Ownership for all...
 

jim-- wrote:

You forgot to post the following statements from the article you cite:


Yeah, last week the idiot known as Bush stated that Americans should own
their own health care plan. The idiot known as Bush had no explanation
for that, either.

Bush and his supporters should stick to what they do best...besmirching
the reputations of those who are braver than he was...John McCain, Max
Cleland, and John Kerry. Bush is at his best in the primordial slime.
You know...where you live, Dennis.



--
Save America - Defeat Bush!

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:

You forgot to post the following statements from the article you cite:


Yeah, last week the idiot known as Bush stated that Americans should own
their own health care plan. The idiot known as Bush had no explanation
for that, either.

Bush and his supporters should stick to what they do best...besmirching
the reputations of those who are braver than he was...John McCain, Max
Cleland, and John Kerry. Bush is at his best in the primordial slime.
You know...where you live, Dennis.


You deleted this from your reply...LOL

- - - - - - -- -

"I want people owning something in America," Bush told a rally in
Hedgesville, W.Va., last week, sounding a theme he is expected to amplify in
his Sept. 2 acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention in New
York.

"If you own something, you have a vital stake in the future of America,"
Bush says in a television ad being run in battleground states. It shows
images of a home, a business, older Americans, children and construction
workers.

Bush's "ownership" platform includes several unfulfilled campaign proposals
from 2000. One would allow younger workers to divert some Social Security
taxes into private government-sponsored retirement accounts. Another would
create tax-free "health savings accounts" that workers could take from job
to job.

Bush aides say the ownership theme helps underscore differences with Kerry,
who advocates raising taxes on the most affluent households and spending
more on health care, education and other domestic programs."
--------

So you resort to name calling instead of discussing the article you brought
up. Obvliously you cannot dispute my retort.

You lost yet another one Krause. This is too easy.

jim-- wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:

You forgot to post the following statements from the article you cite:


Yeah, last week the idiot known as Bush stated that Americans should own
their own health care plan. The idiot known as Bush had no explanation
for that, either.

Bush and his supporters should stick to what they do best...besmirching
the reputations of those who are braver than he was...John McCain, Max
Cleland, and John Kerry. Bush is at his best in the primordial slime.
You know...where you live, Dennis.


You deleted this from your reply...LOL

- - - - - - -- -

"I want people owning something in America," Bush told a rally in
Hedgesville, W.Va., last week, sounding a theme he is expected to amplify in
his Sept. 2 acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention in New
York.

"If you own something, you have a vital stake in the future of America,"
Bush says in a television ad being run in battleground states. It shows
images of a home, a business, older Americans, children and construction
workers.

Bush's "ownership" platform includes several unfulfilled campaign proposals
from 2000. One would allow younger workers to divert some Social Security
taxes into private government-sponsored retirement accounts. Another would
create tax-free "health savings accounts" that workers could take from job
to job.

Bush aides say the ownership theme helps underscore differences with Kerry,
who advocates raising taxes on the most affluent households and spending
more on health care, education and other domestic programs."
--------

So you resort to name calling instead of discussing the article you brought
up. Obvliously you cannot dispute my retort.

You lost yet another one Krause. This is too easy.




There's nothing to discuss, ****-for-brains. It's a dumb theme,
especially to those Americans whose jobs were shipped overseas thanks to
Bush Administration policies, and, as a result, have lost their health
care, their pensions, their jobs, and in many cases, their homes. Many
of your fellow Ohioans will find Bush's theme to ring as hollow as that
space between your ears.

A tax-free health care savings account isn't going to cover much of a
hospital bill or a serious doctor's bill or ongoing meds...and it is no
substitute for good health insurance. What it is is a way for Bush to
hand employers a wedge issue. In fact, it is worse. It is outright
fraud, for reasons you probably couldn't begin to understand.


--
Save America - Defeat Bush!

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:

You forgot to post the following statements from the article you cite:


Yeah, last week the idiot known as Bush stated that Americans should own
their own health care plan. The idiot known as Bush had no explanation
for that, either.

Bush and his supporters should stick to what they do best...besmirching
the reputations of those who are braver than he was...John McCain, Max
Cleland, and John Kerry. Bush is at his best in the primordial slime.
You know...where you live, Dennis.


You deleted this from your reply...LOL

- - - - - - -- -

"I want people owning something in America," Bush told a rally in
Hedgesville, W.Va., last week, sounding a theme he is expected to amplify
in
his Sept. 2 acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention in
New
York.

"If you own something, you have a vital stake in the future of America,"
Bush says in a television ad being run in battleground states. It shows
images of a home, a business, older Americans, children and construction
workers.

Bush's "ownership" platform includes several unfulfilled campaign
proposals
from 2000. One would allow younger workers to divert some Social Security
taxes into private government-sponsored retirement accounts. Another
would
create tax-free "health savings accounts" that workers could take from
job
to job.

Bush aides say the ownership theme helps underscore differences with
Kerry,
who advocates raising taxes on the most affluent households and spending
more on health care, education and other domestic programs."
--------

So you resort to name calling instead of discussing the article you
brought
up. Obvliously you cannot dispute my retort.

You lost yet another one Krause. This is too easy.




