Parking Fees
My town's last board meeting discussed parking fees for the currently
free, public boat launch. There is parking for about 60 trucks and trailers. It is always full and often people don't park properly making it hard to park or leave. The proposal was a $5 fee for the vehicle per day. Single axle trailers less than 20' long another $5. Double axle trailers or single axle trailers over 20' long, $7.50. The estimate of revenue is $2,000 per week May-October and $1,000 per weekend mid-March-April and November. The parking would be free those week days. December-early March would be free, but doubtful anyone would be there. The argument I agree with is there needs to be more order in the current parking situation. I suppose the fees charged will easily cover the cost of a parking attendant. While it wasn't mentioned, I'd like to see the leftover money going to improvements in the lakefront area, rather than lost in the overall budget. I do think the fees are excessive however. Certainly some people will not come to our town to eat, shop or buy gas because they will find another free parking lot within 10 miles on the same lake. Do any of you pay to park or launch at your public boat launch. If you didn't now, would you consider these fees excessive? Is there a difference for residents vs. non-residents? I plan on writing the town board voicing my opinions, but would like to know about other peoples opinions first. Thanks. |
Parking Fees
This year the WA parks dept started charging for all parking at state parks.
$5 for day use. (some park ranges have seen this to mean 'no overnight parking' and therefore charge another $10 in addition for a vehicle left over night.. (this doesn't seem to apply in the camp grounds but does apply at some marine parks. However, at the launch ramp the they charge $5 for a launch and recovery and includes the parking (I assume) for a day. For God Sake, don't let them set up your parking fee system with an Attendant.. This would create several new employee positions that would cost far more than the fees collected. Here they use an honor system. You put your parking or launch ramp fee in an envelope/drop box. The information flap is NCR and you retain a copy and place it in the windshield of your vehicle. The range has enforcement authority and can right tickets if there is no proof that you dropped a fee in the box. So far I have only seen warning tickets.. For day parking we can purchase an annual parking permit for about $50 and seniors get that for free if they are low income. Steve |
Parking Fees
I plan on writing the town board voicing my opinions, but would like to know about other peoples opinions first. Thanks. Having a parking attendant is a bad idea. Use some metal box, fill out envelope with your plates, etc. Have the local cop at least pretend he is checking it. On the flip side, once they charge $5, they will charge $6 next year and so on. This will become a little honeywell, and yes, your town will probably suck those profits in some bureaucracy. |
Parking Fees
Actually I can't complain about the launch ramp fees, even though I have
only use the ramp once. My boat is to large to launch and recover on a trailer. In my area, they have just spent several million dollars of the the boat tax money on a very nice launch ramp and floating docks. I wouldn't object to the parking fees if the money stayed in the parks system for operation and expenses.. However, I know it doesn't.. The boat pumpout station has been out of service for 2 seasons now (maybe longer) until last spring, it was the only pumpout in the whole area.. Fortunately another pumpout was opened a couple miles away at a municipal dock. And they only charge $2 for a 5 min. pump out or porta potty dump. -- My opinion and experience. FWIW Steve s/v Good Intentions |
Parking Fees
I agree, don't have an attendant. These lot attendants always become
little tyrants and act as if they own the place. I use the public lot in Weymouth, MA and there is a lot attendant there like that. Guy told me I can't leave my truck/trailer overnight without telling him in advance. Said he would have my rig towed and send the coast guard out looking for me! Like I need this SOB to give me grief and act like my mother....and I don't think he has the right to tow my rig, but that gives me crap to worry about. Luckily there is a free parking lot where I go usually ( Falmouth,) where I can leave my truck/trailer for a week at a time while I'm out on the boat without a problem. I don't mind paying a fee of $5/day ( even though we already have paid for this in our boat tax ) if at least part of it goes to maintaining the area of the ramp/lot. Don't give people crap about overnighting though. Let them pay the $5/day like everyone else. John C. |
Parking Fees
A comment on your proposed fee structure from someone who does
extended trips. $7.50 a day is too high Ithink for someone at the lot for a week. That means I would have to pay $52.50 to the parking lot if I go out for the week....too steep. I would be real upset about that. A weekly rate of $30 or so would be more reasonable...again, considering we are already paying for these ramps ourselves with our boat taxes. Where is the boat ramp? That matters too. If at Marina Del Ray, thats one thing. If at some mudhole out in the sticks, thats a different thing altogether. John C. |
