#61
 

I picked up a nice collectible. It's a brand new Ruger Mark II US
military prototype manufactured in 1983. According to the 36th edition
of the Blue Book of Gun Values there are only about 25 "US" marked
MKII's in civilian hands. I now have two and one is a confirmed
prototype and that adds to the value. This will be left unfired as part
of my collection.

I'm still trying to decide on an M1A to shoot. Springfield has a
variety and it's hard to decide between one that is more representative
of the original M14 or an updated version with a stainless barrel, for
example.

#61
 

On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 19:35:58 -0500, Alex wrote:

I picked up a nice collectible. It's a brand new Ruger Mark II US
military prototype manufactured in 1983. According to the 36th edition
of the Blue Book of Gun Values there are only about 25 "US" marked
MKII's in civilian hands. I now have two and one is a confirmed
prototype and that adds to the value. This will be left unfired as part
of my collection.

I'm still trying to decide on an M1A to shoot. Springfield has a
variety and it's hard to decide between one that is more representative
of the original M14 or an updated version with a stainless barrel, for
example.

I have to admit, I think the stainless barrel, in this case, detracts from the overall appearance of
the M1A (M14 look alike). But, that may be 'cause I earned my medal with the original M14 back in
'65.

#61
 

On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 09:15:51 -0500, John H.
wrote:

I have to admit, I think the stainless barrel, in this case, detracts from the overall appearance of
the M1A (M14 look alike). But, that may be 'cause I earned my medal with the original M14 back in
'65.

===

Likewise '67. It was a really good shooting gun. I was hitting man
sized targets out to 300 yards using standard iron sights.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

#61
 

On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 10:02:58 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 09:15:51 -0500, John H.
wrote:

I have to admit, I think the stainless barrel, in this case, detracts from the overall appearance of
the M1A (M14 look alike). But, that may be 'cause I earned my medal with the original M14 back in
'65.

===

Likewise '67. It was a really good shooting gun. I was hitting man
sized targets out to 300 yards using standard iron sights.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

During the qualification, I missed two targets - both at 50 yards. Forgot to aim low. No problem
with the long distance shots. ****ed me off!

#61
 

On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 10:57:36 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 10:02:58 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 09:15:51 -0500, John H.
wrote:

I have to admit, I think the stainless barrel, in this case, detracts from the overall appearance of
the M1A (M14 look alike). But, that may be 'cause I earned my medal with the original M14 back in
'65.

===

Likewise '67. It was a really good shooting gun. I was hitting man
sized targets out to 300 yards using standard iron sights.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

During the qualification, I missed two targets - both at 50 yards. Forgot to aim low. No problem
with the long distance shots. ****ed me off!

===

It's an easy mistake to make. I recall doing something similar on a
target even closer than 50 yards.

#61
 

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 19:35:58 -0500, Alex wrote:

I picked up a nice collectible. It's a brand new Ruger Mark II US
military prototype manufactured in 1983. According to the 36th edition
of the Blue Book of Gun Values there are only about 25 "US" marked
MKII's in civilian hands. I now have two and one is a confirmed
prototype and that adds to the value. This will be left unfired as part
of my collection.

I'm still trying to decide on an M1A to shoot. Springfield has a
variety and it's hard to decide between one that is more representative
of the original M14 or an updated version with a stainless barrel, for
example.
I have to admit, I think the stainless barrel, in this case, detracts from the overall appearance of
the M1A (M14 look alike). But, that may be 'cause I earned my medal with the original M14 back in
'65.

I agree. I think I prefer the more authentic version.