|
Well, that didn't last long
The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com |
Well, that didn't last long
On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on the part of his supporters. |
Well, that didn't last long
On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on the part of his supporters. Bull****. |
Well, that didn't last long
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 18:16:17 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on the part of his supporters. Yet it was a Sanders guy who shot up the place. |
Well, that didn't last long
On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on the part of his supporters. Bull****. Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another planet? Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media. |
Well, that didn't last long
On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on the part of his supporters. Bull****. Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another planet? Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media. I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with violence that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO. And sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal slants. Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity again in 2020. |
Well, that didn't last long
On 6/16/17 6:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on the part of his supporters. Bull****. Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another planet? Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media. I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with violence that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO. And sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal slants. Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity again in 2020. Trump said a lot more than "get them out," but,of course, you've turned a blind eye and ear to Trump's transgressions. The best we can hope for is Trump tied up in knots politically, unless, of course, he resigns. "Progressive liberal" Love it. |
Well, that didn't last long
On 6/16/2017 7:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/16/17 6:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on the part of his supporters. Bull****. Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another planet? Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media. I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with violence that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO. And sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal slants. Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity again in 2020. Trump said a lot more than "get them out," but,of course, you've turned a blind eye and ear to Trump's transgressions. The best we can hope for is Trump tied up in knots politically, unless, of course, he resigns. "Progressive liberal" Love it. Eventually the combination of the term "progressive liberal" will separate and become two, distinct political ideologies. We'll have "progressives", "liberals" and "conservatives". Many aspects of liberal ideology I can agree with as can I with many aspects of conservative ideology. "Progressives" like yourself, can't even consider the ideology of either traditional liberals or conservatives. You refuse to read anything that has a conservative slant or watch any media known for having a conservative bias. It's "below" you, as a progressive and, of course, it *must* be bull**** to you (without even giving it any consideration). That's why I can't embrace progressive ideology, even though (unlike you) I am willing to at least listen and read before I draw a conclusion. Progressive ideology to me is too close to European style socialism. I don't think the USA is designed for or made for European style socialism and that is the most significant difference in how we view things. |
Well, that didn't last long
On 6/16/17 7:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 7:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 6:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on the part of his supporters. Bull****. Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another planet? Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media. I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with violence that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO. And sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal slants. Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity again in 2020. Trump said a lot more than "get them out," but,of course, you've turned a blind eye and ear to Trump's transgressions. The best we can hope for is Trump tied up in knots politically, unless, of course, he resigns. "Progressive liberal" Love it. Eventually the combination of the term "progressive liberal" will separate and become two, distinct political ideologies. We'll have "progressives", "liberals" and "conservatives". Many aspects of liberal ideology I can agree with as can I with many aspects of conservative ideology. "Progressives" like yourself, can't even consider the ideology of either traditional liberals or conservatives. You refuse to read anything that has a conservative slant or watch any media known for having a conservative bias. It's "below" you, as a progressive and, of course, it *must* be bull**** to you (without even giving it any consideration). That's why I can't embrace progressive ideology, even though (unlike you) I am willing to at least listen and read before I draw a conclusion. Progressive ideology to me is too close to European style socialism. I don't think the USA is designed for or made for European style socialism and that is the most significant difference in how we view things. I don't separate "progressive liberal" into two distinct words for the purposes you describe here. Liberals *are* per se progressive. Naturally, there is a range of belief within liberalism. My socialist buddies are more liberal than I am in certain areas, and less liberal in other areas. But we'd all describe ourselves as progressive liberals. I do read pieces that have a conservative slant. I do not watch Fox News, but I do see an occasional bit from that network in other places. I will admit that much of what is supposedly news and commentary from "the right" gives me the giggles. I'm not sure what economic system would be best for the future of this country. I do believe that "capitalism" has taken us down a road that is leading to the destruction of the lower and middle income classes. Too much wealth in concentrated in the hands of the truly wealthy, more than ever before, and even the crumbs are being swept that way. |
Well, that didn't last long
