About Us

In article ,
says...
jps wrote:

And, as usual, you attempt to state opinion as fact.

You mean like the way you do when you cut and paste all those
"editorials" which support your biased viewpoint?

I cut and paste for your edificcation. You're showing little, if any
signs of progress.

Your biased opinions are not enlightening. That you pass them off as
fact is intellectually irresponsible.

I do not "pass them off as fact" I merely post them to perhaps soften
your thick skull. You're probably not the best subject.

In reality (which
is difficult enough for you) you know nothing about Harry and
speculating on his being a paid political operative and his personal
motives for what he says here so speculative.

The same way that you know nothing about the inner workings of the Bush
Adminmistration or the war on terrorism, other than what you read in the
speculative tripe that you pass off as "objective" journalism.

What does this have to do with Wilbur speculating on Harry's personal
motives?

Principle. Something you should "edify" yourself on.

WTF are you talking about? Principle? How are these two things related
by principle? The Bush Administration's policies are stated publicly
and we have plenty of smart people's insight from which to draw. I
don't know how you could consider Wilbur an expert on Harry's private
affairs since Harry doesn't publish them nor is it in any way obvious
the nature of his motivation other than as a past time.

You are the one who needs edifying on Principles. Talk to your wife
about the government's desire to control her reproductive rights. Let
us all know what she says and tell us about how your principles match
up.

Harry is a person who's stating his opinions. The Bush
administration isn't.

No, but you claiming certain things about the Bush Administration's
motives is stating your opinion. And like in your example of Wilbur and
Harry, you know nothing about it.

Do you portend to know more about the motives of the Bush Admimistration
than Joe blow from Hackensack?

No, and I don't attempt to present myself as if I do.

Likewise, my opinions are my opinions. The fact that I present them
strongly doesn't preclude that "fact."

Have you read the New American Century doctrine? Do you know who Ken
Lay is? Blue Skies, No Child Left Behind, Terrorists and those who
harbor them?

Yes, so what's your point? Can you prove any of these alleged
"connections"? Until you can, you're only speculating.

Speculating based on stated ambitions and the results of those
ambitions? That's not speculation, it's opinion. Look up the
definitions and get "edified."

What is there to know other than this?

If you had any character and intellectual honesty, you'd already know
the answwer to this.

Again, go ask your wife about her rights to reproduce or not. Until
then, don'talk to me about "intellectual honesty." Yours seems to come
straight from the Republican doctrine.

You probably cast yourself as a "conservative." I have news for you,
the Republicans are anything but conservative at this point in history.
Perhaps you should take this opportunity to "edify" yourself.

And then, just like Rush, you use your ill-formed fantasy to make a
conclusion, which is even more outrageous.

And then, just like the numerous leftist news sources that you regularly
quote, you use your ill-formed fantasy to make a conclusion, which is
even more outrageous.

There's research and reasoning behind journalism. There's nothing but
innuendo, hate and assumed conclusion behind Rush.

Again, your opinion. Most of what I've heard Rush state, are true
happenings. He may spin them a little more to appeal to certain
emotions, but the underlying factoid is true. And calling the liberals
for the manipulative, scheming, divisive, and conniving weasels that
they are, is not "hate" it's bringing appalling activities into the
public light.

Appalling activities like Head Start, protecting the environment,
desiring equal education for all, hoping to protect people from cultural
and race discrimination, protecting the middle class, trying to create
education and jobs for people that'll be more than poverty wage based,
etc.???????

There's no culture of greed in the liberal doctrine as in the
Republican, it's about looking out for others and the world we live in.

Get a ****ing clue Dave. Rush is there to rip things apart and sell
little tiny ideas to dense idiots like yourself.

Taken apart, it's
nothing. Wilbur made a bunch of assumptions about Harry and then came
to a conclusion based on those assumption.

Much like you do when you read (and then post here) the political tripe
that you think is "objective journalism".

You rag on me about reading "objective journalism" when you listen to
the crap that Rush spews??? He's admitted publicly that half the ****
he comes up with is simply to ignite people and keep his listenership.
At least journalists are trying to do honest work. Rush is a bold faced
liar.

Your logic is flawed, your loyalties are clear. You have nothing in
that head resembling independent thought.

My logic is, as always, sound. That you cannot see that you are guilty
of the same things that you accuse others of is almost laughable.

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAHAAAAAAAAAAAA!

Dave, did you ever approach your wife to ask her if she thinks the
government shoud have a say is whether she should procreate or not.

Did you ask your wife whether she thinks the government should take more
of her money to feed and care for illegal aliens?

Yes, she's in favor. She wants to make certain kids are fed and given a
proper education.

Now, go ask your wife about her reproductive rights and what the
government should be able to demand of her.

My opinion is that you don't have a clue and that you're only here to
yank people's chains. That is until someone refers to you as a worm and
you break out of your box to your true remailing self.

Mr Pot, meet Mr. Kettle.

I don't remail vile crap. If I write it I post it under my own handle.

But it's still crap.

That's your opinion and you're welcome to it. I just thank God it's
yours and not mine.

The sad irony is that you can't even see it.

See what? See, I'm using your logic now.

The sad part of this is that you'd spend so much time mounting such weak
arguments.

But at least my arguements are based on more than speculative opinions.

Who says, you?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Politics aside: 9-11-01; Let us never forget	Jim	General	42	September 25th 03 05:24 AM
Can Tow from Florida to Northeast for $$	NOYB	General	106	September 24th 03 01:57 AM

Menu

About Us