|
Very interesting outlook on the transgender military ban...
I agree with this post...
"Nobody has the "Right" to serve in the Military. The Military is not an equal opportunity employer. The Military uses prejudice regularly and consistently to deny citizens from joining for things such as: Too fat. Too skinny. Too old. Too young. Too tall or too short. Citizens are denied for having flat feet, missing fingers. Poor eyesight. Even bad teeth. Bad back. Malnourished. Criminal history. Anxiety. Phobias. Drug addiction. Hearing damage. Even those in wheelchairs are denied entry into military service. Can't run the required course in the required amount of time? Denied. The Military has one job. To go to War and Defend this Country and Allies. Anything else is a distraction and a liability. There are no exceptions made for being special, challenged or socially wonderful. It's the same reason they don't allow diabetics, epileptics, or people with asthma in the military. It's a medical liability and cost issue. If you need constant medication, like a hormonal suppression regiment necessitates, you are not mission ready. That is the military, they discriminate based on ability and commitment. You change YOURSELF to meet military standards. Not the other way around. The Military does not need to accommodate anyone with special needs. The Military needs to maintain readiness." - Steve S |
Very interesting outlook on the transgender military ban...
On 7/30/17 12:59 PM, Tim wrote:
I agree with this post... "Nobody has the "Right" to serve in the Military. The Military is not an equal opportunity employer. The Military uses prejudice regularly and consistently to deny citizens from joining for things such as: Too fat. Too skinny. Too old. Too young. Too tall or too short. Citizens are denied for having flat feet, missing fingers. Poor eyesight. Even bad teeth. Bad back. Malnourished. Criminal history. Anxiety. Phobias. Drug addiction. Hearing damage. Even those in wheelchairs are denied entry into military service. Can't run the required course in the required amount of time? Denied. The Military has one job. To go to War and Defend this Country and Allies. Anything else is a distraction and a liability. There are no exceptions made for being special, challenged or socially wonderful. It's the same reason they don't allow diabetics, epileptics, or people with asthma in the military. It's a medical liability and cost issue. If you need constant medication, like a hormonal suppression regiment necessitates, you are not mission ready. That is the military, they discriminate based on ability and commitment. You change YOURSELF to meet military standards. Not the other way around. The Military does not need to accommodate anyone with special needs. The Military needs to maintain readiness." - Steve S As evidenced by several morons in this newsgroup, the military obviously does accommodate personnel with "special needs." |
Very interesting outlook on the transgender military ban...
On Sunday, July 30, 2017 at 12:09:54 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 7/30/17 12:59 PM, Tim wrote: I agree with this post... "Nobody has the "Right" to serve in the Military. The Military is not an equal opportunity employer. The Military uses prejudice regularly and consistently to deny citizens from joining for things such as: Too fat. Too skinny. Too old. Too young. Too tall or too short. Citizens are denied for having flat feet, missing fingers. Poor eyesight. Even bad teeth. Bad back. Malnourished. Criminal history. Anxiety. Phobias. Drug addiction. Hearing damage. Even those in wheelchairs are denied entry into military service. Can't run the required course in the required amount of time? Denied. The Military has one job. To go to War and Defend this Country and Allies. Anything else is a distraction and a liability. There are no exceptions made for being special, challenged or socially wonderful. It's the same reason they don't allow diabetics, epileptics, or people with asthma in the military. It's a medical liability and cost issue. If you need constant medication, like a hormonal suppression regiment necessitates, you are not mission ready. That is the military, they discriminate based on ability and commitment. You change YOURSELF to meet military standards. Not the other way around. The Military does not need to accommodate anyone with special needs. The Military needs to maintain readiness." - Steve S As evidenced by several morons in this newsgroup, the military obviously does accommodate personnel with "special needs." That's probably right, Harry. they protected themselves by not allowing you in. |
Very interesting outlook on the transgender military ban...