On 6/16/2017 7:52 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/16/17 7:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 7:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 6:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on the part of his supporters. Bull****. Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another planet? Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media. I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with violence that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO. And sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal slants. Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity again in 2020. Trump said a lot more than "get them out," but,of course, you've turned a blind eye and ear to Trump's transgressions. The best we can hope for is Trump tied up in knots politically, unless, of course, he resigns. "Progressive liberal" Love it. Eventually the combination of the term "progressive liberal" will separate and become two, distinct political ideologies. We'll have "progressives", "liberals" and "conservatives". Many aspects of liberal ideology I can agree with as can I with many aspects of conservative ideology. "Progressives" like yourself, can't even consider the ideology of either traditional liberals or conservatives. You refuse to read anything that has a conservative slant or watch any media known for having a conservative bias. It's "below" you, as a progressive and, of course, it *must* be bull**** to you (without even giving it any consideration). That's why I can't embrace progressive ideology, even though (unlike you) I am willing to at least listen and read before I draw a conclusion. Progressive ideology to me is too close to European style socialism. I don't think the USA is designed for or made for European style socialism and that is the most significant difference in how we view things. I don't separate "progressive liberal" into two distinct words for the purposes you describe here. Liberals *are* per se progressive. Naturally, there is a range of belief within liberalism. My socialist buddies are more liberal than I am in certain areas, and less liberal in other areas. But we'd all describe ourselves as progressive liberals. I do read pieces that have a conservative slant. I do not watch Fox News, but I do see an occasional bit from that network in other places. I will admit that much of what is supposedly news and commentary from "the right" gives me the giggles. I'm not sure what economic system would be best for the future of this country. I do believe that "capitalism" has taken us down a road that is leading to the destruction of the lower and middle income classes. Too much wealth in concentrated in the hands of the truly wealthy, more than ever before, and even the crumbs are being swept that way. The term "Progressive" has been around for a long time but has taken on different meanings over the years. In fact, at one time there *were* three, distinct political ideologies consisting of "progressives", "liberals" and "conservatives". Progressives emerged from the extreme left of the liberal ideology and originally had it's roots in socialism and even communism. It remained a minor component of the general "liberal" group but in recent years has taken on a major, leading role in what used to be traditional liberalism. You tend to subscribe to it's modern tenets, as demonstrated in your comments above. That's why we will never agree. |
Well, that didn't last long
justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message: justan Wrote in message: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 6/16/17 7:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 7:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 6:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on the part of his supporters. Bull****. Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another planet? Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media. I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with violence that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO. And sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal slants. Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity again in 2020. Trump said a lot more than "get them out," but,of course, you've turned a blind eye and ear to Trump's transgressions. The best we can hope for is Trump tied up in knots politically, unless, of course, he resigns. "Progressive liberal" Love it. Eventually the combination of the term "progressive liberal" will separate and become two, distinct political ideologies. We'll have "progressives", "liberals" and "conservatives". Many aspects of liberal ideology I can agree with as can I with many aspects of conservative ideology. "Progressives" like yourself, can't even consider the ideology of either traditional liberals or conservatives. You refuse to read anything that has a conservative slant or watch any media known for having a conservative bias. It's "below" you, as a progressive and, of course, it *must* be bull**** to you (without even giving it any consideration). That's why I can't embrace progressive ideology, even though (unlike you) I am willing to at least listen and read before I draw a conclusion. Progressive ideology to me is too close to European style socialism. I don't think the USA is designed for or made for European style socialism and that is the most significant difference in how we view things. I don't separate "progressive liberal" into two distinct words for the purposes you describe here. Liberals *are* per se progressive. Naturally, there is a range of belief within liberalism. My socialist buddies are more liberal than I am in certain areas, and less liberal in other areas. But we'd all describe ourselves as progressive liberals. I do read pieces that have a conservative slant. I do not watch Fox News, but I do see an occasional bit from that network in other places. I will admit that much of what is supposedly news and commentary from "the right" gives me the giggles. I'm not sure what economic system would be best for the future of this country. I do believe that "capitalism" has taken us down a road that is leading to the destruction of the lower and middle income classes. Too much wealth in concentrated in the hands of the truly wealthy, more than ever before, and even the crumbs are being swept that way. If you had been willing to work, you might have accumilated a little wealth. This idea that everything is to be handed to you on a silver platter should have gone away after you stopped suckling on you mamas teat. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income exceeded mine -- Whetever. I have some leftover, where's yours? Carefully invested. And I still have earned income. -- Posted with my iPhone 7+. |
Well, that didn't last long
On 6/16/2017 10:01 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
