|
Raising mi ey, Chicago style...
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:02:24 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 4/26/18 3:32 PM, Tim wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:21:14 -0400, Keyser Soze - show quoted text - We just explained it to you. The system is rigged and they won't let anyone not a R or a D play the game. After Harry Browne and Ross Perot embarrassed Bush and Clinton so badly, nobody can even get into the show. ....... I agree with that. Ross probably would have won if he hadn’t backed out then hopped back in. I was poised to vote for him. Ha ha ha ha. Crackpot Perot. To you, anyone who does not believe the government and the debt can continue exponentially forever is a crackpot. |
Raising mi ey, Chicago style...
wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:02:00 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 3:11 PM, wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:21:14 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 1:16 PM, Bill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 12:43 PM, wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 06:37:09 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 12:57 AM, wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:01:23 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/25/18 1:59 PM, wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:57:23 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Tim wrote: Way to go, Rahm! https://reason.com/archives/2018/04/...-cars-innocent Nice way to use a right-wing site to **** on Chicago. Good job. Why do you thing that is a "right wing" site? Granted they worry about personal rights and government abuse of them but so does the ACLU. In this case it is the CPD screwing over another black guy. I would think you thought that was wrong. I bet if it happened in Montgomery you would be ready to march or something. It's a "libertarian" site, ergo, right-wing. You really do not understand what a Libertarian is do you? I support supporting the constitution and human/civil rights is a "right wing" issue to you. I bet you also think supporting the right to choose, marriage equality and ending the drug war is a right wing issue too. Amazing. Yeah, you probably buy that libertarian nonsense, but the reality is that libertarians are Republicans. If they want to win federal office, they run as Republicans. If it looks like ****, smells like ****, and acts like ****, it is a Republican. ... and democrats are communists. so what? The fact remains that libertarians separate themselves from the righteous right on virtually everything but you are to blind to see that. Separate but equal...libertarians elected to national office run as Republicans. Well, since the debates eliminated anybody not running as a Republican or as a Democrat. Oh, that must be it. OK, name the libertarians who ran and won federal office...U.S. Senate or House...as Libertarians and not as Republicans. We just explained it to you. The system is rigged and they won't let anyone not a R or a D play the game. After Harry Browne and Ross Perot embarrassed Bush and Clinton so badly, nobody can even get into the show. Bull****. I am not surprised you feel that way but it is certainly true Perot and Browne asked the embarrassing questions in that debate. Bush and Clinton were just reciting their stump speech, over and over again, whether it was responsive to the questions or not and the moderators were letting them get away with it. After 96, 3d parties were not allowed in the debates anymore and they became nothing more than regurgitated campaign rhetoric with no serious questions at all. The thing that did come out of that was some of the very real questions about the debt, caused the Gingrich revolt in 94 and the attempt at a balanced budget for a few years. Since then, it has never actually been a serious topic and we never see the numbers that Perot had developed to explain the problem. Perot was a crackpot politician. -- Posted with my iPhone 8+. |
Raising mi ey, Chicago style...