On 7/30/17 1:28 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, July 30, 2017 at 12:09:54 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 7/30/17 12:59 PM, Tim wrote: I agree with this post... "Nobody has the "Right" to serve in the Military. The Military is not an equal opportunity employer. The Military uses prejudice regularly and consistently to deny citizens from joining for things such as: Too fat. Too skinny. Too old. Too young. Too tall or too short. Citizens are denied for having flat feet, missing fingers. Poor eyesight. Even bad teeth. Bad back. Malnourished. Criminal history. Anxiety. Phobias. Drug addiction. Hearing damage. Even those in wheelchairs are denied entry into military service. Can't run the required course in the required amount of time? Denied. The Military has one job. To go to War and Defend this Country and Allies. Anything else is a distraction and a liability. There are no exceptions made for being special, challenged or socially wonderful. It's the same reason they don't allow diabetics, epileptics, or people with asthma in the military. It's a medical liability and cost issue. If you need constant medication, like a hormonal suppression regiment necessitates, you are not mission ready. That is the military, they discriminate based on ability and commitment. You change YOURSELF to meet military standards. Not the other way around. The Military does not need to accommodate anyone with special needs. The Military needs to maintain readiness." - Steve S As evidenced by several morons in this newsgroup, the military obviously does accommodate personnel with "special needs." That's probably right, Harry. they protected themselves by not allowing you in. Timmy, Timmy, Timmy, try thinking. Oh, think about this: according to your bible, Adam and Eve had three sons. |
Very interesting outlook on the transgender military ban...
On Sunday, July 30, 2017 at 1:34:01 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 7/30/17 1:28 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, July 30, 2017 at 12:09:54 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 7/30/17 12:59 PM, Tim wrote: I agree with this post... "Nobody has the "Right" to serve in the Military. The Military is not an equal opportunity employer. The Military uses prejudice regularly and consistently to deny citizens from joining for things such as: Too fat. Too skinny. Too old. Too young. Too tall or too short. Citizens are denied for having flat feet, missing fingers. Poor eyesight. Even bad teeth. Bad back. Malnourished. Criminal history. Anxiety. Phobias. Drug addiction. Hearing damage. Even those in wheelchairs are denied entry into military service. Can't run the required course in the required amount of time? Denied. The Military has one job. To go to War and Defend this Country and Allies. Anything else is a distraction and a liability. There are no exceptions made for being special, challenged or socially wonderful. It's the same reason they don't allow diabetics, epileptics, or people with asthma in the military. It's a medical liability and cost issue. If you need constant medication, like a hormonal suppression regiment necessitates, you are not mission ready. That is the military, they discriminate based on ability and commitment. You change YOURSELF to meet military standards. Not the other way around. The Military does not need to accommodate anyone with special needs. The Military needs to maintain readiness." - Steve S As evidenced by several morons in this newsgroup, the military obviously does accommodate personnel with "special needs." That's probably right, Harry. they protected themselves by not allowing you in. Timmy, Timmy, Timmy, try thinking. Oh, think about this: according to your bible, Adam and Eve had three sons. Harree, Harree, Harree... according to everyone here (but the canuck), you're a flaming asshole. |
Very interesting outlook on the transgender military ban...
On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 10:52:31 -0700 (PDT), Its Me
wrote: On Sunday, July 30, 2017 at 1:34:01 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote: On 7/30/17 1:28 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, July 30, 2017 at 12:09:54 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 7/30/17 12:59 PM, Tim wrote: I agree with this post... "Nobody has the "Right" to serve in the Military. The Military is not an equal opportunity employer. The Military uses prejudice regularly and consistently to deny citizens from joining for things such as: Too fat. Too skinny. Too old. Too young. Too tall or too short. Citizens are denied for having flat feet, missing fingers. Poor eyesight. Even bad teeth. Bad back. Malnourished. Criminal history. Anxiety. Phobias. Drug addiction. Hearing damage. Even those in wheelchairs are denied entry into military service. Can't run the required course in the required amount of time? Denied. The Military has one job. To go to War and Defend this Country and Allies. Anything else is a distraction and a liability. There are no exceptions made for being special, challenged or socially wonderful. It's the same reason they don't allow diabetics, epileptics, or people with asthma in the military. It's a medical liability and cost issue. If you need constant medication, like a hormonal suppression regiment necessitates, you are not mission ready. That is the military, they discriminate based on ability and commitment. You change YOURSELF to meet military standards. Not the other way around. The Military does not need to accommodate anyone with special needs. The Military needs to maintain readiness." - Steve S As evidenced by several morons in this newsgroup, the military obviously does accommodate personnel with "special needs." That's probably right, Harry. they protected themselves by not allowing you in. Timmy, Timmy, Timmy, try thinking. Oh, think about this: according to your bible, Adam and Eve had three sons. Harree, Harree, Harree... according to everyone here (but the canuck), you're a flaming asshole. === That's true of course, but that by itself would not have excluded him from the military. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com |
Very interesting outlook on the transgender military ban...