justan Wrote in message: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 6/16/17 7:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 7:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 6:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on the part of his supporters. Bull****. Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another planet? Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media. I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with violence that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO. And sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal slants. Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity again in 2020. Trump said a lot more than "get them out," but,of course, you've turned a blind eye and ear to Trump's transgressions. The best we can hope for is Trump tied up in knots politically, unless, of course, he resigns. "Progressive liberal" Love it. Eventually the combination of the term "progressive liberal" will separate and become two, distinct political ideologies. We'll have "progressives", "liberals" and "conservatives". Many aspects of liberal ideology I can agree with as can I with many aspects of conservative ideology. "Progressives" like yourself, can't even consider the ideology of either traditional liberals or conservatives. You refuse to read anything that has a conservative slant or watch any media known for having a conservative bias. It's "below" you, as a progressive and, of course, it *must* be bull**** to you (without even giving it any consideration). That's why I can't embrace progressive ideology, even though (unlike you) I am willing to at least listen and read before I draw a conclusion. Progressive ideology to me is too close to European style socialism. I don't think the USA is designed for or made for European style socialism and that is the most significant difference in how we view things. I don't separate "progressive liberal" into two distinct words for the purposes you describe here. Liberals *are* per se progressive. Naturally, there is a range of belief within liberalism. My socialist buddies are more liberal than I am in certain areas, and less liberal in other areas. But we'd all describe ourselves as progressive liberals. I do read pieces that have a conservative slant. I do not watch Fox News, but I do see an occasional bit from that network in other places. I will admit that much of what is supposedly news and commentary from "the right" gives me the giggles. I'm not sure what economic system would be best for the future of this country. I do believe that "capitalism" has taken us down a road that is leading to the destruction of the lower and middle income classes. Too much wealth in concentrated in the hands of the truly wealthy, more than ever before, and even the crumbs are being swept that way. If you had been willing to work, you might have accumilated a little wealth. This idea that everything is to be handed to you on a silver platter should have gone away after you stopped suckling on you mamas teat. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income exceeded mine So what if it didn't? Not everyone makes the same amount of income in their lives but it's no reflection on their willingness to work. I'll betcha I've paid more in federal income taxes in my life than you have every earned as income since you were a youngster. Does that make me "better" than you? No. |
Well, that didn't last long
On 6/16/17 10:39 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 10:01 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: justan Wrote in message: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 6/16/17 7:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 7:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 6:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on the part of his supporters. Bull****. Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another planet? Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media. I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with violence that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO. And sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal slants. Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity again in 2020. Trump said a lot more than "get them out," but,of course, you've turned a blind eye and ear to Trump's transgressions. The best we can hope for is Trump tied up in knots politically, unless, of course, he resigns. "Progressive liberal" Love it. Eventually the combination of the term "progressive liberal" will separate and become two, distinct political ideologies. We'll have "progressives", "liberals" and "conservatives". Many aspects of liberal ideology I can agree with as can I with many aspects of conservative ideology. "Progressives" like yourself, can't even consider the ideology of either traditional liberals or conservatives. You refuse to read anything that has a conservative slant or watch any media known for having a conservative bias. It's "below" you, as a progressive and, of course, it *must* be bull**** to you (without even giving it any consideration). That's why I can't embrace progressive ideology, even though (unlike you) I am willing to at least listen and read before I draw a conclusion. Progressive ideology to me is too close to European style socialism. I don't think the USA is designed for or made for European style socialism and that is the most significant difference in how we view things. I don't separate "progressive liberal" into two distinct words for the purposes you describe here. Liberals *are* per se progressive. Naturally, there is a range of belief within liberalism. My socialist buddies are more liberal than I am in certain areas, and less liberal in other areas. But we'd all describe ourselves as progressive liberals. I do read pieces that have a conservative slant. I do not watch Fox News, but I do see an occasional bit from that network in other places. I will admit that much of what is supposedly news and commentary from "the right" gives me the giggles. I'm not sure what economic system would be best for the future of this country. I do believe that "capitalism" has taken us down a road that is leading to the destruction of the lower and middle income classes. Too much wealth in concentrated in the hands of the truly wealthy, more than ever before, and even the crumbs are being swept that way. If you had been willing to work, you might have accumilated a little wealth. This idea that everything is to be handed to you on a silver platter should have gone away after you stopped suckling on you mamas teat. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income exceeded mine So what if it didn't? Not everyone makes the same amount of income in their lives but it's no reflection on their willingness to work. I'll betcha I've paid more in federal income taxes in my life than you have every earned as income since you were a youngster. Does that make me "better" than you? No. Your moronic buddy implied I have not been willing to work. That's just another of his absurdities, yet no comment from you? You're just enabling a moron, the same way you enable Trump. |
