On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 09:03:07 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 07:53:09 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:


I have an acquaintance who lives in California. She's *very* liberal in
her views which is to be expected, I guess.

She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+
years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get
away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns. Like other liberals,
she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back
program following the mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia.

She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have
anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution. Gun rights are
controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government.
Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today
than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port
Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones.

But, I agree with her about one thing. The culture is different there.
Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies
of military style semi-automatics.


Yup, the culture is different. Apparently they didn't get their fair share of deviants.

I think they just do a better job of weeding the deviants out. It is
certainly a different culture tho,.

On 2/25/2018 11:28 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 09:03:07 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 07:53:09 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:


I have an acquaintance who lives in California. She's *very* liberal in
her views which is to be expected, I guess.

She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+
years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get
away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns. Like other liberals,
she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back
program following the mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia.

She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have
anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution. Gun rights are
controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government.
Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today
than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port
Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones.

But, I agree with her about one thing. The culture is different there.
Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies
of military style semi-automatics.


Yup, the culture is different. Apparently they didn't get their fair share of deviants.


I think they just do a better job of weeding the deviants out. It is
certainly a different culture tho,.

Australia was founded with deviants. So was the USA in some part. The
British transported excess criminals initially to America until the
Revolutionary War and then established colonies in Australia to send
them to.

On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 13:21:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 2/25/2018 11:28 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 09:03:07 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 07:53:09 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:


I have an acquaintance who lives in California. She's *very* liberal in
her views which is to be expected, I guess.

She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+
years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get
away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns. Like other liberals,
she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back
program following the mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia.

She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have
anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution. Gun rights are
controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government.
Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today
than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port
Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones.

But, I agree with her about one thing. The culture is different there.
Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies
of military style semi-automatics.


Yup, the culture is different. Apparently they didn't get their fair share of deviants.


I think they just do a better job of weeding the deviants out. It is
certainly a different culture tho,.

Australia was founded with deviants. So was the USA in some part. The
British transported excess criminals initially to America until the
Revolutionary War and then established colonies in Australia to send
them to.


===

Maybe we'll be able to send them to Mars someday. :-)

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com