About Us

Backyard Renegade wrote:
Harry Krause wrote in message ...
Backyard Renegade wrote:

Harry Krause wrote in message ...
John H wrote:
On 27 Dec 2003 20:29:45 -0800, (Backyard
Renegade) wrote:

Harry Krause wrote in message news:bsil4u$d51ji$1@ID-

Yeah, so, why are you coming down so hard on women under 18? You think
they're all incapable and stupid?

You keep spinning it as simply "under 18", let's get the cards on the
table, let's set a number, like 13. OK, you say a 13 yo girl should be
able to get this medical proceedure without her parents permission or
knowledge, how about field trips? Should the school have to tell me
when they are taking my 13 yo out of town? How about plastic surgery,
dating, cerfews, should she be able to get in a car with her friends
dad and take off to New York on a weekend without her parents
permission? I mean, Harry, where do you draw the line, what age do
parents lose all rights to help their kids make decisions? 18, 13,
10??? Or is is just this one decision, abortion you want to apply this
to as it suits your personal agenda of not wanting anyone to be
accountable for anything?

Good points. I'll be very surprised if you get anything more than
sarcasm or generalities from Harry, jps, et al.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

There are too many instances of right-wing extremist parents forcing
their view of morality on minor girls, with devastating results. If a
13-year-old girl wants or needs an abortion, she should be able to get
one. If her parents want to help, fine. If not, tough darts: the courts
should immediately appoint someone to help the young lady.

The world doesn't need any more of the bigotry, hate and
small-mindedness spewed by right-wingers.

"Hello, Mrs. Gingrich? We have your 13-year-old daughter down here, and
she wants an abortion. Our doctor will perform it in 2 hours. Do you
want to come down here and provide her with support? YEs? Okay, be here
by 3 pm. If not, a friend of the court will help your daughter through
her time of need and the doctor will perform the surgery.

"And no, you cannot remove your pregnant daughter from the premises so
you can try to talk her out of this decision. This is her life, not yours."

How's that?

No good, you still will not answer any direct questions.

What are you babbling about? I gave you my answer on abortions for
13-year-old girls. My answer is the same for all women: abortion on
demand during the first trimester, parental notification for very young
girls, but no ability for parental interference in whether the gal gets
one or not.

Without writing a disseration on the rearing of female teens, let me say
that the household rules and regulations are best determined by direct
negotiations, with the parental units letting go bit by bit.

And, no, I don't believe a gal should be "held accountable" for not
using proper contraception by being forced to bear a child because her
lunatic right-wing parents want to teach her a lesson.

Got it?

ABORTION ON DEMAND FOR ALL FEMALES DURING THE FIRST TRIMESTER. ALL FEMALES.

So how about ear piercing, dating, going on vacations? You still seem
to only want abortions on demand. You keep screaming about the
possible one or two parents who might make wrong decisions for their
children, but ignore the old pervert who got her pregnant... which one
of these folks do you think has the childs best interest in mind, the
parent, or the guy who does not want to get nailed for statutory rape?
Again, you spin to try to say I am trying to hold the girl
accountable, not at all, I am trying to hold the rapist accountable,
but again, that would not suit your agenda...

Now there's a bizarre thought. Preventing a girl from getting an
abortion and forcing her to bear the child holds the father of the child
accountable.

D'oh.

--
Email sent to is never read.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Menu

About Us