If it annoys you, that's purpose enough. Your HEHHEE's don't bother me.
It just shows what a lunatic you are.
about Vietnam, the reason I don't put it in the same class as this
current lie-war we are in is multi-faceted, but to keep it simple, at
least we had allies that were in agreement with us.
I see. So you're saying that Vietnam is different than Iraq because we
didn't have any allies that were in agreement with us, right?
Oh, you disagree? So you are saying Vietnam IS just like Iraq?
There are many reasons why Vietnam is not just like Iraq. You're just
too stupid to point them out. You "reason" that we didn't have any
allies is just pure crap. You don't know what you're talking about AT
ALL.
Now I
have to ask ... which one was it that we didn't have any allies that
were in agreement with is?
We had VERY FEW allies in Iraq, with most of the world either not
wanting to get involved, or showing total disdain for us. Our allies
to countries ratio for Vietnam was MUCH higher.
Ah, I see. You now went from none to VERY FEW allies. Ok, why don't
you list all the allies we have providing material support (men, money,
whatever) in Iraq vs. all the allies we had providing material support
in Vietnam. This should be interesting.
Can't do a simple search yourself? It's quite easy. This should prove interesting.
YOU are the one who made the statement that Iraq is different than
VietNam because in VietNam we had allies and in Iraq we don't.
Here it is again. YOU said:
about Vietnam, the reason I don't put it in the same class as this
current lie-war we are in is multi-faceted, but to keep it simple, at
least we had allies that were in agreement with us.
All I'm doing is asking you to back up your statement by prooving that
we had allies in agreement with us over VietNam and prooving that we
don't have any allies in agreement with us over Iraq. If you can't do
that, fine. Just say so.
OT : Poor, Poor Democrats
Threaded Mode
