Fat kid's failed launch ... again
 

On 4/16/2017 9:53 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:43:27 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/16/2017 6:26 PM, wrote:

I am sure we are "trying to influence" their elections if they
actually had elections. The propaganda arm of the US government has
been going strong for 100 years. (did you watch the PBS WWI show?)
I am still thinking what I said in the other post. Maybe the best
thing we could do is lose Korea and let Kim try to perpetuate the lie
with 50 million south Koreans in his camp.


That would work. You can't take knowledge away from the South Koreans.
Problem is, they would pay a heavy humanitarian price.

How much damage would a nuclear war on the peninsula cost in
humanitarian terms?


The threat of using nuclear weapons always seems to be the focus of
everyone's attention yet the world has survived since their only use 72
years ago. I am optimistic that will continue.

Fat kid's failed launch ... again
 

On 4/17/17 7:12 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/16/2017 9:53 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:43:27 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/16/2017 6:26 PM, wrote:

I am sure we are "trying to influence" their elections if they
actually had elections. The propaganda arm of the US government has
been going strong for 100 years. (did you watch the PBS WWI show?)
I am still thinking what I said in the other post. Maybe the best
thing we could do is lose Korea and let Kim try to perpetuate the lie
with 50 million south Koreans in his camp.


That would work. You can't take knowledge away from the South Koreans.
Problem is, they would pay a heavy humanitarian price.

How much damage would a nuclear war on the peninsula cost in
humanitarian terms?


The threat of using nuclear weapons always seems to be the focus of
everyone's attention yet the world has survived since their only use 72
years ago. I am optimistic that will continue.



That incompetent, ignorant sack of **** in the White House, Trump, is a
likely candidate to set one off.

Fat kid's failed launch ... again
 

On 4/17/2017 7:30 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/17/17 7:12 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/16/2017 9:53 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:43:27 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/16/2017 6:26 PM, wrote:

I am sure we are "trying to influence" their elections if they
actually had elections. The propaganda arm of the US government has
been going strong for 100 years. (did you watch the PBS WWI show?)
I am still thinking what I said in the other post. Maybe the best
thing we could do is lose Korea and let Kim try to perpetuate the lie
with 50 million south Koreans in his camp.


That would work. You can't take knowledge away from the South Koreans.
Problem is, they would pay a heavy humanitarian price.

How much damage would a nuclear war on the peninsula cost in
humanitarian terms?


The threat of using nuclear weapons always seems to be the focus of
everyone's attention yet the world has survived since their only use 72
years ago. I am optimistic that will continue.



That incompetent, ignorant sack of **** in the White House, Trump, is a
likely candidate to set one off.


Has the crazy fat kid set another nuke off yet?

Fat kid's failed launch ... again
 

On Monday, April 17, 2017 at 6:30:59 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/17/17 7:12 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/16/2017 9:53 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:43:27 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/16/2017 6:26 PM, wrote:

I am sure we are "trying to influence" their elections if they
actually had elections. The propaganda arm of the US government has
been going strong for 100 years. (did you watch the PBS WWI show?)
I am still thinking what I said in the other post. Maybe the best
thing we could do is lose Korea and let Kim try to perpetuate the lie
with 50 million south Koreans in his camp.


That would work. You can't take knowledge away from the South Koreans.
Problem is, they would pay a heavy humanitarian price.

How much damage would a nuclear war on the peninsula cost in
humanitarian terms?


The threat of using nuclear weapons always seems to be the focus of
everyone's attention yet the world has survived since their only use 72
years ago. I am optimistic that will continue.



That incompetent, ignorant sack of **** in the White House, Trump, is a
likely candidate to set one off.

you wanted him to run for the presidency, and you told people to vote for him. You were his greatest cheerleader. Now you turn your back on him like that?

Awwwww.

Maybe you should have plugged for Mrs. Mao more often, eh?

Fat kid's failed launch ... again
 

On 4/17/17 7:42 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, April 17, 2017 at 6:30:59 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/17/17 7:12 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/16/2017 9:53 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:43:27 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/16/2017 6:26 PM, wrote:

I am sure we are "trying to influence" their elections if they
actually had elections. The propaganda arm of the US government has
been going strong for 100 years. (did you watch the PBS WWI show?)
I am still thinking what I said in the other post. Maybe the best
thing we could do is lose Korea and let Kim try to perpetuate the lie
with 50 million south Koreans in his camp.


That would work. You can't take knowledge away from the South Koreans.
Problem is, they would pay a heavy humanitarian price.

How much damage would a nuclear war on the peninsula cost in
humanitarian terms?


The threat of using nuclear weapons always seems to be the focus of
everyone's attention yet the world has survived since their only use 72
years ago. I am optimistic that will continue.



That incompetent, ignorant sack of **** in the White House, Trump, is a
likely candidate to set one off.

you wanted him to run for the presidency, and you told people to vote for him. You were his greatest cheerleader. Now you turn your back on him like that?

That's about the 25th time you've posted that nonsense, Timmy. Perhaps
you need a new 78 RPM record that isn't broken.

Fat kid's failed launch ... again
 

8:34 AMKeyser Soze
On 4/17/17 7:42 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, April 17, 2017 at 6:30:59 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/17/17 7:12 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/16/2017 9:53 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:43:27 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/16/2017 6:26 PM, wrote:

I am sure we are "trying to influence" their elections if they
actually had elections. The propaganda arm of the US government has
been going strong for 100 years. (did you watch the PBS WWI show?)
I am still thinking what I said in the other post. Maybe the best
thing we could do is lose Korea and let Kim try to perpetuate the lie
with 50 million south Koreans in his camp.