Parking Fees
I'm not in favor of excesively high fees to when the money doesn't got to
the agency that operates the facilities.. However, if there is only a limited number of parking spots at a launch ramp then there has to be someway to keep boat owners from leaving their trailer and truck for long periods of time.. One way is to set time limits, the other is to charge a fee that is high enough to encourage the boater to have someone take the trailer home while he is on the water for a week.. Could you imagine the problems a the Marina Del Ray ramp if their wasn't a time limit or high fee.. Then of course, I'm apposed to parking fees for overnight parking when I already have a annual parking permit (which has now been defined as 'Day Use'. Doesn't say anything like that on the pass.). In addition, I am already paying for mooring my boat at a state mooring.. Do the guys in the RV park have to pay an extra $10 for their car? I don't think so. please excuse the Venting.. Steve s/v Good Intentions |
Parking Fees
Hi User,
In Jacksonville, the public ramps are free. Or at least no ramp fees. The taxpayers footed the bill. Now we have some nice new ramps here and a 1/2 cent sales tax too. But we also got new sewers, water pipes, roads, courthouse, city hall, schools, parks, football stadium, sports arena, a music park with docks and free pump out, and lots of new cops in the bargain. Many marinas charge all the traffic will bear to plop your boat, and they don't have parking attendants either. One nearby uses a lift and charges 20.00 for the splash and 10 for a pump out. If you go before the city council, and insist the revenues from boat ramps go toward maine activities, I am sure they can find something to waste it on. Capt. Frank http://www.home.earthlink.net/~aartworks user wrote: My town's last board meeting discussed parking fees for the currently free, public boat launch. There is parking for about 60 trucks and trailers. It is always full and often people don't park properly making it hard to park or leave. The proposal was a $5 fee for the vehicle per day. Single axle trailers less than 20' long another $5. Double axle trailers or single axle trailers over 20' long, $7.50. The estimate of revenue is $2,000 per week May-October and $1,000 per weekend mid-March-April and November. The parking would be free those week days. December-early March would be free, but doubtful anyone would be there. The argument I agree with is there needs to be more order in the current parking situation. I suppose the fees charged will easily cover the cost of a parking attendant. While it wasn't mentioned, I'd like to see the leftover money going to improvements in the lakefront area, rather than lost in the overall budget. I do think the fees are excessive however. Certainly some people will not come to our town to eat, shop or buy gas because they will find another free parking lot within 10 miles on the same lake. Do any of you pay to park or launch at your public boat launch. If you didn't now, would you consider these fees excessive? Is there a difference for residents vs. non-residents? I plan on writing the town board voicing my opinions, but would like to know about other peoples opinions first. Thanks. |
Parking Fees
and truck for long periods of time.. One way is to set time limits, the
other is to charge a fee that is high enough to encourage the boater to have someone take the trailer home while he is on the water for a week.. Could you imagine the problems a the Marina Del Ray ramp if their wasn't a time limit or high fee.. Steve, you should realize that although I use the parking lot for a long time, I don't use it often. I don't take my boat out for a day or two, when I go it's for a long time, but not as often as many people do. You seem to want to not allow people to use the lots long, how about if I said people should not be allowed to use the lots often? Maybe put a limit that you can only use a ramp 5 or 6 times a year? Thats just as fair, and that would work for me. We all have different use patterns. I can see your gripe if people were to leave the boat on a mooring and leave the trailer hogging space while not on the boat. Otherwise, no. In Falmouth, MA where I go the rule is no unattended trailers. This way you know people are not just blocking the space with their trailers. If the car is there too you know they are probably out on the boat. Besides, a week at a time means during the week when there isn't a space problem at most ramps anyway. Our fighting over space should be directed away from each other and to the government to build us more ramps. Check out fantastic new ramps at places like Fort Desoto near Tampa, then look at the crappy lousy little ramps we have in New England. Our boat taxes must be used to ...well, nevermind...lol, but I don't think they're being used for boat ramps. John C. |
Parking Fees
Thanks to all for their input. Being that it is $5 for the vehicle and
