" They
backed off and said that synthetics might actually be a better oil,
but they had no data, so were telling people, "not recommended."

Some people seem not to realize that some of this data emanates not
from Engineering, but from Sales and Legal....


That seems logical, but I really wonder about the assumed benefits from
synthetic oil, especially if you are supposed to change it at the same
regular intervals as dino oil. We changed the oil at 10 hours in our
Yamaha and then at 50. Fifty seems a reasonable interval for a gas
engine in pleasure boat service.

Interestingly, I haven't really come across a customer service line at
Yamaha similar to the one I called at Mercury. I can't say I've looked
all that hard, but with Merc, it was easy to find. Yamaha doesn't seem
to encourage such connection.

--
Email sent to is never read.

Harry Krause December 20th 03 03:47 AM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 
Gene Kearns wrote:

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 22:24:35 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


That seems logical, but I really wonder about the assumed benefits from
synthetic oil, especially if you are supposed to change it at the same
regular intervals as dino oil. We changed the oil at 10 hours in our
Yamaha and then at 50. Fifty seems a reasonable interval for a gas
engine in pleasure boat service.


The benefits may, actually, be minimal in temperate climates when the
oil is changed very frequently and there are no anomalies in
operation. Extending drain intervals, IMHO, is dependent, entirely,
on superior filtration technologies, which I doubt are available for
outboards....

Interestingly, I haven't really come across a customer service line at
Yamaha similar to the one I called at Mercury. I can't say I've looked
all that hard, but with Merc, it was easy to find. Yamaha doesn't seem
to encourage such connection.


I believe you are correct. However, I *do* remember that obscure
number being posted here a few years back. Maybe somebody will
remember it?


It would be nice. Did we ever have a Yamaha dealer posting here, or did
Lucretia Borgia of Oz chase him off, too? We used to have a couple
dealers and dealer mechanics who were helpful here. I think Grannis is
the only one left.

--
Email sent to is never read.

Billgran December 20th 03 08:22 AM

Oil & Plug Opinions
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Interestingly, I haven't really come across a customer service line at
Yamaha similar to the one I called at Mercury.


I believe you are correct. However, I *do* remember that obscure
number being posted here a few years back. Maybe somebody will
remember it?


It would be nice. Did we ever have a Yamaha dealer posting here, or did
Lucretia Borgia of Oz chase him off, too? We used to have a couple
dealers and dealer mechanics who were helpful here. I think Grannis is
the only one left.



The Yamaha customer service number is 800-962-7926. Be advised that Yamaha
is not always as "consumer friendly" as Mercury and Bombardier (OMC) help
lines are.

Bill Grannis
service manager




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com