That would work. You can't take knowledge away from the South Koreans.
Problem is, they would pay a heavy humanitarian price.

How much damage would a nuclear war on the peninsula cost in
humanitarian terms?


The threat of using nuclear weapons always seems to be the focus of
everyone's attention yet the world has survived since their only use 72
years ago. I am optimistic that will continue.



That incompetent, ignorant sack of **** in the White House, Trump, is a
likely candidate to set one off.

you wanted him to run for the presidency, and you told people to vote for him. You were his greatest cheerleader. Now you turn your back on him like that?

That's about the 25th time you've posted that nonsense, Timmy. Perhaps
you need a new 78 RPM record that isn't broken.

.....

And it was more times than that, that you urged people to vote for trump. So...

Fat kid's failed launch ... again
 

On 4/17/2017 9:34 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/17/17 7:42 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, April 17, 2017 at 6:30:59 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/17/17 7:12 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/16/2017 9:53 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:43:27 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/16/2017 6:26 PM, wrote:

I am sure we are "trying to influence" their elections if they
actually had elections. The propaganda arm of the US government has
been going strong for 100 years. (did you watch the PBS WWI show?)
I am still thinking what I said in the other post. Maybe the best
thing we could do is lose Korea and let Kim try to perpetuate the
lie
with 50 million south Koreans in his camp.


That would work. You can't take knowledge away from the South
Koreans.
Problem is, they would pay a heavy humanitarian price.

How much damage would a nuclear war on the peninsula cost in
humanitarian terms?


The threat of using nuclear weapons always seems to be the focus of
everyone's attention yet the world has survived since their only use 72
years ago. I am optimistic that will continue.



That incompetent, ignorant sack of **** in the White House, Trump, is a
likely candidate to set one off.

you wanted him to run for the presidency, and you told people to vote
for him. You were his greatest cheerleader. Now you turn your back on
him like that?

That's about the 25th time you've posted that nonsense, Timmy. Perhaps
you need a new 78 RPM record that isn't broken.



Nonsense? Nope. You were rooting Trump on regularly to win the
nomination. Of course that's back when your media idols like Maddow
were on nightly explaining why Trump would lose to Hillary in an
electoral landslide:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBQdhR--cmY

Fat kid's failed launch ... again
 

On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 09:34:05 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 4/17/17 7:42 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, April 17, 2017 at 6:30:59 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/17/17 7:12 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/16/2017 9:53 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:43:27 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/16/2017 6:26 PM, wrote:

I am sure we are "trying to influence" their elections if they
actually had elections. The propaganda arm of the US government has
been going strong for 100 years. (did you watch the PBS WWI show?)
I am still thinking what I said in the other post. Maybe the best
thing we could do is lose Korea and let Kim try to perpetuate the lie
with 50 million south Koreans in his camp.


That would work. You can't take knowledge away from the South Koreans.
Problem is, they would pay a heavy humanitarian price.

How much damage would a nuclear war on the peninsula cost in
humanitarian terms?


The threat of using nuclear weapons always seems to be the focus of
everyone's attention yet the world has survived since their only use 72
years ago. I am optimistic that will continue.



That incompetent, ignorant sack of **** in the White House, Trump, is a
likely candidate to set one off.

you wanted him to run for the presidency, and you told people to vote for him. You were his greatest cheerleader. Now you turn your back on him like that?

That's about the 25th time you've posted that nonsense, Timmy. Perhaps
you need a new 78 RPM record that isn't broken.

The truth is somewhat troublesome, eh Krause?

Do you deny any of what Tim said above?

Fat kid's failed launch ... again
 

6:30 AMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text -
That incompetent, ignorant sack of **** in the White House, Trump, is a
likely candidate to set one off.
....

A few months back you were saying
"Go Donald Go!"

What happened Harry ?

Fat kid's failed launch ... again
 

On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 07:12:41 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/16/2017 9:53 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:43:27 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/16/2017 6:26 PM, wrote:

I am sure we are "trying to influence" their elections if they
actually had elections. The propaganda arm of the US government has
been going strong for 100 years. (did you watch the PBS WWI show?)
I am still thinking what I said in the other post. Maybe the best
thing we could do is lose Korea and let Kim try to perpetuate the lie
with 50 million south Koreans in his camp.


That would work. You can't take knowledge away from the South Koreans.
Problem is, they would pay a heavy humanitarian price.

How much damage would a nuclear war on the peninsula cost in
humanitarian terms?


The threat of using nuclear weapons always seems to be the focus of
everyone's attention yet the world has survived since their only use 72
years ago. I am optimistic that will continue.


As the leaders of the world who actually remember WWII, as a recent
thing, die off, the likelihood of WWIII increases.
A true world war that threatens a nuclear power's land would go
nuclear pretty quickly. The US was never actually in danger and we
nuked the japs anyway.
That is the problem with places like Iran or N Korea having a nuke.
They both have nuclear powers threatening them, much like India and
Pakistan going nuclear in quick succession.
N Korea may be the most dangerous since they definitely feel
threatened and I am not sure they actually understand what a nuclear
war would be.