"Joe" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

4 year old kid sitting on couch with parent, who's watching the news:
"Mommy, what's a rape room?"

You call that a president?

Would you have had an easier time explaining blow jobs?


Kids already live with enough fear. Having to explain rape to a 4 yr old is
unnecessary. Some will disagree, and that would prove my point. It's up to
each parent to decide when to explain what to their kids.

Those who disagree for the sake of conversation will recall that they
probably believe in the concept of slapping a PG-13 or R rating on some
movies so they have some clue that the movies might contain something they
want to check first, before showing them to a toddler.

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 23:06:16 GMT, "Joe" wrote:


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

4 year old kid sitting on couch with parent, who's watching the news:
"Mommy, what's a rape room?"

You call that a president?

Would you have had an easier time explaining blow jobs?


Eeeewwww! That was cutting!

Just one detail: Clinton didn't stand in front of TV cameras and discuss
"blowjobs" using terms that could make some parents suddenly grab the remote
control to kill the TV.

"Scott McFadden" wrote in message
om...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"I think he ought to receive the ultimate penalty...for what he has done
to
his people," the president said. "I mean, he is a torturer, a murderer,
they
had rape rooms".

Rape rooms.

4 year old kid sitting on couch with parent, who's watching the news:
"Mommy, what's a rape room?"

I would have thought that after all of Clinton's well publicized
sexual escapades with his employees in the workplace, any of which
would have forced anyone with a sense of shame to resign his position,
this area would be well covered ground for most folks.

It is very interesting what some you find "personal business" and
therefore defend, and on the other hand what you find "offensive" and
decry.

Consistency and objectivity are becoming "lost arts" while being
replaced by what I refer to as "mindless partisan zombieism" (aka
Harry Krause, ect, ect).

You're right, Scott. Person #1 did something wrong, so it's OK for person #2
to do the same. How could I have missed this? Thank you for pointing it out.

By the way, how would you feel if a video rental store intentionally labeled
R-rated movies with "all audiences labels", and your young kids saw things
you didn't want them to see, while you were grabbing some popcorn in the
kitchen?

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Gimme a break. Your chimp got himself a new word for his speech: Mete

Didn't even bother to pronounce it correctly. :-)


I don't listen to Bush or watch him, because his slaughter of the
language is too painful for my ears. I do read the transcripts, though.

How did he mispronounced mete?

With a short E, like bet. Sigh..........

He also pronounces "heinous" to rhyme with "penis".

Yale.

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:30:14 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Or mine. To me, he's just plain Dubya Dumfoch, the Pretender.



Sure you do. Virtually all the dickhead Konservatives here do, because

Has anyone noticed how foulmouthed Krause has been the past year.

The guy is losing it.

President Dean LOL !

"Duh...drool...me too. Me think that too. Whatever he said."
-Wally

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Joe" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

4 year old kid sitting on couch with parent, who's watching the news:
"Mommy, what's a rape room?"

You call that a president?

Would you have had an easier time explaining blow jobs?

Sure. Oral sex between two consenting adults is a whole lot better
than a president that lied us into an unprecedented war. Now, I know,
JoeTechnician, that you'll want to know why it was unprecedented, so
I'll tell you now. We had NEVER went to war against another country
unprovoked, without reason, and without consent of our allies, that
is, until now.

cough cough vietnam cough cough

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ...

"Scott McFadden" wrote in message
om...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"I think he ought to receive the ultimate penalty...for what he has done
to
his people," the president said. "I mean, he is a torturer, a murderer,
they
had rape rooms".

Rape rooms.

4 year old kid sitting on couch with parent, who's watching the news:
"Mommy, what's a rape room?"

I would have thought that after all of Clinton's well publicized
sexual escapades with his employees in the workplace, any of which
would have forced anyone with a sense of shame to resign his position,
this area would be well covered ground for most folks.

It is very interesting what some you find "personal business" and
therefore defend, and on the other hand what you find "offensive" and
decry.

Consistency and objectivity are becoming "lost arts" while being
replaced by what I refer to as "mindless partisan zombieism" (aka
Harry Krause, ect, ect).

You're right, Scott. Person #1 did something wrong, so it's OK for person #2
to do the same. How could I have missed this? Thank you for pointing it out.

Apples and oranges, is a vast understatement.

Doug, do you permit your kids to watch the local news on TV?

If so, what does your local TV station call "rape"?

"A women was forced to submit to sexual intercourse by a large young
male behind Joe's Bar at 2:00am last night. Be on the lookout
for......".

Give me a break.

By the way, how would you feel if a video rental store intentionally labeled
R-rated movies with "all audiences labels", and your young kids saw things
you didn't want them to see, while you were grabbing some popcorn in the
kitchen?

Do you consider your local TV news broadcasts to be "R" rated?
--
SJM

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:03:14 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
I'll tell you now. We had NEVER went to war against another country
unprovoked, without reason, and without consent of our allies, that
is, until now.

cough cough vietnam cough cough

LOL. He's one of yours.

Steve

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:03:14 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
I'll tell you now. We had NEVER went to war against another country
unprovoked, without reason, and without consent of our allies, that
is, until now.

cough cough vietnam cough cough

LOL. He's one of yours.

Steve

Those LOL's are annoying, and pretty third gradish, to start. Now,
about Vietnam, the reason I don't put it in the same class as this
current lie-war we are in is multi-faceted, but to keep it simple, at
least we had allies that were in agreement with us.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Joe" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

4 year old kid sitting on couch with parent, who's watching the news:
"Mommy, what's a rape room?"

You call that a president?

Would you have had an easier time explaining blow jobs?

Sure. Oral sex between two consenting adults is a whole lot better
than a president that lied us into an unprecedented war. Now, I know,
JoeTechnician, that you'll want to know why it was unprecedented, so
I'll tell you now. We had NEVER went to war against another country
unprovoked, without reason, and without consent of our allies, that
is, until now.

cough cough vietnam cough cough

I didn't include Vietnam, because that was a much more complex
scenario than Iraq. We had allies that agreed with us, and Iraq? Well,
we were just plain lied to, that is all.