Well, that didn't last long
On 6/16/2017 10:48 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/16/17 10:39 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 10:01 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: justan Wrote in message: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 6/16/17 7:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 7:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 6:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on the part of his supporters. Bull****. Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another planet? Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media. I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with violence that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO. And sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal slants. Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity again in 2020. Trump said a lot more than "get them out," but,of course, you've turned a blind eye and ear to Trump's transgressions. The best we can hope for is Trump tied up in knots politically, unless, of course, he resigns. "Progressive liberal" Love it. Eventually the combination of the term "progressive liberal" will separate and become two, distinct political ideologies. We'll have "progressives", "liberals" and "conservatives". Many aspects of liberal ideology I can agree with as can I with many aspects of conservative ideology. "Progressives" like yourself, can't even consider the ideology of either traditional liberals or conservatives. You refuse to read anything that has a conservative slant or watch any media known for having a conservative bias. It's "below" you, as a progressive and, of course, it *must* be bull**** to you (without even giving it any consideration). That's why I can't embrace progressive ideology, even though (unlike you) I am willing to at least listen and read before I draw a conclusion. Progressive ideology to me is too close to European style socialism. I don't think the USA is designed for or made for European style socialism and that is the most significant difference in how we view things. I don't separate "progressive liberal" into two distinct words for the purposes you describe here. Liberals *are* per se progressive. Naturally, there is a range of belief within liberalism. My socialist buddies are more liberal than I am in certain areas, and less liberal in other areas. But we'd all describe ourselves as progressive liberals. I do read pieces that have a conservative slant. I do not watch Fox News, but I do see an occasional bit from that network in other places. I will admit that much of what is supposedly news and commentary from "the right" gives me the giggles. I'm not sure what economic system would be best for the future of this country. I do believe that "capitalism" has taken us down a road that is leading to the destruction of the lower and middle income classes. Too much wealth in concentrated in the hands of the truly wealthy, more than ever before, and even the crumbs are being swept that way. If you had been willing to work, you might have accumilated a little wealth. This idea that everything is to be handed to you on a silver platter should have gone away after you stopped suckling on you mamas teat. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income exceeded mine So what if it didn't? Not everyone makes the same amount of income in their lives but it's no reflection on their willingness to work. I'll betcha I've paid more in federal income taxes in my life than you have every earned as income since you were a youngster. Does that make me "better" than you? No. Your moronic buddy implied I have not been willing to work. That's just another of his absurdities, yet no comment from you? You're just enabling a moron, the same way you enable Trump. He is referencing your constant expectation that the government has an obligation for your welfare than most of us expect. It's your socialist leanings in play. |
Well, that didn't last long
On 6/16/17 10:59 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 10:48 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 10:39 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 10:01 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: justan Wrote in message: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 6/16/17 7:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 7:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 6:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on the part of his supporters. Bull****. Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another planet? Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media. I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with violence that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO. And sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal slants. Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity again in 2020. Trump said a lot more than "get them out," but,of course, you've turned a blind eye and ear to Trump's transgressions. The best we can hope for is Trump tied up in knots politically, unless, of course, he resigns. "Progressive liberal" Love it. Eventually the combination of the term "progressive liberal" will separate and become two, distinct political ideologies. We'll have "progressives", "liberals" and "conservatives". Many aspects of liberal ideology I can agree with as can I with many aspects of conservative ideology. "Progressives" like yourself, can't even consider the ideology of either traditional liberals or conservatives. You refuse to read anything that has a conservative slant or watch any media known for having a conservative bias. It's "below" you, as a progressive and, of course, it *must* be bull**** to you (without even giving it any consideration). That's why I can't embrace progressive ideology, even though (unlike you) I am willing to at least listen and read before I draw a conclusion. Progressive ideology to me is too close to European style socialism. I don't think the USA is designed for or made for European style socialism and that is the most significant difference in how we view things. I don't separate "progressive liberal" into two distinct words for the purposes you describe here. Liberals *are* per se progressive. Naturally, there is a range of belief within liberalism. My socialist buddies are more liberal than I am in certain areas, and less liberal in other areas. But we'd all describe ourselves as progressive liberals. I do read pieces that have a conservative slant. I do not watch Fox News, but I do see an occasional bit from that network in other places. I will admit that much of what is supposedly news and commentary from "the right" gives me the giggles. I'm not sure what economic system would be best for the future of this country. I do believe that "capitalism" has taken us down a road that is leading to the destruction of the lower and middle income classes. Too much wealth in concentrated in the hands of the truly wealthy, more than ever before, and even the crumbs are being swept that way. If you had been willing to work, you might have accumilated a little wealth. This idea that everything is to be handed to you on a silver platter should have gone away after you stopped suckling on you mamas teat. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income exceeded mine So what if it didn't? Not everyone makes the same amount of income in their lives but it's no reflection on their willingness to work. I'll betcha I've paid more in federal income taxes in my life than you have every earned as income since you were a youngster. Does that make me "better" than you? No. Your moronic buddy implied I have not been willing to work. That's just another of his absurdities, yet no comment from you? You're just enabling a moron, the same way you enable Trump. He is referencing your constant expectation that the government has an obligation for your welfare than most of us expect. It's your socialist leanings in play. That's too abstract for your moronic buddyboy. |
Well, that didn't last long
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 06:49:47 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on the part of his supporters. Bull****. Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another planet? Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media. I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with violence that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO. And sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal slants. Harry is right on that one. Trump even to pay the legal fees if his goons beat someone up. |
Well, that didn't last long
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 07:52:27 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote: I'm not sure what economic system would be best for the future of this country. I do believe that "capitalism" has taken us down a road that is leading to the destruction of the lower and middle income classes. Too much wealth in concentrated in the hands of the truly wealthy, more than ever before, and even the crumbs are being swept that way. I suppose "national socialism" sounds good to you but that didn't work out so well in the 20th century. You actually embrace communism but that didn't work out so well either. Without the capitalist incentive to work the proletariat gets lazy and needs an oppressive government to make the system work. |
Well, that didn't last long
On 6/16/2017 11:19 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/16/17 10:59 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 10:48 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 10:39 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 10:01 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: justan Wrote in message: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 6/16/17 7:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 7:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 6:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on the part of his supporters. Bull****. Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another planet? Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media. I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with violence that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO. And sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal slants. Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity again in 2020. Trump said a lot more than "get them out," but,of course, you've turned a blind eye and ear to Trump's transgressions. The best we can hope for is Trump tied up in knots politically, unless, of course, he resigns. "Progressive liberal" Love it. Eventually the combination of the term "progressive liberal" will separate and become two, distinct political ideologies. We'll have "progressives", "liberals" and "conservatives". Many aspects of liberal ideology I can agree with as can I with many aspects of conservative ideology. "Progressives" like yourself, can't even consider the ideology of either traditional liberals or conservatives. You refuse to read anything that has a conservative slant or watch any media known for having a conservative bias. It's "below" you, as a progressive and, of course, it *must* be bull**** to you (without even giving it any consideration). That's why I can't embrace progressive ideology, even though (unlike you) I am willing to at least listen and read before I draw a conclusion. Progressive ideology to me is too close to European style socialism. I don't think the USA is designed for or made for European style socialism and that is the most significant difference in how we view things. I don't separate "progressive liberal" into two distinct words for the purposes you describe here. Liberals *are* per se progressive. Naturally, there is a range of belief within liberalism. My socialist buddies are more liberal than I am in certain areas, and less liberal in other areas. But we'd all describe ourselves as progressive liberals. I do read pieces that have a conservative slant. I do not watch Fox News, but I do see an occasional bit from that network in other places. I will admit that much of what is supposedly news and commentary from "the right" gives me the giggles. I'm not sure what economic system would be best for the future of this country. I do believe that "capitalism" has taken us down a road that is leading to the destruction of the lower and middle income classes. Too much wealth in concentrated in the hands of the truly wealthy, more than ever before, and even the crumbs are being swept that way. If you had been willing to work, you might have accumilated a little wealth. This idea that everything is to be handed to you on a silver platter should have gone away after you stopped suckling on you mamas teat. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income exceeded mine So what if it didn't? Not everyone makes the same amount of income in their lives but it's no reflection on their willingness to work. I'll betcha I've paid more in federal income taxes in my life than you have every earned as income since you were a youngster. Does that make me "better" than you? No. Your moronic buddy implied I have not been willing to work. That's just another of his absurdities, yet no comment from you? You're just enabling a moron, the same way you enable Trump. He is referencing your constant expectation that the government has an obligation for your welfare than most of us expect. It's your socialist leanings in play. That's too abstract for your moronic buddyboy. Heh. This is the dramatic irony of rec.boats. Those of us who know him personally get a big kick out of how he makes you look so foolish in many of your posts. Other than the various "handles" he has used here you know little about him or his past, despite your attempts to garner information about him. It makes for some comical reading sometimes. |
