| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
The few of us here...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Fine. But what about the women who, in the absence of any underlying health risk to her or the infant, insist upon having the right to an abortion at *any* stage in the pregnancy? Is forcing her to have the baby after the first trimester done "just to teach her a lesson"? Or is it to protect the life of the baby? I thought my statement was clear. It is anything *but* clear. Simple question: *Why* do *you* oppose abortion after the first trimester? I don't. -- Email sent to is never read. |
Threaded Mode
