Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 8:19:28 AM UTC-4, Justan wrote:
On 9/8/20 8:22 PM, Bill wrote: wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:14:19 -0400, John wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 09:40:04 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 07:37:01 -0400, John wrote: On Mon, 07 Sep 2020 17:59:42 -0400, wrote: I'd forgotten just how good he was until I watched this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pgs-LaWyUJI What a pleasant contrast. Imagine that, presidential leadership without threats, ridicule, childish insults and inarticulate muttering. Reagan got a lot accomplished that way, by uniting people and reaching consensus on what needed to be done. What a pleasant contrast. Are you taking over? -- === Taking over what? Am I the only conservative on this group that has a problem with presidential lying, threats, ridicule, childish insults and inarticulate muttering? Be careful what you ask for. If you had had to put up with the total resistance of the Democrats in Congress, who give not a **** for this country, what frame of mind would you be in? For one who has seen everything he tries to do thwarted by Pelosi and Schumer only because the president is Donald Trump, I think he's done pretty damn well. Trump was never given a chance to 'unite and reach consensus'. He was facing a 'resist' movement before he took the oath. Pelosi is holding up another aid package. Why? Because Trump wants it.. Amen. **** 'em, I say. And Trump agrees. I don't blame him. -- === Much of that resistance is because of the way he comports himself, constantly playing to his base instead oy trying to build grass roots consensus. It's called leadership, and the lack of it will be his downfall. His leadership wants, but Nancy and Chuck, seem to be working for the DNC and a single party system. Not looking at what is good for the country. As to Biden, I think he lacks any major thinking power, and I disliked Kamala when she was the state AG. Seemed to be in the bottom 4 of all the AG?s. Her tough on crime seemed to **** off a lot of Blacks here. Going for major time, for minor crimes. Appease the tough on crime group, and no consideration of crime or results, also, when they had Proposition 8, the one man one women description of marriage, she refused to defend it in the Supreme Court. Her job was to represent the people of the state of California, not her personal viewpoint. Should have been disbarred for that since she did not recuse herself. I did not vote for Prop 8, but the majority did. Just like any attorney, defend your client, even if you hate the *******. Didn't she sleep around to bolster her career? She certainly flip-flopped on her stance on crime to fit the current political situation. The police didn't like her because she refused to go after a cop killer with the death penalty. She also tried to cover up the theft and mishandling of evidence by someone in the DA's office which resulted in nearly 1000 cases being thrown out. And she created a public database to highlight "police injustice". She's way to liberal, and Joe is far too feeble-minded. It's almost like the DNC wants to lose. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ronald Reagan... | General | |||
Ronald Reagan | General | |||
Ronald Reagan quote | ASA | |||
Ronald Reagan's Daughter Praises F 9/11 | ASA | |||
( OT) Ronald Reagan R.I.P (But in perspective) | General |