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 18:18:04 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:02:00 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 3:11 PM, wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:21:14 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 1:16 PM, Bill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 12:43 PM, wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 06:37:09 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 12:57 AM, wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:01:23 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/25/18 1:59 PM, wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:57:23 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Tim wrote: Way to go, Rahm! https://reason.com/archives/2018/04/...-cars-innocent Nice way to use a right-wing site to **** on Chicago. Good job. Why do you thing that is a "right wing" site? Granted they worry about personal rights and government abuse of them but so does the ACLU. In this case it is the CPD screwing over another black guy. I would think you thought that was wrong. I bet if it happened in Montgomery you would be ready to march or something. It's a "libertarian" site, ergo, right-wing. You really do not understand what a Libertarian is do you? I support supporting the constitution and human/civil rights is a "right wing" issue to you. I bet you also think supporting the right to choose, marriage equality and ending the drug war is a right wing issue too. Amazing. Yeah, you probably buy that libertarian nonsense, but the reality is that libertarians are Republicans. If they want to win federal office, they run as Republicans. If it looks like ****, smells like ****, and acts like ****, it is a Republican. ... and democrats are communists. so what? The fact remains that libertarians separate themselves from the righteous right on virtually everything but you are to blind to see that. Separate but equal...libertarians elected to national office run as Republicans. Well, since the debates eliminated anybody not running as a Republican or as a Democrat. Oh, that must be it. OK, name the libertarians who ran and won federal office...U.S. Senate or House...as Libertarians and not as Republicans. We just explained it to you. The system is rigged and they won't let anyone not a R or a D play the game. After Harry Browne and Ross Perot embarrassed Bush and Clinton so badly, nobody can even get into the show. Bull****. I am not surprised you feel that way but it is certainly true Perot and Browne asked the embarrassing questions in that debate. Bush and Clinton were just reciting their stump speech, over and over again, whether it was responsive to the questions or not and the moderators were letting them get away with it. After 96, 3d parties were not allowed in the debates anymore and they became nothing more than regurgitated campaign rhetoric with no serious questions at all. The thing that did come out of that was some of the very real questions about the debt, caused the Gingrich revolt in 94 and the attempt at a balanced budget for a few years. Since then, it has never actually been a serious topic and we never see the numbers that Perot had developed to explain the problem. Perot was a crackpot politician. A crackpot calling the pot black. Wow. Have you tried Tim's crockpot recipe, crackpot? |
Raising mi ey, Chicago style...
On Thursday, April 26, 2018 at 5:18:06 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:02:00 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 3:11 PM, wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:21:14 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 1:16 PM, Bill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 12:43 PM, wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 06:37:09 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 12:57 AM, wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:01:23 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/25/18 1:59 PM, wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:57:23 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Tim wrote: Way to go, Rahm! https://reason.com/archives/2018/04/...-cars-innocent Nice way to use a right-wing site to **** on Chicago. Good job. Why do you thing that is a "right wing" site? Granted they worry about personal rights and government abuse of them but so does the ACLU. In this case it is the CPD screwing over another black guy. I would think you thought that was wrong. I bet if it happened in Montgomery you would be ready to march or something. It's a "libertarian" site, ergo, right-wing. You really do not understand what a Libertarian is do you? I support supporting the constitution and human/civil rights is a "right wing" issue to you. I bet you also think supporting the right to choose, marriage equality and ending the drug war is a right wing issue too. Amazing. Yeah, you probably buy that libertarian nonsense, but the reality is that libertarians are Republicans. If they want to win federal office, they run as Republicans. If it looks like ****, smells like ****, and acts like ****, it is a Republican. ... and democrats are communists. so what? The fact remains that libertarians separate themselves from the righteous right on virtually everything but you are to blind to see that. Separate but equal...libertarians elected to national office run as Republicans. Well, since the debates eliminated anybody not running as a Republican or as a Democrat. Oh, that must be it. OK, name the libertarians who ran and won federal office...U.S. Senate or House...as Libertarians and not as Republicans. We just explained it to you. The system is rigged and they won't let anyone not a R or a D play the game. After Harry Browne and Ross Perot embarrassed Bush and Clinton so badly, nobody can even get into the show. Bull****. I am not surprised you feel that way but it is certainly true Perot and Browne asked the embarrassing questions in that debate. Bush and Clinton were just reciting their stump speech, over and over again, whether it was responsive to the questions or not and the moderators were letting them get away with it. After 96, 3d parties were not allowed in the debates anymore and they became nothing more than regurgitated campaign rhetoric with no serious questions at all. The thing that did come out of that was some of the very real questions about the debt, caused the Gingrich revolt in 94 and the attempt at a balanced budget for a few years. Since then, it has never actually been a serious topic and we never see the numbers that Perot had developed to explain the problem. Perot was a crackpot politician. -- Posted with my iPhone 8+. He was an extremely successful businessman who wanted to put America back to work. |
Raising mi ey, Chicago style...
