"NOYB" wrote in message

...and an 11 point post-convention bounce. Ironically, Kerry had a
*negative* bounce following his Convention.

But McAuliffe et al explained at the time that there was no post convention
Dem bounce because the race was so tight there simply were not enough free
voters available to form the bounce numbers.

Therefore, we must presume that this post-convention W bounce is merely a
fig-newton of our imaginations. It simply can't be there. :-)

"NOYB" wrote in message
news
Eleven points is huge...well outside the poll's margin of error. On
August
5th, Bush was *down* 7 points in the Time poll. On 8/26/04, Bush and
Kerry
were even. On 9/3, he's up 11. That's an 18 point swing in less than a
month...and an 11 point post-convention bounce. Ironically, Kerry had a
*negative* bounce following his Convention.

snip
Since little Bush is doing so well in the polls you don't have to waste any
time voting this fall!

;-)

Mark Browne

It's sad that attacks from documented liars, "Swift Boat Truth Tellers"
influence peoples vote.

We get what we deserve.

Some of the founding fathers suggested that voting rights be restricted to
owners of property.

Maybe the modern qualifier should be an IQ test. :-)

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
It's sad that attacks from documented liars, "Swift Boat Truth Tellers"
influence peoples vote.

We get what we deserve.

Some of the founding fathers suggested that voting rights be restricted to
owners of property.

Maybe the modern qualifier should be an IQ test. :-)

I'd be for that...or a test with 10 questions about the candidates who are
running.

On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 13:43:32 -0400, NOYB wrote:


Some of the founding fathers suggested that voting rights be restricted
to owners of property.

Maybe the modern qualifier should be an IQ test. :-)

I'd be for that...or a test with 10 questions about the candidates who are
running.

Why not just give the candidates and IQ test? That would be one way to
send GWB back to Crawford. ;-)

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 13:43:32 -0400, NOYB wrote:


Some of the founding fathers suggested that voting rights be restricted
to owners of property.

Maybe the modern qualifier should be an IQ test. :-)

I'd be for that...or a test with 10 questions about the candidates who
are
running.

Why not just give the candidates and IQ test? That would be one way to
send GWB back to Crawford. ;-)

You might be supprised at the IQ's of certain people. What is your IQ? I am
just shy of getting into the club.

Bert Robbins wrote:

You might be supprised at the IQ's of certain people. What is your IQ? I am
just shy of getting into the club.

The club of folks with triple-digit IQs, Bertie? No surprise. Too rigid
for reality.

I really wonder about your intellect...you think medical savings plans
are the answer for the 43 million Americans without health insurance?
Yeah, some of them might be able to save, what, $20 a week? Priced any
serious prescriptions lately?

The best cure for right-wing smug****s like you is to have to experience
some of life's financial angst.

--
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
And don't forget to pay your taxes so the rich don't have to!