$5-7.50 for the trailer, that's $10 or $12.50 per day except for canoes and dinghies would end up being $5. About 1.5 miles away from the launch is a public beach. Not much of a place, about 400' of waterfront, on perhaps 3 acres. They have restrooms with 3 stalls for the women (my wife says) and 2 urinals and 2 stalls for the men. There's some picnic tables off the beach. There's parking for about 100 cars, making the parking area as large as the rest of the park. They do have a lifeguard and the place is fairly clean. Parking is strictly residents only. They've sold decals ($10 per year) for a good 300 cars, despite only having 100 spaces. The logic is some of these people work in town and there is also a residents only parking lot off the street. You have to get in early. Anyone can use the beach. There's probably 100 other cars parked near the beach. Half residents, half out of towners. This has left people with businesses or homes in the area rather miffed. It is not a thriving area, but a little better than a mud hole. The point of the honor system sounds good. I used to live in an area where parking was $1 per day at the bus station, for commuters. It was on the honor system. People were not paying for the most part. Eventually parking meters went in and the fee to park was 25¢ per hour, so commuters like myself had to pay $2.50 per day, plus have the hassle of having so many quarters... I also see the point of someone staying 4 days in a row costing $40-50. In that perspective, it does seem excessive. I suspect someone sees this as a cash cow for the town (which it may not be) plus summer/weekend jobs for someone's kids. I'm still not certain what I'll write or say, but I believe this needs to be significantly revised before they vote on it. |
Parking Fees
"user" wrote in message In that perspective, it does seem excessive. I suspect someone sees this as a cash cow for the town (which it may not be) plus summer/weekend jobs for someone's kids. I'm still not certain what I'll write or say, but I believe this needs to be significantly revised before they vote on it. Fee systems usually come about as a result of some community operating commitee or board.. It is seldom that these things happen without an opportunity for community input or objections.. Once they are in place the revenue is budgeted and it is much more difficult and complicated to eliminate or modify a fee or use tax. If you want to have a user fee removed, be prepared to offer suggestions on where else this revenue could come from.. My recommendation is to follow all local proceedings with an eye towards objecting to any new fees or increases to existing fees.. On any election day, my moto is not "I Voted", rather "I Voted No".. I vote NO on everything.. The public service, fees and taxes were just fine at the time I retired 8 years ago and I don't need an increase in anything.. Steve s/v Good Intentions |
Parking Fees
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:24:43 -0800, "Steve" wrote:
"user" wrote in message In that perspective, it does seem excessive. I suspect someone sees this as a cash cow for the town (which it may not be) plus summer/weekend jobs for someone's kids. I'm still not certain what I'll write or say, but I believe this needs to be significantly revised before they vote on it. Fee systems usually come about as a result of some community operating commitee or board.. It is seldom that these things happen without an opportunity for community input or objections.. Once they are in place the revenue is budgeted and it is much more difficult and complicated to eliminate or modify a fee or use tax. If you want to have a user fee removed, be prepared to offer suggestions on where else this revenue could come from.. My recommendation is to follow all local proceedings with an eye towards objecting to any new fees or increases to existing fees.. On any election day, my moto is not "I Voted", rather "I Voted No".. I vote NO on everything.. The public service, fees and taxes were just fine at the time I retired 8 years ago and I don't need an increase in anything.. Steve s/v Good Intentions I agree. What happens is towns figure "boat people have a lot of money, so lets go get some from them." It sucks. John C. |
Parking Fees
I agree. What happens is towns figure "boat people have a lot of
money, so lets go get some from them." It sucks. John C. If the money goes into a dedicated fund to maintain/improve the boat ramp and associated parking lot, it's hard to see what the beef would be----but that's a huge "if". In WA, every gallon of gasoline sold is subject to a large tax to maintain state highways. I believe the tax is now almost 30-cents a gallon, so every time a driver burns 20 gallons of gas in his car he's contributing $6 toward highway maintenance. Doesn't seem all that far out of line- the roads aren't paved and maintained by magic. When the law was put in, years ago, the legislature acknowledged that not all gaoline is used by vehicles driving on a highway. Boaters are allowed to keep track of their gasoline purchases, and individually file for a refund of the gas tax each year. Of course, the paperwork is a hassle, a lot of boaters only pay $15-20 in tax, and so most people don't file for the refund. The unrefunded portion is *supposed* to go to improving boat ramps and other boating-oriented uses. Ha! The state capped the refund at 19-cents when they raised the tax beyond that point. That's almost understandable, since the majority of boats that burn gasoline are traveling down the road on a trailer for a lot more miles than they are travelling across the water.However, in most years the money allocated for boating infrastructure gets raided for other uses. What would seem to be a reasonable idea gets screwed up by greedy politicians. Conservatives should be applauding user fees for boat ramps, trailer parking, etc. This places the financial burden squarely on the shoulders of the people benefitting from the service, rather than the taxpayers at large. :-) |
