wrote in message
...
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 17:33:06 GMT, "Clams Canino"
wrote:

That assumes most of us even care about the political flappings. hehe

We *all* agree he *had* chem / bio weapons. He never provided proof of
destruction. If they were destroyed, I want him to prove it. If he sent
them away, I wanna know *where*.

It's still real simple.


Then you and Bush blundered badly by not letting the inspectors
complete their mission before rushing to war. Now that Iraq has been
bombed and burned, you have little chance of making YOUR case.

BB

The burden of proof was/is on Saddam. Not the inspectors.


db