Well, that didn't last long
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 11:19 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 10:59 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 10:48 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 10:39 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 10:01 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: justan Wrote in message: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 6/16/17 7:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 7:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 6:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on the part of his supporters. Bull****. Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another planet? Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media. I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with violence that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO. And sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal slants. Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity again in 2020. Trump said a lot more than "get them out," but,of course, you've turned a blind eye and ear to Trump's transgressions. The best we can hope for is Trump tied up in knots politically, unless, of course, he resigns. "Progressive liberal" Love it. Eventually the combination of the term "progressive liberal" will separate and become two, distinct political ideologies. We'll have "progressives", "liberals" and "conservatives". Many aspects of liberal ideology I can agree with as can I with many aspects of conservative ideology. "Progressives" like yourself, can't even consider the ideology of either traditional liberals or conservatives. You refuse to read anything that has a conservative slant or watch any media known for having a conservative bias. It's "below" you, as a progressive and, of course, it *must* be bull**** to you (without even giving it any consideration). That's why I can't embrace progressive ideology, even though (unlike you) I am willing to at least listen and read before I draw a conclusion. Progressive ideology to me is too close to European style socialism. I don't think the USA is designed for or made for European style socialism and that is the most significant difference in how we view things. I don't separate "progressive liberal" into two distinct words for the purposes you describe here. Liberals *are* per se progressive. Naturally, there is a range of belief within liberalism. My socialist buddies are more liberal than I am in certain areas, and less liberal in other areas. But we'd all describe ourselves as progressive liberals. I do read pieces that have a conservative slant. I do not watch Fox News, but I do see an occasional bit from that network in other places. I will admit that much of what is supposedly news and commentary from "the right" gives me the giggles. I'm not sure what economic system would be best for the future of this country. I do believe that "capitalism" has taken us down a road that is leading to the destruction of the lower and middle income classes. Too much wealth in concentrated in the hands of the truly wealthy, more than ever before, and even the crumbs are being swept that way. If you had been willing to work, you might have accumilated a little wealth. This idea that everything is to be handed to you on a silver platter should have gone away after you stopped suckling on you mamas teat. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income exceeded mine So what if it didn't? Not everyone makes the same amount of income in their lives but it's no reflection on their willingness to work. I'll betcha I've paid more in federal income taxes in my life than you have every earned as income since you were a youngster. Does that make me "better" than you? No. Your moronic buddy implied I have not been willing to work. That's just another of his absurdities, yet no comment from you? You're just enabling a moron, the same way you enable Trump. He is referencing your constant expectation that the government has an obligation for your welfare than most of us expect. It's your socialist leanings in play. That's too abstract for your moronic buddyboy. Heh. This is the dramatic irony of rec.boats. Those of us who know him personally get a big kick out of how he makes you look so foolish in many of your posts. Other than the various "handles" he has used here you know little about him or his past, despite your attempts to garner information about him. It makes for some comical reading sometimes. He works hard at being a moron... 🤔 -- Posted with my iPhone 7+. |
Well, that didn't last long
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:31:41 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: Carefully invested. And I still have earned income. I bet it is invested in American Capitalism too. If you are 100% in federal paper your returns barely beat inflation if at all. |
Well, that didn't last long
wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:01:06 -0400 (EDT), Keyser Soze wrote: i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income exceeded mine Yet you still complain about capitalism. Amazing. If you really made that kind of money you certainly would not want to settle for a government mandated wage. I didn't...he did. Navy pay. Get it? -- Posted with my iPhone 7+. |
Well, that didn't last long
On 6/16/2017 12:08 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 11:19 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 10:59 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 10:48 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 10:39 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 10:01 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: justan Wrote in message: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 6/16/17 7:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 7:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 6:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on the part of his supporters. Bull****. Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another planet? Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media. I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with violence that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO. And sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal slants. Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity again in 2020. Trump said a lot more than "get them out," but,of course, you've turned a blind eye and ear to Trump's transgressions. The best we can hope for is Trump tied up in knots politically, unless, of course, he resigns. "Progressive liberal" Love it. Eventually the combination of the term "progressive liberal" will separate and become two, distinct political ideologies. We'll have "progressives", "liberals" and "conservatives". Many aspects of liberal ideology I can agree with as can I with many aspects of conservative ideology. "Progressives" like yourself, can't even consider the ideology of either traditional liberals or conservatives. You refuse to read anything that has a conservative slant or watch any media known for having a conservative bias. It's "below" you, as a progressive and, of course, it *must* be bull**** to you (without even giving it any consideration). That's why I can't embrace progressive ideology, even though (unlike you) I am willing to at least listen and read before I draw a conclusion. Progressive ideology to me is too close to European style socialism. I don't think the USA is designed for or made for European style socialism and that is the most significant difference in how we view things. I don't separate "progressive liberal" into two distinct words for the purposes you describe here. Liberals *are* per se progressive. Naturally, there is a range of belief within liberalism. My socialist buddies are more liberal than I am in certain areas, and less liberal in other areas. But we'd all describe ourselves as progressive liberals. I do read pieces that have a conservative slant. I do not watch Fox News, but I do see an occasional bit from that network in other places. I will admit that much of what is supposedly news and commentary from "the right" gives me the giggles. I'm not sure what economic system would be best for the future of this country. I do believe that "capitalism" has taken us down a road that is leading to the destruction of the lower and middle income classes. Too much wealth in concentrated in the hands of the truly wealthy, more than ever before, and even the crumbs are being swept that way. If you had been willing to work, you might have accumilated a little wealth. This idea that everything is to be handed to you on a silver platter should have gone away after you stopped suckling on you mamas teat. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income exceeded mine So what if it didn't? Not everyone makes the same amount of income in their lives but it's no reflection on their willingness to work. I'll betcha I've paid more in federal income taxes in my life than you have every earned as income since you were a youngster. Does that make me "better" than you? No. Your moronic buddy implied I have not been willing to work. That's just another of his absurdities, yet no comment from you? You're just enabling a moron, the same way you enable Trump. He is referencing your constant expectation that the government has an obligation for your welfare than most of us expect. It's your socialist leanings in play. That's too abstract for your moronic buddyboy. Heh. This is the dramatic irony of rec.boats. Those of us who know him personally get a big kick out of how he makes you look so foolish in many of your posts. Other than the various "handles" he has used here you know little about him or his past, despite your attempts to garner information about him. It makes for some comical reading sometimes. He works hard at being a moron... 🤔 He sometimes has to work hard to *appear* to be a moron because he knows it puts a nickle in you and makes you perform. |
Well, that didn't last long
On 6/16/2017 12:10 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
wrote: On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:01:06 -0400 (EDT), Keyser Soze wrote: i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income exceeded mine Yet you still complain about capitalism. Amazing. If you really made that kind of money you certainly would not want to settle for a government mandated wage. I didn't...he did. Navy pay. Get it? How long was he in the Navy collecting a government mandated wage? You don't know. Hint: It wasn't his career. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com |
Well, that didn't last long
On 6/16/17 12:12 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 12:10 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: wrote: On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:01:06 -0400 (EDT), Keyser Soze wrote: i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income exceeded mine Yet you still complain about capitalism. Amazing. If you really made that kind of money you certainly would not want to settle for a government mandated wage. I didn't...he did. Navy pay. Get it? How long was he in the Navy collecting a government mandated wage? You don't know. Hint: It wasn't his career. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Not the point. I worked for "the guvmint" for a year. The adventure was worthwhile, the pay was...adequate. I turned down two big league "guvmint" jobs, one with the Department of Agriculture and one (twice, actually) for the private corporation that runs the USPS. |
Well, that didn't last long
On 6/16/17 12:10 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 12:08 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 11:19 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 10:59 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 10:48 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 10:39 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 10:01 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: justan Wrote in message: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 6/16/17 7:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 7:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 6:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on the part of his supporters. Bull****. Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another planet? Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media. I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with violence that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO. And sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal slants. Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity again in 2020. Trump said a lot more than "get them out," but,of course, you've turned a blind eye and ear to Trump's transgressions. The best we can hope for is Trump tied up in knots politically, unless, of course, he resigns. "Progressive liberal" Love it. Eventually the combination of the term "progressive liberal" will separate and become two, distinct political ideologies. We'll have "progressives", "liberals" and "conservatives". Many aspects of liberal ideology I can agree with as can I with many aspects of conservative ideology. "Progressives" like yourself, can't even consider the ideology of either traditional liberals or conservatives. You refuse to read anything that has a conservative slant or watch any media known for having a conservative bias. It's "below" you, as a progressive and, of course, it *must* be bull**** to you (without even giving it any consideration). That's why I can't embrace progressive ideology, even though (unlike you) I am willing to at least listen and read before I draw a conclusion. Progressive ideology to me is too close to European style socialism. I don't think the USA is designed for or made for European style socialism and that is the most significant difference in how we view things. I don't separate "progressive liberal" into two distinct words for the purposes you describe here. Liberals *are* per se progressive. Naturally, there is a range of belief within liberalism. My socialist buddies are more liberal than I am in certain areas, and less liberal in other areas. But we'd all describe ourselves as progressive liberals. I do read pieces that have a conservative slant. I do not watch Fox News, but I do see an occasional bit from that network in other places. I will admit that much of what is supposedly news and commentary from "the right" gives me the giggles. I'm not sure what economic system would be best for the future of this country. I do believe that "capitalism" has taken us down a road that is leading to the destruction of the lower and middle income classes. Too much wealth in concentrated in the hands of the truly wealthy, more than ever before, and even the crumbs are being swept that way. If you had been willing to work, you might have accumilated a little wealth. This idea that everything is to be handed to you on a silver platter should have gone away after you stopped suckling on you mamas teat. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income exceeded mine So what if it didn't? Not everyone makes the same amount of income in their lives but it's no reflection on their willingness to work. I'll betcha I've paid more in federal income taxes in my life than you have every earned as income since you were a youngster. Does that make me "better" than you? No. Your moronic buddy implied I have not been willing to work. That's just another of his absurdities, yet no comment from you? You're just enabling a moron, the same way you enable Trump. He is referencing your constant expectation that the government has an obligation for your welfare than most of us expect. It's your socialist leanings in play. That's too abstract for your moronic buddyboy. Heh. This is the dramatic irony of rec.boats. Those of us who know him personally get a big kick out of how he makes you look so foolish in many of your posts. Other than the various "handles" he has used here you know little about him or his past, despite your attempts to garner information about him. It makes for some comical reading sometimes. He works hard at being a moron... 🤔 He sometimes has to work hard to *appear* to be a moron because he knows it puts a nickle in you and makes you perform. I don't believe he has to work at being a moron. |
Well, that didn't last long
|
Well, that didn't last long
On 6/16/2017 12:19 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/16/17 12:12 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 12:10 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: wrote: On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:01:06 -0400 (EDT), Keyser Soze wrote: i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income exceeded mine Yet you still complain about capitalism. Amazing. If you really made that kind of money you certainly would not want to settle for a government mandated wage. I didn't...he did. Navy pay. Get it? How long was he in the Navy collecting a government mandated wage? You don't know. Hint: It wasn't his career. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Not the point. I worked for "the guvmint" for a year. The adventure was worthwhile, the pay was...adequate. I turned down two big league "guvmint" jobs, one with the Department of Agriculture and one (twice, actually) for the private corporation that runs the USPS. Maybe you should have accepted the jobs. You might be less frustrated with for-profit corporations. |
Well, that didn't last long
On 6/16/17 12:22 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 12:19 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 12:12 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 12:10 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: wrote: On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:01:06 -0400 (EDT), Keyser Soze wrote: i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income exceeded mine Yet you still complain about capitalism. Amazing. If you really made that kind of money you certainly would not want to settle for a government mandated wage. I didn't...he did. Navy pay. Get it? How long was he in the Navy collecting a government mandated wage? You don't know. Hint: It wasn't his career. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Not the point. I worked for "the guvmint" for a year. The adventure was worthwhile, the pay was...adequate. I turned down two big league "guvmint" jobs, one with the Department of Agriculture and one (twice, actually) for the private corporation that runs the USPS. Maybe you should have accepted the jobs. You might be less frustrated with for-profit corporations. Your assumption I am "frustrated" by for-profit corporations is incorrect. |
Well, that didn't last long
On 6/16/2017 12:28 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/16/17 12:22 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 12:19 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/16/17 12:12 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/16/2017 12:10 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: wrote: On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:01:06 -0400 (EDT), Keyser Soze wrote: i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income exceeded mine Yet you still complain about capitalism. Amazing. If you really made that kind of money you certainly would not want to settle for a government mandated wage. I didn't...he did. Navy pay. Get it? How long was he in the Navy collecting a government mandated wage? You don't know. Hint: It wasn't his career. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Not the point. I worked for "the guvmint" for a year. The adventure was worthwhile, the pay was...adequate. I turned down two big league "guvmint" jobs, one with the Department of Agriculture and one (twice, actually) for the private corporation that runs the USPS. Maybe you should have accepted the jobs. You might be less frustrated with for-profit corporations. Your assumption I am "frustrated" by for-profit corporations is incorrect. Sure. Ok. |
Well, that didn't last long
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general, FoxNews and others. Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on the part of his supporters. Bull****. Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another planet? Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media. So find a cite or STFU. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:27 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com