Parking Fees
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... I agree. What happens is towns figure "boat people have a lot of money, so lets go get some from them." It sucks. John C. If the money goes into a dedicated fund to maintain/improve the boat ramp and associated parking lot, it's hard to see what the beef would be----but that's a huge "if". In WA, every gallon of gasoline sold is subject to a large tax to maintain state highways. I believe the tax is now almost 30-cents a gallon, so every time a driver burns 20 gallons of gas in his car he's contributing $6 toward highway maintenance. Doesn't seem all that far out of line- the roads aren't paved and maintained by magic. When the law was put in, years ago, the legislature acknowledged that not all gaoline is used by vehicles driving on a highway. Boaters are allowed to keep track of their gasoline purchases, and individually file for a refund of the gas tax each year. Of course, the paperwork is a hassle, a lot of boaters only pay $15-20 in tax, and so most people don't file for the refund. The unrefunded portion is *supposed* to go to improving boat ramps and other boating-oriented uses. Ha! The state capped the refund at 19-cents when they raised the tax beyond that point. That's almost understandable, since the majority of boats that burn gasoline are traveling down the road on a trailer for a lot more miles than they are travelling across the water.However, in most years the money allocated for boating infrastructure gets raided for other uses. What would seem to be a reasonable idea gets screwed up by greedy politicians. Conservatives should be applauding user fees for boat ramps, trailer parking, etc. This places the financial burden squarely on the shoulders of the people benefitting from the service, rather than the taxpayers at large. :-) The problem us fiscal conservatives have with the fees, is the usage. California has (had) $35 billion + in the highway fund. Now we can not get any highway improvements as there is no money in the state budget available. Seems as if the Former Governor Gumby and his Legislature borrowed all the money for the general fund. Reduced the deficit we saw. But still $35 Billion in money that has been stolen. |
Parking Fees
Tax, tax, tax. Didn't you pay some already?
"user" wrote in message ... My town's last board meeting discussed parking fees for the currently free, public boat launch. There is parking for about 60 trucks and trailers. It is always full and often people don't park properly making it hard to park or leave. The proposal was a $5 fee for the vehicle per day. Single axle trailers less than 20' long another $5. Double axle trailers or single axle trailers over 20' long, $7.50. The estimate of revenue is $2,000 per week May-October and $1,000 per weekend mid-March-April and November. The parking would be free those week days. December-early March would be free, but doubtful anyone would be there. The argument I agree with is there needs to be more order in the current parking situation. I suppose the fees charged will easily cover the cost of a parking attendant. While it wasn't mentioned, I'd like to see the leftover money going to improvements in the lakefront area, rather than lost in the overall budget. I do think the fees are excessive however. Certainly some people will not come to our town to eat, shop or buy gas because they will find another free parking lot within 10 miles on the same lake. Do any of you pay to park or launch at your public boat launch. If you didn't now, would you consider these fees excessive? Is there a difference for residents vs. non-residents? I plan on writing the town board voicing my opinions, but would like to know about other peoples opinions first. Thanks. |
Parking Fees
FWIW, at the Breakwater launch ramp in Monterey, it's $8/day for a single
vehicle, $12/day for tow vehicle and trailer, 9:00 a.m. till sometime at night. You can also pay by the hour. ($1.50/hour single, I think, I always get the all-day). TVs & trailers only in most of the lot till noon. No charge to launch. There's a machine that takes credit cards or cash. What are their enforcement costs going to be? Monterey has several meter "maids" (one looks like an NFL lineman) in Cushman three-wheelers. And that "over 20" rule is going to be a pain to enforce. -- Chuck Tribolet http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/people/triblet Silicon Valley: STILL the best day job in the world. "user" wrote in message ... My town's last board meeting discussed parking fees for the currently free, public boat launch. There is parking for about 60 trucks and trailers. It is always full and often people don't park properly making it hard to park or leave. The proposal was a $5 fee for the vehicle per day. Single axle