On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 09:59:34 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
I agree with this post... "Nobody has the "Right" to serve in the Military. The Military is not an equal opportunity employer. The Military uses prejudice regularly and consistently to deny citizens from joining for things such as: Too fat. Too skinny. Too old. Too young. Too tall or too short. Citizens are denied for having flat feet, missing fingers. Poor eyesight. Even bad teeth. Bad back. Malnourished. Criminal history. Anxiety. Phobias. Drug addiction. Hearing damage. Even those in wheelchairs are denied entry into military service. Can't run the required course in the required amount of time? Denied. The Military has one job. To go to War and Defend this Country and Allies. Anything else is a distraction and a liability. There are no exceptions made for being special, challenged or socially wonderful. It's the same reason they don't allow diabetics, epileptics, or people with asthma in the military. It's a medical liability and cost issue. If you need constant medication, like a hormonal suppression regiment necessitates, you are not mission ready. That is the military, they discriminate based on ability and commitment. You change YOURSELF to meet military standards. Not the other way around. The Military does not need to accommodate anyone with special needs. The Military needs to maintain readiness." - Steve S Well said. And it's for damn sure commanders don't need the additional worry of whether GI Joe should be called Joe or Joanne on any given day. |
Very interesting outlook on the transgender military ban...
On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 13:33:59 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 7/30/17 1:28 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, July 30, 2017 at 12:09:54 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 7/30/17 12:59 PM, Tim wrote: I agree with this post... "Nobody has the "Right" to serve in the Military. The Military is not an equal opportunity employer. The Military uses prejudice regularly and consistently to deny citizens from joining for things such as: Too fat. Too skinny. Too old. Too young. Too tall or too short. Citizens are denied for having flat feet, missing fingers. Poor eyesight. Even bad teeth. Bad back. Malnourished. Criminal history. Anxiety. Phobias. Drug addiction. Hearing damage. Even those in wheelchairs are denied entry into military service. Can't run the required course in the required amount of time? Denied. The Military has one job. To go to War and Defend this Country and Allies. Anything else is a distraction and a liability. There are no exceptions made for being special, challenged or socially wonderful. It's the same reason they don't allow diabetics, epileptics, or people with asthma in the military. It's a medical liability and cost issue. If you need constant medication, like a hormonal suppression regiment necessitates, you are not mission ready. That is the military, they discriminate based on ability and commitment. You change YOURSELF to meet military standards. Not the other way around. The Military does not need to accommodate anyone with special needs. The Military needs to maintain readiness." - Steve S As evidenced by several morons in this newsgroup, the military obviously does accommodate personnel with "special needs." That's probably right, Harry. they protected themselves by not allowing you in. Timmy, Timmy, Timmy, try thinking. Oh, think about this: according to your bible, Adam and Eve had three sons. According to his and Donnee's bible. |
Very interesting outlook on the transgender military ban...
|
Very interesting outlook on the transgender military ban...
Keyser Soze
- show quoted text - Timmy, Timmy, Timmy, try thinking. Oh, think about this: according to your bible, Adam and Eve had three sons. .... Why should I think about that? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com