Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 05:42:38 +0000, Gould 0738 wrote:
I've been wondering if it isn't time to amend the constitution. Give the POTUS a single, six-year term and then he's outa there. The VP could succeed him. What a refreshing change it would be to have a president dong his best to live up to his campaign promises during his term, rather than barely getting anything off the ground in the first four years so we feel like we are compelled to send him back for a second four so he can finish up. Imagine, a president spending six years administering the executive branch instead of four years "running" for reelection. There are other, less drastic ways to accomplish this. Personally, I'm hesitant to change the Constitution. It has provided a stability that has worked for over 200 years. Calls to change it, I think, somehow weaken it. It's similar to term limits. It only limits our ability to keep good legislators. If they are incompetent, it is our job to fire them. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More bad news for Bush, good news for Americans | General |