Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
matt, give it up. beernoulli is not part of any theory of flight. none.
except in kiddies books. And kiddies books aren't used at the college level. If you dont understand that, you don't understand even the first semester. google to your hearts content is you want. add the words astrology and tele-kenesis to your google and see how many hits you get. Jax, This is so much like when I was a GA. "Yes" is not a complete answer. So...I Repeat If not Bernoulli, Then perhaps you will explain to the readers how the Kutta-Zhukovsky Theorem can explain everything without assistance of the equations set out by Daniel Beroulli. Or, did you have something else in mind? Please elaborate, we are waiting Oh so patiently. There are two DC's here wait to hear. Matt Colie - See Prior Sig JAXAshby wrote: yes. From: Matt Colie Date: 8/28/2004 4:30 PM Eastern Daylight Time Message-id: Jax, How much have you studied the response of sails? By studied, I mean with real data from instruments calibrated to accepted standards and in standardized conditons. If not Bernoulli, Then perhaps you will explain to the readers how the Kutta-Zhukovsky Theorem can explain everything without assistance of the equations set out by Daniel Beroulli. Or, did you have something else in mind? Matt Colie (CV by request only) JAXAshby wrote: Try some "Bernoulli experiments for kids",and you will reach a better understanding. no, you won't. wings/sails do not have lift because of "Bernoulli" inspite of the fact you can read such in thousands of kiddie books. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|