There's nothing to discuss, ****-for-brains. It's a dumb theme,
especially to those Americans whose jobs were shipped overseas thanks to
Bush Administration policies, and, as a result, have lost their health
care, their pensions, their jobs, and in many cases, their homes. Many
of your fellow Ohioans will find Bush's theme to ring as hollow as that
space between your ears.

A tax-free health care savings account isn't going to cover much of a
hospital bill or a serious doctor's bill or ongoing meds...and it is no
substitute for good health insurance. What it is is a way for Bush to
hand employers a wedge issue. In fact, it is worse. It is outright
fraud, for reasons you probably couldn't begin t ounderstand.


--
Save America - Defeat Bush!

Do you ever get tired of spewing the same garbage time and time again,
regardless of topic?

Your dog don't hunt anymore Krause. Time to get a new one.

On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 22:48:35 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:


That's the second time you've made that claim. I'm still curious...on
what do you base it?

The same way you spew your garbage...bull**** you pull from your old
tired ass.

All youre doing is supporting the sterotype, that democrats are poor,
stupid, uneducated rednecks.

No go back to your village...youre making all of us democrats look
bad.

SNIP

All youre doing is supporting the sterotype, that democrats are poor,
stupid, uneducated rednecks.

SNIP


Actually, there are 3 types of Democrats-

1)- Poor, stupid, uneducated rednecks. "Get us another beer, woman- the
stock car race is a-comin on the TV." (Our "poor" people live much better
than 3/4 of the world's population)

2)- Rich, spoiled, Society folks & Academians who feel so guilty about their
success (or good fortune) that they vote Democratic, knowing full well that
the Dems will give them plenty of loopholes so they can trim their taxes
down to size. They feel the need to help the "little people", whom they feel
are not bright enough to fend for themselves.....

3)- Lazy, under-employed "poor me" pot smoking crybabies who want the rest
of us to "help them get on their feet" for the next, oh say, 20 or 30 years.
" NO MORE WAR ! What? People died supplying me these drugs? No way, man..."


Let all but the most deserving people (handicapped, newly destitute,
transitional job trainees) help themselves, and you will discover just how
strong, resourceful, and intelligent they really are. True character comes
from doing for one's self.

"Stanley Barthfarkle" wrote in message m...
SNIP

All youre doing is supporting the sterotype, that democrats are poor,
stupid, uneducated rednecks.

SNIP


Actually, there are 3 types of Democrats-

1)- Poor, stupid, uneducated rednecks. "Get us another beer, woman- the
stock car race is a-comin on the TV." (Our "poor" people live much better
than 3/4 of the world's population)

2)- Rich, spoiled, Society folks & Academians who feel so guilty about their
success (or good fortune) that they vote Democratic, knowing full well that
the Dems will give them plenty of loopholes so they can trim their taxes
down to size. They feel the need to help the "little people", whom they feel
are not bright enough to fend for themselves.....

3)- Lazy, under-employed "poor me" pot smoking crybabies who want the rest
of us to "help them get on their feet" for the next, oh say, 20 or 30 years.
" NO MORE WAR ! What? People died supplying me these drugs? No way, man..."


Let all but the most deserving people (handicapped, newly destitute,
transitional job trainees) help themselves, and you will discover just how
strong, resourceful, and intelligent they really are. True character comes
from doing for one's self.

Someone has to be pretty stupid to lump every liberal in the world
into such catagories. Would you like to be lumped into a catagory,
just because of your political views?

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Stanley Barthfarkle" wrote in message
m...
SNIP

All youre doing is supporting the sterotype, that democrats are poor,
stupid, uneducated rednecks.

SNIP


Actually, there are 3 types of Democrats-

1)- Poor, stupid, uneducated rednecks. "Get us another beer, woman- the
stock car race is a-comin on the TV." (Our "poor" people live much better
than 3/4 of the world's population)

2)- Rich, spoiled, Society folks & Academians who feel so guilty about
their
success (or good fortune) that they vote Democratic, knowing full well
that
the Dems will give them plenty of loopholes so they can trim their taxes
down to size. They feel the need to help the "little people", whom they
feel
are not bright enough to fend for themselves.....

3)- Lazy, under-employed "poor me" pot smoking crybabies who want the
rest
of us to "help them get on their feet" for the next, oh say, 20 or 30
years.
" NO MORE WAR ! What? People died supplying me these drugs? No way,
man..."


Let all but the most deserving people (handicapped, newly destitute,
transitional job trainees) help themselves, and you will discover just
how
strong, resourceful, and intelligent they really are. True character
comes
from doing for one's self.

Someone has to be pretty stupid to lump every liberal in the world
into such catagories. Would you like to be lumped into a catagory,
just because of your political views?

Good list.

Well he did forget another category that you and Harry fit in Bassy.

#4. The village idiots and morons.

Aren't you guilty of doing the exact same thing?


"basskisser" wrote in message

Someone has to be pretty stupid to lump every liberal in the world
into such catagories. Would you like to be lumped into a catagory,
just because of your political views?

"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:zRoWc.298548$a24.9118@attbi_s03...
Aren't you guilty of doing the exact same thing?

But liebrals are 'allowed' to whine about others for the same thing they are
guilty of. Kerry has become at it.




"basskisser" wrote in message

Someone has to be pretty stupid to lump every liberal in the world
into such catagories. Would you like to be lumped into a catagory,
just because of your political views?