Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
JimH
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Was it really necessary for Edwards to even introduce the subject of
Cheney's family issues?

Slick cheap shot in my book.

Eisboch


You may be right.

I hadn't considered the effect such a remark would have on people who
consider
homosexuality a vile, deviant, "sin" rather than a biological
anomaly.

A liberal hears, "So and so has a lesbian daughter," and to us it
sounds
like,
"The
Jones family has a kid who is left handed."

Conservatives hear the same remark and perhaps some of them conclude,

"The
Jones family must have done a crappy job of raising their kids if one
of
them
turned out queer. They should have taken them to church more often.
How
sad to
think that nice young woman is condemned to burn in hell for all
eternity."

If Edwards had a malicious intent when he commented on Cheney's
daughter
and
the support the Cheney family has extended to her, then the comments

that
it
was a "shot" have some legs.

If a conservative had made that comment, it is more likely that it
would
have
been malicious than when the same comment is made by a moderate or a
liberal.
Goes to frame of reference.




LOL! You are about as non partisan as Dennis Kucinich.


Typical of a liebral.....they are ashamed of themselves.

Typical of a right winger, they feel the need to start that
third-grade-like name calling.


ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  #2   Report Post  
P.Fritz
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"JimH" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Was it really necessary for Edwards to even introduce the subject

of
Cheney's family issues?

Slick cheap shot in my book.

Eisboch


You may be right.

I hadn't considered the effect such a remark would have on people

who
consider
homosexuality a vile, deviant, "sin" rather than a biological
anomaly.

A liberal hears, "So and so has a lesbian daughter," and to us it
sounds
like,
"The
Jones family has a kid who is left handed."

Conservatives hear the same remark and perhaps some of them

conclude,
"The
Jones family must have done a crappy job of raising their kids if

one
of
them
turned out queer. They should have taken them to church more often.
How
sad to
think that nice young woman is condemned to burn in hell for all
eternity."

If Edwards had a malicious intent when he commented on Cheney's
daughter
and
the support the Cheney family has extended to her, then the

comments
that
it
was a "shot" have some legs.

If a conservative had made that comment, it is more likely that it
would
have
been malicious than when the same comment is made by a moderate or

a
liberal.
Goes to frame of reference.




LOL! You are about as non partisan as Dennis Kucinich.

Typical of a liebral.....they are ashamed of themselves.

Typical of a right winger, they feel the need to start that
third-grade-like name calling.


ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Cripes, that asslicker is dumber than a tree stump

LMAO






  #3   Report Post  
basskisser
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"P.Fritz" wrote in message ...
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Was it really necessary for Edwards to even introduce the subject

of
Cheney's family issues?

Slick cheap shot in my book.

Eisboch


You may be right.

I hadn't considered the effect such a remark would have on people

who
consider
homosexuality a vile, deviant, "sin" rather than a biological
anomaly.

A liberal hears, "So and so has a lesbian daughter," and to us it
sounds
like,
"The
Jones family has a kid who is left handed."

Conservatives hear the same remark and perhaps some of them

conclude,
"The
Jones family must have done a crappy job of raising their kids if

one
of
them
turned out queer. They should have taken them to church more often.
How
sad to
think that nice young woman is condemned to burn in hell for all
eternity."

If Edwards had a malicious intent when he commented on Cheney's
daughter
and
the support the Cheney family has extended to her, then the

comments
that
it
was a "shot" have some legs.

If a conservative had made that comment, it is more likely that it
would
have
been malicious than when the same comment is made by a moderate or

a
liberal.
Goes to frame of reference.




LOL! You are about as non partisan as Dennis Kucinich.

Typical of a liebral.....they are ashamed of themselves.

Typical of a right winger, they feel the need to start that
third-grade-like name calling.


ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Cripes, that asslicker is dumber than a tree stump

See? Thanks for making my point!!!!!!
  #4   Report Post  
JimH
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Was it really necessary for Edwards to even introduce the
subject

of
Cheney's family issues?

Slick cheap shot in my book.

Eisboch


You may be right.

I hadn't considered the effect such a remark would have on
people

who
consider
homosexuality a vile, deviant, "sin" rather than a biological
anomaly.

A liberal hears, "So and so has a lesbian daughter," and to us
it
sounds
like,
"The
Jones family has a kid who is left handed."

Conservatives hear the same remark and perhaps some of them

conclude,
"The
Jones family must have done a crappy job of raising their kids
if

one
of
them
turned out queer. They should have taken them to church more
often.
How
sad to
think that nice young woman is condemned to burn in hell for all
eternity."

If Edwards had a malicious intent when he commented on Cheney's
daughter
and
the support the Cheney family has extended to her, then the

comments
that
it
was a "shot" have some legs.

If a conservative had made that comment, it is more likely that
it
would
have
been malicious than when the same comment is made by a moderate
or

a
liberal.
Goes to frame of reference.




LOL! You are about as non partisan as Dennis Kucinich.

Typical of a liebral.....they are ashamed of themselves.

Typical of a right winger, they feel the need to start that
third-grade-like name calling.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Cripes, that asslicker is dumber than a tree stump

See? Thanks for making my point!!!!!!


That you are dumber than a tree stump? I agree.


  #5   Report Post  
basskisser
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"JimH" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Was it really necessary for Edwards to even introduce the subject of
Cheney's family issues?

Slick cheap shot in my book.

Eisboch


You may be right.

I hadn't considered the effect such a remark would have on people who
consider
homosexuality a vile, deviant, "sin" rather than a biological
anomaly.

