Backyard Renegade wrote:

Harry Krause wrote in message ...
Backyard Renegade wrote:
Harry Krause wrote in message news:bspgiu$f8b1v$1@ID-
The unanswered question? How many were the result of daddy messing with
his little gal. Incest is a big problem among you righties.

Yeah, maybe not. Why is it then that it is the leftys that want
abortion on demand with every opportunity for the father of the child,
and pro abortion folks to convince the 13 yo girl to do something and
at the same time, make every effort to keep that girl from even
hearing an opposing viewpoint? I still say it is so adult men can
inpregnate little children and cover it up with guilt trips laid on
the little girl and keep her from telling on them. That's what this is
all about, again, the left trying to aviod accountability.


You go right ahead and fulfill your fantasies with and about little
girls. Me, I'd prefer their mommies. You are some piece of work.


It is no fantacy of mine or anyone elses, it is fact, it happens.
Adults get little girls pregnant, and this law will enable that
further and allow those criminals to get away with it.

Bullship.



You still want to give the parent only two hours notice, this is still
obviously so the child can not have access to even fair and unbiased
information before the proceedure.

What fair and unbiased information does a pregnant 13-year-old girl
need, other than where to get a safe abortion from a licensed doctor?

You're not thinking of some effort to persuade the girl to go full term
with the pregnancy, are yoU?

--
Email sent to is never read.

Harry Krause wrote in message ...
Backyard Renegade wrote:

Harry Krause wrote in message ...
Backyard Renegade wrote:
Harry Krause wrote in message news:bspgiu$f8b1v$1@ID-
The unanswered question? How many were the result of daddy messing with
his little gal. Incest is a big problem among you righties.

Yeah, maybe not. Why is it then that it is the leftys that want
abortion on demand with every opportunity for the father of the child,
and pro abortion folks to convince the 13 yo girl to do something and
at the same time, make every effort to keep that girl from even
hearing an opposing viewpoint? I still say it is so adult men can
inpregnate little children and cover it up with guilt trips laid on
the little girl and keep her from telling on them. That's what this is
all about, again, the left trying to aviod accountability.


You go right ahead and fulfill your fantasies with and about little
girls. Me, I'd prefer their mommies. You are some piece of work.


It is no fantacy of mine or anyone elses, it is fact, it happens.
Adults get little girls pregnant, and this law will enable that
further and allow those criminals to get away with it.

Bullship.



You still want to give the parent only two hours notice, this is still
obviously so the child can not have access to even fair and unbiased
information before the proceedure.

What fair and unbiased information does a pregnant 13-year-old girl
need, other than where to get a safe abortion from a licensed doctor?

You're not thinking of some effort to persuade the girl to go full term
with the pregnancy, are yoU?

Not at all. In many cases she would indeed have the final say, however
I think there should be time for her to hear other than from a guy who
does not want to be burdened with a child, or have it found out that
he is a father. The parents need to be at least as involved as he, is
there a problem with that?

Backyard Renegade wrote:
Harry Krause wrote in message ...
Backyard Renegade wrote:

Harry Krause wrote in message ...
Backyard Renegade wrote:
Harry Krause wrote in message news:bspgiu$f8b1v$1@ID-
The unanswered question? How many were the result of daddy messing with
his little gal. Incest is a big problem among you righties.

Yeah, maybe not. Why is it then that it is the leftys that want
abortion on demand with every opportunity for the father of the child,
and pro abortion folks to convince the 13 yo girl to do something and
at the same time, make every effort to keep that girl from even
hearing an opposing viewpoint? I still say it is so adult men can
inpregnate little children and cover it up with guilt trips laid on
the little girl and keep her from telling on them. That's what this is
all about, again, the left trying to aviod accountability.


You go right ahead and fulfill your fantasies with and about little
girls. Me, I'd prefer their mommies. You are some piece of work.


It is no fantacy of mine or anyone elses, it is fact, it happens.
Adults get little girls pregnant, and this law will enable that
further and allow those criminals to get away with it.

Bullship.



You still want to give the parent only two hours notice, this is still
obviously so the child can not have access to even fair and unbiased
information before the proceedure.

What fair and unbiased information does a pregnant 13-year-old girl
need, other than where to get a safe abortion from a licensed doctor?

You're not thinking of some effort to persuade the girl to go full term
with the pregnancy, are yoU?

Not at all. In many cases she would indeed have the final say, however
I think there should be time for her to hear other than from a guy who
does not want to be burdened with a child, or have it found out that
he is a father. The parents need to be at least as involved as he, is
there a problem with that?


The only thing that matters when a young girl seeks an abortion is the
mental and physical health of that girl.

Nothing is preventing her parents from "involvement" in the girl's
mental and physical restoration after the abortion.

The problem with your line of thinking is that some parents would oppose
the abortion and force their kid to go to term.

Screw that.

Let them live their own ridgid little lives and let the girl get on with
hers.



--
Email sent to is never read.