The only thing worse...
 

On 4/11/18 11:07 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 04:59:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 6:52:22 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election. Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a minor one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently pointed out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.

WOAH!

The Clintons were awash in foreign money while Hillary was SoS.


Awww.

The Clintons are not in office. Try to get over it.

The only thing worse...
 

runn Nag? Stumbling around...

The only thing worse...
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/11/18 11:07 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 04:59:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 6:52:22 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election. Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a minor one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently pointed out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.

WOAH!

The Clintons were awash in foreign money while Hillary was SoS.


Awww.

The Clintons are not in office. Try to get over it.


I guess if you rob a bank and do not get caught you are not a thief. You
should have studied if you took a logics course in school.

The only thing worse...
 

On 4/11/2018 12:20 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/11/18 11:07 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 04:59:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 6:52:22 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating one
set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other
crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election.Â*Â*Â* Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a minor
one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently pointed
out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.

WOAH!

The Clintons were awash in foreign money while Hillary was SoS.


Awww.

The Clintons are not in office. Try to get over it.


Yeah, that's the excuse for Hillary's ramblings
and past criminal activities used by all her
supporters and/or defenders.

The rest of the Dems are now saying, "Hillary Who?"

The only thing worse...
 

On 4/11/18 12:37 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 12:20 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/11/18 11:07 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 04:59:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 6:52:22 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating
one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other
crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election.Â*Â*Â* Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a
minor one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently
pointed out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.

WOAH!

The Clintons were awash in foreign money while Hillary was SoS.


Awww.

The Clintons are not in office. Try to get over it.


Yeah, that's the excuse for Hillary's ramblings
and past criminal activities used by all her
supporters and/or defenders.

The rest of the Dems are now saying, "Hillary Who?"




Hillary has been out of government for 5+ years. Bill has been out of
office for 17+ years.

The only thing worse...
 

On 4/11/2018 12:42 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/11/18 12:37 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 12:20 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/11/18 11:07 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 04:59:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 6:52:22 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating
one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other
crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election.Â*Â*Â* Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a
minor one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently
pointed out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to
point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.

WOAH!

The Clintons were awash in foreign money while Hillary was SoS.


Awww.

The Clintons are not in office. Try to get over it.


Yeah, that's the excuse for Hillary's ramblings
and past criminal activities used by all her
supporters and/or defenders.

The rest of the Dems are now saying, "Hillary Who?"




Hillary has been out of government for 5+ years. Bill has been out of
office for 17+ years.


Yup. She's closing in on the statute of limitations. :-)

The only thing worse...
 

On 4/11/18 12:46 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 12:42 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/11/18 12:37 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 12:20 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/11/18 11:07 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 04:59:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 6:52:22 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many
criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election
collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating
one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those
other crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election.Â*Â*Â* Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a
minor one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently
pointed out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to
point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to
the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.

WOAH!

The Clintons were awash in foreign money while Hillary was SoS.


Awww.

The Clintons are not in office. Try to get over it.


Yeah, that's the excuse for Hillary's ramblings
and past criminal activities used by all her
supporters and/or defenders.

The rest of the Dems are now saying, "Hillary Who?"




Hillary has been out of government for 5+ years. Bill has been out of
office for 17+ years.


Yup.Â* She's closing in on the statute of limitations.Â*Â* :-)



The federal statute is five years.

The only thing worse...
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/11/18 12:46 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 12:42 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/11/18 12:37 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 12:20 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/11/18 11:07 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 04:59:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 6:52:22 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many
criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election
collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating
one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those
other crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election.Â*Â*Â* Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a
minor one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently
pointed out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to
point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to
the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.

WOAH!

The Clintons were awash in foreign money while Hillary was SoS.


Awww.

The Clintons are not in office. Try to get over it.


Yeah, that's the excuse for Hillary's ramblings
and past criminal activities used by all her
supporters and/or defenders.

The rest of the Dems are now saying, "Hillary Who?"




Hillary has been out of government for 5+ years. Bill has been out of
office for 17+ years.


Yup.Â* She's closing in on the statute of limitations.Â*Â* :-)



The federal statute is five years.


Your a legal scholar now?

The only thing worse...
 

On 4/11/18 1:13 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/11/18 12:46 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 12:42 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/11/18 12:37 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 12:20 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/11/18 11:07 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 04:59:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 6:52:22 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many
criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election
collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating
one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those
other crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election.Â*Â*Â* Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a
minor one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently
pointed out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to
point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to
the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.

WOAH!

The Clintons were awash in foreign money while Hillary was SoS.


Awww.

The Clintons are not in office. Try to get over it.


Yeah, that's the excuse for Hillary's ramblings
and past criminal activities used by all her
supporters and/or defenders.

The rest of the Dems are now saying, "Hillary Who?"




Hillary has been out of government for 5+ years. Bill has been out of
office for 17+ years.


Yup.Â* She's closing in on the statute of limitations.Â*Â* :-)



The federal statute is five years.


Your a legal scholar now?



Scholar enough to know how to look it up.

The only thing worse...
 

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 07:52:19 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election. Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a minor one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently pointed out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.



Would you have expected Harry to be up front with something like that?