Super Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cP2...KyMufI&index=2
And...it's a great reminder! Only about 62 days! |
Super Video
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:34:01 -0400, John H
wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cP2...KyMufI&index=2 And...it's a great reminder! Only about 62 days! === So how did Pachabel's Canon in D come to be known as the Christmas Canon? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=090BIg0mlcY --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com |
Super Video
On 10/23/17 2:50 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:34:01 -0400, John H wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cP2...KyMufI&index=2 And...it's a great reminder! Only about 62 days! === So how did Pachabel's Canon in D come to be known as the Christmas Canon? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=090BIg0mlcY --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com It's really too bad Pachelbel's original piece has been so schmaltzed up with over-orchestration and a drastic increase in tempo. As written, it is a sweet bit for three violins and continuo. This is the way it is supposed to sound, though even here there are a couple too many instruments, e.g., the lute and the organ, though the organist appears to be bolstering the continuo part. It is a much more delicate and slower piece than the modern versions seem to give it. |
Super Video
On 10/23/17 4:36 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/23/17 2:50 PM, wrote: On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:34:01 -0400, John H wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cP2...KyMufI&index=2 And...it's a great reminder! Only about 62 days! === So how did Pachabel's Canon in D come to be known as the Christmas Canon? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=090BIg0mlcY --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com It's really too bad Pachelbel's original piece has been so schmaltzed up with over-orchestration and a drastic increase in tempo. As written, it is a sweet bit for three violins and continuo. This is the way it is supposed to sound, though even here there are a couple too many instruments, e.g., the lute and the organ, though the organist appears to be bolstering the continuo part. It is a much more delicate and slower piece than the modern versions seem to give it. And of course I forgot to attach the URL: http://tinyurl.com/aorgu3t I'm also not a fan of Ravel's orchestration of Mussorgsky's Pictures at an Exhibition. It's a superior piece of piano music, overdone in Ravel's arrangement. This is the way it is supposed to sound: http://tinyurl.com/y763kv48 |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com