|
OT--Can't they make up their minds?
When Gallup showed that Bush's lead had risen to 13 points among "likely"
voters, the liberal media whined that the more accurate number was the 8 point lead he had among "registered" voters. Now that Bush's "registered" voter lead has *risen* to 11 points, the liberal media touts the "likely" voter number that has fallen. What is wrong with the media? Aren't there any non-partisan journalists left? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Bush's lead gets smaller in poll By Susan Page, USA TODAY WASHINGTON - President Bush leads Sen. John Kerry by 8 points among likely voters, the USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup Poll shows, a narrower advantage than Bush held in mid-September and one that puts him at the edge of the survey's margin of error. Among all registered voters, the president's lead widened a bit to a statistically significant 11 percentage points. |
"NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... When Gallup showed that Bush's lead had risen to 13 points among "likely" voters, the liberal media whined that the more accurate number was the 8 point lead he had among "registered" voters. Now that Bush's "registered" voter lead has *risen* to 11 points, the liberal media touts the "likely" voter number that has fallen. What is wrong with the media? Aren't there any non-partisan journalists left? Nope. All of them...CNN, CNBC, ABC, Fox, CBS and NBC are biased. The newspapers are the same way. The only way to make sense of the news is to read several sources. |
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:51:11 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:
When Gallup showed that Bush's lead had risen to 13 points among "likely" voters, the liberal media whined that the more accurate number was the 8 point lead he had among "registered" voters. Now that Bush's "registered" voter lead has *risen* to 11 points, the liberal media touts the "likely" voter number that has fallen. What is wrong with the media? Aren't there any non-partisan journalists left? This is what you get when you allow three companies to own ALL the news outlets in the country. And guess what - you can blame this on President Clinton because he appointed Michael "I don't see anything wrong with one company owning all the media" Powell to do precisely that - make it happen. He did and this is the result. It will only get worse in the coming years. All the best, Tom -------------- "What the hell's the deal with this newsgroup... is there a computer terminal in the day room of some looney bin somewhere?" Bilgeman - circa 2004 |
|
"NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... When Gallup showed that Bush's lead had risen to 13 points among "likely" voters, the liberal media whined that the more accurate number was the 8 point lead he had among "registered" voters. Now that Bush's "registered" voter lead has *risen* to 11 points, the liberal media touts the "likely" voter number that has fallen. What is wrong with the media? Aren't there any non-partisan journalists left? The funny thing is that typically, the 'likely' voter trend leans conservative compared to registered, so should have a higher number....some is cooking the books..... The other funny is how all the polls tend to be consistent, except for rasmussen (sp?) which is what all the loonie left is quoting as if they had any hope. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- -- Bush's lead gets smaller in poll By Susan Page, USA TODAY WASHINGTON - President Bush leads Sen. John Kerry by 8 points among likely voters, the USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup Poll shows, a narrower advantage than Bush held in mid-September and one that puts him at the edge of the survey's margin of error. Among all registered voters, the president's lead widened a bit to a statistically significant 11 percentage points. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com