John H. wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 18:18:04 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:02:00 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 3:11 PM, wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:21:14 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 1:16 PM, Bill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 12:43 PM, wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 06:37:09 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 12:57 AM, wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:01:23 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/25/18 1:59 PM, wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:57:23 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Tim wrote: Way to go, Rahm! https://reason.com/archives/2018/04/...-cars-innocent Nice way to use a right-wing site to **** on Chicago. Good job. Why do you thing that is a "right wing" site? Granted they worry about personal rights and government abuse of them but so does the ACLU. In this case it is the CPD screwing over another black guy. I would think you thought that was wrong. I bet if it happened in Montgomery you would be ready to march or something. It's a "libertarian" site, ergo, right-wing. You really do not understand what a Libertarian is do you? I support supporting the constitution and human/civil rights is a "right wing" issue to you. I bet you also think supporting the right to choose, marriage equality and ending the drug war is a right wing issue too. Amazing. Yeah, you probably buy that libertarian nonsense, but the reality is that libertarians are Republicans. If they want to win federal office, they run as Republicans. If it looks like ****, smells like ****, and acts like ****, it is a Republican. ... and democrats are communists. so what? The fact remains that libertarians separate themselves from the righteous right on virtually everything but you are to blind to see that. Separate but equal...libertarians elected to national office run as Republicans. Well, since the debates eliminated anybody not running as a Republican or as a Democrat. Oh, that must be it. OK, name the libertarians who ran and won federal office...U.S. Senate or House...as Libertarians and not as Republicans. We just explained it to you. The system is rigged and they won't let anyone not a R or a D play the game. After Harry Browne and Ross Perot embarrassed Bush and Clinton so badly, nobody can even get into the show. Bull****. I am not surprised you feel that way but it is certainly true Perot and Browne asked the embarrassing questions in that debate. Bush and Clinton were just reciting their stump speech, over and over again, whether it was responsive to the questions or not and the moderators were letting them get away with it. After 96, 3d parties were not allowed in the debates anymore and they became nothing more than regurgitated campaign rhetoric with no serious questions at all. The thing that did come out of that was some of the very real questions about the debt, caused the Gingrich revolt in 94 and the attempt at a balanced budget for a few years. Since then, it has never actually been a serious topic and we never see the numbers that Perot had developed to explain the problem. Perot was a crackpot politician. A crackpot calling the pot black. Wow. Have you tried Tim's crockpot recipe, crackpot? Whatever his business smarts, Perot was a political crackpot. -- Posted with my iPhone 8+. |
Raising mi ey, Chicago style...
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:46:47 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:01:40 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 3:08 PM, wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 12:58:14 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 12:43 PM, wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 06:37:09 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 12:57 AM, wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:01:23 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/25/18 1:59 PM, wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:57:23 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Tim wrote: Way to go, Rahm! https://reason.com/archives/2018/04/...-cars-innocent Nice way to use a right-wing site to **** on Chicago. Good job. Why do you thing that is a "right wing" site? Granted they worry about personal rights and government abuse of them but so does the ACLU. In this case it is the CPD screwing over another black guy. I would think you thought that was wrong. I bet if it happened in Montgomery you would be ready to march or something. It's a "libertarian" site, ergo, right-wing. You really do not understand what a Libertarian is do you? I support supporting the constitution and human/civil rights is a "right wing" issue to you. I bet you also think supporting the right to choose, marriage equality and ending the drug war is a right wing issue too. Amazing. Yeah, you probably buy that libertarian nonsense, but the reality is that libertarians are Republicans. If they want to win federal office, they run as Republicans. If it looks like ****, smells like ****, and acts like ****, it is a Republican. ... and democrats are communists. so what? The fact remains that libertarians separate themselves from the righteous right on virtually everything but you are to blind to see that. Separate but equal...libertarians elected to national office run as Republicans. That is simply because the system is rigged and you can't run as any kind of 3d party. More likely, it is because most Americans view the Libertarians as crackpots. Tell me true, would you rather have Trump or Gary? Neither. Both are unqualified, and for at least two of the same reasons...ignorance and intellectual laziness. I think Johnson was better than Trump and certainly better than Hillary. The idea that Johnson is stupid or lazy is contradicted by his record in New Mexico. |
Raising mi ey, Chicago style...