trailers less than 20' long another $5. Double axle trailers or single axle trailers over 20' long, $7.50. The estimate of revenue is $2,000 per week May-October and $1,000 per weekend mid-March-April and November. The parking would be free those week days. December-early March would be free, but doubtful anyone would be there. The argument I agree with is there needs to be more order in the current parking situation. I suppose the fees charged will easily cover the cost of a parking attendant. While it wasn't mentioned, I'd like to see the leftover money going to improvements in the lakefront area, rather than lost in the overall budget. I do think the fees are excessive however. Certainly some people will not come to our town to eat, shop or buy gas because they will find another free parking lot within 10 miles on the same lake. Do any of you pay to park or launch at your public boat launch. If you didn't now, would you consider these fees excessive? Is there a difference for residents vs. non-residents? I plan on writing the town board voicing my opinions, but would like to know about other peoples opinions first. Thanks. |
Parking Fees
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:20:24 +0000, user wrote:
My town's last board meeting discussed parking fees for the currently free, public boat launch. There is parking for about 60 trucks and trailers. It is always full and often people don't park properly making it hard to park or leave. The proposal was a $5 fee for the vehicle per day. Single axle trailers less than 20' long another $5. Double axle trailers or single axle trailers over 20' long, $7.50. The estimate of revenue is $2,000 per week May-October and $1,000 per weekend mid-March-April and November. The parking would be free those week days. December-early March would be free, but doubtful anyone would be there. The argument I agree with is there needs to be more order in the current parking situation. SNIP Here in Canada, most ramps charge for parking rather than "launching". Most have machines where you get your parking ticket, and I assume a "metermaid" kinda person to check the tickets. A few have "attendants" that also help "traffic control" at the ramp, sell bait, tackle, ice cream, etc. and usually have Good Advice about fishing. You can tell them where you're going if you're going over a day and they will inform the CG if your vehicle is still there after you're supposed to be back. Provincial Parks (where a lot of ramps are) have recently started charging for parking, and there's quite an underground "economy" where people leaving will give their parking tickets to those arriving. After all, we've already paid for the park: why should we pay for parking? Has it helped the "chaos" of the parking area? Not that I've noticed. I think a SINGLE parking fee is the best, using a machine. Easy to set up, easy to monitor. The "Attendant" can be nice but not necessary, and the complex system you're proposing sounds way too hard to set up and monitor! BTW: Parking-machine ramps are usually $3-7, and ones with attendants are around $10-15 (CDN) Lloyd |
Parking Fees
Marina Del Rey is $2 for a single vehicle and $5 for boat and trailer.
Machine and gate takes cash or credit card. "Lloyd Sumpter" wrote in message ... On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:20:24 +0000, user wrote: My town's last board meeting discussed parking fees for the currently free, public boat launch. There is parking for about 60 trucks and trailers. It is always full and often people don't park properly making it hard to park or leave. The proposal was a $5 fee for the vehicle per day. Single axle trailers less than 20' long another $5. Double axle trailers or single axle trailers over 20' long, $7.50. The estimate of revenue is $2,000 per week May-October and $1,000 per weekend mid-March-April and November. The parking would be free those week days. December-early March would be free, but doubtful anyone would be there. The argument I agree with is there needs to be more order in the current parking situation. SNIP Here in Canada, most ramps charge for parking rather than "launching". Most have machines where you get your parking ticket, and I assume a "metermaid" kinda person to check the tickets. A few have "attendants" that also help "traffic control" at the ramp, sell bait, tackle, ice cream, etc. and usually have Good Advice about fishing. You can tell them where you're going if you're going over a day and they will inform the CG if your vehicle is still there after you're supposed to be back. Provincial Parks (where a lot of ramps are) have recently started charging for parking, and there's quite an underground "economy" where people leaving will give their parking tickets to those arriving. After all, we've already paid for the park: why should we pay for parking? Has it helped the "chaos" of the parking area? Not that I've noticed. I think a SINGLE parking fee is the best, using a machine. Easy to set up, easy to monitor. The "Attendant" can be nice but not necessary, and the complex system you're proposing sounds way too hard to set up and monitor! BTW: Parking-machine ramps are usually $3-7, and ones with attendants are around $10-15 (CDN) Lloyd |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com