"JimH" wrote in message
...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Was it really necessary for Edwards to even introduce the subject of
Cheney's family issues?

Slick cheap shot in my book.

Eisboch


You may be right.

I hadn't considered the effect such a remark would have on people who
consider
homosexuality a vile, deviant, "sin" rather than a biological anomaly.

A liberal hears, "So and so has a lesbian daughter," and to us it sounds
like,
"The
Jones family has a kid who is left handed."

Conservatives hear the same remark and perhaps some of them conclude,
"The
Jones family must have done a crappy job of raising their kids if one of
them
turned out queer. They should have taken them to church more often. How
sad to
think that nice young woman is condemned to burn in hell for all
eternity."

If Edwards had a malicious intent when he commented on Cheney's daughter
and
the support the Cheney family has extended to her, then the comments
that
it
was a "shot" have some legs.

If a conservative had made that comment, it is more likely that it would
have
been malicious than when the same comment is made by a moderate or a
liberal.
Goes to frame of reference.




LOL! You are about as non partisan as Dennis Kucinich.

Typical of a liebral.....they are ashamed of themselves.

In article ,
says...


Typical of a liebral.....they are ashamed of themselves.

If you had a brain in your head, you might understand why Americans
should be ashamed of themselves. We hired the village idiot to run the
country.

jps

jps wrote:
In article ,
says...


Typical of a liebral.....they are ashamed of themselves.

If you had a brain in your head, you might understand why Americans
should be ashamed of themselves. We hired the village idiot to run the
country.

jps


There's the rub...he has no brain in his head. The twerp is barely
literate...he probably thinks Dubya speaks English "good."

--
"...vice president (Cheney), I'm surprised to hear him talk about
records. When he was one of 435 members of the United States House, he
was one of 10 to vote against Head Start, one of four to vote against
banning plastic weapons that can pass through metal detectors. He voted
against the Department of Education. He voted against funding for
Meals on Wheels for seniors. He voted against a holiday for Martin
Luther King. He voted against a resolution calling for the release of
Nelson Mandela in South Africa. It's amazing to hear him criticize
either my record or John Kerry's."

- Senator John Edwards, 10/05/04

jps wrote:

We hired the village idiot to run the country.

When did b'asskisser become president?

-- Charlie

In article ,
says...


jps wrote:

We hired the village idiot to run the country.

When did b'asskisser become president?

-- Charlie

There's more than one village in the country. Are you running this
year?

Charles wrote in message ...
jps wrote:

We hired the village idiot to run the country.

When did b'asskisser become president?

-- Charlie

Are you trying to make a point, or just being stupid, as usual?

"P.Fritz" wrote in message ...
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Was it really necessary for Edwards to even introduce the subject of
Cheney's family issues?

Slick cheap shot in my book.

Eisboch


You may be right.

I hadn't considered the effect such a remark would have on people who
consider
homosexuality a vile, deviant, "sin" rather than a biological anomaly.

A liberal hears, "So and so has a lesbian daughter," and to us it sounds
like,
"The
Jones family has a kid who is left handed."

Conservatives hear the same remark and perhaps some of them conclude,
"The
Jones family must have done a crappy job of raising their kids if one of
them
turned out queer. They should have taken them to church more often. How
sad to
think that nice young woman is condemned to burn in hell for all
eternity."

If Edwards had a malicious intent when he commented on Cheney's daughter
and
the support the Cheney family has extended to her, then the comments
that
it
was a "shot" have some legs.

If a conservative had made that comment, it is more likely that it would
have
been malicious than when the same comment is made by a moderate or a
liberal.
Goes to frame of reference.




LOL! You are about as non partisan as Dennis Kucinich.

Typical of a liebral.....they are ashamed of themselves.

Typical of a right winger, they feel the need to start that
third-grade-like name calling.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Was it really necessary for Edwards to even introduce the subject of
Cheney's family issues?

Slick cheap shot in my book.

Eisboch


You may be right.

I hadn't considered the effect such a remark would have on people who
consider
homosexuality a vile, deviant, "sin" rather than a biological
anomaly.

A liberal hears, "So and so has a lesbian daughter," and to us it
sounds
like,
"The
Jones family has a kid who is left handed."

Conservatives hear the same remark and perhaps some of them conclude,
"The
Jones family must have done a crappy job of raising their kids if one
of
them
turned out queer. They should have taken them to church more often.
How
sad to
think that nice young woman is condemned to burn in hell for all
eternity."

If Edwards had a malicious intent when he commented on Cheney's
daughter
and
the support the Cheney family has extended to her, then the comments
that
it
was a "shot" have some legs.

If a conservative had made that comment, it is more likely that it
would
have
been malicious than when the same comment is made by a moderate or a
liberal.
Goes to frame of reference.




LOL! You are about as non partisan as Dennis Kucinich.

Typical of a liebral.....they are ashamed of themselves.

Typical of a right winger, they feel the need to start that
third-grade-like name calling.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"JimH" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Was it really necessary for Edwards to even introduce the subject
of
Cheney's family issues?

Slick cheap shot in my book.

Eisboch


You may be right.

I hadn't considered the effect such a remark would have on people
who
consider
homosexuality a vile, deviant, "sin" rather than a biological
anomaly.

A liberal hears, "So and so has a lesbian daughter," and to us it
sounds
like,
"The
Jones family has a kid who is left handed."

Conservatives hear the same remark and perhaps some of them
conclude,
"The
Jones family must have done a crappy job of raising their kids if
one
of
them
turned out queer. They should have taken them to church more often.
How
sad to
think that nice young woman is condemned to burn in hell for all
eternity."

If Edwards had a malicious intent when he commented on Cheney's
daughter
and
the support the Cheney family has extended to her, then the
comments
that
it
was a "shot" have some legs.

If a conservative had made that comment, it is more likely that it
would
have
been malicious than when the same comment is made by a moderate or
a
liberal.
Goes to frame of reference.




LOL! You are about as non partisan as Dennis Kucinich.

Typical of a liebral.....they are ashamed of themselves.

Typical of a right winger, they feel the need to start that
third-grade-like name calling.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Cripes, that asslicker is dumber than a tree stump

LMAO

"P.Fritz" wrote in message ...
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Was it really necessary for Edwards to even introduce the subject
of
Cheney's family issues?

Slick cheap shot in my book.

Eisboch


You may be right.

I hadn't considered the effect such a remark would have on people
who
consider
homosexuality a vile, deviant, "sin" rather than a biological
anomaly.

A liberal hears, "So and so has a lesbian daughter," and to us it
sounds
like,
"The
Jones family has a kid who is left handed."

Conservatives hear the same remark and perhaps some of them
conclude,
"The
Jones family must have done a crappy job of raising their kids if
one
of
them
turned out queer. They should have taken them to church more often.
How
sad to
think that nice young woman is condemned to burn in hell for all
eternity."

If Edwards had a malicious intent when he commented on Cheney's
daughter
and
the support the Cheney family has extended to her, then the
comments
that
it
was a "shot" have some legs.

If a conservative had made that comment, it is more likely that it
would
have
been malicious than when the same comment is made by a moderate or
a
liberal.
Goes to frame of reference.




LOL! You are about as non partisan as Dennis Kucinich.

Typical of a liebral.....they are ashamed of themselves.

Typical of a right winger, they feel the need to start that
third-grade-like name calling.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Cripes, that asslicker is dumber than a tree stump

See? Thanks for making my point!!!!!!