A liberal hears, "So and so has a lesbian daughter," and to us it
sounds
like,
"The
Jones family has a kid who is left handed."

Conservatives hear the same remark and perhaps some of them conclude,

"The
Jones family must have done a crappy job of raising their kids if one
of
them
turned out queer. They should have taken them to church more often.
How
sad to
think that nice young woman is condemned to burn in hell for all
eternity."

If Edwards had a malicious intent when he commented on Cheney's
daughter
and
the support the Cheney family has extended to her, then the comments

that
it
was a "shot" have some legs.

If a conservative had made that comment, it is more likely that it
would
have
been malicious than when the same comment is made by a moderate or a
liberal.
Goes to frame of reference.




LOL! You are about as non partisan as Dennis Kucinich.

Typical of a liebral.....they are ashamed of themselves.

Typical of a right winger, they feel the need to start that
third-grade-like name calling.


ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Hmm, perhaps you've, again, been mistaken about what was said? I'll
bet you think that in the above, that I've done what I'm saying isn't
called for? Pray tell, what name DID I call you?
Do you think it's an adult like act to call people petty little names?
I say third grade like, because my daughter, who's in fourth grade,
knows more than to do things like that.


  #6   Report Post  
John Gaquin
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"JimH" wrote in message

...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Was it really necessary for Edwards to even introduce the

subject of
Cheney's family issues?

Slick cheap shot in my book.

Eisboch


You may be right.

I hadn't considered the effect such a remark would have on people

who
consider
homosexuality a vile, deviant, "sin" rather than a biological
anomaly.

A liberal hears, "So and so has a lesbian daughter," and to us it
sounds
like,
"The
Jones family has a kid who is left handed."

Conservatives hear the same remark and perhaps some of them

conclude,
"The
Jones family must have done a crappy job of raising their kids if

one
of
them
turned out queer. They should have taken them to church more

often.
How
sad to
think that nice young woman is condemned to burn in hell for all
eternity."

If Edwards had a malicious intent when he commented on Cheney's
daughter
and
the support the Cheney family has extended to her, then the

comments
that
it
was a "shot" have some legs.

If a conservative had made that comment, it is more likely that

it
would
have
been malicious than when the same comment is made by a moderate

or a
liberal.
Goes to frame of reference.




LOL! You are about as non partisan as Dennis Kucinich.

Typical of a liebral.....they are ashamed of themselves.

Typical of a right winger, they feel the need to start that
third-grade-like name calling.


ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Hmm, perhaps you've, again, been mistaken about what was said? I'll
bet you think that in the above, that I've done what I'm saying isn't
called for? Pray tell, what name DID I call you?
Do you think it's an adult like act to call people petty little names?
I say third grade like, because my daughter, who's in fourth grade,
knows more than to do things like that.



  #7   Report Post  
John Gaquin
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"basskisser" wrote on 10/7

Do you think it's an adult like act to call people petty little names? I

say third grade like, because my daughter, who's in fourth grade,
knows more than to do things like that.


[basskisser, 10/8, same thread] My god, you are dumb!

[basskisser, 10/7, same thread] Are you trying to make a point, or just
being stupid, as usual?

[basskisser, 10/7] "...you are nothing but a piece of **** trying to act
like
special... in my youth, we made punching bags out of arrogant little
assholes like you..."

[basskisser, 10/8] God, you are stupid... You are just too stupid to find
it, I quess.

"quess" ??

I could go on, and on, and on. Its just too easy.

LOL


  #8   Report Post  
Jon Smithe
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John, You have got to stop pointing out the obvious to bass. He might pack
up his bags and leave, then were are we going to get our daily laugh.


"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote on 10/7

Do you think it's an adult like act to call people petty little names? I

say third grade like, because my daughter, who's in fourth grade,
knows more than to do things like that.


[basskisser, 10/8, same thread] My god, you are dumb!

[basskisser, 10/7, same thread] Are you trying to make a point, or just
being stupid, as usual?

[basskisser, 10/7] "...you are nothing but a piece of **** trying to act
like
special... in my youth, we made punching bags out of arrogant little
assholes like you..."

[basskisser, 10/8] God, you are stupid... You are just too stupid to find
it, I quess.

"quess" ??

I could go on, and on, and on. Its just too easy.

LOL




  #9   Report Post  
basskisser
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John Gaquin" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" atl_man2@a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=yahoo%20com" onmouseover="window.status='yahoo.com'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"yahoo.com/a wrote on 10/7

Do you think it's an adult like act to call people petty little names? I

say third grade like, because my daughter, who's in fourth grade,
knows more than to do things like that.


[basskisser, 10/8, same thread] My god, you are dumb!

[basskisser, 10/7, same thread] Are you trying to make a point, or just
being stupid, as usual?

[basskisser, 10/7] "...you are nothing but a piece of **** trying to act
like
special... in my youth, we made a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=punching%20bags" onmouseover="window.status='punching bags'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"punching bags/a out of arrogant little
assholes like you..."

[basskisser, 10/8] God, you are stupid... You are just too stupid to find
it, I quess.

"quess" ??

I could go on, and on, and on. Its just too easy.

LOL


Nice. You did exactly as I suspected, and that is NOT ANSWER THE
QUESTION. Care to try again?
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Political Debate Gilligan ASA 99 October 8th 04 02:28 AM
GOP Spin on Why Bush Lost Debate... Harry Krause General 1 October 2nd 04 12:35 AM
OT Bush still afraid to publicly debate Kerry? basskisser General 21 September 15th 04 11:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017