On 4/26/18 6:59 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:46:47 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:01:40 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 3:08 PM, wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 12:58:14 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 12:43 PM, wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 06:37:09 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 12:57 AM, wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:01:23 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/25/18 1:59 PM, wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:57:23 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Tim wrote: Way to go, Rahm! https://reason.com/archives/2018/04/...-cars-innocent Nice way to use a right-wing site to **** on Chicago. Good job. Why do you thing that is a "right wing" site? Granted they worry about personal rights and government abuse of them but so does the ACLU. In this case it is the CPD screwing over another black guy. I would think you thought that was wrong. I bet if it happened in Montgomery you would be ready to march or something. It's a "libertarian" site, ergo, right-wing. You really do not understand what a Libertarian is do you? I support supporting the constitution and human/civil rights is a "right wing" issue to you. I bet you also think supporting the right to choose, marriage equality and ending the drug war is a right wing issue too. Amazing. Yeah, you probably buy that libertarian nonsense, but the reality is that libertarians are Republicans. If they want to win federal office, they run as Republicans. If it looks like ****, smells like ****, and acts like ****, it is a Republican. ... and democrats are communists. so what? The fact remains that libertarians separate themselves from the righteous right on virtually everything but you are to blind to see that. Separate but equal...libertarians elected to national office run as Republicans. That is simply because the system is rigged and you can't run as any kind of 3d party. More likely, it is because most Americans view the Libertarians as crackpots. Tell me true, would you rather have Trump or Gary? Neither. Both are unqualified, and for at least two of the same reasons...ignorance and intellectual laziness. I think Johnson was better than Trump and certainly better than Hillary. The idea that Johnson is stupid or lazy is contradicted by his record in New Mexico. He was ignorant and lazy during his presidential campaign...he had no knowledge of important facts and he didn't bother to cram. |
Raising mi ey, Chicago style...
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 18:18:04 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: Perot was a crackpot politician. Simply because you do not understand what he was trying to say. He may have actually just been too smart for the American voter, |
Raising mi ey, Chicago style...
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 18:42:39 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
John H. wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 18:18:04 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:02:00 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 3:11 PM, wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:21:14 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 1:16 PM, Bill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 12:43 PM, wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 06:37:09 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/18 12:57 AM, wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:01:23 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/25/18 1:59 PM, wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:57:23 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Tim wrote: Way to go, Rahm! https://reason.com/archives/2018/04/...-cars-innocent Nice way to use a right-wing site to **** on Chicago. Good job. Why do you thing that is a "right wing" site? Granted they worry about personal rights and government abuse of them but so does the ACLU. In this case it is the CPD screwing over another black guy. I would think you thought that was wrong. I bet if it happened in Montgomery you would be ready to march or something. It's a "libertarian" site, ergo, right-wing. You really do not understand what a Libertarian is do you? I support supporting the constitution and human/civil rights is a "right wing" issue to you. I bet you also think supporting the right to choose, marriage equality and ending the drug war is a right wing issue too. Amazing. Yeah, you probably buy that libertarian nonsense, but the reality is that libertarians are Republicans. If they want to win federal office, they run as Republicans. If it looks like ****, smells like ****, and acts like ****, it is a Republican. ... and democrats are communists. so what? The fact remains that libertarians separate themselves from the righteous right on virtually everything but you are to blind to see that. Separate but equal...libertarians elected to national office run as Republicans. Well, since the debates eliminated anybody not running as a Republican or as a Democrat. Oh, that must be it. OK, name the libertarians who ran and won federal office...U.S. Senate or House...as Libertarians and not as Republicans. We just explained it to you. The system is rigged and they won't let anyone not a R or a D play the game. After Harry Browne and Ross Perot embarrassed Bush and Clinton so badly, nobody can even get into the show. Bull****. I am not surprised you feel that way but it is certainly true Perot and Browne asked the embarrassing questions in that debate. Bush and Clinton were just reciting their stump speech, over and over again, whether it was responsive to the questions or not and the moderators were letting them get away with it. After 96, 3d parties were not allowed in the debates anymore and they became nothing more than regurgitated campaign rhetoric with no serious questions at all. The thing that did come out of that was some of the very real questions about the debt, caused the Gingrich revolt in 94 and the attempt at a balanced budget for a few years. Since then, it has never actually been a serious topic and we never see the numbers that Perot had developed to explain the problem. Perot was a crackpot politician. A crackpot calling the pot black. Wow. Have you tried Tim's crockpot recipe, crackpot? Whatever his business smarts, Perot was a political crackpot. Hey! I'm filtered. Remember, liar? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com