"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
news:5oJDb.8966
Not MY president.

Renounce your citizenship?



No, silly. I didn't hire the guy. I disagree with 99% of his policies. I
have no respect for him as a person, and my 14 year old son is a better
communicator. I attach no special symbolism or place of honor to his
position, so the only thing left are the material realities mentioned in the
previous sentence. Since those don't exist for me, Bush is vapor.

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:05:48 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
news:5oJDb.8966
Not MY president.

Renounce your citizenship?



No, silly. I didn't hire the guy. I disagree with 99% of his policies. I
have no respect for him as a person, and my 14 year old son is a better
communicator. I attach no special symbolism or place of honor to his
position, so the only thing left are the material realities mentioned in the
previous sentence. Since those don't exist for me, Bush is vapor.


Then why all the ****in' and moanin'?

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

JohnH wrote in message
Then why all the ****in' and moanin'?


I believe you misspelled two words. The correct spelling is ****ing,
and moaning. See what happens when you start correcting grammer,
spelling and syntax, when you can't debate? The thing to do would
have, when you couldn't debate anymore, would have been to quit, as
opposed to correcting spelling.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
JohnH wrote in message
Then why all the ****in' and moanin'?


I believe you misspelled two words. The correct spelling is ****ing,
and moaning. See what happens when you start correcting grammer,
spelling and syntax, when you can't debate? The thing to do would
have, when you couldn't debate anymore, would have been to quit, as
opposed to correcting spelling.

Grammer?

Doh!

On 22 Dec 2003 07:59:46 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

JohnH wrote in message
Then why all the ****in' and moanin'?


I believe you misspelled two words. The correct spelling is ****ing,
and moaning. See what happens when you start correcting grammer,
spelling and syntax, when you can't debate? The thing to do would
have, when you couldn't debate anymore, would have been to quit, as
opposed to correcting spelling.


Have you ever heard of a colloquialism?

Debate what? Your grammar? Read, please, this sentence: The thing to do would
have, when you couldn't debate anymore, would have been to quit, as opposed to
correcting spelling. Do you find a boo-boo therein? Also, do you realize you are
'correcting' may grammar using the word 'grammer'?

Why don't you just stop? My God, I couldn't take it any more. You're like the
Energizer Bunny.



John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 12:48:04 -0500, JohnH wrote:

On 22 Dec 2003 07:59:46 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

JohnH wrote in message
Then why all the ****in' and moanin'?


I believe you misspelled two words. The correct spelling is ****ing,
and moaning. See what happens when you start correcting grammer,
spelling and syntax, when you can't debate? The thing to do would
have, when you couldn't debate anymore, would have been to quit, as
opposed to correcting spelling.


Have you ever heard of a colloquialism?

Debate what? Your grammar? Read, please, this sentence: The thing to do would
have, when you couldn't debate anymore, would have been to quit, as opposed to
correcting spelling. Do you find a boo-boo therein? Also, do you realize you are
'correcting' may grammar using the word 'grammer'?

Why don't you just stop? My God, I couldn't take it any more. You're like the
Energizer Bunny.



John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

Please change 'may' to 'my'. My May grammar and spelling is much better than my
December grammar and spelling!

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

"JohnH" wrote in message
...


Also, do you realize you are
'correcting' may grammar using the word 'grammer'?

One of the funniest lines of the day! Thanks.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message

...I didn't hire the guy... I disagree ... no respect for him...son is a
better
communicator.

All irrelevant. If you're a US citizen, he's your President. Now, if you'd
like to propose a Constitutional amendment that would allow each citizen to
designate his/her own Federal officers, contact your representative in
Congress, and they can start the ball rolling for you. Meanwhile, like it
or not, and until someone else is elected, George Bush is your President.
Sorry for the disappointment.

JG

"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message

...I didn't hire the guy... I disagree ... no respect for him...son is a
better
communicator.

All irrelevant. If you're a US citizen, he's your President. Now, if
you'd
like to propose a Constitutional amendment that would allow each citizen
to
designate his/her own Federal officers, contact your representative in
Congress, and they can start the ball rolling for you. Meanwhile, like it
or not, and until someone else is elected, George Bush is your President.
Sorry for the disappointment.

JG

"President" implies leadership, and we each have a choice as to whether we
consider someone our leader. In a dictatorship, leadership is forced. In
this country, a leader gets his mandate (or not) from the people.

It's possible to work for a corporation where you are totally happy, but
consider the CEO a complete idiot. As long as it doesn't affect your
situation, it doesn't matter, does it?

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:30:01 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message

...I didn't hire the guy... I disagree ... no respect for him...son is a
better
communicator.

All irrelevant. If you're a US citizen, he's your President. Now, if
you'd
like to propose a Constitutional amendment that would allow each citizen
to
designate his/her own Federal officers, contact your representative in
Congress, and they can start the ball rolling for you. Meanwhile, like it
or not, and until someone else is elected, George Bush is your President.
Sorry for the disappointment.

JG

"President" implies leadership, and we each have a choice as to whether we
consider someone our leader. In a dictatorship, leadership is forced. In
this country, a leader gets his mandate (or not) from the people.

It's possible to work for a corporation where you are totally happy, but
consider the CEO a complete idiot. As long as it doesn't affect your
situation, it doesn't matter, does it?

He's still your CEO, isn't he?

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD